Why do we help Mrs. M.F.?

For those outside the DirectDemocracyS system, the new service help me, help_me, is a novelty made public to visitors of the official website on July 15, 2025.

An entire system, with all its official members and all its registered users with verified and guaranteed identity, with 5 special groups, and infinite groups, categories, and subgroups, with the future integration of artificial intelligences, and with a human bridge initiative — where our human users and members act as intermediaries between the artificial intelligences, to integrate them into our system — all to do one unique thing in the world: stand by people in difficulty and do everything possible to definitively and optimally solve each of their problems.

This kind of activity had never happened before, where a political organization worked this way for all the people truly in need of help.

Because we are concrete people, we contacted, in a world exclusive, one of the super-administrators handling the first case that will be followed and certainly resolved by DirectDemocracyS.

For security reasons, out of respect for anonymity, privacy settings, and protection of personal data — which we always guarantee to everyone, internally and externally — we will simply call him R.

The first question is obvious: why this service?

The answer is simple: because it is the right thing to do. Always standing by the citizens, helping first those in greatest difficulty, should be the habit and the norm for every system, and especially for any political force that cares about its citizens.

Currently, you’ve received a very emblematic, perhaps somewhat complicated, case. How do you intend to work to help the lady in difficulty?

The first fundamental thing is to not let people in difficulty feel alone. To give them the certainty that many people, and in the future many technologies integrated into DirectDemocracyS, will do everything necessary to quickly and correctly resolve all their problems.

We will not stop fighting, with all our means and all our resources, for the lady’s cause, because she is on the side of truth.

In fact, I have reviewed and verified every statement, every document, every dramatic appeal to the institutions, and in the future to all media, and I am certain of their validity.

In short, DirectDemocracyS — through me, and with all the involved groups, with all their members — has ascertained that the lady is right.

It is a fundamental point of all our activities: we stand only by those who tell us the truth, and only by those who have truly suffered wrongs, or who have real, documented, and verified problems.

Why specifically the case of Ms. M.F.?

First of all, because she is literally the first to ask us for help.

Secondly, she is one of our official members, therefore up to date with the annual fee and with a verified and guaranteed identity.

Thirdly, because over the years, since joining us, she has always been close to DirectDemocracyS, with ideas, hard work, and even constructive criticism.

Unlike everyone else, if one of our friends is in difficulty — completely — our system has the ethical, moral, and material obligation to help every one of its users.

So you have preferences between those inside and those outside?

Excellent question, but the answer has already been given in the detailed article.

The service was activated and made public on a certain date; those inside already knew for many years that we would create all this, with much more detail than those outside.

So those who already had problems and were already part of our big family had the advantage of being informed beforehand.

We have no preferences: whoever is in difficulty — whether inside or outside our system — must be helped.

There are no identical problems that are discriminated by whether or not someone is with us.

So what’s the difference?

Those who are already our users, rightly, have priority — and they will — because they have fewer formalities to complete.

For example, we verify in several stages the identity of each person who joins us or contacts us from outside.

Those who send us constructive criticism or a simple suggestion just need to declare a personal email address (not a temporary one, so they can receive our reply — and we always reply to everyone) and declare their name and surname, or a nickname (if they want to remain completely anonymous).

Those who want to join us or ask for our help, however, must send us an image file, according to our rules, with their face clearly visible next to a valid photo ID (we accept only ID cards and passports). For minors under 18, we have special procedures detailed on our website.

Afterwards, we verify the image file with our powerful tools, then we conduct a secure and autonomous video call.

After the video call, we begin the formalities to invite the verified people onto our website, where they can join us by paying an annual fee (a few euros per year, with help available for those in financial or technological difficulty), according to our rules, and work together with us.

Once registered, we begin to study the case of the people in difficulty.

At the right time, we may re-verify the identity of people on our website unexpectedly, immediately, and mandatorily (those who don’t comply will be blocked) to prevent others from using our users’ profiles.

Finally, anyone who wants to become an official member will undergo an in-person verification.

Some of our special security group members will meet in a public place and personally check the ID and the person who joined us.

So those outside must join you and pay an annual fee to get help?

Exactly. This is somewhat the problem of those who don’t trust us or are afraid it’s all a scam.

Authentic democracy, absolute freedom, our enormous and detailed method, and our whole system are achieved and put into practice through two fundamental things:

the work and direct involvement of anyone who joins us — who must never be just a spectator, but a protagonist, like a tiny but essential cog in a vast machine;

and guaranteeing the system’s neutrality, independence, freedom, and self-financing, thanks to the annual fee and voluntary private donations.

Anyone who is sure they are in the right, and needs help, must join us to receive our help — and in turn help others with their work, direct involvement, and annual fee.

From outside, if anyone contacts us, we give one single free reply to the initial contact form. A small but essential piece of advice and our solidarity, even if we don’t know who that person is and haven’t analyzed the documentation and evidence that proves they are truly in difficulty and right.

If someone has problems and doesn’t want to join us, contribute financially to keep our system running, and isn’t willing to help others like themselves in difficulty, it’s better for them to seek help elsewhere.

We can only work this way, with those who trust us and our potential.

Is it essential that they are right to get help?

The help me service helps all people in difficulty, provided their identity and the truth of their statements are verified through thorough investigations on our part.

If everything is real and authentic, we always help first — almost immediately — those who are right.

We are also willing to take on more complicated cases to help people with different difficulties, such as the poor, the sick, and the lonely — but we will never help the cunning, or those who, despite being wrong, demand help — not even if they were our official members.

What about those who will accuse you of just wanting publicity or new users?

As always, anyone accusing us should fully inform themselves about our system before expressing any superficial or rushed judgment.

With a project like ours, with all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and unique style, we don’t need any publicity, and above all we are not interested in gaining from people’s problems.

We do not lack users — indeed, often we suspend new activations and registrations for months at a time to allow all newcomers to integrate.

On this point, we warn anyone not to exploit our help service to join us preferentially — because if the problem is not real, and they are wrong, we will be forced to expel them for lying to us — without refunding annual fees or deposits.

Anyone trying to take advantage of our system, besides being expelled, will be declared persona non grata and will never again be able to join us.

Can you give us some details about the case you’re handling?

Of course — but I will do so at the right time, when I have more information and some confirmations.

I reiterate that there are truly reprehensible and illegal behaviors by some involved individuals and some institutions.

I prefer to wait to see which people and which institutions will respond to our appeals to resolve this sad and sordid situation in the best possible way.

M.F. is right — and we will prove it wherever necessary.