Security

🔵 Simplified Introduction (For Everyone)

Before going into the full details, it is essential to understand one very simple thing:

In DirectDemocracyS there are different levels of participation , and everyone is free to choose:

• If you want to participate for free, without obligation
• If you observe before you trust
• If you actively contribute
• Whether to become an official member and co-owner

👉 No one is forced to pay.
👉 No one is forced to trust immediately.
👉 No one is forced to do anything.

This system was designed precisely to respect a fundamental principle:

Trust is built over time, not imposed.

Many people start with doubts:

• “What if I pay for nothing?”
• “What if I don’t get what I pay for?”
• “What if the system is not as it seems?”

👉 These doubts are normal, expected, and respected.

For this reason:

• There are free user types
• there are gradual paths
• There are very strict safety rules

Everything you read below is to protect:

• tea
• the others
• the entire system

🔶 Why are there seemingly restrictive rules?

Before reading the full text, it is important to clarify one thing:

Many online systems allow:

• casual friendships
• uncontrolled messages
• immediate access

👉 The result is:

• spam
• scams
• waste of time
• chaos

DirectDemocracyS does the opposite.

👉 Here:

• every contact has a meaning
• all access is controlled
• every relationship is traceable
• all responsibility is clear

This does not limit freedom.

👉 It protects her.

📖 Reading Guide

The following text is complete and detailed.

You will find:

• precise rules
• operating procedures
• technical explanations
• concrete examples

👉 If something seems complex:
that's normal, because the system is profound.

👉 But each part has a precise logic.

🔹 Initial context: trust and gradual access

There are some people who have been with DirectDemocracyS for a long time, without doing much, or who joined us recently, or some who want to join us but aren't confident paying annual fees, at least initially. Perhaps some people are afraid of paying for nothing, or of not receiving the type of user they paid for, and so they prefer a free user type, with no attendance requirements and no need to volunteer with us.

🔎 Supplementary explanation:
This is the most natural behavior possible. A serious system does not eliminate this fear — it manages it.

👉 DirectDemocracyS doesn't force trust:
it builds it through direct experience.

🔹 Friend Request Rules

Let's briefly talk about our friend request rules...

🔎 Supplementary explanation:
This section is fundamental because it defines how relationships are created in the system .

👉 It's not a traditional social network
👉 it's an organized structure

🔹 Concrete example (integration)

👉 Simplified real case:

• User A enters for free
• He doesn't trust → he doesn't pay
• Know an official member
• Communicate via forms
• After some time he decides to trust
• Become an official member
• Start building your network

👉 This is the natural expected path.

🔹 Key Explanation: Limited Friendships

Friend requests are not allowed for all types of users for various reasons...

🔎 Simply translated:

👉 You can't add anyone because:

• avoid fake people
• avoid wasting time
• avoid disturbance

👉 But you can still:

• speaking in groups
• contact whoever you want
• collaborate

👉 So:
it's not a limitation → it's a smart protection

🔹 Official invitations (critical point)

🔎 Strengthened explanation:

Many think:

“Why should I take responsibility?”

Simple answer:

👉 You are not asked to control everything
👉 You are asked NOT to ignore problems

👉 If you report → you are protected
👉 If you help → you are valued
👉 If you ignore → it becomes a responsibility

🔹 Micro-groups (heart of the system)

🔎 Simplified explanation:

A micro-group is:

• small
• controllable
• real
• verifiable

👉 31 people = a manageable number. Subsequently, additional members can be added, up to an unlimited number, creating integrated local structures, from the smallest to the largest, at the local, national, continental, and international levels.
👉 Real trust
👉 Solid growth

🔹 Practical consequences of the system

This system leads to concrete results:

✔ zero spam
✔ zero fake accounts (or almost)
✔ real
accountability ✔ controlled growth ✔
strong local organizations

Let us now return to the initial concept, examining it in greater depth in the complete operational context.

There are some people who have been with DirectDemocracyS for a long time, without doing much, or who joined us recently, or some who want to join us but aren't confident paying annual fees, at least initially. Perhaps some people are afraid of paying for nothing, or of not receiving the type of user they paid for, and so they prefer a free user type, with no attendance requirements and no need to volunteer with us.

Let's briefly discuss our friend request rules, always remembering that the latest rules apply to everyone, even if they're different from the previous ones.

For friend requests, a simple rule.

In the early stages of our system, friend requests were prohibited. People communicated with each other in groups in our social areas, and for higher user types, in community areas.

Subsequently, certain types of users—our guarantors, super administrators, and administrators—were allowed to send friend requests and communicate confidentially through our internal messaging services and live chat.

Currently, all our managers , owners , political representatives, official representatives, and official members can only add as “friends” (contacts) people who have informed them of the existence of our system, provided they have a higher user type (users with verified identity and official members, all with the blue check mark next to their username, in our social area).

For all other types of users, friend requests are temporarily not allowed, but they can continue to communicate with each other in the various groups they belong to. In short, only if one of the two users is at least an official member can they send contact requests (via the user contact form), and then the official member can friend the other user (or one of the two if both are official members).

A brief explanation.

Friend requests are not allowed for all types of users for various reasons, here are some:

1. Avoid contact with unreliable users, i.e. those without a verified and guaranteed identity, who disrupt other people's work with meaningless, unhelpful, and unauthorized friend requests.
2. You can communicate with virtually anyone without disturbing them via contact forms.
3. You can communicate with anyone directly in the various groups, without any limitations, but not in public areas, or by disturbing users in their activities.

For those who are already our users.

If you are already an official member (in good standing with your annual fee, as collective owners of our system), you can directly add the person who introduced you to DirectDemocracyS as a "friend" (contact in DirectDemocracyS). To do so, simply log in to our free website, in our social area, and enter your username and password in our login form at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/social

Find or ask for the link or QR code to the personal profile of our official member and add them as a friend. Visit their profile and click "add as friend," and they'll accept if they want. Technically, you can add them even if they're not an official member, as long as they're at least a registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity, and have the blue checkmark next to their username in the social area. However, in this case, you'll only be able to communicate directly, without many mutual benefits.

two options to add the user who introduced you to our system as a "friend" (contact). The first, simpler option is to pay an annual official member fee based on your age (which will take effect as soon as your annual registered user fee, with a verified and guaranteed identity, expires). You will then immediately obtain the official member status, while still using the previous annual fee you paid until it expires. After paying and obtaining the official member status, as a collective owner, you can add the user who introduced you to DirectDemocracyS as a "friend" (contact) by going to your personal profile. The second option is to simply log in to our free website with your username and password and contact our official member who introduced you to our system at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/utility/extensions/internal-forms/contact-user 

asks the user to add you as a “friend” (contact) in the social area of our free website.

For those who joined us a while ago, regardless of whether they're free or not (login users, partially verified users, or registered users without a verified or guaranteed identity), there are two important new features. The first allows you to add as a "friend" or direct contact in DirectDemocracyS only the user who introduced you to our system and gave you the instructions to join us. This is done without an official invitation, but with a simple invitation, not through the social area. To do so, simply log in with your username and password to our free website and contact our official member who introduced you to our system at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/utility/extensions/internal-forms/contact-user

By asking the user to add you as a "friend" (contact) in the social area of our free website. The user who invited you must be at least an official member to add you as a "friend" (contact).

For those who haven't registered yet.

There are two ways to connect as a contact with one of our official members who introduced you to our system. The simplest is to request an official invitation, with a unique registration link, via a simple email invitation (which our official member sends to the email address of the person you're inviting), with the unique link, or the QR code to scan, for the unique registration form, which will automatically connect them as a "friend" (contact) to the official member who invited them. The second is to register with a free profile, or a lower user level, with the generic registration link, and then, depending on the user level obtained, proceed with the steps described above.

To directly reach the top user types.

Based on a virtually unanimous vote by our users, we've decided to allow a higher level of user, only upon official invitation (with guaranteed identity verification and acceptance of full responsibility by the inviter for the invitee's activities and behavior). This invitation will be sent by one of our higher level users, who will then send a unique link or QR code containing the unique link, which will automatically connect the inviter and the invitee as "friends." The primary reason for this is to keep the system safe, secure, organized, and orderly.

The official invitation for new and existing users.

New users.

All new users can request and receive a simple invitation (without being connected to the inviter and the invited person), a direct invitation (with a link or QR code for the registration form), and an official invitation with identity verification (direct or anonymous with our special security team).

Our users.

To get an official invite, simply request friendship according to the rules above, and ask our official member for an invite to upgrade to a higher user level.

Our users of all free and lower membership levels can request a higher membership level, even that of an official member, by contacting their national group, which will connect them with an official member or an official representative, who will provide all the support, information, and instructions, and, if the two users are authorized, even an official invitation to a higher membership level. In certain countries, local groups can also connect two users to have the free or lower membership level officially invited (always assuming responsibility) and upgrade them to a higher membership level.

How are all these rules about friend requests and official invitations connected and integrated with the creation of micro-groups?

They are linked by the fact that to create a micro-group, one must be at least an official member, in good standing with the annual fee, mandatory attendance, and volunteer activities. The official member, as the collective owner of our entire system, must request and obtain an official representative profile, which cannot be linked to their personal profile. The official representative profile, obtained free of charge and with extensive potential, will be partially public, therefore identifiable in some internal groups, virtually, and physically, in person, in their urban or rural area, with a username and geographic coordinates, as well as with their first name, last name, actual date of birth, and authorization codes. At the right time, they will be added to a local group of official representatives, and after a short training course with all the instructions, they will create their own micro-group, manage it, verify it, and grow it.

This procedure is very simple, fast, and safe.

Based on the above rules, virtually anyone can join us. Anyone who meets all the requirements can become our official member, thus collectively owning our entire system. As the system owner, they will have the right to have an official representative profile and represent our system in their own geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area by creating their own micro-group and being able to invite new users, especially new official members, to join their micro-group. Once the micro-group has at least 31 official members, they will be able to obtain the status and potential of an official organization, which will offer everyone numerous benefits and advantages.

Our official representative will be able to verify the annual fees of new users, with the exception of free users, who pay nothing but can join groups reserved for various user types, connected via human bridges from official members to future official organizations. They will be able to extend official invitations to other official members and manage, monitor, and authorize all activities and individuals in their area, their micro-group, and the next official organization. They will be able to verify and guarantee the identity of everyone in their area and organize a wide range of activities, together with all our local, national, continental, and international organizations.

This is a very important statement for anyone who, as a member or verified user, wants to officially invite someone. Why should I take full responsibility, forever, for all the activities and behavior of anyone I invite? Let's just say that for a relative, a friend, or someone I know, I might accept, but for a stranger, perhaps one randomly assigned to me by our national or local organizations, I don't think I'd be willing to take full responsibility.

Our response to this statement. In DirectDemocracyS, responsibility lies with individuals, with connected individuals, with entire groups, and with the entire system. Let us explain. If a person or group engages in reprehensible activities and behaves inappropriately, those who do so are primarily responsible, directly and continuously. However, anyone who invites someone, whether they know them well or only for a short time, is obligated to verify every activity and behavior of the person they invite, reporting any possible "anomalies" to our special security groups, allowing us to prevent any potential misconduct and any morally and ethically incorrect behavior. If the invited person engages in activities that do not comply with our rules or behaves inappropriately, and there is no way to prevent it, the inviter, together with the groups involved, will be responsible for addressing any issues. This is what accountability is all about. In short, we will never hold the host responsible if they attempt to prevent, and succeed, with the help of our groups, in preventing and resolving, any of their guests' mistakes. The host's responsibility, however, is evident if they fail to monitor, intervene, prevent, and resolve—we repeat, with the help of all our groups, and our entire system, everyone involved. Everyone must work to protect all our activities, for the common good.

Responsibility in DirectDemocracyS: Protecting the Common Good

In a system based on collective ownership and direct democracy , freedom is not an abstract concept, but a daily exercise of awareness. In DirectDemocracyS, each member is not a simple user, but a co-owner. This position entails immense rights, but requires a fundamental pillar: Shared Responsibility .

1. The Three Levels of Responsibility

To understand how our system works, we must clearly distinguish where individual duty ends and collective duty begins.

• Individual Responsibility: Each user is directly and personally responsible for their actions, comments, and activities within the system.
• Liaison Responsibility (The Inviter): Whoever officially invites a new member acts as an "ethics guarantor." This isn't a condemnation, but rather a mentoring and oversight role.
• Group and System Responsibility: Local, national and special security groups step in to support individuals, ensuring that the entire system runs smoothly.

2. The Big Doubt: "If I invite someone, will I risk my money?"

The answer is a categorical "NO".

One of the most common fears concerns the financial sphere. It's essential to clarify that:

• No member pays for the defaults of others. If someone you invite decides not to renew their annual membership fee or doesn't participate in activities, your financial standing and funds are not affected in the slightest.
• Fiscal Autonomy: Each profile is a separate financial entity. Your responsibility is solely for its own behavior and security , not for anyone else's wallet.

3. What does “Assumption of Responsibility” mean?

Officially inviting someone means certifying that that person is real and that, to the best of your knowledge, they are willing to respect our values.

Preventive monitoring

Your main task is prevention . If you notice that one of your guests is behaving aggressively, spreading misinformation, or violating the system's rules, your duty is to:

1. Intervene privately to advise and correct.
2. Report the anomaly to our Special Security Groups if the behavior persists.

Golden Rule: You will never be held responsible for one of your guests' mistakes, provided you did everything possible to prevent the action or reported it promptly. Blame arises only in the case of failure to supervise or complicity.

4. Concrete Examples of Critical Issue Management

5. Why does this system make us the safest in the world?

While traditional social networks are full of fake profiles, bots, and scammers because no one is responsible for anyone, in DirectDemocracyS every new entry is filtered by human intelligence and conscience.

This "chain of trust" allows you to:

• Eliminate Spam and Nuisance: Only serious people enter with an official invitation.
• Creating Strong Micro-Groups: An Official Representative managing a micro-group of 31 people (or more) who know and vouch for each other creates an unbreakable local structure.
• Total Transparency: The blue tick and verified identity make every interaction real, honest, and constructive.

Conclusion

Don't be afraid to invite. It's normal to be cautious at first, but you'll soon realize that this mechanism is your greatest protection. By inviting valuable people, you're not just increasing your points or your time in the system; you're building the foundation of your future Official Organization .

At DirectDemocracyS, those who help keep the system clean and safe are the true drivers of change. Your responsibility is our freedom.

In DirectDemocracyS:

• freedom is not chaos
• trust is not blind
• responsibility is not punishment

👉 It's a system designed to work over the long term.

💡 Final message

If you're new:

• observe
• trial
• verify
• ask questions

👉 you don't have to trust right away

But you need to know one thing:

Every rule you read exists to protect you, even before the system.

🔵 Simplified Introduction (For Everyone)

Before going into the full details, it is essential to understand one very simple thing:

In DirectDemocracyS there are different levels of participation , and everyone is free to choose:

• If you want to participate for free, without obligation
• If you observe before you trust
• If you actively contribute
• Whether to become an official member and co-owner

👉 No one is forced to pay.
👉 No one is forced to trust immediately.
👉 No one is forced to do anything.

This system was designed precisely to respect a fundamental principle:

Trust is built over time, not imposed.

Many people start with doubts:

• “What if I pay for nothing?”
• “What if I don’t get what I pay for?”
• “What if the system is not as it seems?”

👉 These doubts are normal, expected, and respected.

For this reason:

• There are free user types
• there are gradual paths
• There are very strict safety rules

Everything you read below is to protect:

• tea
• the others
• the entire system

🔶 Why are there seemingly restrictive rules?

Before reading the full text, it is important to clarify one thing:

Many online systems allow:

• casual friendships
• uncontrolled messages
• immediate access

👉 The result is:

• spam
• scams
• waste of time
• chaos

DirectDemocracyS does the opposite.

👉 Here:

• every contact has a meaning
• all access is controlled
• every relationship is traceable
• all responsibility is clear

This does not limit freedom.

👉 It protects her.

📖 Reading Guide

The following text is complete and detailed.

You will find:

• precise rules
• operating procedures
• technical explanations
• concrete examples

👉 If something seems complex:
that's normal, because the system is profound.

👉 But each part has a precise logic.

🔹 Initial context: trust and gradual access

There are some people who have been with DirectDemocracyS for a long time, without doing much, or who joined us recently, or some who want to join us but aren't confident paying annual fees, at least initially. Perhaps some people are afraid of paying for nothing, or of not receiving the type of user they paid for, and so they prefer a free user type, with no attendance requirements and no need to volunteer with us.

🔎 Supplementary explanation:
This is the most natural behavior possible. A serious system does not eliminate this fear — it manages it.

👉 DirectDemocracyS doesn't force trust:
it builds it through direct experience.

🔹 Friend Request Rules

Let's briefly talk about our friend request rules...

🔎 Supplementary explanation:
This section is fundamental because it defines how relationships are created in the system .

👉 It's not a traditional social network
👉 it's an organized structure

🔹 Concrete example (integration)

👉 Simplified real case:

• User A enters for free
• He doesn't trust → he doesn't pay
• Know an official member
• Communicate via forms
• After some time he decides to trust
• Become an official member
• Start building your network

👉 This is the natural expected path.

🔹 Key Explanation: Limited Friendships

Friend requests are not allowed for all types of users for various reasons...

🔎 Simply translated:

👉 You can't add anyone because:

• avoid fake people
• avoid wasting time
• avoid disturbance

👉 But you can still:

• speaking in groups
• contact whoever you want
• collaborate

👉 So:
it's not a limitation → it's a smart protection

🔹 Official invitations (critical point)

🔎 Strengthened explanation:

Many think:

“Why should I take responsibility?”

Simple answer:

👉 You are not asked to control everything
👉 You are asked NOT to ignore problems

👉 If you report → you are protected
👉 If you help → you are valued
👉 If you ignore → it becomes a responsibility

🔹 Micro-groups (heart of the system)

🔎 Simplified explanation:

A micro-group is:

• small
• controllable
• real
• verifiable

👉 31 people = a manageable number. Subsequently, additional members can be added, up to an unlimited number, creating integrated local structures, from the smallest to the largest, at the local, national, continental, and international levels.
👉 Real trust
👉 Solid growth

🔹 Practical consequences of the system

This system leads to concrete results:

✔ zero spam
✔ zero fake accounts (or almost)
✔ real
accountability ✔ controlled growth ✔
strong local organizations

Let us now return to the initial concept, examining it in greater depth in the complete operational context.

There are some people who have been with DirectDemocracyS for a long time, without doing much, or who joined us recently, or some who want to join us but aren't confident paying annual fees, at least initially. Perhaps some people are afraid of paying for nothing, or of not receiving the type of user they paid for, and so they prefer a free user type, with no attendance requirements and no need to volunteer with us.

Let's briefly discuss our friend request rules, always remembering that the latest rules apply to everyone, even if they're different from the previous ones.

For friend requests, a simple rule.

In the early stages of our system, friend requests were prohibited. People communicated with each other in groups in our social areas, and for higher user types, in community areas.

Subsequently, certain types of users—our guarantors, super administrators, and administrators—were allowed to send friend requests and communicate confidentially through our internal messaging services and live chat.

Currently, all our managers , owners , political representatives, official representatives, and official members can only add as “friends” (contacts) people who have informed them of the existence of our system, provided they have a higher user type (users with verified identity and official members, all with the blue check mark next to their username, in our social area).

For all other types of users, friend requests are temporarily not allowed, but they can continue to communicate with each other in the various groups they belong to. In short, only if one of the two users is at least an official member can they send contact requests (via the user contact form), and then the official member can friend the other user (or one of the two if both are official members).

A brief explanation.

Friend requests are not allowed for all types of users for various reasons, here are some:

1. Avoid contact with unreliable users, i.e. those without a verified and guaranteed identity, who disrupt other people's work with meaningless, unhelpful, and unauthorized friend requests.
2. You can communicate with virtually anyone without disturbing them via contact forms.
3. You can communicate with anyone directly in the various groups, without any limitations, but not in public areas, or by disturbing users in their activities.

For those who are already our users.

If you are already an official member (in good standing with your annual fee, as collective owners of our system), you can directly add the person who introduced you to DirectDemocracyS as a "friend" (contact in DirectDemocracyS). To do so, simply log in to our free website, in our social area, and enter your username and password in our login form at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/social

Find or ask for the link or QR code to the personal profile of our official member and add them as a friend. Visit their profile and click "add as friend," and they'll accept if they want. Technically, you can add them even if they're not an official member, as long as they're at least a registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity, and have the blue checkmark next to their username in the social area. However, in this case, you'll only be able to communicate directly, without many mutual benefits.

two options to add the user who introduced you to our system as a "friend" (contact). The first, simpler option is to pay an annual official member fee based on your age (which will take effect as soon as your annual registered user fee, with a verified and guaranteed identity, expires). You will then immediately obtain the official member status, while still using the previous annual fee you paid until it expires. After paying and obtaining the official member status, as a collective owner, you can add the user who introduced you to DirectDemocracyS as a "friend" (contact) by going to your personal profile. The second option is to simply log in to our free website with your username and password and contact our official member who introduced you to our system at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/utility/extensions/internal-forms/contact-user 

asks the user to add you as a “friend” (contact) in the social area of our free website.

For those who joined us a while ago, regardless of whether they're free or not (login users, partially verified users, or registered users without a verified or guaranteed identity), there are two important new features. The first allows you to add as a "friend" or direct contact in DirectDemocracyS only the user who introduced you to our system and gave you the instructions to join us. This is done without an official invitation, but with a simple invitation, not through the social area. To do so, simply log in with your username and password to our free website and contact our official member who introduced you to our system at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/utility/extensions/internal-forms/contact-user

By asking the user to add you as a "friend" (contact) in the social area of our free website. The user who invited you must be at least an official member to add you as a "friend" (contact).

For those who haven't registered yet.

There are two ways to connect as a contact with one of our official members who introduced you to our system. The simplest is to request an official invitation, with a unique registration link, via a simple email invitation (which our official member sends to the email address of the person you're inviting), with the unique link, or the QR code to scan, for the unique registration form, which will automatically connect them as a "friend" (contact) to the official member who invited them. The second is to register with a free profile, or a lower user level, with the generic registration link, and then, depending on the user level obtained, proceed with the steps described above.

To directly reach the top user types.

Based on a virtually unanimous vote by our users, we've decided to allow a higher level of user, only upon official invitation (with guaranteed identity verification and acceptance of full responsibility by the inviter for the invitee's activities and behavior). This invitation will be sent by one of our higher level users, who will then send a unique link or QR code containing the unique link, which will automatically connect the inviter and the invitee as "friends." The primary reason for this is to keep the system safe, secure, organized, and orderly.

The official invitation for new and existing users.

New users.

All new users can request and receive a simple invitation (without being connected to the inviter and the invited person), a direct invitation (with a link or QR code for the registration form), and an official invitation with identity verification (direct or anonymous with our special security team).

Our users.

To get an official invite, simply request friendship according to the rules above, and ask our official member for an invite to upgrade to a higher user level.

Our users of all free and lower membership levels can request a higher membership level, even that of an official member, by contacting their national group, which will connect them with an official member or an official representative, who will provide all the support, information, and instructions, and, if the two users are authorized, even an official invitation to a higher membership level. In certain countries, local groups can also connect two users to have the free or lower membership level officially invited (always assuming responsibility) and upgrade them to a higher membership level.

How are all these rules about friend requests and official invitations connected and integrated with the creation of micro-groups?

They are linked by the fact that to create a micro-group, one must be at least an official member, in good standing with the annual fee, mandatory attendance, and volunteer activities. The official member, as the collective owner of our entire system, must request and obtain an official representative profile, which cannot be linked to their personal profile. The official representative profile, obtained free of charge and with extensive potential, will be partially public, therefore identifiable in some internal groups, virtually, and physically, in person, in their urban or rural area, with a username and geographic coordinates, as well as with their first name, last name, actual date of birth, and authorization codes. At the right time, they will be added to a local group of official representatives, and after a short training course with all the instructions, they will create their own micro-group, manage it, verify it, and grow it.

This procedure is very simple, fast, and safe.

Based on the above rules, virtually anyone can join us. Anyone who meets all the requirements can become our official member, thus collectively owning our entire system. As the system owner, they will have the right to have an official representative profile and represent our system in their own geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area by creating their own micro-group and being able to invite new users, especially new official members, to join their micro-group. Once the micro-group has at least 31 official members, they will be able to obtain the status and potential of an official organization, which will offer everyone numerous benefits and advantages.

Our official representative will be able to verify the annual fees of new users, with the exception of free users, who pay nothing but can join groups reserved for various user types, connected via human bridges from official members to future official organizations. They will be able to extend official invitations to other official members and manage, monitor, and authorize all activities and individuals in their area, their micro-group, and the next official organization. They will be able to verify and guarantee the identity of everyone in their area and organize a wide range of activities, together with all our local, national, continental, and international organizations.

This is a very important statement for anyone who, as a member or verified user, wants to officially invite someone. Why should I take full responsibility, forever, for all the activities and behavior of anyone I invite? Let's just say that for a relative, a friend, or someone I know, I might accept, but for a stranger, perhaps one randomly assigned to me by our national or local organizations, I don't think I'd be willing to take full responsibility.

Our response to this statement. In DirectDemocracyS, responsibility lies with individuals, with connected individuals, with entire groups, and with the entire system. Let us explain. If a person or group engages in reprehensible activities and behaves inappropriately, those who do so are primarily responsible, directly and continuously. However, anyone who invites someone, whether they know them well or only for a short time, is obligated to verify every activity and behavior of the person they invite, reporting any possible "anomalies" to our special security groups, allowing us to prevent any potential misconduct and any morally and ethically incorrect behavior. If the invited person engages in activities that do not comply with our rules or behaves inappropriately, and there is no way to prevent it, the inviter, together with the groups involved, will be responsible for addressing any issues. This is what accountability is all about. In short, we will never hold the host responsible if they attempt to prevent, and succeed, with the help of our groups, in preventing and resolving, any of their guests' mistakes. The host's responsibility, however, is evident if they fail to monitor, intervene, prevent, and resolve—we repeat, with the help of all our groups, and our entire system, everyone involved. Everyone must work to protect all our activities, for the common good.

Responsibility in DirectDemocracyS: Protecting the Common Good

In a system based on collective ownership and direct democracy , freedom is not an abstract concept, but a daily exercise of awareness. In DirectDemocracyS, each member is not a simple user, but a co-owner. This position entails immense rights, but requires a fundamental pillar: Shared Responsibility .

1. The Three Levels of Responsibility

To understand how our system works, we must clearly distinguish where individual duty ends and collective duty begins.

• Individual Responsibility: Each user is directly and personally responsible for their actions, comments, and activities within the system.
• Liaison Responsibility (The Inviter): Whoever officially invites a new member acts as an "ethics guarantor." This isn't a condemnation, but rather a mentoring and oversight role.
• Group and System Responsibility: Local, national and special security groups step in to support individuals, ensuring that the entire system runs smoothly.

2. The Big Doubt: "If I invite someone, will I risk my money?"

The answer is a categorical "NO".

One of the most common fears concerns the financial sphere. It's essential to clarify that:

• No member pays for the defaults of others. If someone you invite decides not to renew their annual membership fee or doesn't participate in activities, your financial standing and funds are not affected in the slightest.
• Fiscal Autonomy: Each profile is a separate financial entity. Your responsibility is solely for its own behavior and security , not for anyone else's wallet.

3. What does “Assumption of Responsibility” mean?

Officially inviting someone means certifying that that person is real and that, to the best of your knowledge, they are willing to respect our values.

Preventive monitoring

Your main task is prevention . If you notice that one of your guests is behaving aggressively, spreading misinformation, or violating the system's rules, your duty is to:

1. Intervene privately to advise and correct.
2. Report the anomaly to our Special Security Groups if the behavior persists.

Golden Rule: You will never be held responsible for one of your guests' mistakes, provided you did everything possible to prevent the action or reported it promptly. Blame arises only in the case of failure to supervise or complicity.

4. Concrete Examples of Critical Issue Management

5. Why does this system make us the safest in the world?

While traditional social networks are full of fake profiles, bots, and scammers because no one is responsible for anyone, in DirectDemocracyS every new entry is filtered by human intelligence and conscience.

This "chain of trust" allows you to:

• Eliminate Spam and Nuisance: Only serious people enter with an official invitation.
• Creating Strong Micro-Groups: An Official Representative managing a micro-group of 31 people (or more) who know and vouch for each other creates an unbreakable local structure.
• Total Transparency: The blue tick and verified identity make every interaction real, honest, and constructive.

Conclusion

Don't be afraid to invite. It's normal to be cautious at first, but you'll soon realize that this mechanism is your greatest protection. By inviting valuable people, you're not just increasing your points or your time in the system; you're building the foundation of your future Official Organization .

At DirectDemocracyS, those who help keep the system clean and safe are the true drivers of change. Your responsibility is our freedom.

In DirectDemocracyS:

• freedom is not chaos
• trust is not blind
• responsibility is not punishment

👉 It's a system designed to work over the long term.

💡 Final message

If you're new:

• observe
• trial
• verify
• ask questions

👉 you don't have to trust right away

But you need to know one thing:

Every rule you read exists to protect you, even before the system.

All groups in DirectDemocracyS, and all the people who make up them, are essential to the functioning of our system.

Brief introduction.

The choice to conduct virtually all our activities and make virtually every decision in groups has proven to be highly intelligent and beneficial both for our system and for those who are part of it. The rationale is simple but powerful: a single person, a small leadership, or a few powerful groups will never have the professionalism, computing power, collective human intelligence, brilliance, ideas, projects, attention to detail, and security measures guaranteed by everyone. But what does "everyone" mean? It's not propaganda or a way to appear fair and just. For us, "everyone" literally means everyone. Obviously, not all together without all the necessary distinctions, because that would create chaos and lead to errors, dangers, and even failures and injustices. The word "everyone" is not generic, but is based on individual qualities that allow the entire system to grow, improve, and evolve. Potentially, anyone who meets all the requirements can study our system, and if they like what we do, trust our system and those who build it, have the desire, the time, the skills, and consider themselves compatible, they can decide to join us. So we repeat: we are not a secret sect, nor an extremely closed system. Unfortunately, many people, and even some technologies, confuse collective security with severity and restrictive measures. They confuse detailed rules with complexity, and justice with excessive punitive measures.

Our five special groups at DirectDemocracyS are essential to making our system work. They are all equally important because they couldn't achieve the same results without each other.

Many people are familiar with our special groups, so we'll briefly introduce them and then provide a little more detail.

1. The special administration group. The engine that drives the entire mechanism of our system. All activities within our system are managed and verified by our special administration group, with its associated categories, groups, and subgroups.
2. The special security group. It ensures the protection of the entire system, its members, and those who collaborate with us, contact us, and visit us from outside. It has many activities specified by implementing rules and other specific rules.
3. The special group of rules, laws, and justice.
4. The special group on equality and meritocracy. It applies equality and meritocracy to the entire system, to those who are part of it, or to those who collaborate with us, contact us, or visit us, continuously, always united and put into practice, consistently over time.
5. The special group: logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect. It ensures that our entire system and its members consistently, concretely, declaredly, documentedly, tested, and verified, apply the various words that make up its name.

All the initial rules were conceived, proposed, discussed, planned, tested, chosen, decided, voted on, and implemented by the first five creators of our system. So, from the very beginning, it was a continuous, complicated, and hard collective effort.

Based on need, we engaged competent people and specialists representing all populations, all continents, and virtually every country in the world. For a very long time, they worked to create fundamental rules that would be shared and decided upon internationally. It would not have been fair and just to have just a few countries decide our internal laws, but it was crucial to involve others with specializations that would ensure maximum professionalism. 277 people wrote the fundamental rules, voting on them unanimously. They also decided the reason why we created DirectDemocracyS, which we all know, as well as many of our goals, and the method to achieve them. To ensure we never forget these things and never lose our identity, it was decided that unanimity would be required to eliminate, and even change, the fundamental rules. This decision is very important because it still allows us to evolve, but only in a way that is shared by all.

The same process has continued since we made our political system and organization partially public.

Creating a single special group for rules, laws, and justice may seem strange, even suspicious, because many people believe this special group of ours has too much power. However, this is not the case at all, since literally all our official members, as collective owners of our system, can be part of all five special groups. And who can become our official member? Anyone who meets all the requirements and is at least one of our registered users with a verified and guaranteed identity. And who can become our registered user, with a verified and guaranteed identity? Anyone who has joined us and meets all the requirements. And who can join us? Anyone on earth, after having informed themselves, can register, create a personal profile, and join us. Potentially, anyone in the world can be part of our system, and anyone who becomes our official member will be able to join all our special groups.

To join our special group for rules, laws, and justice, simply fill out an online form on our platforms after logging in to our free website or one of our main websites.

Not only are our official members involved in our special groups, but all our users with verified and guaranteed identities can participate in many of our activities and exercise their voting rights, as they are integrated into our shared leadership.

Who can propose rules, ideas, and projects to the DirectDemocracyS system? Anyone within our system, or even outside, can propose rules, ideas, and projects using a simple contact form, depending on the type of proposal. If you propose a rule, you should contact our dedicated group for rules, laws, and justice at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/law-groups/law-special-group-contact

If you would like to submit ideas, projects, or activities, please use the contact form for our special administration group at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/administration-groups/administrators

you will have to write as subject: proposed new rule, or depending on the case, proposed new idea, new project, or new activity.

We recommend that existing users log in using the login form, entering their username and password. These are identical to those on our registration website, as your application will be processed more quickly than those of our visitors. For all contact information and instructions on how to fill out a contact form, simply visit our contact website at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

Each proposal will be carefully analyzed and evaluated, and then, if deemed useful, legal, and approved by all special groups, it can be voted on according to detailed implementing rules.

For proposals regarding our rules, it should be noted that any new proposal cannot modify or overturn existing rules if they are deemed more important than the new proposal. In practice, we recommend proposing new rules that are compatible, integrable, and improve upon the existing rules.

For those who are already our official members as collective owners of our system, practically all proposals are accepted, and a group to manage and monitor the proposal is created almost immediately.

It will be possible to request the addition of the new final version, or a modification of the previous rule, based on implementing rules that require evaluation and approval by the group that determines the importance of each proposal, be it a rule, an idea, a project, or an activity. The proposal evaluation group, which any of our official members can join, sends a copy of the proposal to all five special groups and the guarantor group, who will decide whether the proposal is accepted and propose its importance. If it is considered fundamental, a unanimous vote will be required; if it is considered very important, a quorum of between 75% and 95% of the votes will be required; if it is considered important, between 66% and 75% of the votes will be required; if it is considered fairly important, 50% + 1 vote will suffice; if it is considered unimportant, or an implementing rule, the votes of the five special groups and the guarantor group will suffice. Each special group and the guarantor group can object, justifying their decision and proposing amendments to bring it into compliance. This legislative and bureaucratic process, along with the respective justifications, is explained in the various internal regulations.

In practice, everything is decided together on the basis of freedom, democracy, and security measures.

How is the law applied, and how is internal justice interpreted, managed, and verified? The special group for rules, laws, and justice, code 03, is responsible for verifying that all proposed rules, our proposed laws, all our programs, all our ideas, projects, and activities are compliant, coherent, compatible, and integrable with our system. It is also responsible for writing and legalizing all our rules, laws, ideas, projects, and activities, authorizing them along with all other special groups. Furthermore, it is responsible for managing internal justice, based on reports, investigations, and complaints from all other special groups, official groups, and members, as well as other types of users—higher, lower, and unpaid—as well as from people who collaborate, communicate, or visit us from outside.

How is justice managed in DirectDemocracyS? Through various categories, subcategories, groups, and subgroups, which carry out different activities. There is a clear division and delimitation of powers, and internal processes are applied, guaranteeing full access to all parties involved. At the conclusion of all levels of proceedings, and all possible appeals, if necessary, we will not hesitate to turn to external justice, reporting and providing the necessary data. All reports, investigations, complaints, trials, sentences, and justifications for all internal judicial processes and activities are conducted in a detailed, fair, just, expeditious, and highly secure manner, offering all guarantees and all necessary explanations to all parties. The structures that manage and review processes and internal justice are: investigation teams, complaint teams, prosecution teams, defense teams, evidence evaluation, management, and review teams, witness teams, jury teams, adjudication teams, sentencing teams, and reasoning teams, with various subgroups based on the levels of judgment, which vary from one for less serious cases, two for moderately serious cases, and three for serious cases. The severity of the facts, and the number of levels of judgment, is determined by the Gravity Assessment Group, which decides the seriousness of each judicial activity based on the complaints and preliminary evidence. The final group involved is the Judicial Activity Evaluation Group, which is elected by our shared leadership and our official members and has the power to review every single judicial activity at every level and to test the loyalty, reliability, and corruptibility of all parties involved.

This method of work, carried out by this special group, is carried out similarly by each group in our system, to ensure the best conditions for everyone, to carry out excellent work, thanks to continuous mutual monitoring, for the good of the entire system and all those who are part of it. Knowing that it works perfectly within us, we will also propose it externally, with adapted laws, to ensure rules, laws, and judicial processes that are truly equal for all, fair, thorough, swift, and secure, for the entire world population, without discrimination, and therefore without preferences, eliminating any potential corruption, thanks to specific activities, which we will introduce at the right time, adaptable to each people and each country.

Other important groups are: code 06 human and technological specialist groups, ddsAI, and allddsAI; 07 geographic groups, with traditional and bottom-up hierarchies; 08 numerical groups, which calculate the various possibilities, probabilities, and statistics; 09 Related Projects, which are: 090 Politics; 091 Finance; 092 Banking; 093 Currency; 094 Economics; 095 Radio; 096 TV; 097 Information; 098 Leisure; 099 Other Projects. For each of these, much information, rules, methodologies, instructions, and rationales are published, or will be published, publicly, privately, or confidentially.

All groups in DirectDemocracyS, and all the people who make up them, are essential to the functioning of our system.

Brief introduction.

The choice to conduct virtually all our activities and make virtually every decision in groups has proven to be highly intelligent and beneficial both for our system and for those who are part of it. The rationale is simple but powerful: a single person, a small leadership, or a few powerful groups will never have the professionalism, computing power, collective human intelligence, brilliance, ideas, projects, attention to detail, and security measures guaranteed by everyone. But what does "everyone" mean? It's not propaganda or a way to appear fair and just. For us, "everyone" literally means everyone. Obviously, not all together without all the necessary distinctions, because that would create chaos and lead to errors, dangers, and even failures and injustices. The word "everyone" is not generic, but is based on individual qualities that allow the entire system to grow, improve, and evolve. Potentially, anyone who meets all the requirements can study our system, and if they like what we do, trust our system and those who build it, have the desire, the time, the skills, and consider themselves compatible, they can decide to join us. So we repeat: we are not a secret sect, nor an extremely closed system. Unfortunately, many people, and even some technologies, confuse collective security with severity and restrictive measures. They confuse detailed rules with complexity, and justice with excessive punitive measures.

Our five special groups at DirectDemocracyS are essential to making our system work. They are all equally important because they couldn't achieve the same results without each other.

Many people are familiar with our special groups, so we'll briefly introduce them and then provide a little more detail.

1. The special administration group. The engine that drives the entire mechanism of our system. All activities within our system are managed and verified by our special administration group, with its associated categories, groups, and subgroups.
2. The special security group. It ensures the protection of the entire system, its members, and those who collaborate with us, contact us, and visit us from outside. It has many activities specified by implementing rules and other specific rules.
3. The special group of rules, laws, and justice.
4. The special group on equality and meritocracy. It applies equality and meritocracy to the entire system, to those who are part of it, or to those who collaborate with us, contact us, or visit us, continuously, always united and put into practice, consistently over time.
5. The special group: logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect. It ensures that our entire system and its members consistently, concretely, declaredly, documentedly, tested, and verified, apply the various words that make up its name.

All the initial rules were conceived, proposed, discussed, planned, tested, chosen, decided, voted on, and implemented by the first five creators of our system. So, from the very beginning, it was a continuous, complicated, and hard collective effort.

Based on need, we engaged competent people and specialists representing all populations, all continents, and virtually every country in the world. For a very long time, they worked to create fundamental rules that would be shared and decided upon internationally. It would not have been fair and just to have just a few countries decide our internal laws, but it was crucial to involve others with specializations that would ensure maximum professionalism. 277 people wrote the fundamental rules, voting on them unanimously. They also decided the reason why we created DirectDemocracyS, which we all know, as well as many of our goals, and the method to achieve them. To ensure we never forget these things and never lose our identity, it was decided that unanimity would be required to eliminate, and even change, the fundamental rules. This decision is very important because it still allows us to evolve, but only in a way that is shared by all.

The same process has continued since we made our political system and organization partially public.

Creating a single special group for rules, laws, and justice may seem strange, even suspicious, because many people believe this special group of ours has too much power. However, this is not the case at all, since literally all our official members, as collective owners of our system, can be part of all five special groups. And who can become our official member? Anyone who meets all the requirements and is at least one of our registered users with a verified and guaranteed identity. And who can become our registered user, with a verified and guaranteed identity? Anyone who has joined us and meets all the requirements. And who can join us? Anyone on earth, after having informed themselves, can register, create a personal profile, and join us. Potentially, anyone in the world can be part of our system, and anyone who becomes our official member will be able to join all our special groups.

To join our special group for rules, laws, and justice, simply fill out an online form on our platforms after logging in to our free website or one of our main websites.

Not only are our official members involved in our special groups, but all our users with verified and guaranteed identities can participate in many of our activities and exercise their voting rights, as they are integrated into our shared leadership.

Who can propose rules, ideas, and projects to the DirectDemocracyS system? Anyone within our system, or even outside, can propose rules, ideas, and projects using a simple contact form, depending on the type of proposal. If you propose a rule, you should contact our dedicated group for rules, laws, and justice at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/law-groups/law-special-group-contact

If you would like to submit ideas, projects, or activities, please use the contact form for our special administration group at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/administration-groups/administrators

you will have to write as subject: proposed new rule, or depending on the case, proposed new idea, new project, or new activity.

We recommend that existing users log in using the login form, entering their username and password. These are identical to those on our registration website, as your application will be processed more quickly than those of our visitors. For all contact information and instructions on how to fill out a contact form, simply visit our contact website at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

Each proposal will be carefully analyzed and evaluated, and then, if deemed useful, legal, and approved by all special groups, it can be voted on according to detailed implementing rules.

For proposals regarding our rules, it should be noted that any new proposal cannot modify or overturn existing rules if they are deemed more important than the new proposal. In practice, we recommend proposing new rules that are compatible, integrable, and improve upon the existing rules.

For those who are already our official members as collective owners of our system, practically all proposals are accepted, and a group to manage and monitor the proposal is created almost immediately.

It will be possible to request the addition of the new final version, or a modification of the previous rule, based on implementing rules that require evaluation and approval by the group that determines the importance of each proposal, be it a rule, an idea, a project, or an activity. The proposal evaluation group, which any of our official members can join, sends a copy of the proposal to all five special groups and the guarantor group, who will decide whether the proposal is accepted and propose its importance. If it is considered fundamental, a unanimous vote will be required; if it is considered very important, a quorum of between 75% and 95% of the votes will be required; if it is considered important, between 66% and 75% of the votes will be required; if it is considered fairly important, 50% + 1 vote will suffice; if it is considered unimportant, or an implementing rule, the votes of the five special groups and the guarantor group will suffice. Each special group and the guarantor group can object, justifying their decision and proposing amendments to bring it into compliance. This legislative and bureaucratic process, along with the respective justifications, is explained in the various internal regulations.

In practice, everything is decided together on the basis of freedom, democracy, and security measures.

How is the law applied, and how is internal justice interpreted, managed, and verified? The special group for rules, laws, and justice, code 03, is responsible for verifying that all proposed rules, our proposed laws, all our programs, all our ideas, projects, and activities are compliant, coherent, compatible, and integrable with our system. It is also responsible for writing and legalizing all our rules, laws, ideas, projects, and activities, authorizing them along with all other special groups. Furthermore, it is responsible for managing internal justice, based on reports, investigations, and complaints from all other special groups, official groups, and members, as well as other types of users—higher, lower, and unpaid—as well as from people who collaborate, communicate, or visit us from outside.

How is justice managed in DirectDemocracyS? Through various categories, subcategories, groups, and subgroups, which carry out different activities. There is a clear division and delimitation of powers, and internal processes are applied, guaranteeing full access to all parties involved. At the conclusion of all levels of proceedings, and all possible appeals, if necessary, we will not hesitate to turn to external justice, reporting and providing the necessary data. All reports, investigations, complaints, trials, sentences, and justifications for all internal judicial processes and activities are conducted in a detailed, fair, just, expeditious, and highly secure manner, offering all guarantees and all necessary explanations to all parties. The structures that manage and review processes and internal justice are: investigation teams, complaint teams, prosecution teams, defense teams, evidence evaluation, management, and review teams, witness teams, jury teams, adjudication teams, sentencing teams, and reasoning teams, with various subgroups based on the levels of judgment, which vary from one for less serious cases, two for moderately serious cases, and three for serious cases. The severity of the facts, and the number of levels of judgment, is determined by the Gravity Assessment Group, which decides the seriousness of each judicial activity based on the complaints and preliminary evidence. The final group involved is the Judicial Activity Evaluation Group, which is elected by our shared leadership and our official members and has the power to review every single judicial activity at every level and to test the loyalty, reliability, and corruptibility of all parties involved.

This method of work, carried out by this special group, is carried out similarly by each group in our system, to ensure the best conditions for everyone, to carry out excellent work, thanks to continuous mutual monitoring, for the good of the entire system and all those who are part of it. Knowing that it works perfectly within us, we will also propose it externally, with adapted laws, to ensure rules, laws, and judicial processes that are truly equal for all, fair, thorough, swift, and secure, for the entire world population, without discrimination, and therefore without preferences, eliminating any potential corruption, thanks to specific activities, which we will introduce at the right time, adaptable to each people and each country.

Other important groups are: code 06 human and technological specialist groups, ddsAI, and allddsAI; 07 geographic groups, with traditional and bottom-up hierarchies; 08 numerical groups, which calculate the various possibilities, probabilities, and statistics; 09 Related Projects, which are: 090 Politics; 091 Finance; 092 Banking; 093 Currency; 094 Economics; 095 Radio; 096 TV; 097 Information; 098 Leisure; 099 Other Projects. For each of these, much information, rules, methodologies, instructions, and rationales are published, or will be published, publicly, privately, or confidentially.

Everything decided in DirectDemocracyS is born from long, hard, and complicated work, based on proposals, discussions, ideas, projects, testing, selection, voting by our shared leadership, and implementation. Every idea and proposal from anyone who joins us is brought to fruition in various groups by our official members.

The choice to divide our groups with numerical codes makes it much easier for our collective ownership, made up of all our official members, to manage and control our entire system.

These divisions are fundamental rules established from the beginning to divide our activities, and to prevent, for example, a single group, or a few groups, from having too much power, we have always decided from the beginning, that each of our official members could be part of all groups, with the sole exception of the specialist groups code 06, we talk about it at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/all-our-rules/all-group-rules/rules-for-specialist-groups/rules-for-the-specialist-groups

Geographic groups code 07, numerical groups code 08, and various project groups code 09. Only our official members, who declare, document, possess, and continuously demonstrate their expertise, can join the specialist groups. The reason is simple. A professional system cannot allow those who have not studied, taught, or worked in certain sectors to join expert groups, for the simple reason that not everyone has the necessary skills and knowledge required. In the geographical groups at the various international, continental, national, local, and micro-group levels, anyone can only join if they are a resident or hold citizenship, according to very specific and detailed rules and requirements. In practice, not everyone makes decisions for all territories, but there are limitations to allow for fair and equitable local autonomy, while respecting the various integrity and hierarchies. People can access numerical groups based on the last number of their unique identification code (or personal profile) in DirectDemocracyS, according to the following scheme: numerical group 081 if it ends with 1 and 6, 082 if it ends with 2 and 7, 083 if it ends with 3 and 8, 084 if it ends with 4 and 9, or 085 if it ends with 5 and 0. This random subdivision has allowed us, from the very beginning, to communicate, collaborate, and carry out countless activities together, with people from various populations, even those with ongoing conflicts, and with great historical, cultural, ethnic, religious, political, and traditional differences. This allows us to be united in diversity, practicing mutual respect. In the various projects, while any of our official members can carry out activities, do business, and invest in potentially any activity, only those who pay the required fees for each type and category can be integrated into each individual project, always according to specific rules.

For all other groups, starting with the five special groups, each of our official members, as the collective owner of our entire system, can join all of them, according to specific rules. Our recommendation is not to join all five groups at once, but to start with just one special group and slowly and gradually increase the number of special groups they join, based on their free time, skills, and knowledge of our system. But no one can stop an official member, if they wish, from joining all five special groups at once; the only problem will be getting used to five completely different types of activities, all at once.

We must reiterate a not insignificant detail, for those who superficially accuse us of being a secret sect, or an overly closed and overprotected system, that potentially anyone can join us, and by respecting our rules, methodologies, and instructions, anyone who joins us and meets all the requirements can become our official member, thus collectively owning our entire system. Those who make these kinds of claims judge a book by its title, or by its cover. Or they rely on specious and false assessments by humans or certain artificial intelligences, who, by not analyzing our system comprehensively, openly, and comprehensively, express inconsistent criticisms and hasty judgments, often with the aim of denigrating, boycotting, slowing us down, or worse, stopping us. We're not complaining, we're not childish, and we're not crying, but we'd like to be evaluated on facts, not impressions, understanding our potential and the potential consequences of our existence, and not on potential critical issues, which, if they existed, would be less than those of other systems. In short, while allowing everyone complete freedom, we'd like to be considered for what we truly are: innovative, and completely different from all others, therefore unique and inimitable. Those who look at DirectDemocracyS measure and evaluate it with the same criteria as other systems, looking for similarities, which don't exist, because no system is more complete, fair, equitable, perfectly functional, and secure than ours. This is the undeniable reality because there's been enormous, hard, long, and complicated work done by everyone who has joined us, and by those who will join us in the future. We have analyzed all the mistakes, all the critical issues, all the problems, and all the cruelties committed throughout history, and we have found solutions to prevent and resolve each of those already seen, even foreseeing possible but not yet realized scenarios. This excellent work, of which we are proud, makes us appear presumptuous, vain, and even unpleasant, but we limit ourselves to analyzing reality, telling the truth, even knowing that not everyone will understand, not everyone will accept our explanations and our motivations, but sooner or later time will prove us right. Our undeniably solid theory must necessarily work in reality, implementing and realizing all our rules, respected by all.

To those who accuse us of talking and not concluding, of boasting before winning even a single election, we say: 1. Give us the time we need; there was no instruction manual to create such a complex system from scratch. The old and failed traditional systems, with their respective political forces and political representatives, have had a long time to actually carry out their activities, with the abysmal results we all know, with very few short-lived exceptions. 2. Without a good theory and without comprehensive research, and all the necessary tests, there can be no good concrete results; therefore, we must pay attention to every tiny detail. 3. Give us your trust not because we claim to be infallible, but because, given our structure, it is unlikely we can do worse than those who preceded us. At least we share all the power we have gained with our voters, on our platforms, continuously, with anyone who joins us, including those who will not vote with us.

Our five special groups have already had some informative articles, and we'll certainly publish more. They have clear names and codes. 1. Special Administration Group. This is the engine that runs our entire system; virtually all our activities take place in our administration group, both online and in person. 2. Special Security Group. This ensures the ongoing protection of our entire system, everyone who is part of it, and ensures that all laws and regulations are followed. It carries out all necessary checks and continuously verifies the integrity of all our users, groups, technologies, and anyone who wants to communicate, collaborate, or join us. We discuss this in various links, including this one we recommend:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/system-info/system-security/user-number-verification

03. Special Group on Rules, Laws, and Justice. This group proposes, discusses, chooses, tests, decides, votes, and implements our rules. It proposes laws at all levels, internally and externally (our proposed laws). It administers internal justice, rewards, and punishes. We discuss it at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/03-rules-laws-and-justice

4. Special Equality and Meritocracy Group. Equality is very important only if it is guaranteed to everyone, individually, humans and technologies, groups, and in all activities throughout the system, always in continuous union with meritocracy. If either is missing, a system cannot deliver optimal results. This group is also responsible for evaluating our users, our groups, and our technologies, allowing for the accumulation of points, which we believe are the best way to evaluate the concrete results of anyone who joins us. These points are the perfect balance of the various hierarchies, both traditional and bottom-up, therefore horizontal. 5. Special Logic, Common Sense, Truth, Study, Reality, Resilience, Consistency, and Mutual Respect Group. This is a very important special group because by applying the definitions in its name to all our activities, all our decisions, and throughout our entire system, we are highly professional and useful for the common good.

In addition to the five special groups, there is Group 00, the creators, initiators, and guarantors of our system. It is composed of the five people who had the idea to create DirectDemocracyS, the 277 subsequent official members who decided on the fundamental rules before partially making our system public, and some super administrators subsequently accepted into this group. This group, along with all five other special groups, is essential for evaluating and authorizing individuals, groups, and activities throughout our entire system. This group constantly reminds us why we were created, where we want to go, and how we must get there. It allows us to maintain our identity and remain true to our motivations.

Each special group, and all other group codes, have potentially infinite categories, divided into countless subgroups, all connected by human (physical) and technological (platform and virtual) bridges, creating a highly complex, resilient, and perfectly functional mechanism, regardless of whether we have just a few users, many users, or even the entire population of the earth. This independence and optimal functioning, even with very many users, is guaranteed by self-financing (through annual fees, donations, and advertising contracts), but also by the architecture of our system, created as an enormous mechanism, consisting of infinite chains, all interconnected by countless links, so that if one link were to weaken, break, or be missing, the entire structure would be able to replace the missing or weak link, without weakening the entire structure.

Many people, and even some technologies, are saying: it's a great project, but how will it work with so many users, all different from each other, and not all joining with the best intentions? Thanks to excellent work by many of our human and technological groups in anticipating and addressing critical issues, those with good intentions will be empowered, and those with bad intentions will be rendered harmless and irrelevant, because they will be found by our human and technological groups, reported internally, or externally (if necessary), monitored (through cross-checks that respect privacy and anonymity), investigated, charged, tried, and, if guilty, convicted—in an intelligent, discreet, yet very careful and secure manner.

DirectDemocracyS implements logic, common sense, truth, reality, study, consistency, and mutual respect throughout the system and externally, in every activity and decision.

We established this fundamental rule from the very beginning and have always applied it. We even created a special group with this name and code 05.

Each of our official members has the right to participate in all five of our special groups; therefore, anyone who joins us, if they meet the requirements, can access them and participate in concrete activities, taking part in various decisions.

We will focus on mutual respect for all people, both individually and in groups, both between populations and across countries and geographical subdivisions, including at the local level.

Mutual respect intelligently, ingeniously, and immediately resolves every possible conflict and every type of violence, if applied and implemented by everyone.

As is often the case, simple solutions must have very detailed rules to be applied ethically and morally correct. Simply put, it's not enough to simply want to do things and find all the solutions; they must work properly to deliver benefits, so all potential errors and problems must be anticipated and resolved.

But how should mutual respect be applied to truly work? The first thing to clarify is that respect must be applied and implemented, but for it to be beneficial, it must be mutual. Therefore, in two or more parties with potential critical issues, there must be a willingness and availability from everyone to engage in dialogue and genuine, loyal, honest, and sincere collaboration, with all safety measures in place.

As always, for all of us human beings there must be the will to change and improve the world, through changing and improving our own mentality, at every level.

Changing your mindset doesn't mean giving up your own ideas, ideals, traditions, cultures, and interests, but rather having the right open-mindedness to understand and accept the ideas, needs, and interests of others.

In our opinion, in any possible conflict, the fundamental thing is to put yourself in the other person's shoes, to understand their motivations.

These are all easy things to say and difficult to implement, and we are aware of this, but by educating, and therefore teaching everyone, mutual respect, it is achieved more quickly and lastingly.

However, if two or more protagonists are like "oil and water" and cannot be united by common interests, it is up to the system, or systems, to intervene, not by throwing "fuel on the fire" as unfortunately often happens, but by peacefully, intelligently, but very determinedly compelling all parties involved to dialogue and mutual respect.

A concrete example: if two countries or two peoples are in conflict, everyone around them, and the entire world, must force them to respect each other and find solutions to all the various issues, leaving no stone unturned and nothing unresolved. In short, there must be no details left unclear, to avoid future problems.

At DirectDemocracyS, our rules, respected by all, oblige everyone to respect one another, lest they be justly punished. The mutual respect imposed by our architecture is highly effective, because in the event of internal conflicts between two people, two groups, two populations, or two organizations, one does not side with one side or the other, because divisions create a potential conflict. Everyone is committed to finding solutions that do not favor one side alone, identifying the causes of the conflict, finding all possible solutions, and implementing them without allowing the two or more involved to feel supported by anyone. DirectDemocracyS and all its members strive to carefully and impartially study the causes of conflicts, and to offer solutions for the common good, always striving to do so without displeasing, whenever possible, any of the parties involved.

But how is it applied internally? Through logic, common sense, truth, reality, study, consistency, and the good and interests of all. And if someone is dissatisfied with everyone's decisions? They are informed that the common good, unity in diversity, is more important than any private interest, and therefore there is no alternative but to end the conflict.

And how does this apply outside of DirectDemocracyS? Just as we do internally. Obviously, to "enforce" compliance, prevent any potential conflict, and always resolve it, we need everyone's full commitment, and we need electoral victories for our political organization, with our political representatives in the most important, and therefore decisive, roles. At this point, many people will ask: are they at DirectDemocracyS overly optimistic, vain, presumptuous, and overly confident of winning everywhere? We have always known our potential and the benefits for the common good of our system, we are proud of our long, hard and complicated work, and we are certain that just as they have trusted, throughout their lives, all the other political forces, which after the elections have not always been correct, and have not always fully respected the programs and all the promises made, to obtain the consensus necessary to win, sooner or later they will also trust us and our political representatives, because we, unlike all the others, share all the power with all our voters, on our platforms.

This power-sharing, even after the elections, by implementing complete freedom and authentic democracy, will allow us to "force" everyone to respect each other, and ensure that it is mutual. We want to better explain a very simple concept, with a concrete example, which we will apply everywhere. The tragic and cowardly Russian invasion of Ukraine, still unresolved, in early April 2026. If DirectDemocracy had won the elections in both countries before the invasion, our Russian President, undoubtedly different and better than Putin, would never have ordered such an invasion, and our Ukrainian President, undoubtedly different and better than Zelensky, would have engaged in dialogue and resolved all issues regarding respect for minority rights and other issues. But if the two presidents hadn't done so, even if it wasn't our method, their respective voters would have forced them, and their respective populations on our platforms would have found all the solutions. But if even the respective populations on our platforms had failed to resolve every problem, all the peoples of neighboring countries, and the entire world population, without siding with one side or the other, would have compelled them to mutual respect, which would have allowed for constructive dialogue, free from any kind of violence. In practice, only a system united in diversity allows for the peaceful resolution of every critical issue, and only through mutual respect.

The same example of the Russian and Ukrainian peoples can and must be applied everywhere in the world, with DirectDemocracyS and with the global organization of all peoples, which has existed since the first moment we conceived and created our system.

Many people, however, will ask: How do we resolve human unpredictability? Through clear and detailed rules, shared and respected by all. By rendering bad people powerless and harmless, giving voice and power to good people, who are everywhere the majority. Almost every conflict arises from a chain of events, some caused violently, through boycotts, provocations, crimes, and violence, almost all created in such a way as to provoke reactions, which in turn fuel the spiral of violence and mutual hatred. It would be enough to report, investigate, and uncover the culprits, accuse them, judge them, and if guilty, condemn them and punish them very harshly, publicly—not with the death penalty, but by severely depriving them of all freedoms. Individual evil must be made impossible, thanks to the collective good. It's not easy to do, it will take a long time, but by doing everything as we planned, the results will be seen, and the solutions will be lasting.

So, will DirectDemocracyS be a dictatorship of the good majority over the evil minority? All dictatorships involve a minority, usually evil, that subjugates and exploits a majority, usually good. The only ones who implement true democracy, lasting over time, are us at DirectDemocracyS. Let's assume that in even partially free oligarchic party systems, often called Western countries, the good always win (something yet to be proven), and in all the various systems, it is always a majority that wins (good or bad, the voters will judge), which governs for long years and makes laws with almost no possibility for the population to oppose it. However, when we're talking about the only political force that shares all power, with all its voters, on its platforms, if we were to win, we would be creating a "dictatorship" of the majority over the minority. Those who make these arguments either don't carefully evaluate the diversity of situations, or they don't have the interest of acknowledging reality. Furthermore, who's stopping anyone who doesn't vote with us from joining us and taking part in all our decisions for the common good? We welcome them with open arms, without any kind of discrimination.

And who condemns DirectDemocracyS for its articles on weapons? Our position on everything is based on the rules of Group 05, which we're discussing in this article, but we should also add pragmatism. Our article on weapons simply stated that if there are a few superpowers in the world with a wealth of weapons and very powerful armed forces, those without the means to defend themselves are easily subdued. Therefore, anyone who opposes weapons in Europe, and a common professional European army, is either stupid or corrupted by one of the other superpowers. Potentially unlimited freedom and democracy (even the fake kind that exists in many countries) must be defended so that we can live in a better world. For all of us at DirectDemocracyS, all weapons should disappear from the face of the earth, but they should be reduced by everyone, gradually, and not just by a few fools, who would be easily invaded, controlled, and enslaved by those who refuse to give up their weapons.

A fundamental aspect that we believe needs further clarification concerns the growth and diffusion phase of our system, and the way in which our principles are being applied concretely in the real world, even before a possible global diffusion.

DirectDemocracyS doesn't base its credibility on promises or predictions, but on concrete, verifiable results over time. From the very beginning, wherever we operate, we fully apply our rules, methods, and principles, demonstrating in practice the benefits of mutual respect, power-sharing, individual and collective responsibility, and the logical and rational management of conflict.

In every context we serve, even on a small scale, the system is designed to function fully, without the need for ideal conditions or global control. This means that every micro-group, every community, every local structure represents a real and concrete example of how DirectDemocracyS works. The results achieved in these contexts are not theoretical, but visible, measurable, and replicable.

Through these concrete examples, the system spreads naturally. Individuals, communities, and gradually even institutions, observing the real benefits, can freely decide to join together, contribute, and actively participate. This process is not based on impositions, but on a conscious, informed, and rational choice.

We are fully aware that this path will not be without obstacles. In many cases, individuals, groups, or organizations with vested interests may oppose, attempt to hinder, slow down, or discredit our system. This is a natural phenomenon in any process of real change. However, our approach does not involve direct confrontation or imposition, but rather the continuous demonstration of the system's validity through concrete results, transparency, and consistency.

Those who oppose, over time, will find themselves faced with evidence that is increasingly difficult to ignore. In many cases, such opposition will gradually diminish, or even turn into collaboration, when the benefits become evident even to those who were initially opposed. In other cases, those who continue to oppose will naturally isolate themselves, losing credibility and consensus.

At the same time, the system is designed to prevent and limit attempts at manipulation, infiltration, or sabotage. This is achieved through clear rules, distributed controls, non-transferable individual responsibility, and verification systems based on concrete activities and demonstrable behaviors over time. It's not enough to declare oneself part of the system: it must be consistently demonstrated through consistent actions.

Another key element is conflict management in contexts not yet fully integrated into the system. Even when DirectDemocracyS is not dominant, its members and structures operate according to the same principles: they do not take sides or fuel divisions, but actively work to foster dialogue, mutual understanding, and the search for shared solutions. This approach, applied consistently and consistently, builds trust and credibility, even externally.

Over time, as the system expands, its ability to positively influence external contexts increases. Not through imposition, but through a growing critical mass of people and communities applying the same principles. When this critical mass becomes sufficiently large, the system also acquires the ability to exert positive pressure on conflicts, encouraging all parties involved to engage in dialogue and mutual respect.

It's important to understand that our ultimate goal is not control, but the dissemination of a working method. A method that, once adopted, progressively renders destructive behaviors, manipulations, and unresolved conflicts useless and ineffective.

The medium- and long-term consequences of this approach are profound. Conflicts tend to decline not because they are repressed, but because they are addressed and resolved at their root. People gain greater awareness, responsibility, and the ability to collaborate. Decisions become more balanced because they are based on data, analysis, and real participation. Minorities find concrete spaces for expression and influence, not through conflict, but through active and structured participation.

At the same time, harmful, opportunistic, or violent behaviors are becoming increasingly difficult to implement, because the system identifies, isolates, and neutralizes them in a proportionate and justified manner, without resorting to arbitrary measures, but through shared and consistently applied rules.

The system as a permanent school of mutual respect

DirectDemocracyS has an educational mechanism that requires no classrooms, teachers, or formal programs: the system itself, in its daily functioning, teaches mutual respect directly, concretely, and permanently.

Everyone who joins DirectDemocracyS and actively participates in the system's life doesn't learn mutual respect as an abstract concept, but experiences it as a practical reality. Every shared decision, every internal conflict addressed and resolved according to the rules, every interaction within micro-groups, every mutual check-in, every moment in which the system forces all parties to dialogue rather than allowing oppression—all this is real, lived education, incorporated into daily practice.

The difference between this approach and any form of traditional values education is profound and crucial. Traditional education transmits principles that each individual then applies—or fails to apply—in their own lives, according to their own will, habits, and convenience. In DirectDemocracyS, however, principle and practice coincide: one cannot participate in the system without applying mutual respect, because the system doesn't function otherwise, and those who don't apply it are identified, corrected, and, if necessary, excluded. This creates a learning experience that doesn't depend on individual goodwill, but is structurally guaranteed by the system's architecture.

The motivations for this approach are multiple and deeply interconnected. The first is psychological: human beings learn much more effectively through direct experience than through theoretical instruction. A principle lived in daily practice becomes incomparably more deeply and lastingly rooted in the mindset than one read, heard, or even intellectually shared. The second motivation is social: when a group of people systematically practices mutual respect in a structured context, a shared culture is created that exerts positive pressure on all members, including those initially less inclined. Respectful behavior becomes the expected norm, and deviating from it becomes socially costly as well as normatively sanctioned. The third motivation is strategic: a system that educates through practice produces members who also take this method externally, into their family, professional, community, and political contexts, multiplying the educational effect well beyond the formal confines of DirectDemocracyS.

The consequences of this mechanism are equally significant. In the short term, every micro-group that functions properly becomes a visible and verifiable example for outside observers. These are not promises or theories, but concrete, measurable, and replicable results. In the medium term, the critical mass of people who have internalized mutual respect as a practical method grows organically, and with it the system's ability to positively influence external contexts, even before any electoral victory. In the long term, generations of people trained within this system will bring with them a profoundly different mindset from that produced by current systems—a mindset in which mutual respect is not an imposed obligation, but a natural and spontaneous method of dealing with every type of relationship and conflict.

The beneficial effects are evident at all levels. At the individual level, those who systematically practice mutual respect develop superior cognitive and emotional skills in conflict management, understanding other people's perspectives, and finding shared solutions. These skills directly and measurably improve the quality of personal, professional, and interpersonal life. At the collective level, communities and organizations that systematically practice mutual respect demonstrate greater cohesion, greater productivity, greater ability to adapt to change, and a lower incidence of destructive conflict. At the systemic level, the progressive diffusion of this method structurally reduces the demand for violence, oppression, and manipulation as conflict management tools, making it progressively more difficult and less cost-effective to resort to such tools, even for those who would be inclined to do so.

One aspect that distinguishes this mechanism from any form of ideological conditioning or imposition must be clearly emphasized. DirectDemocracyS does not ask anyone to adopt specific values, particular beliefs, or predefined identities. It simply requires the application of a method: mutual respect as a practical tool for coexistence and conflict resolution. This method is compatible with any culture, tradition, identity, and value system because it does not replace them, but rather creates the conditions for them to coexist without destroying each other. It is this universal compatibility that makes the method scalable globally, and the system itself replicable in any cultural, geographical, and political context.

Ultimately, DirectDemocracyS doesn't simply propose mutual respect as a value to be pursued, but builds it as a collective skill through daily practice, consolidates it as a culture through structured repetition, and disseminates it as a universal method through concrete and verifiable example. The system is simultaneously the rule and the school, the goal and the path, the principle and its practical demonstration.

In conclusion, DirectDemocracyS does not simply propose an ideal model for a global future, but represents a system already operational, capable of functioning immediately, growing through concrete examples, and progressively transforming reality through conscious participation, mutual respect, and the rigorous application of logical and shared rules.

Our social area is present on various websites, various subdomains, on our platforms.

This is very important because it transforms DirectDemocracyS into a real system-wide social network.

Our social area has all the potential of all other social networks, and some unique and inimitable features, suitable for all our activities.

We've explained several times why we created our platforms, with all our systems, our web servers, and many other proprietary technologies. We simply reiterate that we value being free, independent, neutral, resilient, and protected, and this is achieved by having everything we need collectively owned by all our official members. We do it all through self-funding, without having to ask for favors or permissions, to express ourselves and work together, with shared rules that are proposed, discussed, chosen, tested, voted on, and implemented in an autonomous and truly democratic manner.

Our social network has its own place on many of our websites, based on specific activities, the types of users who can access them, and the importance of what is done in each social area.

Differences between us and others.

The personal profile.

Everyone who joins us must register and create a single personal profile by completing a simple registration form. After activation, they can customize their profile, avoiding posting unsolicited, and especially unauthorized, status updates, so as not to clutter public spaces with unnecessary content. If they wish to express themselves freely, while respecting the rules, they can do so within the group or in groups they are a member of, without disturbing other users, but allowing them to express their full potential. Each member will participate in at least one group and will have the opportunity to participate in a wide range of activities.

Public spaces in our social areas.

In DirectDemocracyS, public spaces are reserved for our public spaces management group, which includes all our official members, who collectively own our entire system. While we embrace everyone's creativity and want to give everyone complete freedom to express themselves, posting or posting status updates without first requesting and, if you meet all requirements, receiving permission to post or post a status update from our public spaces management group is strictly prohibited.

How do I post something in the public areas? Use a support form at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/utility/extensions/submit-ticket

Please note: the above link only works after logging into our website with your credentials (username and password). The subject line should be: Public Area Management Group – Private Post in Public Area, or, as appropriate, Status Update in Public Area. You can leave the default priority (normal). For the message, write the post you want to write, and finally explain why your post is of public interest.

Explanation: We don't need posts that aren't of fundamental importance to everyone—cat photos, greetings, birthday wishes, or holiday greetings. Things of collective interest should be posted in everyone's space; specific things can be posted in private, confidential, invisible, or even secret areas, where they're visible only to those who are truly interested. This isn't a lack of freedom, but rather respect for the system and everyone in it. We have many free groups, in designated areas, where anyone can find whatever they're looking for, with very few restrictions based on the law, our rules, common sense, logic, good taste, and mutual respect.

Our public area management team can authorize or deny publication of your post or status update. If permission is denied, they will explain the reasons and recommend one or more groups, in your language and country or geographic area, from our free groups category, where you can post. If a group or page doesn't exist, you will be offered the option of creating one privately, with full instructions, allowing other people—your family, friends, contacts, and even strangers—to join your group or page. Naturally, you will create the group in the free social area and will be its manager, according to our implementing rules for creating groups and activities.

Rationale: Let's leave public areas for the general public's benefit, without taking away anyone's freedom of expression, but without forcing everyone to see posts and status updates, which aren't of interest to everyone.

Potential of our social areas.

In addition to the various profiles and groups (with numerous categories and subgroups), there are pages for various categories, events, videos, audio, and many other potential uses for endless activities. In the initial phases, almost all activities will be private, confidential, or secret, but in later phases, many public activities will be visible, in some cases based on internal decisions, even to those outside our system.

But how do you access our social area? Simply join us, register, and create a personal profile. After activation, you will be able to access our websites with your own login credentials, which are a username and password, chosen by each user on the registration form and which must not be shared with anyone for any reason. The username and password are used and entered only on the login form, and on the various websites based on your user type, the number of points earned, and various authorizations.

How do you get all the support, help, and information you need? Through our contact forms if you're a visitor, and through a support form after logging in if you're a user. The contact and support forms are available 24/7, 7 days a week, and in all languages. Responses are received faster, practically in real time, if you're a user, and you're a higher user type.

Is it fair to divide users into categories? Shouldn't everyone have the same rights? In DirectDemocracyS, the rules are the same for everyone, so there's no discrimination. Anyone who meets all the requirements can obtain a higher category of user, and roles of greater importance and responsibility. The division of our users is necessary because not all our users are the same; not everyone joins us with good intentions, and therefore, not everyone is reliable, sincere, loyal, honest, competent, and compatible with all our rules and methodologies. Therefore, not everyone meets the requirements for higher category users. Based on the specific activities performed, your behavior, and the time spent in our system, you earn points, both for individual activities and in various groups. These accumulated points demonstrate that you deserve higher category users. Each category user begins accumulating points immediately after joining us by completing the registration form. All our users, even free ones, earn 25 points just for joining us, and will continue to earn them based on very detailed implementation rules. The creation of "traditional" hierarchies, from top to bottom, in perfect balance, with shared leadership implementing bottom-up, horizontal hierarchies, is necessary to continuously implement equality and meritocracy for all, forever.

Is it right that official members have so much power? Anyone who respects all our rules, methodologies, and instructions, and meets our motivations and all the requirements, can join us at any time, without any invitation, voluntarily, without having to pay anything, without ever having to pay annual fees, without having to be present, and without having to volunteer in our system. All they need to do is choose a username (even a nickname or a random code), a password of at least 12 characters, and all they need is a personal email address (not temporary and protected by a secure password), and a personal phone number. Read the instructions for completing the registration form at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/activity-rules/registration-rules/registration-form

and then register at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/register

by choosing the free user type, or based on detailed rules, one of the other types available, in the registration form.

Anyone can join us, and if and when they meet all the requirements, every user—and therefore every person—can become our official member and have collective ownership of our entire system. Since our entire system is also their property, according to our implementation rules, they will have unlocked a wealth of potential and a tremendous amount of collective and shared power. No one is discriminated against. Everyone can achieve anything if they demonstrate their worthy status.

I don't know whether I can trust paying the annual fees. What can I do? Anyone who isn't confident can get a free user level, and then decide to upgrade to a higher level, or keep the free one forever. There are no obligations, and everyone decides as they prefer. Obviously, while you can do a lot of things with us, the free user level doesn't offer much potential, and it doesn't grant access to very important areas. This is logical; we can't allow just anyone to hold very important roles unless they prove they deserve it.

You always talk about merit. If I have little potential as a free user, how can I prove my worth? With the points I earn, everyone who joins us demonstrates their worth from the very first moment.

Why don't you clearly state how much each point is worth? Each point has a value in our system, which varies based on many specific rules. You can't buy points to gain access to secret areas or to obtain higher user levels. Points can't be used to pay annual fees. Points cannot be sold, transferred, or inherited. Each person accumulates their own points based on their activities and behavior, both individually and within various groups.

So if points have no cash value, how do you reward your top users? I read that 33% of all money coming in goes to rewarding your top users.

The answer is very simple: the top user management and review group, through the user rewards group, awards money, goods, services, and even jobs (project, fixed-term, or permanent) to the best users, based on very detailed, specific rules. Thirty-three percent of all money received is used to reward the best users. To determine how much money, rewards, goods, services, and jobs each of our users is entitled to, we take into account several criteria: 1. the time spent with us (those who have been with us longer are entitled to more rewards), 2. the number of points accumulated (those with more points are entitled to more rewards), 3. the specific activities performed (some activities are much more important than others), 4. the user's behavior (those who have received sanctions, been suspended, or been blocked will receive fewer rewards), 5. the user type (certain rewards, perks, and benefits are reserved for certain types of users, to create healthy, fair, useful, honest, orderly, organized, and safe competition).

The social space offers a wealth of potential and makes DirectDemocracyS the leading social network for politics, but also for countless other projects in various categories: economic, financial, multimedia, information, sports, social, and many others, and even our own charitable foundation. It's an ever-expanding universe made up of countless "galaxies" of projects , many of which have their own space on our platforms and, with our micro-groups, potentially physically anywhere.

At DirectDemocracyS, we invest approximately 33% of our total funds in security measures and technology. We invest 33% to reward our best users, based on accumulated points, who demonstrate concrete activities and impeccable behavior. We invest 33% in continental, national, and local phases, and to develop our ideas and projects, always collectively. We give 1% to those who conceived and created all of this from the beginning, and to our groups of guaranteed members, who deserve our recognition in both a tangible and symbolic way.

These fundamental rules concern the use of the money that enters our system through annual dues, private donations, advertising contracts, and all other income, with the exception of electoral reimbursements or state contributions to political organizations and political parties in countries where public funding is provided for political forces.

Everything goes in at the international level, and is managed by our special administration groups, financial income control management subgroups, our specialist groups, and many other involved groups, and is verified by all the special groups.

All our official members can join all groups, all categories, all subgroups, all special groups, and, based on their expertise, all specialist groups. What does this mean in concrete terms? That anyone who is an official member can collectively manage, review, and decide how our funds will be spent, taking into account the initial fundamental rules.

First, we want to explain why we use 1% of all our revenue to reward, reward, and thank the first five people who had the idea to create DirectDemocracyS, and the subsequent 277 official members, representing many populations, from virtually every country in the world, who wrote much of our fundamental rules, and all subsequent official members who have been welcomed and integrated into our guarantor groups. The reason, decided and unanimously voted on, based on a proposal from a new member, is based on logic, common sense, truth, research, reality, and mutual respect. It's simple: we know how to reward merit, and gratitude is a fundamental value for anyone who joins us. It's a bit like building statues for important people, or celebrating the founders of anything. In our system, it seemed right to us to continually and concretely thank those who had the crazy idea of creating a system like DirectDemocracyS from scratch, but also to fund our special group of guarantors, which is very important to all of us. We will discuss this group of men and women in dedicated articles, who have worked for many years, in their spare time, hard and complicated, in the early stages of our system. The guarantors are those who keep us from forgetting why we were born, where we want to go, and how we must get there. They are our identity and help us not to lose our bearings. That many human beings don't understand why we give 1% to this special group seems almost normal to us. Just look at how they treat an athlete who, after winning everything, loses a few competitions. They don't continually and concretely thank us for the joys and achievements of the past, but they quickly forget about anyone. But it has happened to us that many Artificial Intelligences not only didn't understand the feeling of gratitude, but that while appreciating our publicity, they advised us not to say it publicly, and not to repeat it often, because not everyone would understand. Dear friends, as you can see, we say it, and if necessary, we will repeat it every time: we know how to say thank you, and we demonstrate it. If with a few users it means little money, with many users it could be significant sums. If the entire world's population were to unite, these 283 (282 + 1 recently integrated and added) members of our very important special group would share a nice nest egg. Many of them have already said they will divide the funds and concretely help those among them most in need, and if the sums are very substantial, they will help families with people in difficulty, and create jobs and scholarships. So you can criticize, but you have no right to judge us. We take full responsibility for everything we decide, unlike many others.

We use 33% for all our security measures and technology investments, ensuring our system is always technically and physically protected. This is always based on projects managed by various groups, with the assistance of specialist groups, and with the oversight and authorization of all special groups.

We use the 33% to reward our best users and internal groups, based on points accumulated individually and across groups, with very detailed implementation rules. The same rules apply, along with the hard work of user evaluation groups, point attribution and verification groups, and groups to assign value to accumulated points, both individually and as a group.

33% for the development of our projects, internationally, continentally, and locally, and for our micro-groups. Please note: while we are talking about our system in general, these funds will be used for the activities of the entire system, at the geographical, territorial, administrative, and electoral levels, according to the same rules as before. They will not be used for economic, financial, social, informational, multimedia, or sports activities, nor for our foundation, which have their own funds. Like all our funds, everything will be based on projects, submitted, evaluated, verified, and approved, all proportional to revenue and the number of users for each type, as well as the total number of points in each urban and rural area, and at all other levels.

You will have understood that nothing is left to chance, and we will not waste even a cent.

The same rules apply to all goods and services, received and shared equally, across various activities, throughout our system.

We hope it's clear to everyone that each of our official members, based on collective ownership, can potentially participate in all the various groups. There's complete management and control over everything, dividing the various activities into different groups, as it would be impossible for a single person to manage and verify everything. We also use all our technologies and our proprietary Artificial Intelligence model, ddsAI, to perform better, faster, more carefully, and comprehensively.

Use of electoral reimbursements and various funds by the state in countries where politics is publicly funded.

While all other revenues are managed by our central system (which includes all our official members from every continent, every people on earth, and every country), the public funds received by our organizations at the continental, national, and local levels will be managed directly by our organization, which receives these funds and public financing, always with complete control of our entire system. We'll give you an example, hoping the laws don't change, but the method is the same everywhere in the world. For example, if in France, where the state funds the various parties based on the number of votes received, our national organization (DirectDemocracyS France) receives public money, all our French official members will create management groups to monitor the use of the public funds received, with the obligation to allow the French state and all its authorities to fully and continuously monitor how all the money received has been spent. If it involves public money or electoral reimbursements, they will remain with our French national and local organizations. For each country and even at the local level, in federal states, and in all the others, there are already very detailed implementing rules.

DirectDemocracyS is a system, a political organization, and a charitable foundation, primarily non-profit, which means that every penny earned is fully spent annually, with the creation of reserve funds, according to our implementing rules and various laws.

DirectDemocracyS, with its financial, economic, information, multimedia, sports, and social activities, when not considered non-profit, and in the parts that generate profits, are entirely separate from our political organizations and charitable foundation. While we enjoy the extraterritoriality of the Internet everywhere, and can choose our various tax locations according to very detailed implementing rules, our policy is to pay all taxes, just like everyone else, precisely in the countries and territories where we generate our various profits. Obviously, we will pursue our own interests, negotiate with the various countries, and make decisions based on how the various authorities treat us and all our members. For example, there are countries that do not recognize or respect our system, or do not recognize our digital signatures, our personalized emails (certified mail), or our digital identities; others have engaged in reprehensible behavior toward one or more of our members. We will avoid investing in these countries, and if we do, we will use, like many internet giants, every legal trick available to avoid paying a single cent of taxes to those countries. We know that one cannot respond with malice to malice, but we cannot tolerate certain behaviors, and our reasons are always valid, and we do not retaliate; rather, if we offer esteem and respect, we demand esteem and respect. Let's clarify this concept with an example: if a country does not respect our system, we will not invest a single cent in that country, but we will invest in neighboring countries and states, just to avoid having to deal with those authorities. Be careful. We are talking about investments, about business, and not about our presence as a political organization, or with our charitable foundation, which represents our system, anywhere in the world.

Let it be clear to all of us as a whole system that we will respect every rule and law, everywhere in the world, and where we find laws and regulations that we and our voters consider wrong and not in the interest of the entire population, internally or externally we will change and improve all respective rules and laws, for the common good, without discrimination.

Our management of money and the funds we raise, combined with the fact that we don't waste money on trivial things, allow us to be and remain forever free, independent, neutral, resilient, secure, and incorruptible, whether with a few users in the initial phases, with many users in later phases, and potentially with the entire world population, because many users mean many volunteer activities, many donations, and many annual dues. What if everyone chose to join us, as a free user, with no obligation to attend or volunteer, to make our enormous mechanism work? We already have a sufficient number of official members (collective ownership) and verified users (shared leadership), representing all the peoples of the world, all the countries of the world, and many urban and rural areas. Therefore, we will create all our micro-groups and official organizations, which, by uniting, will create all our local organizations, from the smallest to the largest, which will integrate at the right time with our national organizations (already existing and active throughout the world), with our continental organizations, and with our international organizations. Therefore, whether few, many, or all, of all types of users, we are and will always be ready to welcome anyone who wishes to join us in the best possible way. For those who don't trust our system, or those who are part of it, the free user type, with no obligation to attend, no invitation, no documents to upload, and no volunteer work, is still a good starting point. Like all other user types, it allows for a wide range of activities, and you receive the initial 25 points, allowing anyone to accumulate more, based on our rules and impeccable behavior.

We have seen in many of our informative articles how democracy throughout the world is never applied authentically, completely, and above all continuously over time.

In all countries of the world, after elections, citizens do not hold all the power, but they give it away with their votes to some political forces and to some political representatives.

This method has a name: oligarchic partycracy, one of the diseases of representative "democracy." The solution to changing and improving the situation has always been found by DirectDemocracyS, which allows its identified users/voters, on its platforms, complete management and control over their political representatives, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections. We transform representative "democracy" into authentic democracy, direct democracy.

So why not allow all citizens complete control over their political representatives? Why can only DirectDemocracyS do this, and not all other political forces? Why can't everyone use this system? Why can this system only be applied virtually on platforms and physically in micro-groups?

The reasons have been explained in many of our very detailed informative articles, which we will provide you with links to read at the end of this informative article. But let's briefly answer the questions. Because the issue is not very simple, but presents many potential problems if implemented across all political forces. First, a system like DirectDemocracyS is not convenient for various lobbies, for very powerful, rich, and famous individuals and commercial companies, because it would create a different and better world, with equality always combined with meritocracy, and many benefits for the common good. By taking all power away from political forces and giving it to the people to possess and maintain, many lobbies, which control almost all other political forces, depending on who wins the elections, would have a harder time being decisive and continuing to pursue their own interests, those of a few, to the detriment of all. Second, it is not convenient for political forces to be controlled by their voters, because almost all of them would lose the ability to serve the various lobbies, which have practically always been the ones making decisions. We're not the ones preventing others from giving all power to citizens, as the very word democracy implies. Democracy, as everyone knows, means power to the people, and certainly not power after elections to the lobbies that control political forces and political representatives. The DirectDemocracyS system can only be applied on our platforms, for many reasons, clearly explained in this informative article at this link:

https:// www .directdemocracys.org/law/info/our-philosophies/why-should-you-join-us

Democracy, even direct democracy, is not the solution to all problems, and by itself it does not change or improve the world, for various reasons, which we explain at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/all-news/all-informations/all-international-info/defects-of-direct-democracy

In short, it's the only system that can truly work, because it was designed from the beginning to put the interests of the entire population at the center, and because it is the result of long, complex, and hard collective work by everyone who has joined us. It will continue to improve and evolve, thanks to the help, suggestions, ideas, projects, concrete work, ongoing presence, and annual dues of everyone who joins us, even in the future. Here's an article explaining how we continually evolve and improve:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/system-info/improvement/improvement-and-evolution

In the previous sentence, we mentioned one of the things that makes DirectDemocracyS brilliant and resilient. Our system was designed to function perfectly, with a few or many, even with all citizens of the world. DirectDemocracyS has a solid and secure internal architecture that sustains itself, without the need for external intervention, thanks to the continuous presence of our higher-level users (which are almost all of those who join us). This continuous presence, combined with significant volunteer work, means that we all work together to carry out all the necessary activities to ensure the smooth functioning of our enormous mechanism. Annual dues, donations, advertising contracts, and all other financial, economic, and social activities ensure our self-financing, which means we have no debts to anyone, which means we are free, independent, neutral, and incorruptible. On corruption, as on all other topics, we have presented the world with a wealth of information, such as this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/our-philosophies/philosophy-of-the-system/incorruptible

All this is done by everyone, in a coordinated, shared, collective, orderly, organized, and adequately protected way.

DirectDemocracyS has very simple basic and fundamental rules: truly and completely shared leadership, meaning that all our users/voters on our platforms, whose identities are verified and guaranteed, are a single, immense leader. Collective ownership of all our official members, across all our platforms, all our rules, all our activities, and our entire system, ensures unity in diversity. And as we saw in the opening section of this article, absolute management and complete control of our identified users/voters over our political representatives, even after elections, means authentic, sustained, and competent democracy that implements grassroots democracy and shared power. Please note that the above rule applies throughout our system, at every level, to the management and control of the system by all our identified users. We also discuss it in this article, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/justifications/justifications-of-the-system/trust-justifications/complete-system-verification

In this article, we discuss verifying the identities of those who join us, including the higher-level user types, how we guarantee anonymity for all users, and why it's so important to verify the identities of those in shared leadership.

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/justifications/justifications-of-the-system/trust-justifications/verified-identity-guaranteed-anonymity

But is DirectDemocracyS a safe, reliable, consistent, fair, honest, sincere, real, and above all legal system?

DirectDemocracyS is a system owned by all its official members, who are people who have freely decided to engage in politics and a wide range of activities together, following shared rules, decisions, and democratic voting. Our system is therefore legal, a free association of people, practically anywhere in the world. In certain dictatorial countries, or countries with a single-party system of thought, or in countries without a political system or free elections, they might decide to make our system illegal, but the popular will of anyone who joins us to implement our system will allow us to make it legal, anywhere in the world. Our reliability is guaranteed by the fact that there are no negative reviews, and if there are any in the future, before judging us, ask for our position and explanations, and you will see that they are either false or unfounded. Consistency is beyond discussion; we are the only ones who, from the first word, in the first seconds of the first meeting, have always been consistent in everything we have said or done. We are loyal to everyone and guarantee that we will always protect the interests and well-being of all, whether inside or outside our system. We are honest because we are the first to verify ourselves, and so far there have been no specific cases of our members being dishonest. If we have the votes to govern and make the Laws, we will be able to verify everyone's honesty, not just our own. We have always been honest, answering all the questions we have been asked, even when they were critical, even conjectures, conspiracies, and uncomfortable questions. We are real and have created a system 100% created and managed by humans, and with the integration of our technological innovations, we will never lose our humanity. For some phases, we are virtual and with a lot of important theory, but with micro-groups, we will be physically present, in every urban or rural area, to do the good of all, up close, together with everyone. We are often considered obsessive about security measures, precisely because we invest approximately 33% of our total money in security measures and technology. We invest 33% to reward our best users, based on accumulated points, who demonstrate concrete activities and impeccable behavior. We invest 33% in continental, national, and local phases, and to develop our ideas and projects, always collectively. We give 1% to those who conceived and created all this from the beginning, and to our groups of guaranteed members, who deserve our recognition in both a tangible and symbolic way.

To help you understand that DirectDemocracyS is a safe system, read our article carefully, at this link:

 https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/system-info/system-security/user-number-verification

But there are dozens of very detailed public information articles on our security measures.

Some people may be wondering: what if someone attacked DirectDemocracyS's technology and compromised it? How do we know the algorithms, components, modules, and all the platforms are secure?

Our security measures were designed to work, and to ensure continuity and optimal defenses in the event of any attack. We cannot deny the possibility that someone will try to undermine us, sabotage us, and attack us by any means, but we are ready to respond intelligently and with great determination, and we will turn any type of attack into a boomerang. We have foreseen everything and are ready for anything. We will not list all our security measures, some of which have been explained in other informative articles. We were created from the beginning not to depend on technology, the Internet, or even electricity. Thanks to our micro-groups, with human bridges, we are practically impenetrable and indestructible. Technologically, a system like ours, ethically and morally correct, that truly puts the common good above all else, is unlikely to be attacked by hackers (who usually know how to distinguish good from evil), but we can only be attacked by lobbies, governments, other political forces, and those who fear losing everything in a different and better world. As we said, we are ready and attentive.

Our algorithms and technological systems are so complex, so diverse, and so spread across the globe, that no one can cause us serious problems, and if they do, they can be solved quickly. Because we don't have a central headquarters or a single server farm, but many in many countries, we are very protected.

We've answered countless questions and concerns, several times, some in detail, explaining all our reasons. If we've all agreed on certain rules together, some very detailed ones, it's not to complicate our lives, but because a system like ours can only function this way. It's not out of malice, as we don't compromise with anyone outside of ourselves, but out of pragmatism, and to avoid any potential problems through prevention.

DirectDemocracyS as a system can only work if everyone who joins us permanently respects all our rules, which are so detailed that the portion visible to everyone on our platforms represents less than 0.1% of what is visible, based on implementing rules, user types, and the number of points earned, in our private, restricted, and secret areas. The reason is simple: not everyone is interested in all the details , but know that since we are so many people, we have done a thorough job, analyzing every possible problem and finding solutions that are both preventative and effective.

If you tell us: human beings are unpredictable, we agree with you, but we can assure you that even looking at all the problems of all other systems, of all political forces past and present, and of all people, political representatives, personalities, and ordinary people, we have learned from their mistakes, so nothing can surprise us or find us unprepared.

DirectDemocracyS has a unique feature: it's designed to repair itself, and do you know how? By applying all our rules, and with the help of everyone who has joined us, and all those who will do so in the future. For these reasons, it can function continuously and optimally, regardless of how many people it supports, and regardless of any type of attack. Those who are already part of our immense family know this, and can assure you that this is truly the case. We say it often and repeat it: we don't ask you to trust us, but to join us and verify everything directly.

In conclusion, our true democracy, authentic and complete, requires continuous presence, direct, concrete work, volunteerism, and since everything has a cost, even a few euros a year in dues. However, we can guarantee that what you will receive in return, applying the previous sentence, will be much more than what you give or do; it will be the creation of a new, different, and better world for yourselves, for your relatives, friends, contacts, neighbors, for the entire world population, and for future generations. The human beings of the future will watch us, study us, and judge us. By joining us, we guarantee they will thank us for the excellent work we've all done together.

The number of new user activations has always been managed by the new user activation group, based on very important rules to prevent any potential problems.

A brief introduction to understand some of our security measures and the reasons behind them.

From the moment we first made our system partially public, we realized that at certain times, lobbies, commercial companies, and wealthy, powerful, and famous individuals, as well as unknown individuals, could attempt to seize control and use our system in an unethical and morally incorrect manner. We have always been very careful to anticipate and prevent any attempt to boycott, slow down, or, worse, stop us. Especially in the initial stages, with just a few infiltrated users or fronts, even paying their annual fees, with little money, and many new users, it would have been possible to "democratically" seize control of our system. While we initially blocked new registrations, and we did so several times for over eight consecutive months, today we have changed our methodology.

We also allow registrations for various user types, but we only activate 10% of the total number of users, calculated on the number of users already on our platforms. We do this for each user type, and will continue to do so for as long as necessary.

Let's explain it with some examples.

Based on our fundamental rule of shared leadership, if we had 100 registered users with verified and guaranteed identities, in theory, it would be enough to register 101 new users, with verified and guaranteed identities, to achieve an absolute majority of this type of user, which implements our grassroots democracy and freedom. Obviously, to change certain rules, the required quorum can be 66%, 75%, 80%, or 95%, depending on the importance of the decision to be made. Therefore, by registering a sufficient number of new users, we could even achieve 99.99% of the total votes. This is one of the reasons we decided from the very beginning that changing or adding fundamental rules requires unanimity, both to preserve our identity and to prevent anyone from distorting or modifying our fundamental rules for their own interests.

The same goes for our collective ownership, and therefore for the user types of our official members, and for all higher user types. With a sufficient number of new users, our official members, it would theoretically be possible to take control of our system and exploit it in despicable ways.

If necessary, we may suspend new activations of certain user types, even for extended periods, for example, allowing only free users to register and activate, or lower-level user types (login, partially identified, or registered users). Knowing that only higher-level user types— registered users with verified and guaranteed identities— have the right to vote bindingly for our system, in our shared leadership, and that only official member types, and even higher, have the right to vote in separate groups and electors (based on geography and user types) and collectively own our system, we have implemented some very efficient and intelligent security measures.

1. Very detailed voting regulations are created and implemented immediately and continuously, with open, reasoned votes and the assumption of full responsibility.
2. Electors are created, and votes are cast in groups based on geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral boundaries, making it impossible for certain user groups to expand globally, making it very difficult for anyone from the outside to take control of our system.
3. In all our votes and binding decisions, the votes are calculated separately, for each type of user, and the necessary quorums must be obtained in all types of users, proportionally, in this way any attempt to boycott us, and any incorrect activity, is practically made impossible.
4. Everyone is allowed to register only for the free user level. Only after a certain period of time (a few months or years), having earned a certain number of points based on specific activities and impeccable behavior, and adhering to all our rules, methods, instructions, and motivations, can you request, and if you meet all the requirements, obtain, a higher user level. This rule is already valid and implemented.
5. Higher user levels, which allow binding votes, are only available through official invitations from other higher-level users. The inviting user assumes full responsibility for all activities and the invited user's behavior. This rule is already valid, mandatory, and successfully implemented.
6. In extreme cases, we block all new registrations for certain periods of time, temporarily block new activations, create waiting lists, or require payment of a security deposit, which you may lose if you don't follow all our rules.
7. We create different and separate spaces for activities based on the trustworthiness of our users on our platforms, through various subdomains and websites, all ending with directdemocracys.org. These include: https://free.directdemocracys.org/ , the initial registration website for everyone; https://access.directdemocracys.org/ , the secondary website, called access; https://www.directdemocracys.org/ , the official website; and many others. These subdivisions separate the various stages of assessing the trustworthiness of each user and better integrate them into the system. These subdivisions are very efficient and allow us to prevent numerous problems.
8. Finally, the most effective rule, already implemented and mandatory: only 10% of new users are registered and activated, out of the total number of "old" users, already present and active on the site.

Our security rule number 8, a 10% increase in new users based on the number of existing users, makes our system very secure because it is applied simultaneously with all seven other rules. It allows us to evaluate, with nine people for each new user, the concrete activities and behaviors of each person who joins us. The results are multiple: the first is the correct integration, in ethically and morally correct ways, of all those who join us, thanks to our user evaluation groups, a subgroup of new user evaluations. The second is that nine users who inform, support, concretely help, and monitor each new user, make it very easy for newcomers to integrate quickly, simply, completely, and securely, and work with us, with excellent results.

But is it right to treat new users this way? Yes, it is right, because those who come with good intentions suffer no harm; on the contrary, they benefit from a safer, more meritocratic environment with less risk of pollution. If someone does nothing wrong and joins us with the best intentions, they will only benefit from all our rules, including all those listed above. We trust everyone, and as long as everyone behaves well, there is no reason to be too demanding or overly intrusive. However, the work we are doing is extremely important; it has enormous potential for the good of all people, and if all goes as planned, we will gain enormous power to share with anyone who joins us; therefore, we must be very careful and responsible to prevent any potential problems.

We know full well that DirectDemocracyS will not be well received by the old systems, the old power lobbies, and even by commercial corporations, the rich, powerful, famous, and even secret societies. Giving all power to anyone who joins us—therefore, theoretically, to many people, even to the entire world population (if they all joined our system, in the time and manner described)—will effectively prevent the world from continuing to be run with the old systems, using ours, which is better, fairer, more equitable, and meritocratic, but above all, more shared and secure. We believe people are perfectly free to remain in the old systems, but those who want to join us must do so with the best intentions, knowing that no one will be able to cause problems.

But by waiting for new users to integrate before welcoming others, will the time needed for a global system be extended, and many might lose patience and never join again? With the implementation of micro-groups and many new features, the time needed won't be excessively long.

This informative article briefly explains the very detailed rules, which are familiar to many of our users, precisely because we conceived, proposed, discussed, selected, tested, decided, and voted on them, all together, with the common good of all in mind, and the optimal functioning of our system.

We know there will be several attempts , but we have many other security measures in place to protect ourselves from those who attempt to misuse DirectDemocracyS, and we are confident that we have already anticipated and resolved any such attempt.

We just hope we won't be judged negatively for our almost obsessive attention to even the smallest detail, so we accept all criticism, even if spurious. But before judging us, always try to understand all our motivations, which are never trivial, nor even useless.

This system of gradual entry doesn't slow down the revolution; it makes it irreversible. Those who enter, enter to stay and build, not to conquer. The result will be a more cohesive, competent, and difficult-to-corrupt community.

DirectDemocracyS doesn't want to grow quickly at any cost. It wants to grow well and forever.

This is why we have chosen not to allow a wave of new arrivals, even in good faith, to accidentally or intentionally overturn the fundamental rules that have made us different.

The 10% rule is not a barrier against honest people: it is a shield against anyone who would transform a shared democracy into a numerical conquest.

To all these security measures are obviously added:

Regular and transparent audits of activations/invitations (with the possibility of collective revocation if suspicious patterns emerge).

Time or volume limits on invitations per sponsor user (to avoid uncontrolled invitation chains).

Monitoring clusters of behaviors (e.g., if many new users invited by the same sponsor vote en masse in an anomalous way).

Longer “probation” mechanisms for users who access high levels.

Backup of fundamental rules on immutable or multi-signature mechanisms (although not pure blockchain).

Possibility of “emergency fork” or temporary suspension of powers in case of detected attack.

And finally, to complete these security measures, we use all the best and most modern technologies, always updated, renewed, and constantly evolving, to make us faster, more precise, powerful, and complete.