Pro-Western

Of all possible systems, the capitalist one is better than the statist one, because despite its many imperfections and injustices, it can be changed and improved by continuously implementing equality and meritocracy over time, always together. Statism is a rotten system, riddled with problems, including corruption and backwardness, and is certainly doomed to failure.

Of all political systems, the relatively free and partially democratic Western political forces are always preferable to various dictatorships. Whether they are oligarchic dictatorships like in Russia, where all the country's wealth is given away to incompetent individuals who control and manage the most important companies, or one-party, one-way dictatorships like in China, where fake communism creates regime billionaires who are extremely wealthy, and the population, deprived of any rights, lives in poverty. We will never be in favor of political forces that tolerate no opposition and often even physically eliminate their opponents.

Some examples that explain our motivations.

Would anyone who supports President Putin's dictatorship in Russia, or China's one-party system, speaking ill of the West, the United States, NATO, Europe, and even Israel, have the courage and the ability to do so, living in Russia and criticizing Russian politics, or to create an opposition political party in China? The imperfect West at least gives everyone the freedom to criticize, protest, and demonstrate. It allows anyone to create a political force, and if credible, to win elections, govern, and make laws. This partial freedom is invaluable and must be defended at all costs.

Those who criticize investments in Europe's defense with banal and meaningless slogans like "no to weapons" certainly lack the ability to reason, using logic, common sense, and practicality. If the major military powers, which are armed, do not also give up their weapons, proportionately, a militarily weak Europe would easily be invaded and dominated by those who do not give up their weapons. Therefore, the fake pacifists are either stupid and ignorant, or corrupt, serving the interests of the various superpowers and dictatorships. We sincerely pity those who support such squalid political forces, which do not value freedom. Everyone is against weapons, as long as they are reduced and eliminated from all countries, not just a few. Otherwise, we are working for the strong "bad guys," and not for our own citizens.

To those who demand that Ukraine cede its territories in exchange for peace, we ask: if we forcibly occupied some rooms in their homes, would they give them to us, so as not to fight to defend them? And to those who say Europe is not helping Ukraine survive, we ask: if we came to their homes, by force, wouldn't they want help from their neighbors? Would they like to be left alone? International politics is very simple: all promises made must be honored, without allowing anyone, by any means, to fail to do so. Let us remember that Russia had sworn to defend Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for its nuclear arsenal, over 1,900 missiles, with full guarantees from the United States and the United Kingdom. By failing to honor the Budapest Memorandum, with the occupation of Crimea, and the subsequent cowardly invasion, the reliability and loyalty of Russian policy were demonstrated . The West stood by and watched, as it did in 1939, when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Intelligent and determined intervention by the rest of the world would have averted World War II, with tens of millions of deaths. Bullies are not fought with banal phrases, or unarmed, throwing flowers, but with popular uprisings that ensure their fate, which all dictators deserve: arrest, investigation, indictment, and, if found guilty, sentencing. We are not for the death penalty, under any circumstances, but for rendering harmless all cruel, dictatorial, and therefore dangerous people.

Enough with the rhetoric that Russia liberated Eastern Europe from the threat of Nazi-fascism. Everyone knows it wasn't Russia, but the entire Soviet Union (including Ukraine), that did it, but only thanks to the help of money, weapons, steel, and other technological components from the United States. Otherwise, German would have been spoken, even in Russia, and throughout the Soviet Union. But we don't look at the whole story; we often choose to tell only what suits us, eliminating the parts that don't prove us right.

To those seeking geopolitical, or even partially invented, reasons to justify the Russian invasion, we ask a simple question: what does it mean to be a sovereign, free, and independent country? Every people and every country should be able to freely choose, without asking anyone's permission, which military or economic alliance to join. If many countries surrounding Russia choose to join NATO, it is only because of Russia's unreliability and dangerousness, which does not hesitate to invade neighboring countries it had sworn to defend. The United States has never invaded its allies; on the contrary, it liberated them from fascist dictatorships.

To those who say that Russia is defending itself, we ask: what sane country would attack a military superpower that possesses nearly 8,000 nuclear warheads? Be logical and use common sense. No one threatens Russia, but Russia itself threatens and attacks militarily, and almost always interferes in the elections, of neighboring countries.

DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved guarantees everyone the freedom to think differently, but as we always repeat, we should take a 360-degree view, carefully analyzing all available data and verifying all sources. Once this is done, we must use only and exclusively: logic, common sense, truth, research, and mutual respect, without any preference.

Anyone who sides with the bully (President Putin's Russia) and fails to help and support the bullied (Ukraine) by all means not only fails to use logic, common sense, truth, education, and mutual respect, without any preference, but can only be defined in three ways, and we say this without offending anyone: stupid, ignorant, or corrupt.

We know that Ukraine has many faults and shortcomings, some of which include: discrimination against other nationalities, discrimination against the Russian Orthodox religion, the use of force to respond to provocations and violent actions organized on its territory by the Russians, and the evident and very serious corruption in many sectors. But no reason justifies so many deaths, so many injuries, so much destruction, and so much fear for the entire world, especially for the Ukrainian and Russian people, and all those living in conflict zones worldwide.

Something perhaps not everyone understands: if Russia were gifted Ukrainian territories, as happened with Crimea, would it stop, or, like Hitler, would it press on, even invading friendly countries with which it had signed treaties? Furthermore, would the conquered areas live freely and happily, in a true democracy, or would they be subjected to despicable dictatorships? Finally, who would exploit the conquered territories and their associated riches? Certainly not by those entitled to them, namely the respective populations. Not even the Russian people would gain anything, because the ones controlling everything, and truly profiting, would be a few Russian oligarchs, without any merit or competence. It would also be a failure for those few nostalgic communists who believe that the Nazi-fascist President Putin will restore the pathetic and false greatness of the failed communist ideology, which had many flaws, but at least claimed to be peaceful, despite being a false pacifist and a historic utopia.

The West, the European Union, the United States, Israel, and all the freest and most partially democratic countries certainly have many flaws, with systems that transform into oligarchic partycracies after elections, but at least they allow the birth and implementation of the DirectDemocracyS system. In dictatorial systems, our presence will be permitted only by the determination, courage, and intelligent choices of their respective populations, and certainly not by the peaceful cooperation of the political forces that control their countries through force and violence.

So, while we have no enemies, we will never support anyone who does not implement total freedom and authentic democracy, which for us, and for every person, should be non-negotiable.

To achieve true peace, true and complete disarmament, we will have to wait for DirectDemocracyS to win elections in every country in the world. Only then will we all live in a truly just, equitable, fair, reliable, prosperous, and secure world, for the good of all the world's people.

Ours is not a utopia, nor even a hope, but a certainty based on the validity of the system we are all creating together.

DirectDemocracyS does not seek to teach anything, but rather to provide everyone with all the information they need to form a more accurate and useful opinion, for the good of all.

The only political force born to unite, and not to win elections on divisions.

We share all power, with all who join us, and we will not allow this power to be exploited by a few rich, powerful, and famous individuals, groups, or lobbies.

We have created a system structured to prevent any dictatorship, eliminate any discrimination , and prevent any possible problems.

If you like it, get informed and join us; if you don't, stick with the old ways. But if you criticize us, at least let it be informed, competent, logical, and common-sense criticism. A plea: don't be superficial, and above all, lazy; be the true protagonists, along with the rest of us!