Main premise

Many people ask us where we are at? Others ask us to hurry because the world urgently needs our innovation, which is an alternative to all other systems. And then there are those who fear that there are old systems, lobbies, and powerful, rich, and famous people who won't let us get started and continue what we're doing.

Where are we now? We are exactly on track with our forecasts, perhaps slightly ahead of schedule, and this was not a given, given the various international events of recent years. The international phases have allowed us to create a comprehensive system, with fundamental rules shared by representatives of all the peoples of the world. The continental phases have allowed us to create very important rules, increasingly detailed, but also more specific to the various territories. The national phases have provided us with implementing rules, some of which are customized for each country, while always respecting the fundamental, and very important, rules of the previous phases. While continuing the same work, with all our local phases (from the largest to the smallest), we will soon begin testing our micro-groups by geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area, with up to 1,000 inhabitants. These represent our physical presence in the various territories. These groups will spread like wildfire, with human bridges connecting our groups to one another, creating electors, and, by uniting, establishing all the necessary integrations with our local groups (official organizations for those with at least 31 members). Many new words, many specificities, and above all, many rules, respected by all. We are experiencing slow but steady and highly selective growth, especially in the initial phases, which are the most sensitive and important, as they serve us to collectively define the definitive form of DirectDemocracyS. However, it will continue to be improved and complemented by the ideas and projects of anyone who joins us. We've always worked this way, evolving according to our needs and desires, and we'll continue to do so. We've explained previously that having detailed rules is vital, because without a solid and shared theory, practice cannot achieve optimal results, useful for the common good.

Haste is not part of our DNA.

We know full well that the world's situation is abnormal, but we also can't act superficially, risking mistakes. As we asked in our first informative article, we reiterate that you must be patient, because what we are all doing together is not something trivial or simple to achieve, but rather an alternative, pioneering, and very important process of renewal. Those who understand our potential tell us that we are the only hope for everyone to live differently and better, more equitable and just, safer and more peaceful, and therefore happier for all. We will take all the time necessary, carrying out our activities in an orderly, organized manner, and without any unnecessary risks. The real challenge, as we anticipated, is not making our system known, understood, and appreciated, nor even, as you will see in this article, gaining consensus, but rather making everyone understand our enormous potential and responsibility.

The hardest thing to do.

From the beginning, we were aware that the most difficult thing to change and improve is the mentality of all people. Long years, and for the older ones, many decades, of manipulation and failed and corrupt ideologies, which, through a wide range of media, and more recently the Internet, have literally burned out many, too many, neurons in some, too many people. The fault certainly doesn't lie with those who are brainwashed, but with those who have continually and forever committed it, to hinder any form of free thinking.

Why and how do they do it?

Obviously, free people with the right mindset are capable of understanding the situation they live in, and perhaps would like to try to change and improve it, and thus become dangerous to those who have practically always run the entire world, by every means possible. They do so through cunning and underhanded methods, even deluding people into thinking they understand the real situation. You'll see in this article that you didn't understand everything. Let us explain: do you remember some of our previous informative articles, in which we often seemed to take very harsh stances against various anti-establishment groups, conspiracy theorists, conspiracy theorists, and alternative thought? Our positions are motivated by the fact that almost all these people believe they have all the truth, believe they have everything figured out, and are very angry, and try in every way to rebel, trying to fight against those who created this situation. That there are those who want to control the world, and that they are succeeding perfectly, is undeniable, but almost always, those who believe they've found the problem fail to make any intelligent next move. It simply invites people to rebel, and creates, or rather attempts to organize, direct confrontations with those who created this entire "traditional" world—failing, insecure, manipulative, and giving everything to a few, and very little to everyone. The direct confrontation approach of people who believe, or rather delude themselves, that they can win, is exactly what the various systems, lobbies, and rich, powerful, and often famous people want.

First of all: you can neither fight nor win with the systems and those who created this world as we know it. The reasons are simple: they created an infallible, unassailable system, and any attempt at direct struggle is easily defeated, even with the complicity, often involuntary and unwitting, of those who aren't doing so badly in the old system, perhaps because they receive "a few crumbs that fall from these people's tablecloths." When slaves, or subjects, are offered freedom, they often fear moving toward a better, unknown destiny, precisely because it is insecure and unknown; therefore, they prefer to turn back and "put their chains back on themselves."

The second reason is the simplest in the world, but precisely because it's so simple, it's often taken for granted, and no one takes it into consideration: all other systems, lobbies, and powerful and wealthy people (fortunately, not all of them, not all the rich and powerful, are bad) have every capacity, and every opportunity, to gradually and often invisibly regain any power they may have lost, even strengthening it. In practice, they have an incredible ability; they seize every "revolution" and exploit every social conflict to their advantage. Those who suffer and, sadly, often die for "freedom" and "democracy" do so in vain, because those who are defeated find a way to take it all back with interest. This is demonstrated by the countless revolutions that subsequently failed to produce many useful results for a long time, but the positive effects quickly wore off.

Why change and improve your mindset?

Because it's the only way to achieve both better results for the common good and to make them definitive, secure, and therefore unassailable. Let us explain: almost all other systems and almost all other political forces immediately seek the support of as many people as possible, which in elections is transformed into votes, which then allow those who win and make decisions (the traditional political forces) to almost always be influenced, and often controlled, by lobbies and by rich, powerful, and in many cases famous people. We want to clarify that our statements are not conspiracy theories, conspiracies, suppositions, or simply fake news; what we say is clearly visible, documented by reliable sources, and verifiable by anyone.

Why is the DirectDemocracyS mindset so important?

Because it was conceived from the very beginning to be the only hope for all good people, not because we, who conceived it, are better looking or better than others, but because we made it impossible to steal from the very beginning. When creating our innovation, which is and will forever be an alternative to all other systems, the first thing we had to do was make it impossible to use for despicable purposes, preventing anyone from appropriating our system, negatively influencing it, and controlling it. How did we do it? Simply and intelligently: truly and completely shared leadership, collective ownership, bottom-up control, with a perfect balance between traditional hierarchies and direct democracy, but above all with micro-groups and shared decisions. For the first time in the world, free and democratic people have decided not to fight with others, but to create something new, different, better, and impossible to control, precisely because it is already controlled by everyone. We repeat: shared leadership and collective ownership, by themselves, definitively solve practically every problem.

To always prevent as few problems as possible, we have created very detailed rules and methodologies that actually work, which are respected by everyone who joins us.

But where is the real genius of DirectDemocracyS?

Our system seems rigid and complicated, but it's actually the only free one, and it's also very simple, because it prevents a few people, or groups, from concentrating too much power, and it prevents, through prevention and continuous checks on everyone and every activity, any potential corruption. In practice, they're all necessary and fundamental: our security measures (which some consider excessive, but vital for the common good), and our constant integrity checks (considered by some to be invasive of privacy, or even unfair, or even illegal). In practice, everyone who accuses us of wanting to ensure that everyone within us respects all the rules merely confirms that the only way to defend our shared "achievements," making them permanent, is to ensure that everyone who joins us respects all our shared rules. Other systems fail, or are unjust, precisely because they allow some to be crafty, to concentrate and wield too much power, and above all, they allow some to corrupt, and many "rank-and-file" members to be corrupted.

To better understand, let's give you a simple political example. How do lobbies and rich and powerful individuals control and manage power? Through many traditional political forces, which are subjugated to a few, serving the interests of the few. What if the many voted for other traditional political forces? It would be enough for them to bribe, manage, and control the other political forces when they win elections. Have you ever wondered why, even when other political forces win, the situation doesn't improve much, and for a long time, and no major differences are seen? At this point, many groups believe that by giving all the power to all the people, all the problems would be solved. Instead, it would be completely useless if the entire population were not protected, and therefore made incorruptible, as our system does. Direct democracy, implemented by other systems and "given away" to the entire world's population, would be beautiful and seemingly fair and just. In reality, however, through various mass manipulations (which are constantly implemented), or with a few gifts, bonuses, or incomes for doing nothing, the old systems would control the masses, continuing to gain consensus and votes, and creating collective debts that sooner or later must be repaid. And by whom? Certainly not by the rich and powerful, because public debt belongs to everyone and is divided equally among all people, unlike wealth, which in the old systems belongs to a few. The gifts obtained must be repaid, not by the entire population (because complete corruption isn't necessary; bribing a few influencers and fake philosophers is enough to gain the votes of the masses), but these manipulations and divisions are sufficient to obtain the necessary votes for traditional political forces. In practice, by creating enormous public debts, they make everyone a debtor, and therefore even more enslaved, willing to do anything to survive. The sad thing is that they get power and riches for a few with money and riches paid for by everyone.

How can these despicable activities be prevented? Only by preventing all forms of corruption.

Only by verifying the integrity, loyalty, and trustworthiness of the masses, both collectively and individually, through continuous and comprehensive testing of everyone, without exception, can we prevent reprehensible behavior and change and improve the world. For some people, these concepts are illiberal and contradict "rights." Many tell us that our system does not respect: the rights of individuals. The only right we do not respect is that of having corrupt or corruptible people in our system. If we find them, we do not eliminate them (we are against the death penalty), but we render them harmless. And until they demonstrate integrity, trustworthiness, and loyalty—not to us but to the community, and therefore to everyone —they will be isolated and tested. In practice, we create a variable period of ethical quarantine for them.

Why is the DirectDemocracy mentality difficult to implement?

The only difficult thing is to change and improve everyone's mentality, making everyone immune to manipulation, ideology, and division. For us, "United in diversity" isn't just a slogan, but a fundamental choice, one of direct commitment, with everyone shouldering all responsibility together. Many people prefer to blame others rather than engage directly. Those who join us choose to take a leading role.

If you're outside or inside our system and rushing us, you're not helping us. Instead, join us and begin working concretely with all of us immediately.