No-DirectDemocracyS

Our system and our political organization were created to change and improve the world, creating a new, different, better, innovative, and alternative path to follow with anyone who joins us. DirectDemocracyS was designed to improve and evolve, thanks to the ideas and projects of all our users, and even those who don't join us but offer their support.

We support individual and group freedom, which must be potentially infinite, but which must necessarily end where the freedom of another individual or group begins. Freedom leads to democracy, which obviously leads to pluralism.

We repeat the previous sentences often because they are essential to understanding our motivations, and to understanding that we are certain that no-DirectDemocracyS groups will soon arise, who will envy us, hate us, try to boycott us, slow us down, and delude themselves that they can stop us.

We who are for freedom would never allow ourselves to judge those who are against us, even if engaging in politics against someone is stupid, ignorant, opportunistic, and frankly does not create anything good.

We didn't create DirectDemocracyS, and we don't use it against anyone. We don't judge other systems and political forces, nor the various political representatives of the past, present, and future. We simply analyze the facts, tell the truth, and allow ourselves to criticize anyone's decisions, pointing out their negative consequences and offering our solutions, which are almost always alternatives and certainly work.

Unlike many others, we don't distort real facts and the truth, we don't use them partially to our advantage, we don't eliminate the very few positive aspects of others. Instead, we simply point out things that anyone can easily verify and won't be able to deny, without the risk of making a bad impression. In short, you all have every means to verify that we're not lying to you and that we're basing our statements on documented, reliable sources, continually tested and verified.

We don't tell you our truths, but the sad reality that surrounds you, seeking, together with all of you, solutions to create a better, more equitable, more just present, and therefore better for all of us, and for all future generations.

The truth often hurts, and it's hard to admit that those who tell us something certainly don't do it to manipulate us, and certainly don't pretend to teach us anything, but only to point out that we're not making good choices. Many people's decisions and votes are often wrong, and are often due to divisive systems, superficiality, laziness, and the inability to always look at things from a 360-degree perspective. There are countless examples—we've discussed them many times—but we'll limit ourselves to reminding you how, for example, current events are judged. If a terrorist attack occurs, normal people, with at least two functioning neurons, will side with the victims. The same goes for any military action , and for any news story, that has violent consequences. Then, like "vultures," those whose brains have been literally burned by ideologies, envy, divisions, propaganda, and hate speech appear, saying things like, "They too have their reasons," or worse, "Others also made mistakes," or, "After all, they asked for it and deserved it." They've brainwashed you so effectively that you tolerate and even, disgustingly, justify an innocent person getting hurt, or a dead person, if they're "on the bad side," or "on the other side." All this is abhorrent to us, but other systems and other political forces are free to do so; ultimately, they're only pursuing their own interests, and the stupid ones are those who allow themselves to be manipulated, not those who have always done so.

We've been telling you practically from the start that for us, victims are victims, and there is no motivation to commit violence, and we will condemn them all, without any preference.

You'll have to admit that being part of DirectDemocracyS, beyond all the other positive aspects, also allows us not to be ashamed of our official positions, on any matter. We have no debts to repay, and above all, we have no preferences, other than those of good over evil.

We and anyone who joins us are not to blame for the past, but unlike many others, we will forever assume full responsibility—individually, collectively, and collectively—for every consequence of what we decide, vote for, and do together. Joining us is not a matter of preference, but an act of generosity toward others, choosing to always be on the right side, not out of convenience, but by systemic engineering.

Thanks to highly detailed rules and the brilliant people who have joined us, and will continue to do so, we have a system architecture that makes us very secure and protected from any kind of negative interference. We conceived and implemented DirectDemocracyS not for the interests of a few individuals and groups, but of all humanity, and obviously for the entire planet. We did so without excess, but with intelligence, pragmatism, consistency, and rules that prevent anyone from exploiting our system, and the inevitable power and wealth it brings, for ethically and morally wrong purposes.

You already know many of these things: we are long, repetitive, and often complicated. We are also defensive, but certainly not by choice, but by necessity. Those who are superficial and judge a book by its cover, making hasty judgments, are of no use to us in the delicate and important initial stages. They will only be able to join us once we have consolidated our system and can no longer cause any problems. Such a person, when seeing so many words, phrases, and concepts repeated, tends to "give up" and stops reading after a few sentences. How often do we see people who, just from the title, have "already understood everything" in their thoughts, only to then demonstrate with their actions that they have not understood anything. Repeating concepts is a necessity because to understand anything in DirectDemocracyS, you need a 360-degree vision; otherwise, you will be left disoriented and unable to understand our motivations. Although we are based on simple ideas and fundamental rules, their implementation requires very detailed implementation rules, to ensure that everything actually works, and not just in theory. This apparent complexity is necessary because the world is not simple; human beings are unpredictable, and we, and anyone who joins us, must be able to predict human unpredictability, preventing potential misbehaviors with truly effective solutions. Many people surrender to this complexity, instead of studying it carefully, with an open mind to our innovation, comprehensively, seeking to understand our motivations and the consequences of all our decisions. What others see as complicated actually has truly positive effects, preventing human behavior that is often unintelligent but very cunning.

Shared leadership, horizontal hierarchy, and grassroots democracy are only very useful when combined with traditional, even pyramidal, power balances (politically, certainly not in business), based on continuously guaranteed equality for all, always combined with meritocracy. And how do we know who the best are? With a points system that anyone who joins us begins to accumulate by completing the registration form, regardless of user type. But what makes the accumulation of power impossible, the dictatorship of the majority over the minority (which has always been a reality in all other systems), is the right to collective ownership, which grants each of our official members a single, non-cumulative and non-transferable individual share. This collective ownership is not communism, because we implement equality on a meritocratic basis, but it guarantees our incorruptibility and forever prevents the formation of a few leaders and a few control groups, since each of our members is an owner, along with everyone else. We have many other rules that make our system impossible to use for illicit purposes. We are not a secret sect, nor a closed system. In fact, literally anyone in the world can join us if they wish, and if they meet all the requirements—which anyone can meet—they will become a collective owner of DirectDemocracyS. To implement and enforce all the rules on shared leadership and collective ownership, and to make our activities more concrete, we have established our own micro-groups in urban and rural areas, with up to 1,000 inhabitants. These are the cells of a complete and complex organism, our system.

All of our collective work, implemented with unity in diversity, is certainly annoying from the outset, to those who fear losing advantages and benefits undeserved in other systems. We're not complaining, and we knew we might be envied, and even hated, by certain lobbies—by the rich, powerful, or famous, but also by ordinary people, who get a few "crumbs from the tables" of those who control and govern the world, and its various peoples and countries. This "anomaly" of DirectDemocracyS can be criticized, but we risk making a fool of ourselves when we explain our motivations. Finding no serious and logical reasons, and fearing a debate on ideas, they boycotted us, making our system practically invisible in various search engines (especially initially) or on traditional social networks (on some of them, especially in the initial stages, they blocked us for months and deleted many of our profiles as soon as we began to gain some visibility). Many algorithms continue to make our existence difficult, deleting our content, making it inaccessible, or falsely declaring it dangerous. We're not complaining; it's their home; they can do it, they will continue to do it, and we can only respond intelligently. We've exploited every despicable activity against us to our own advantage. If they'd given us normal visibility, we would have been literally swamped by too many people all at once, and we could have faced organizational, organizational, and even security problems. Throughout this period in which we were practically invisible, we've welcomed brilliant minds and highly competent people to create a solid foundation for our system. A slow but steady growth, preparing us for the real invasion, which will arrive sooner or later, not thanks to expensive advertising, nor thanks to mass media and journalists talking about us, perhaps demanding exclusives or advantages, but thanks to our genius. At the right time, after the various testing phases, a tiny victory in local elections, anywhere in the world, will be enough, and by implementing our system, we will achieve excellent results at the local level, because they are inevitable when people are empowered, and we all make decisions together, continuously.

Soon, DirectDemocracyS will be talked about locally, not in the mass media, but through the most powerful means of communication: human word of mouth. Everyone nearby will be curious to get to know us, and our micro-group will expand like wildfire, thanks to human bridges, physically. At a certain point, there will be a point zero, when literally everyone in the world will know of our existence, our rules, our methodologies, our instructions, our ideologies, our values, our ideals, and our unique and inimitable style and mindset. If stopping us is already practically impossible—there are too many of us, and we exist in every country in the world—from the moment practically everyone knows us, understands us, and appreciates us, it will be truly impossible to make us invisible.

No-DirectDemocracyS groups and communities will be organized, because it is logical that we will not please everyone, but we will be content to please the good and intelligent majority, and we will give the few who do not understand us time to understand the truth and evaluate reality.

And we promise you one thing: we will not prevent anyone from misunderstanding us, from hating us, from envying us, from criticizing us, or even from offending us (though we will report those who offend us in the appropriate places, as anyone can do), as long as they do so peacefully (violence is never an intelligent choice, and must be punished by the competent authorities), and without creating problems for those who decide to join us.

We don't hate anyone; we weren't born against anyone or anything. We don't engage in pointless battles; we engage in dialogue with everyone, but we don't compromise, because we always act only for the common good, working in the interests of all, including those who freely, democratically, and peacefully declare themselves against DirectDemocracy.

It's unlikely anyone will find anything better, and it's unlikely anyone will find real, concrete, well-founded, and credible flaws. Not out of presumption—we're not vain—but because we've compared DirectDemocracyS to everything that has existed, exists, and even tried to compare it to everything that will exist. Speaking of the future , our system is constantly improving and evolving, thanks to every person who joins us, so we will always be relevant and adapted to the needs of a world that we hope for everyone to be different and better.