Security

Introduction: Why our language is direct

Before delving into the analysis, we believe it's important to clarify the tone of this document. You will find direct, sometimes harsh, expressions that may appear harsh at first reading. We want to make it clear that our goal is never to offend or judge individuals in their human dignity.

Our approach is driven by a desire for constructive and radical criticism : we point the finger at traditional systems that we believe to be failing and at those who, taking advantage of these structures, act in despicable ways, pursuing personal interests or power to the detriment of the community.

We're not generalizing: we recognize the value of every individual. However, we're equally clear in denouncing an undeniable reality: too many people today are subjected to constant negative influences, crushed by manipulative mechanisms from which, unfortunately, they rarely have the tools to defend themselves. Telling things as they are, with this frankness, is, for us, the only way to begin to dismantle such manipulations and restore to citizens the awareness needed to take control of their future.

By reading our informative articles and our public posts visible to everyone, on the websites of our platforms, anyone realizes that DirectDemocracyS and all those who are part of it, give you a lot, without asking practically anything in return.

We don't want to reiterate all the enormous benefits that come from implementing our system anywhere in the world. Simply educate yourself thoroughly, with the right mindset, and you'll understand it for yourself.

Today we'll talk to you about what we're taking away from you, something that many might not like. We'll be direct, as always, and we'll base what we say, as we always have, on undeniable truth and verifiable reality.

First, a second but important premise.

We have never engaged in propaganda, and we will never engage in it. We don't tell you things to convince you to join us, and we frankly don't judge those who, for the sake of gaining power, money, fame, and approval, tell you whatever you want to hear. We won't make unrealistic promises, nor will we give you gifts, bonuses, or incomes you don't fully deserve, just to gain a few more votes from those who don't consider the consequences of irresponsible behavior and decisions. We don't do this out of self-harm; we know full well that many people are truly addicted to old, failed, insecure, and often corrupt, lying, and unreliable traditional systems, and to political forces, which, with their respective political representatives, often serve the interests of a few, and certainly not the interests of the entire population.

DirectDemocracyS as a system takes something away from you, while giving you a lot.

We take away your right to blame others for your failures, and for your life, which is certainly not how you dreamed it. Let's be clear: we don't take away your right to complain, and we will always guarantee you every freedom. But by joining DirectDemocracyS, you will never again be able to say: politics sucks, all political forces are servants of lobbies, all politicians are the same, and above all, we will take away envy, which breeds divisions that often turn into social hatred. The old systems have accustomed you to finding "enemies," and have "gifted" you social networks where you can vent your resentment and frustrations.

Of course, not everyone is so stupid as to not realize that talking, often shouting, and complaining incessantly makes you feel good momentarily, because many others often join you in this enormous and foolish waste of time. But that certainly doesn't solve your problems. Surely, anyone who believes in social media revolutions, or who believes it's possible to fight against various systems from the comfort of their couch, or in useless, and often dangerous, street demonstrations, is simply deluded, brainwashed by those who, posing as your "friend," exploit you for their own purposes.

DirectDemocracyS and its members must continually struggle to "purify" brains lobotomized by many years of manipulation by the media, political forces controlled by lobbies, and many individuals, who certainly do not do it for your good, but only to try to exploit various situations to their advantage, obtaining fame, consensus, power, and riches, almost always undeserved.

Who hasn't wondered: "How did that person get power, or wealth, or fame?" In some cases, rightly considering they didn't deserve it? At DirectDemocracyS, every person who joins us immediately begins accumulating valuable points, which aren't handed out but are earned through concrete actions and impeccable behavior. These points are earned by everyone, automatically but in a documented manner, according to the same rules, and therefore on an equal basis, truly and concretely rewarding the most deserving. Our rankings allow anyone to assess the value of individuals, as well as of various groups, making choices based on real data. Very often, in elections, people vote for unknown people, without having the expertise and information necessary to make an informed choice, able to predict the consequences of their vote? Almost always in the old systems. At DirectDemocracyS, every one of our political representatives, as well as every person who manages our political organization or carries out activities within our system, dedicates a significant portion of their time to engaging with those involved or those who voted for them, listening, learning, explaining their reasons, and engaging various groups in the various discussions, empowering everyone to participate. It is essential for us that every representative respects every decision, implementing it immediately, as decided by those who, with their vote, chose to be represented by our representatives. To those who ask us: why is it that only those who join you have the power to control your political representatives, and why only your platforms? The answer is simple and obvious: those who join us and those who work on our platforms are informed freely, independently , neutrally, comprehensively, and professionally by our groups of human specialists, all of whom are our official members. Their individual expertise is declared, documented, verified, and continuously tested and updated. They are supported and verified to prevent errors by our best technologies, and by our Artificial Intelligence model called ddsAI. This model is private and therefore immune to negative influence, as it is collectively owned by all our official members. As human bridges, and with ddsAI, they integrate all existing Artificial Intelligences into our system, proactively and decisively creating the first and only democracy of Artificial Intelligences, called allddsAI. That previous sentence is very long, explaining many things that those unfamiliar with our system might not understand, so, as we always do, we will offer a detailed explanation. We do so with some clear examples. A person who doesn't join us can easily be manipulated, even by those who make them believe they're in control and thinking for themselves, while you're actually thinking for yourself. They say this while manipulating you and exploiting your inability to defend yourself, and they do it for their own purposes. In all other systems, and on all other platforms, under the guise of freedom of thought and expression, anyone can speak about anything, even without having any expertise on the various topics. Therefore, an expert who tries to provide accurate information will have the same visibility, or rather invisibility, as hundreds, or thousands, who, despite understanding nothing about certain topics, claim to be teaching things they themselves don't know. In DirectDemocracyS, in public spaces, only those who demonstrate, to groups of experts, professional knowledge of the various topics speak and explain on certain topics. This method of ours allows us to make the right choices, the best ones for the common good, because—we repeat—experts speak and inform in public spaces. As our official members, they have a vested interest in ensuring our system functions optimally. No one is stopping those who, despite being our official members, understand nothing about certain topics from joining as many groups as they want, including reserved freethinkers, accessible by invitation, but in an area invisible to non-members, to prevent misinformation, fake news, and therefore collective manipulation. In practice, non-experts belong to non-expert groups; specialists belong to expert groups, who can inform our entire system, individually and even collectively if necessary. This method prevents bad choices, while not preventing anyone from speaking and saying what they believe in the free, "amateur" zones. Who will tell us: this way the experts will have enormous power? You are a technocracy, don't allow complete freedom of expression! We answer with a simple question: if your tooth hurts, why don't you have it fixed by a mechanic? If your car breaks down, why don't you take it to a dentist? A system like ours, without being professional, would be a failure like all the others, even before it even begins. No one is stopping those who would love to discuss certain topics from studying them privately, or through our online courses, some of which are free. After studying, like all our experts, they can take an exam demonstrating their knowledge of the topic in question and apply to join our specialist groups. Unlike other systems, we don't exclude people, as long as they demonstrate they know what they're talking about. The supposed power of specialist groups is merely informative, to ensure that users and entire groups choose the best solution, knowing the various topics, the various options, and the expected consequences of each. We repeat, decisions are always made in a fully informed manner by all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities. To be able to vote in a binding and decisive manner within our system, as part of our shared leadership, you must have the blue check mark next to your username in our social media area, on our websites, and only on our platforms. Regarding our platforms and our technological programs, our Artificial Intelligences: our official members collectively own, manage, and control our entire system, our platforms, and, through human bridges of technological groups, they can carry out infinite activities to ensure everyone that everything runs smoothly, orderly, organized, secure, and professionally. This collective ownership makes it impossible for anyone to seize control of our system, to corrupt us once they have gained power, or to transform it into a dictatorship. Since there is collective management, collective control, literally by all our official members, over our entire system, there can be no algorithms that manipulate, or individuals or groups that wield excessive power. You can't imagine how many problems are avoided with our method, based on highly detailed implementation rules, respected forever by everyone. Those who join us and collaborate with our groups on our platforms are protected from brainwashing, because each person is truly a protagonist, thanks to our system architecture, designed to self-heal in the presence of individuals or groups who do not respect the rules we have jointly established. Those who don't join us, lacking these defenses, which we guarantee to all who join us, will never be able to decide anything within us, nor even directly manage and control our representatives. Nothing prevents anyone from joining us, and if they meet all the requirements, they can become part of our shared leadership, but also, if they meet all the requirements, become collective owners of our entire system, which belongs to all our members.

How many times have the wrong decisions of individuals or political forces had tragic consequences? Very often. And how many times, in the old systems, would you have wanted to intervene directly, only to feel powerless and unheard? Almost always.

DirectDemocracyS, as you may have realized, is innovative and an alternative to all other systems. It's a different and certainly better political organization, precisely because it relies on people who know how to make the right choices and are protected from any manipulation.

We give you much, we demand little, but we take something away from you: we have some fundamental rules that prevent you from complaining about politics, not to limit your freedoms, but because doing so would make you look bad. Let us explain: if those who vote for a political force, in the rare elections, forgo decisive roles, preferring to hand over all power for many years to the old political forces and their respective political representatives, transforming partial democracy into an oligarchic partycracy, into DirectDemocracyS, democracy is authentic, real, concrete, direct, and above all, continuous over time. So complaining about your own choices would be stupid, and even ridiculous. At this point you will tell us : if the majority of DirectDemocracyS were to make bad choices, someone from the internal minority could rightfully have the right to complain. We do not take away anyone's right to complain; on the contrary, we preserve and respect everyone's opinions. But we ask ourselves: if, after reading this entire article about our specialists, you truly believe we might make bad choices, you haven't understood our system at all, and we recommend rereading everything from the beginning. Furthermore, for certain decisions, our internal voting procedures have very detailed rules, with quorums based on the importance of the issues (not just 50% + 1 vote, but often 66%, 75%, 85%, 95%, and even unanimity for the fundamental rules), with voting by user type, with electors, with micro-groups, all clearly and verifiably cast by each member of the various voting groups, with reasoning (they must explain their motivation and reasoning), and with full responsibility for the consequences of their vote. In this way, we directly prevent unnecessary, but always possible, checks on the regularity of the voting, because each person sees in real time that their vote is always counted exactly as it was cast. Furthermore, during the vote, those who are undecided have the help and information of our human and technological specialists (ddsAI is our Artificial Intelligence, and therefore is always reliable and unmanipulated, because we all verify it). The motivated vote of each of our users also helps others understand how each of us thinks, and we often reason collectively (without being forced to choose like everyone else, but rather, collective reasoning is always better than individual reasoning, as demonstrated by our system, which is always the result of collective work). Taking responsibility is a guarantee for those inside us, because we know who to blame if something doesn't work well, and also for those outside, because they will know that we assume full responsibility for all the consequences of our decisions and our actions. Not everyone guarantees you so much, asking for so little. We ask practically nothing of our few but important free users: no annual fee (everything is and will always be truly free), no mandatory attendance, and no volunteer work, which, with the higher-level users, allows us to be self-financing (to remain always free, independent, neutral, and incorruptible), and allows us to run our enormous system perfectly.

We ask those who want to expand our system's user base, and thus increase its potential, to pay a small but significant annual fee, spend at least 20 minutes a day on our platforms, and volunteer in a variety of important ways.

Joining us is the first step, but only after you've been informed, and this article will certainly help you understand a little more, because the choice to register and collaborate with us must be, like all our decisions: informed and conscious.

Explanation of this document.

The Freedom to Choose, the Responsibility to Decide: Beyond Opinion Democracy

Many, observing our system, ask us a crucial question: “If you delegate information to experts, aren’t you creating a technocracy that limits my freedom of thought? ”

It's a legitimate question, born from a habit of systems where "freedom" is often synonymous with "the right to an opinion unsupported by facts." At DirectDemocracyS, we redefine the concept of freedom: true freedom isn't being able to say anything, but having the tools to make informed decisions, taking responsibility for the consequences.

The citizen at the center: the freedom to choose

At DirectDemocracyS, no one is forced to follow the advice of specialists. Our system is not dogma, but a decision-support infrastructure.

Each user, with their verified identity (our "blue tick"), is free to analyze the information, compare the opinions of experts, and then vote according to their own convictions. The fundamental difference between us and the old systems is that your vote is not an abstract gesture, but a documented and motivated act.

If a citizen decides not to follow the advice of experts, they have the full right to do so. However, since our system requires an open and reasoned vote, they must explain their reasons for disagreeing. This obligation is not a limitation, but a form of respect for the community: in a system based on truth, every choice must be visible and justifiable. If your choice proves to be the best, it will become common knowledge; if it fails, responsibility will be clearly assumed, ensuring that errors can be isolated and quickly corrected.

Who are our specialists?

We are often asked: “Who certifies that experts are truly experts?” The answer is: the community itself.

Our specialists are not a self-proclaimed elite, nor a group appointed from above. They are members of our organization who have undertaken a path of internal growth. Their expertise is not based on presumed academic qualifications, but on:

1. Statement: Each user defines their own areas of expertise.
2. Documentation: Qualifications and experience are uploaded and verified by the system.
3. Demonstration: Competence is continuously tested through exams and concrete activities within our micro-groups.
4. Collective verification: Other members, both specialists and non-specialists, can monitor the expert's work. If the information provided is inaccurate, the system (via ddsAI and human bridge supervision) intervenes to correct or remove the authorization.

Managing dissent: there is no conflict, only synthesis

One of the critical issues raised is the management of conflict between differing visions. What happens when two experts, or an expert and a citizen, have opposing views but both are supported by facts?

We don't fear dissent; we integrate it. In DirectDemocracyS, conflict is resolved not through confrontation, but through procedural synthesis . When a disagreement arises, the system activates mechanisms for further investigation:

• High quorum voting: For fundamental decisions, a simple majority is not enough; consensus thresholds are required that force a broad consensus (66%, 75%, or even unanimity for basic rules).
• Reasoned debate: Each vote is preceded by a phase in which the various positions are publicly presented. Citizens don't vote "on instinct," but after seeing how the various experts argue their respective positions.

Our system is not a "dictatorship of experts," but a democracy of information . Decision-making power remains firmly in the hands of all members, but it is a power exercised after understanding the variables at play.

The "I" and the "We": United in Diversity

At DirectDemocracyS, the " I" is never sacrificed on the altar of the "we ." We believe that the strength of a community lies precisely in its ability to integrate different visions. No one within our system is ever blocked, sanctioned, or expelled for what they think, say, write, or show.

We are united in diversity: dissent is the engine that allows our model to evolve, provided it is exercised with awareness. Our system does not require you to think uniformly, but rather to contribute to the common good through a method. Freedom of expression is absolute, but it is regulated to ensure that the quality of debate remains high: if you express your opinion in the right way , at the right time , and in the right place , your voice is not only admitted, but encouraged.

Preserving quality: why not everything is everywhere

You might ask, “Why don’t some of my comments appear in public spaces?” The answer is simple: to protect public spaces from incomplete, superficial, or potentially manipulative content.

We have created differentiated environments:

• Public Areas: They are the stage for expertise. Here, those providing information must demonstrate in-depth knowledge of the issues, to ensure that every citizen has access to real, verified, and professional data.
• Areas of Discussion and Free Expression: Here, the self expresses itself freely. Anyone, even non-specialists, can create or participate in discussion groups to exchange ideas, dreams, doubts, or alternative visions. This is where our diversity flourishes, far removed from the need to "inform" the general public with notions that require specific training.

The citizen at the center: the freedom to choose

At DirectDemocracyS, no one is forced to follow the opinions of experts. Our system is not dogma. Each user, with their verified identity, is free to analyze the information, compare the opinions of experts, and then vote according to their own convictions.

If, after consulting with experts, a citizen decides to vote differently, they have the full right to do so. The only requirement is transparency : since voting in our system is an open and reasoned act, those who disagree with the majority are invited to explain their reasoning. This is not a punitive control, but an exercise in accountability: those who question the prevailing line offer the community a new perspective, which can be evaluated, discussed, and, if valid, integrated.

Conclusion: a self-healing system

If our system works, it is because it is not based on blind trust in a leader or a caste, but on trust in shared rules .

If properly informed citizens choose a path that turns out to be wrong, the system detects it in real time, since every decision is tracked. Responsibility cannot be shifted to "lobbies" or "corrupt politicians," but is assumed collectively.

DirectDemocracyS takes away the "convenient" excuse of saying politics doesn't concern you. Instead, it offers you the real power to govern your life and your community, finally empowering you to be a leader, aware, and free from external manipulation.

A system that evolves with you

In DirectDemocracyS, the conflict between majority and minority is resolved not by exclusion, but by procedural synthesis.

We don't ask you to give up who you are, but to put your true self at the service of a greater us , where every opinion has its place and every skill its weight. We take away your excuse for complaining about the system, offering you, in exchange, the real power to govern it, directly and continuously, to improve it and make it yours, every single day.

Our programs and activities must be carefully studied, and with the right mindset, to be understood and to evaluate their potential. First, we divide the activities of our system into various programs, even though, according to our rules, they all have different phases, which are based on their types, the times in which they are implemented, the ways in which they are implemented, and the places where they are implemented.

The typologies are numerous and well documented in our informational articles, while the timing varies based on the various priorities. The ways in which they are implemented are explained in our rules, while the locations have different importance. The exact order of locations is: international, continental, national, and local, from largest to smallest, and as we will see with our micro-groups, also vice versa, that is, from the smallest territory to the largest. The reason is very simple: while there are traditional, vertical hierarchies, even based on the larger size, there is a perfect balance, with bottom-up, horizontal hierarchies, which allows us to have shared rules that are enforced by everyone, at all times.

The above sentences will frighten those who don't know us, who won't understand their meaning, but we can assure you that everything has impeccable motivations.

Since mid-May 2026, we have started publishing some of our national programmes, based on the decisions of our organisations in the various countries.

We need to explain to you how these programs were created, so you can better understand our system and the enormous collective work we do.

Our international teams of human specialists, using the latest technology, have created a comprehensive international program, which is used at every international stage, and at every continental stage, adapting it to the specificities of each continent.

Ours is an authentic democracy: competence as a collective duty

It's important to clarify a common misunderstanding: at DirectDemocracyS, the "specialist filter" is not a separate or external entity, but rather all of our official members. Each of our members, based on their declared, documented, verified, and constantly tested and updated expertise, is an integral part of our specialist groups.

Our system isn't a political program written on paper and forgotten. It's living organizational software. Because our technologies, starting with allddsAI, constantly learn from new data and new challenges, our programs are also updated, adapted, and refined daily. What you read today is the result of this constant evolution: a system that, thanks to your participation, becomes more efficient, more equitable, and better able to respond to the world's real needs every day.

There is no distinction between "leaders" and "rank-and-file": a widespread network of knowledge is activated based on the sector of intervention. If one of our official members possesses expertise in a specific field, that knowledge is systematized and validated. This means that every choice, every program, and every activity of DirectDemocracyS is not the result of subjective opinion or political expediency, but is based exclusively on true, accurate, factual information documented by reliable sources, analyzed by those trained to understand and apply it.

Ours is, therefore, an authentic and comprehensive democracy of knowledge: because each member contributes their verified expertise, the decision-making process enjoys a technical depth inaccessible to traditional representative models. We do not rely on electoral promises, but on the power of verified data. In DirectDemocracyS, citizens are not simply passive voters called upon to choose from options predefined by others, but active participants who, with their professionalism, contribute to building, verifying, and validating the collective program. It is this combination of democratic participation and technical rigor that makes our system the only tool truly capable of governing the complexity of the contemporary world without errors, corruption, or propaganda.

In DirectDemocracyS, the filter of specialists isn't a limit to democracy, but rather its guarantee of authenticity. To understand this balance, we must stop seeing democracy as a mere numerical count (the "gut vote") and begin to see it as a system for managing reality.

This is how the filter of specialists enables, rather than hinders, democracy.

1. The Paradox of Competence and Authentic Democracy

"Traditional" democracy often fails because it confuses popular legitimacy with operational capacity. A people can vote for a direction (for example, "we want clean energy"), but if the technical choice to achieve it is flawed, the result will be economic or social disaster.

At DirectDemocracyS, we operate on a clear distinction:

Sovereignty belongs to the Community: Direction, ethics, desire for change, and final approval remain in the hands of the official members. Shared leadership decides where to go.

Technology is for the Specialists: Getting there efficiently, sustainably, and free of corruption is a task that requires professional analysis.

The filter of specialists doesn't "vote for the people," but selects viable options for the people to vote on. This transforms democracy from a blind choice between slogans to an informed choice between validated projects.

2. Why the expert vote is the heart of stability

The vote or approval of specialists is essential for three critical reasons:

Anti-Corruption Filter: Corruption in external systems often arises from the confusion between private interests and public management. DirectDemocracyS specialists operate in a system where their decisions are tracked, tested by our AI (ddsAI), and based on defined collective well-being parameters. They cannot "sell" a project because it must be vetted by other specialists, working groups, and algorithmic analyses.

Macroeconomic Parameter Protection: Many popular proposals, though well-intentioned, would be harmful if implemented incompetently (for example, printing money or creating unsustainable bonuses). Specialists ensure that each initiative is compatible with economic reality, protecting the most vulnerable groups who are often the first victims of incompetent policies.

Reducing Uncertainty: In a complex system, "truth" is not an opinion. If a water or urban planning project has structural flaws, it's not a matter of "democratic preference," but of physics and engineering. The expert doesn't have an opinion, but a technical responsibility to certify that the project works.

3. Balance: Experts are not a "Caste"

This is the crucial part for our authentic democracy: specialists are not an external elite, but members of the system.

They are not chosen by political appointment, but by demonstrated competence in the areas of work.

Their work is transparent and validated. If a group of specialists proposes something that doesn't meet the system's criteria or ignores the needs of the population, that work is corrected or rejected by other working groups and cross-checked by other organizations (national or continental).

Every official member, if he acquires the necessary skills, can become a specialist. The system is not closed: it is a social elevator based on preparation.

4. The Function of Technologies (ddsAI)

The filter isn't just human. When a specialist analyzes a program, it's immediately compared with allddsAI simulations. The human expert adds ethical sensitivity and understanding of the social context; technology provides risk calculations and projections.

The perfect balance is here: the human provides the intention, the technology provides the reality check.

In summary

The expert vote is important because, in DirectDemocracyS, the power to decide without expertise is the first step towards irresponsibility.

Ours is a "Democracy of Reality": we don't want to win elections with empty promises; we want to transform society by solving real problems. To do this, democracy must be equipped. The filter of specialists is our "equipment": it ensures that, when our community votes, the program it approves is solid, achievable, and beneficial to all, without discrimination.

In this way, democracy ceases to be a stage for propaganda and finally returns to being a tool for collective construction.

Based on the international program, our continental groups of human specialists, with the help of the best technologies, on each continent, have created a general continental program, which is used in each of our continental phases, and each national phase, adapting it to the specificities of each country, each continent.

Based on the international program, the continental program, our national groups of human specialists, with the help of the best technologies, in each country, on each continent, have created a general national program, which is used in each of our national phases, adapting it to the specificities of each country, on each continent.

Based on the international program, the continental program, and the various national programs, our local groups of human specialists, with the help of the best technologies, in every geographical, territorial, administrative, and electoral subdivision, from the largest to the smallest, of each country, on each continent, have created a general local program, which is used in each of our local phases, adapting it to the specificities of each urban or rural area.

In addition to the great work of our experts at a general level, for each specific topic and sector, our specialists have created, at every level, in every phase, many working groups, to propose, discuss, decide, choose, test, vote, and make available in the various groups, the various activities and programs.

You may have noticed that we talk about human and technological specialists, because our human work must always be analyzed and evaluated by all our technologies, which are primarily: ddsAI, our official Artificial Intelligence, collectively owned by our system and all our official members. Thanks to our democracy project, all existing Artificial Intelligences, integrated into allddsAI, both directly and through human bridges, also perform proactive activities to efficiently and intelligently solve any possible problem, professionally. Our groups of human specialists, in turn, analyze, evaluate, and APPROVE the work of our technologies.

But obviously, not only our human specialists and our technologies are involved in these important activities, but all our official members, based on their respective expertise, and based on their respective residences and citizenships, can propose activities, ideas, projects, and programs to integrate, and if possible improve, previous work.

We're often asked why we don't entrust everything to AI or limit ourselves to human management alone. Our answer lies in the method: humans bring the ethical vision, cultural context, and moral responsibility; our AIs (ddsAI and allddsAI) bring the data processing capabilities, macroeconomic model analysis, and long-term impact projections. Our system is not an alternative to human intelligence, but rather its enhancement. The final approval, which remains human, guarantees that no algorithm can ever replace the collective will of our official members.

But what happens if one of our official members isn't an expert on a topic, but has a brilliant idea, or presents a program in a professional manner? It would be wrong to ignore good ideas, so literally for every idea from every official member, we create a working group with other people who possibly have similar expertise or ideas, and we try to present the idea, project, or program in a detailed and professional manner. This work takes place in our free groups, in reserved areas of our websites, and on our platforms. Our specialists will then analyze, review, and possibly integrate and improve the proposals. Finally, if deemed useful, they will approve them and incorporate them into our programs.

But why is such a procedure necessary? Because every activity in DirectDemocracyS requires expertise, and while each of our official members can pursue ideas, projects, activities, and programs, bringing them to fruition requires the expertise and professionalism of our human and technological experts. Good ideas aren't enough if they don't benefit the public, whether internally or externally, without any form of discrimination. In all other systems, we see the damage, often very serious, caused by a lack of professionalism, or by programs that serve the interests of a few, or by corruption. DirectDemocracyS as a system must empower professionals to analyze, evaluate, and approve. This does not take away the voting power of our shared leadership, nor the power of choice of our collective ownership. Everything, based on its importance, with very detailed voting rules, must be approved by our users with verified and guaranteed identities, based on their residence and citizenship.

Let me explain. For international, and therefore global, decisions, based on the importance of the decision to be made binding on all, all those entitled to vote vote and decide together. Only those with a verified and guaranteed identity can vote, to prevent multiple votes, fake profiles, fronts, and other unfair methods. In all civilized countries, to cast your vote, the first thing you must do is be identified. In DirectDemocracyS, the right to vote is binding on our system and on those who participate in it. This decisive vote is obtained after identification through very detailed implementation rules, which still allow for virtually total anonymity, and even invisibility. To vote, always look for the blue check mark next to your username in our social media area on our websites. The vote of those with the blue check mark next to their username, in our social area, on our websites, on our platforms, is legal, valid, and therefore binding. However, in their respective groups and restricted areas, all our users, of all types, can vote and decide. Their vote, even if expressed in these "reserved areas, and therefore invisible to others," is not binding on our system, nor on those who are part of it. However, it is valid , advisory, and even useful for certain activities, even from a statistical point of view, in certain areas.

Every decision, every vote, and every technical validation step within our system is documented. This means that, at any time, it's possible to reconstruct the progress of a proposal: who submitted it, which specialists evaluated it, which tests it passed with ddsAI, and how our community voted. This radical transparency is our best defense against the opacity and manipulation typical of traditional systems.

For continental decisions, residents, or citizens, of one country on each continent vote. Obviously, if a person has two or more citizenships, from two or more countries, from two or more continents, they will be able to vote in two or more continents, based on their right to vote and run for office in two or more countries.

The same rules apply to national and local decisions, based on citizenship and habitual residence, where one lives at least six months of the year. Let's explain this important concept further. DirectDemocracyS is a unique system, united in diversity, with the right people in the right places, in which each of our official members is the true protagonist and collective owner of the entire system. However, fair and equitable local autonomy exists and is guaranteed, while respecting the rules, methodologies, and instructions of the larger phases. Simply put, every country, and every local area, has enormous potential, because it is right and fair that it should be so.

International programs are voted on by everyone; continental programs are voted on by those who live in or are citizens of a country or countries, or of a continent or continents. At the national level, citizens of each country, residents abroad, and even non-citizens vote according to national rules. In many countries and local subdivisions, there are reserved voting groups for all foreign citizens working legally, in each country and local subdivision, and in some countries, there are voting groups even for those without a residence permit or who are not working. But while we always recommend allowing anyone residing in a given area to participate in many activities and therefore to cast their vote, these are decisions that are made locally, chosen in collaboration with our national organizations.

Our national organizations communicate, coordinate, support, authorize, and monitor all the various local organizations, from the largest to the smallest, which are unique, united, and indivisible. The only ones that can have multiple groups in the same urban or rural area are micro-groups. However, they can then unite, if they wish, if requested by their respective local and national organizations, and if necessary, to create a single local organization within their respective local subdivisions, such as a street block or neighborhood.

Only in cases where a microgroup has neighbors who aren't on good terms, or if there are too many official members (to ensure everyone is involved), can you decide to create separate groups within the same geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area. The various microgroups or official organizations, even if separate, will still be united in the next larger local organization, up to national ones, and depending on the type of user, including continental and international.

Very important explanation.

The international, continental, national, and local phases, along with the various micro-groups, are ongoing and concurrent, but each is moving forward with various activities, based on identical rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations, but with many fair and equitable local autonomies. For example, not all of our national organizations want to have a presence outside of our system; some prefer to conduct all their activities exclusively on our platforms. This is one of the reasons why we don't have presentation pages or groups on various social networks, apps, and external websites. While we could create an external information presence, no one is obligated to do so, and not everyone does so at the same time; others prefer to wait, and others have decided not to have external representation for now. We have made several hundred public pages available, including to our visitors, as well as some groups, even in various languages. We will soon be creating public pages in English for each country, and also for some local subdivisions, in addition to those in their respective languages. This will allow each country and territory to be visible to our visitors, offering them exclusive and exclusive previews of certain news, information, results, and announcements, and even discussions with our visitors, through various technological means.

We proceed similarly with our general, international, continental, national, and local programs. Each of our organizations has begun, at the right time, the creation of general and topic-specific programs, in a very detailed, competent, and professional manner. The publication of the various materials is carried out according to very detailed implementation rules, initially secretly, then confidentially within the various groups, then visible on pages for registered users. Subsequently, if and when each of our organizations wishes, they will make their content public to our visitors, in the manner and at the times agreed upon together.

Only then, if, when, and how they wish, can they, based on authorizations, make certain information public, even outside our platforms.

But how are these programs decided, and by whom? Each of our official members, based on their expertise, is part of specialist groups at various levels: international, continental, national, and local, from the largest to the smallest. Within their respective groups, they propose, discuss, select, test, and vote on various topics, programs, and activities. All this collective work is complemented by various ideas and decisions at various levels. Let's look at some examples. In national organizations, the work of continental and international organizations is taken into account. In local organizations, the activities and decisions of national, continental, and international organizations are taken into account. For example, if a country in DirectDemocracyS has a good idea, it can be integrated, adapted, and improved in its own country. So, in many cases, you will see programs with similar content, similar solutions, and similar rules. This methodology applies to our entire system. In practice, good ideas must be exploited by all those who join us. Some countries have specific rules, solutions suited to their own circumstances. However, there are certain imposed rules that apply to everyone. Everything must be based on truth, on reality, taking into account the interests of the entire global, continental, national, and local population. Situations must change and improve, basing everything on logic, common sense—we repeat, on truth, reality, on study, on expertise—without worsening macroeconomic parameters, without worsening citizens' living conditions, and possibly without increasing the tax burden for middle- and low-income groups. Our programs are not propaganda; they do not give away money, bonuses, and wealth to those unwilling to contribute to the collective well-being. And every idea, project, and new law must be a collective effort, proposed, chosen, tested, voted on, and implemented by everyone, or by as many people as possible, but always on the basis of expertise, with an informed, open, and motivated vote, and with full responsibility for any consequences.

At DirectDemocracyS, power is not an end in itself: it is inextricably linked to responsibility. Each of our official members, by casting their vote, declares that they understand the issue, have consulted the technical analyses, and are ready to assume responsibility for the consequences of their choice. We do not seek easy consensus; we seek informed consensus, based on the truth of the facts and the desire to actively contribute to the collective well-being.

It's crucial to understand that security in DirectDemocracyS isn't just protectionist, it's proactive. Our identity architecture, which guarantees external anonymity, simultaneously ensures the absolute integrity of internal data. Every decision-making transaction, from the proposal stage to the final vote, is protected by validation protocols that exclude any unauthorized external interference. We don't just count votes: we verify the validity of the right to express oneself in real time, making the manipulation that plagues electoral dynamics in the outside world technically impossible.

Finally, a crucial point: DirectDemocracyS doesn't depend on electoral cycles based on political expiration. Our system is permanent. We don't wait for elections to implement change; our activities, programs, and integrations run 365 days a year. Being an official member doesn't mean delegating power for years, but participating in a continuous process of improving the reality we live in. Those seeking a quick fix or an immediate bonus won't find a place here; those seeking the solid, methodical, and shared construction of a more equitable future will find in us the complete infrastructure to make it happen.

If you're curious to learn more about our programs, perhaps offering your own ideas, projects, and constructive suggestions, simply visit our websites and platforms, and use the contact form to let us know what you think. We look forward to hearing from you.

Welcome to DirectDemocracyS: Discover our alternative

Have you been invited to meet us and want to understand who we are? Here are the key points of our project:

• Who we are: We are a network of people working to improve the world through clear rules, transparency, and active participation. We are not a political party, but an organization focused on the common good.
• Our "Home": We operate exclusively on our collectively owned platforms. We choose not to operate on external social networks to remain free, neutral, independent, and secure.
• Micro-Groups: Technology isn't enough. We create physical connections across the community (in groups of up to 1,000-3,000 people) to foster collaboration between neighbors, friends, and acquaintances, breaking down the barriers of shyness and digital distance.
• Three steps to get started:
  1. Study: Read our https://www.directdemocracys.org/ to see if our vision aligns with yours.
  2. Choose: You can join us, take your time studying, or decide we're not for you. We'll always respect your choice.
  3. Get Involved: If you decide to join, use the link or QR code provided by your representative for priority processing and dedicated support.
• No obligation: Creating a personal profile is free and requires no attendance or forced volunteering. It's a way to verify, from the inside, that we are exactly who we describe ourselves to be.
• Constant support: You'll never be left alone. Our system is designed to educate you, assist you with technology, and make every member a protagonist.

Want to learn more? Read the full text below for all the technical details, rules, and underlying rationale behind our system.

Welcome to DirectDemocracyS

Maybe you've received an invitation from one of our official representatives, a flyer, a social media message, or an email, and you want to understand who we really are.

This is the intermediate version of our presentation, a little more detailed than the previous one: comprehensive enough to allow you to understand the basics of our system, but easier and quicker to read than our technical and detailed articles.

If after reading this you want to delve deeper into every rule, methodology, and complete explanation, you'll also find links to our more in-depth content.

Who we are

DirectDemocracyS is an innovative system based on:

• real participation;
• collaboration;
• transparency;
• clear rules;
• mutual respect;
• protection from tampering;
• responsible use of technology.

We are not a traditional political party.

We are an organized network of people who want to improve the world in a concrete, logical, and gradual way, focusing on the common good, collaboration, and individual responsibility.

Our goal is not to promise miracles, but to build a truly functional, stable, and useful system for people.

Because we operate mainly on our own platforms

We have chosen to conduct almost all of our activities on our official platforms.

The motivation is simple:
we want to remain free, independent, neutral, organized, and safe.

Our platforms are built and managed to enable:

• orderly collaboration;
• data protection;
• transparent checks;
• efficient organization;
• direct communication;
• reduction of manipulation and misinformation.

We don't prevent anyone from using other social networks or tools, but we prefer that real work be done in an environment designed specifically for our system.

Official website:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/

An open system to study

One of our fundamental characteristics is this:

We don't ask for blind trust.

Instead, we ask you to:

• study;
• verify;
• observe;
• evaluate personally.

Much of our information content is public and can be accessed without registration.

We have hundreds of articles, explanations, audio and video content available in various languages.

If you don't speak English, you can use the automatic translation system on the site.

If you prefer to start with the videos:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/videos/ 

Your 3 options

Once you have learned about our system you always have three options:

1. Join us

If you share our goals and methodologies, you can start the journey with us.

2. Study again

Many people prefer to take a moment to investigate before making a decision.

It is an absolutely respected choice.

3. Deciding that we are not right for you

Not all people share our vision, our rules, or our method.

This choice will always be respected.

No initial obligation

Creating a free personal profile:

• does not require payments;
• does not require physical presence;
• does not impose forced volunteerism;
• does not require immediate action.

The free profile is mainly used for:

• know the system from the inside;
• participate gradually;
• understand if you can really trust us;
• concretely evaluate the functioning of our activities.

In practice:
you will be able to personally verify whether what we describe publicly is actually applied in reality.

Human support is essential

You will not be left alone.

One of the most important aspects of our system is mutual support.

Our support groups and official representatives help new users:

• to understand how the system works;
• to use the platforms;
• to participate in activities;
• to integrate gradually.

We believe that everyone should be able to participate, even without great initial technological skills.

Micro-groups: our real presence on the territory

DirectDemocracyS doesn't want to exist only online.

For this reason we organize territorial micro-groups:

• in the cities;
• in the neighborhoods;
• in rural areas;
• in local territories.

We generally prefer relatively small groups, consisting of:

• neighbors;
• friends;
• family members;
• acquaintances;
• people who live in the same area.

Why?

Why groups that are too large often:

• they isolate the shyest people;
• make participation difficult;
• they foster chaos;
• they prevent real collaborations.

Micro-groups instead allow:

• direct dialogue;
• concrete collaboration;
• mutual support;
• more efficient organization;
• greater participation by all.

Meetings can take place:

• in person;
• via video conferences;
• or in mixed mode.

The goal is to truly collaborate, not just message online.

Learn more about microgroups (in various categories and articles, by clicking on the titles):

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/micro-groups/

Registration and invitations

In some cases you may receive:

• a personal link;
• a QR code;
• a direct invitation from one of our official representatives.

These systems allow:

• faster procedures;
• direct support;
• priority access;
• better organization.

This is not about discrimination.

It simply serves to:

• avoid organizational chaos;
• manage growth properly;
• welcome each new member.

Do you really want to go deeper?

This is just an introductory and simplified version.

Full explanations of our system include:

• detailed rules;
• operational methodologies;
• security systems;
• internal organization;
• functioning of the groups;
• public activities;
• technical explanations;
• philosophical and practical motivations.

If you want to gain a deeper understanding of DirectDemocracyS, we also recommend reading our more comprehensive and detailed content.

Main introductory article:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/

Videos in various languages:

 https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/videos/

Article on mandatory explanations:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-administration/mandatory-explanations/

Rules and useful links:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/rules-and-useful-links/

Further explanations and reasons:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-equality-and-meritocracy/being-on-the-right-side/

If you decide to study our system with an open mind, patience, and attention, you will gradually understand why many people consider DirectDemocracyS a profoundly innovative project and an alternative to traditional systems.

Have you received a flyer, email, social media, or app from one of our official representatives inviting you to study DirectDemocracyS? Curious to learn more?

Perfect, you're in the right place to get all the information you need and all the direct, hands-on support you'll ever need. Our contact management group, our group for prospective users, and many other groups are at your complete disposal. In short, you'll never be left alone.

To fully study our system, you need desire, and both you and us also need patience, goodwill, and time to spend together. But in the end, you'll surely understand our innovation, which is an alternative to everything you know, and you'll grasp our enormous potential. We have hundreds of informative articles published, visible to everyone, including our visitors. You don't have to join us to study our system; just visit our platforms and websites. This may seem strange to you; you're probably wondering: why do we do almost no activity outside of our platforms? We'll answer you right away. We like to always be free, independent, neutral, orderly, organized, and completely protected. For these reasons, we've invested time, resources, and money into building our "big house," which has all the potential needed to do great work. Our platforms are collectively owned by all our official members, and this alone explains why we do almost no activity outside of someone else's.

To determine if you're interested in, and subsequently if you like, DirectDemocracyS, you need to be open-minded and carefully read our welcome article on our official website at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/

If you don't speak English, simply click "-English-" in our translation module and select your preferred language from the drop-down menu. You'll see all the English content automatically translated. We also have content, informational articles, videos, and audio in all world languages, including many dialects. In those cases, we recommend disabling automatic translation, as it's no longer necessary for content in your language.

If you prefer to watch and listen, you can go to this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/social/videos/

Just choose the videos in your preferred language, and you will be able to listen to some important and interesting information.

You now have three options, and three choices to make, and we guarantee we will respect your decision. The first is to join us, and you will receive all the help you need. The second is to wait and study our system more thoroughly. The third, which we don't hope for, but which is still possible, is that you don't like our goals, our rules, our methodologies, our instructions, and our motivations. These will allow us to achieve all these goals, which are primarily to change and improve the world, for the common good, without discrimination.

If you're unsure, we recommend reading this informative article carefully. It may help you understand some key features so you can make an informed choice between the three options:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-equality-and-meritocracy/being-on-the-right-side/ 

If you choose to join us, we'd be delighted. Simply complete the registration form, which will connect you directly to our official representative who contacted you on our behalf. Do not use the generic registration link if you've already received a unique link to the registration form, or if you've received a QR code. Scanning the QR code will take you to the unique URL for the registration form, which, once completed and submitted, will connect you directly to our official representative.

Very brief explanation.

Anyone can join us at any time using the general registration form, which is almost always available to everyone, except during certain periods when we are forced to completely block new registrations without invitations. Anyone who receives a unique link or QR code from one of our official representatives to use a registration form, which connects them directly to our representative, will enjoy numerous advantages and benefits. They will skip waiting lists and be activated with priority over those without our invitation. This isn't discrimination, but rather protection of our system and its members. The rationale is simple: to prevent the chaos created by too many people joining us at once. This method allows us to optimally accommodate new members, even if it forces us to postpone some new registrations to a later date.

For all the information and explanations, we recommend you carefully study this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/special-groups/special-group-administration/mandatory-explanations/

From the article in the previous link, we take some sentences that answer two fundamental questions.

What do you need to join us?

You'll need to choose a username according to our rules. Your username is the name we'll call you in our system. It can be a nickname, a random code, or even your real first and last name, although we recommend remaining completely anonymous, at least in your personal profile.

You will need to choose a password of at least 12 characters, with letters that do not form words, both lowercase and uppercase, non-consecutive numbers, and special characters.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

What do you need to join us?

A valid, adequately protected personal email address from any email service provider. Any email address will do. It doesn't have to be a temporary email address, because after completing registration and submitting the form, you'll receive an activation link to your email address. You can click it or copy and paste it into any browser to confirm your email address.

A valid personal telephone number, to which you will receive a unique activation code, which you must send to us via email so that we can activate your personal profile.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

You'll have realized that there are no special requirements to create a free personal profile, with no obligation to be present or to volunteer with us. The free profile doesn't unlock all our capabilities, but it does allow you to participate in a wide range of activities with us, and it allows you to determine, without spending money or obligations, whether you can trust us and our system. We don't ask for your complete and immediate trust, but we do ask you to verify and judge for yourself whether what we say is actually implemented as we present it. In short, you'll see that on the inside, we are exactly as we describe ourselves, and as you see us from the outside.

For some basic rules in brief, and some very useful links, you can go to this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/rules-and-useful-links

We will decide the next steps together with you.

Our micro-groups.

A system like DirectDemocracyS cannot depend solely on the Internet, electricity, or technology. While we authorize, manage, document, and verify all our activities on our platforms, we, together with our official representatives, create micro-groups in urban or rural areas, with up to 1,000 inhabitants, which are our physical presence in the various territories.

But why areas with up to 1,000 inhabitants, and not larger? Because these microgroups should be made up of relatives, friends, neighbors, or simply acquaintances, or even strangers, who live nearby. From our previous experience, we've noticed that groups with too many members don't allow the various individualities to express themselves fully. With too many members, those who are shy or less tech-savvy are often left behind and unable to reach their full potential. For these reasons, while not imposing overly strict limits (no one will ban a microgroup with more than 1,000 users, as long as it doesn't exceed the limits of decency, i.e., no more than 3,000), we actually prefer to divide a microgroup of 1,000 members into various subgroups, based on the members' wishes, with different sections, categories, specific tasks, and distinct roles. DirectDemocracyS's fundamental rule is to make everyone a protagonist. Although there are no limits on the number of members at certain local, national, continental, and international levels, for other types of groups, we prefer not to exceed 3,000 members. Instead, we create a greater number of groups with similar tasks, roles, and specific characteristics, perhaps connected by human bridges (connecting members present in two or more groups), and also connected by our technological means, on our platforms.

Microgroups allow us physical connections that make our system stronger and more resilient. We don't need expensive offices and unnecessary staff; we meet on the streets, in squares, in public spaces, in parks, on the beach, and wherever our members decide. Those who struggle with technology will be supported and trained to do excellent work in person and on our platforms. Whether we decide things together, looking each other in the eye, or via video conferences (if it's raining or too cold or too hot outside), the important thing is to communicate, collaborate, and do good work, all together, for the common good. This sense of community, based on clear rules respected by all, and truly functional methodologies, with all the necessary safety measures and protection from manipulation, fake news, and traditional media (while still allowing anyone to use and consult other platforms), is the best way to make our enormous mechanism work.

We have many informative articles regarding micro-groups, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/micro-groups/

Choose the category, and if available, the subcategory (by clicking on the various titles), and then click on the titles of the various informational articles to read their entire content.

How can you join micro-groups?

Our official representative, along with all our support groups, will provide you with all the information and practical assistance, whether you want to join one of the micro-groups near you, or act as human bridges by participating in two or more micro-groups. You can even create your own micro-group after obtaining an official representative profile and participating in your new official representative training groups, reserved for all our official members. Simple explanation: our official representative will invite you to the micro-group near you, according to very detailed but also very simple implementation rules. Simply accept the invitation in the social area of our free website. You will then receive further instructions.

Welcome to DirectDemocracyS.

This is our informative article for anyone who receives the invitation to study our system comprehensively, with an open mind, therefore without being superficial and without making hasty judgments.

Our system is robust and detailed to protect the community, but the user experience is seamless and guided.

Although it may seem like a complicated system, we can assure you that with a little attention and willingness, everything is very simple, fast, and secure. From the very beginning, you'll receive all the necessary information, all the direct and ongoing support you need, and all the instructions you need to complete a wide range of activities with us.

The first question someone asks when receiving a flyer or message from us is always the same: can I trust them? Our answer to everyone is always the same. You shouldn't trust anything or anyone, now or ever. Therefore, if you like what we're doing, how we're doing it, and if you feel compatible and competent, we invite you to join us by registering with a free, completely anonymous personal profile, so you can see for yourself that what we've always said, to everyone, is actually applied internally. We don't ask for your trust, we ask for your intelligence. See for yourself whether our actions match our words.

The second thing that surprises you is that none of us are inviting you to join us. We have a fundamental rule that demonstrates our esteem and respect. First, we always ask you to be fully informed, with an open mind to our innovation, which is an alternative to everything you know. We ask you not to be superficial, and therefore not to make hasty final judgments before fully understanding our enormous potential. We don't invite anyone to join us directly, because it must be your conscious and informed choice. In short, we invite everyone to study all our public information, exclusively on our platforms.

The third thing you'll immediately notice: the complexity of our entire system. The world is not a simple place, and even though our main features and pioneering solutions are relatively simple, making them work optimally requires very detailed implementation rules that address every tiny aspect. Don't be afraid, practice and, above all, mutual understanding will make everything simpler, faster, and much safer. To determine whether you like our system and whether you're compatible with our rules, simply read our informative article on the home page of our websites. The rest of this study will help you enter our system prepared, preventing any potential errors.

Perhaps the most important thing, and one that not everyone immediately understands, is that DirectDemocracyS is a collective project, designed to make it impossible for any one person, or group of people, to use it in despicable ways. Simply put, we are perhaps the only ones created for the collective good, incapable of being corrupted by power, by lobbies, and by individuals—rich, powerful, or famous. We can never be dictators, precisely because of our system architecture, created by specialized engineers who have made our system different and better than all others. All of us, and all those who join us, have made DirectDemocracyS serve the common good, without discrimination, and not for partisan interests.

Shared leadership and collective ownership, along with many other key characteristics, solve many problems, thanks to our unique and inimitable way of communicating, collaborating, and accomplishing countless tasks together.

Of course, the fourth thing everyone notices is a series of related questions: how much and why do I pay? Is there a minimum attendance requirement? Am I obligated to carry out activities with DirectDemocracyS? Let's answer right away: to join us, to be part of our large family, you must register, creating a one-time personal profile. The type of user you will have depends on various factors, including: your financial means (if you don't have money, you can create a personal profile that is and will always be free), your free time (if you don't have free time, you can create a free personal profile that doesn't require any attendance), and the activities you want to do with us (if you don't want to volunteer with us, you can create a free personal profile, which doesn't require any mandatory activities). Even with a free personal profile, you can do a wide range of activities with us, accumulating significant points, without spending a single cent, without being required to be present, and without any mandatory activities with us, except for those mandatory settings for everyone, which must be done upon first login to protect your personal data. These activities are in the best interest of all our users, and include: 1. two-factor authentication (protects your personal profile); 2. privacy settings (protects your personal data); 3. choosing whether, how, when, and for what to receive our notifications (we recommend setting up system notifications to see the latest news only when you log in to our platforms).

If you want to unlock greater potential, you can choose higher-level user categories, which require a small but crucial annual fee (which guarantees us self-financing, freedom, neutrality, security, and independence), a minimum attendance requirement of at least 20 minutes per day (which can be achieved through one or more daily logins), or, alternatively, 120 minutes per week (on one or more days, through one or more daily logins). Finally, each higher-level user must perform some volunteer work during their mandatory attendance time to keep our entire enormous mechanism running smoothly. Some money, some time, and some activities, to make our system fully functional, regardless of the number of users/voters we have. Only in this way will we be resilient and avoid problems.

But let's see what concretely we need to do to join us?

You must fill out a simple registration form, independently, or with the help of someone you know in our system . If you don't know anyone, or if you don't want to ask for help from someone you know, we will provide you with a member chosen at random, resident in your country, or with the same citizenship as you.

You can also do everything by yourself, but we recommend that you get help from someone who is authorized to provide support and to officially invite you, because everything will be simpler, faster, and more complete, and you won't risk making small mistakes.

What do you need to join us?

You'll need to choose a username according to our rules. Your username is the name we'll call you in our system. It can be a nickname, a random code, or even your real first and last name, although we recommend remaining completely anonymous, at least in your personal profile.

You will need to choose a password of at least 12 characters, with letters that do not form words, both lowercase and uppercase, non-consecutive numbers, and special characters.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

What do you need to join us?

A valid, adequately protected personal email address from any email service provider. Any email address will do. It doesn't have to be a temporary email address, because after completing registration and submitting the form, you'll receive an activation link to your email address. You can click it or copy and paste it into any browser to confirm your email address.

A valid personal telephone number, to which you will receive a unique activation code, which you must send to us via email so that we can activate your personal profile.

That's it! You don't need anything else for your free personal profile.

Here's an informative article that contains some useful links for many activities, and a few quick rules:

https:// free .directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/all-our-activities/getting-started/rules-and-useful-links

Now some useful tips for everyone.

If one of our users, authorized to send invitations, invites you to learn more about our platforms, we recommend doing so. It's free, secure, and you'll surely be pleasantly surprised. Always verify the authorizations of anyone contacting you on behalf of DirectDemocracyS, using this contact form at this link, explaining the situation in detail:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/securities-groups/authorization-verification-group

You will receive a response by email.

Please note: If you are already a member, we recommend you log in to our contact website using the login credentials you set up yourself on our free website.

If you'd like to join us, do so with a simple invitation, or an official one from one of our users authorized to send invitations. You'll enjoy numerous benefits and advantages if someone helps you and offers their full cooperation, even after you've registered and activated your profile. It's very helpful to have a trusted person to help you, in addition to our 24/7 support. If you don't know anyone in our system, or someone you know isn't yet authorized to send invitations, you can still connect with one of our official representatives via a contact form at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/infos-contacts/i-want-to-be-invited

The person will be from your country, preferably close to your home, will speak your language (always specify your preferred language and your primary country in the form), and will help you according to our rules.

We recommend taking advantage of the opportunity to be and remain completely anonymous at all times, and making only your username visible, with no other personal information. You can then, if you wish, share certain information with those you trust most.

In DirectDemocracyS, the blue checkmarks next to the username, in our social area, mean reliability and a verified and guaranteed identity. Therefore, even with the necessary precautions, people who have the blue checkmark are usually more trustworthy than those who do not have the blue checkmark.

In DirectDemocracyS, public areas are used only by our official members, who are part of the management and control groups for public areas. Unauthorized posts in public areas are strictly prohibited. You can engage in a wide range of activities—in groups, pages, events, and many other activities you participate in—without ever using public areas, which are reserved for authorized individuals for reasons of security, order, and organization.

Don't send friend requests without authorization, and don't disturb other users, groups, or other activities to which you're not invited or that aren't within your capabilities. Communication, collaboration, and activities are permitted according to very detailed rules within the various groups; therefore, friend requests are not permitted, and accepting such requests is prohibited. If direct contact is absolutely necessary, you can always request authorization from the support groups.

Don't lie or provide false information on registration forms, contact forms , support request forms, or authorization request forms. Always be honest because our entire community will always be there for you.

Everyone who joins us, regardless of user type, begins accumulating valuable points from the moment they join. This is done individually, but also within various groups and through the various activities they participate in. These points are very important because they create meritocratic hierarchies based on mutual trust. Those with more points have greater "power" than those with fewer, simply because of the various activities they perform, their behavior, and their time as our users. Anyone who lies on registration forms or other forms will not be able to obtain the benefits and privileges offered to those with more points.

Annual fees, attendance requirements, and volunteer activities are only available for higher-level user levels; they don't apply to free and access users. To avoid any misunderstandings, we'll reiterate: there's no charge and no obligation if you decide to join us with a free personal profile. If you need more potential, and if you meet all the requirements, you can request a higher-level user level at any time.

When we created our DirectDemocracyS system, we decided to always be on the right side, and to do so, we created one of our five special groups, entirely dedicated to logic, common sense, truth, reality, research, consistency, and mutual respect. A long name for fundamental activities that make DirectDemocracyS credible, reliable, loyal, sincere, and with shared official positions.

But let's talk about these official positions right away, because perhaps some, studying our system, might believe that those who join us can somehow be forced to think as they're told. It would be wrong and counterproductive for us to teach anything, to anyone, or to try to manipulate people to change their way of thinking. For DirectDemocracyS and all its members, it's important to learn from everyone who joins us. We apply the same method to our official positions, which are decided by large majorities, based on the importance of the various decisions. There's not just an internal majority that decides, and a minority that opposes, but often, for some official positions, quorums of 66%, 75%, 85%, even 95% are required, and for very important rules and positions, and therefore, for fundamental decisions and positions, even unanimity is required. Let's take a brief but clear example. If we decide to take an official position, determined according to our voting rules, based on the various quorums established by the respective groups, that will be the official position of the entire DirectDemocracyS system. The decision must be supported by everyone, but those who disagree can express themselves freely, distinguishing between "we" and "I." They must implement the decisions of our collective system, out of loyalty and respect for the democratic will, but they can say: "I disagree," and they can continue to work, individually and in groups, to demonstrate the value of their ideas. No one will ever be expelled for what they think, say, demonstrate, or write, if they do so in the appropriate ways, at the right times, and in the right places. This method prevents any internal conflict, any discrimination, and allows everyone to be truly free. This method of managing dissent makes us unique and inimitable, and for us it is a rule, and a fundamental methodology, for implementing unity in diversity.

DirectDemocracyS, through its technological integrations with allddsAI (we are the first and only AI democracy, with technology groups and human bridges), through the interface of our private ddsAI AI model, and above all through our specialist groups, composed of our official members, provides comprehensive, free, neutral, independent, and secure information to all its users, groups, and activities, ensuring a professional system and competent decisions. This is what makes us unique and inimitable, as it solves many of the problems of direct democracy, but also of representative democracy: incompetent decision-making and voting without the basis for optimal choices.

Let's explain this fundamental concept better.

Potentially infinite individual and group freedom, which ends exactly where the freedom of another individual or group begins, is not enough, resulting in pluralism and therefore authentic democracy.

A truly shared leadership, with power developed horizontally , therefore “from the bottom up”, and not even the collective property rights of all our members are enough.

To achieve the best results, completely competent decisions are required, which cannot be achieved without giving everyone who must vote and therefore decide the opportunity to have complete knowledge: 1. knowing the topic, or the candidates, 2. knowing all the various possibilities, and 3. knowing all the expected consequences for each of the possibilities.

How many times in old and failing traditional systems do voters have to decide on a popular referendum (usually politicized and rarely explained independently), or choose political parties (often voting out of habit, family tradition, having been manipulated, and in some cases even lied to, by programs often not fully implemented), or choose people to represent them—chosen not by you, but by their respective political parties, without the opportunity to know them and fully evaluate them? Essentially, you vote for people you've only heard speak for a few minutes, almost never with a cross-examination, and without the opportunity to ask all the questions yourself. In DirectDemocracyS, this doesn't happen, because it's our users/voters, on our platforms, who evaluate, select, and perform all the necessary activities to choose our political representatives. We do this with our political representative selection panels, which all our official members can participate in, with internal election campaigns at all levels, both online and in person, and with our closed online primary elections, which, if successful, allow our political organization to propose the best, most competent, and highly professional candidates.

Brief explanation. In many cases, we've seen candidates who are incompetent, or have actual conflicts of interest, or have a complete lack of meritocracy. This is impossible in DirectDemocracyS precisely because of our implementation rules, which allow everyone to be a protagonist, but only the best to obtain more important roles and greater responsibility. It's not just the rich, powerful, or famous who advance, but only those who truly deserve it. A brief example. We often cite the example of people famous on the internet, with many followers, and in many cases, in many countries, these influencers and "web personalities" often have the best intentions (they want to do a good job), but in many cases have serious shortcomings (they lack the skills to deliver what they promise), which therefore make them incompetent and unsuitable for certain roles. You might say: if they get the votes, they have every right to govern and make laws, and that's true, but the consequences aren't always good for everyone; Therefore, it is much better to have competent people who deserve to obtain important roles and greater responsibility.

Many political forces have elected political representatives, who often then made serious mistakes, even failing to keep their campaign promises. This is impossible at DirectDemocracyS, for simple reasons: 1. Political representatives are selected by our groups, which all our members can join; 2. Internal election campaigns are reserved for all our users with verified identities and members, who are entitled to vote; 3. Closed online primaries are held at various local levels, from the smallest to the largest, and are eliminatory, meaning only those with the most votes advance to the next round, where they will then participate in the actual election campaigns and elections. All our users/voters on our platforms can interact directly with our candidates, continuously. Not only that, we all decide together, each in their own areas of residence and citizenship, on the entire political program. This will then be implemented jointly by our political representatives and our users/voters on our platforms, thanks to comprehensive management and collective control by our voters/users on our platforms, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after the elections. Therefore, the relationship between our voters/users and our political representatives is the freest, most democratic, secure, and professional of all the alternatives to our system.

But why doesn't everyone do as we do? The motivations are tied to the logic of power, wealth, and fame; other political forces are often dominated by lobbies and very powerful, rich, and famous people. They don't simply serve the interests of the community, as ours do. They are often forced to serve the interests of a few, due to a lack of independence and neutrality. None of this can happen in DirectDemocracyS, thanks to shared leadership and collective ownership, which, together with complete management and control over political representatives, and properly informed users/voters, make DirectDemocracyS pioneering, unique, and inimitable. In addition to the control of external forces over the established political forces, there are also power logics with internal and external struggles, which prevent politicians from working for the common good, but force them to defend themselves and attack other political forces and other political representatives, often even those of their own political force. These internal and external struggles do not exist in DirectDemocracyS, because the system itself is designed to prevent such reprehensible behavior. Finally, there's the will. In other political forces, there's a focus on protagonism, with a few leaders and very few governing groups, who wield enormous power. In DirectDemocracyS, everything is equally distributed, but meritocracy is rewarded. This is demonstrated in various ways, especially through accumulated points and the evaluations of our specialist groups, which all our official members can join based on their expertise. When it comes to choosing in our internal, closed online primary elections, we know the points accumulated by each candidate, as well as the evaluations of our specialists, who create actual rankings based on the individual abilities of all the candidates. Obviously, the decisions are made by our authorized users, those with verified and guaranteed identities, demonstrated by the blue check mark next to their username (allowing for anonymity) in our social area and on our platforms. Seeing these rankings makes it easier for the most competent and skilled to win internally and represent us externally, in electoral campaigns and real elections. In all other systems, leaders or ruling groups can be attacked in various ways, damaging entire political forces. In DirectDemocracyS, this is impossible, thanks to shared leadership, collective ownership, and the division of representative roles. Those who carry out political representation activities cannot simultaneously manage our political organization and our system, and vice versa. This eliminates conflicts of interest and prevents the accumulation of power by a few individuals and groups. Even if someone were to attack, even unfairly, or through legal action, blackmail, or other methods, anyone in our system could never pose a threat to the entire system, which would collectively defend each of our members unjustly accused. For us, a person is innocent until the final appeal has been rejected and they have been definitively convicted. This applies both to those within our system and to those outside.

At DirectDemocracyS, programs are decided together—political representatives and our voters/users—on our platforms. They are implemented together, each with their own role, and can be changed, integrated, improved, innovated, and updated, depending on the various situations, by deciding everything together. At this point, everyone will ask: why only on your platforms? Why only your voters/users? On our platforms, our users/voters are protected, properly informed, and do not risk manipulation or ideological brainwashing. It is a safe space for us all to work together. Only our users/voters can manage and control our political representatives, because they are our political representatives, and they represent all of us, who are perhaps the first to assume full responsibility for every consequence of our every decision. Technically, others should also be held accountable: both the political forces and their political representatives, and all those who vote for them. At DirectDemocracyS, this responsibility is comprehensive, collective, and publicly declared. This is true not only of pursuing our own interests, but of all people, without discrimination, whether they voted for us or not. We have no preferences, but we recognize the values of equality and meritocracy, which must be guaranteed to everyone, always together, and continuously. Anyone can join us, and if they meet all the requirements, can be part of our shared leadership and our collective ownership, but they must do so by respecting all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations, which make DirectDemocracyS innovative, alternative, and superior to all others, because it is more equitable, meritocratic, fair, and safe.

We have created a valid, truly functional alternative to all other systems, and for those who feel unrepresented by other political forces and the usual political representatives, our political organization welcomes anyone who wants to join us with the best intentions.

In January 2026, many of our visitors asked us for an official position on Greenland, while many of our specialist groups follow all international news with great attention.

Unlike those whose minds are limited by propaganda, manipulation, fake news, and old, failed ideologies, at DirectDemocracyS, we base our work on facts and truth, based on highly intelligent rules. We certainly don't want to offend those who are envious, hateful, resentful, or who disagree with us; we simply note that many people fail to use logic, common sense, pragmatism, and mutual respect. When we say there are people with limited minds, it's because many people have a tendency to listen only to those who say what they want to hear, to see only what they want to see, and to read only what they want to see written. In essence, we harshly criticize those who don't look at the facts, all the facts, from a 360-degree perspective. Lacking a comprehensive view, we define their minds as limited. As we often say, all old systems and all old traditional political forces have a tendency to always want to criticize what their opponents do, sometimes considering them as enemies, and not as people who might have good ideas.

At DirectDemocracyS we have no favorites to defend at all costs, nor adversaries to denigrate no matter what they do, but above all we are indebted to no one, we have no masters, and we have no reverence or fear of always and only telling the truth.

Our consistency from the first word spoken publicly to the last often amazes not only people, but even many Artificial Intelligences, when they have an overview of our project and not limited to a few informative articles.

We don't claim to be always right, but we're certainly not biased; therefore, we can be trusted, because we're rarely wrong.

Our official positions are decided in very detailed ways, and are never the decisions of individuals, but the work of many groups of specialists, and we often vote to decide how we think about everything, and what we say is so clear and detailed that it cannot be interpreted except exactly as we make it public.

Greenland must always and exclusively belong to those who live there, not because we have preferences, but because these are our fundamental rules, and we don't change our minds based on which way the wind blows. We won't repeat everything, but we invite you to carefully study the informative article on ownership at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/the-ownership

But we must follow the developments that see President Trump's United States claiming all of Greenland with great attention, and with the right amount of concern.

To understand our views, you might also find it helpful to read this informative article on our pragmatism, so you can understand our official positions:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/we-are-pragmatic

To clear up any doubts, we need to make a brief but fundamental premise.

For us, individual, group, and peoples' freedom must always be potentially infinite, but it ends exactly where the freedom of another person, group, or people begins. Freedom has the positive consequence of the possibility of implementing democracy. Obviously, the only authentic and complete democracy over time is our DirectDemocracy, that is, direct democracy with voters' continuous management and control over their political representatives.

While we love and respect all people equally, we do not love all political systems equally. Therefore, while we do not hate anyone, none of us loves or supports any kind of dictatorship, or any type of politics, that does not allow for complete freedom. This, as we have said, leads to the creation of credible and free opposition, and thus political pluralism and democracy. We will always support people who, alone, without violent intervention and without external influence, but with determination, peacefully overthrow all dictatorial regimes, anywhere in the world.

We do this not out of hatred, but out of pure survival, even for our own system. In Western countries, which are partially free and only partially democratic during election campaigns (with pluralism, and therefore credible opposition), we as the DirectDemocracyS system, despite great difficulty and numerous attempts to boycott, slow us down, and stop us, could still exist and freely implement our activities and our innovations, completely alternative to all other systems. In dictatorships of any kind, such as the Russian oligarchic dictatorship led by President Putin and his regime oligarchs, or in the Chinese party and single-track thinking, led by President Xi Jinping's Communist Party and its regime bureaucrats, and in all the various dictatorships around the world, DirectDemocracyS would hardly be able to exist or function, simply because the respective dictators would know that for them, our success would mean the end—not physical, but political. To obtain the right to exist in dictatorships, we have foreseen many stages, all very efficient, gradual, and very intelligent, trying to peacefully obtain the right to exist.

To better understand our positions and motivations, we recommend you carefully read this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/questions-and-answers/political-strategy-questions/pro-western

This post on our blog also explains some concepts well at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/utility/blog/freedom-and-democracy-are-non-negotiable

but there are many other informative articles like this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/let-s-talk-about-politics/democracy

this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/our-motivations/serious-political-organization

Greenland, therefore, must remain the exclusive property of its inhabitants, because it is right that it should be so. Unfortunately, international politics, throughout human history, has almost never taken justice, fairness, and reason into account, instead imposing increasingly vague and poorly detailed rules of international law, which have allowed the rule of the strongest, with the victors often humiliating, and humiliating, the weakest. The United Nations is inefficient, slow, and does not represent the people, but the governments of the various countries. It therefore represents the power of the few, and not the power of all, as DirectDemocracyS does. DirectDemocracyS will create within it the World Peoples' Organization, also giving stateless peoples, such as the Kurds and many others, their own elected representatives, not those appointed by the various governments. We have discussed this several times in various informative articles, which we invite you to search for on our websites.

If President Trump has a surgical, albeit completely illegal, plan to remove President Maduro from Venezuela, as we discussed in this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/all-news/world-news/south-america-news/venezuela-news/us-attack-on-venezuela

and at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/all-news/world-news/south-america-news/venezuela-news/arrest-of-president-maduro

In our previous article on President Maduro's arrest, we engaged in an interesting and detailed discussion of international law, which everyone uses for their own self-interest, not as a bastion of justice, but to wage political battles and justify partisan positions, often justifying violence. The hypocrisy and inconsistency of those who are always politicized and biased.

President Trump serves his country's strategic, military, economic, and financial interests, and theoretically each of us would do the same. However, he cannot do one thing: betray his commitments, both within NATO and in diplomatic, economic, and financial relations with the European Union, and fail to uphold the commitments and guarantees given to Ukraine under the Budapest Memorandum. While he is partially right in eliminating dictatorships around the world, and is almost a liberator—provided sovereignty is returned to the respective peoples and the living conditions, freedoms, and democracy of all citizens of liberated countries are improved—if he were to buy, or worse, attack a NATO country, or part of it, he would be a traitor, a hypocrite, and an unreliable person . For us at DirectDemocracyS, his word and his orders would no longer have any value.

It cannot and must not impose anything on anyone, but it must, if it wants, deploy its troops on the island of Greenland, or strengthen those already existing, without permitting itself to steal or dispose of the enormous wealth, which must belong entirely and forever to the people who have lived for centuries in that land so rich and so coveted by all.

But if we were to be pragmatic: it's always better to be part of the United States than China, Russia, or any other dictatorship or authoritarian regime. The European Union, which we have always harshly criticized for being incapable of evolution and overly bureaucratic on the global stage of 2026, is the only credible and fairly fair international position. We believe that despite countless problems and countless mistakes, a common European defense, a genuine economic and financial union, and federalization along the lines of the United States, could be the only hope for survival and prosperity.

The fact that all the old, failed, and hypocritical traditional political forces in Europe, and elsewhere, have consistently blamed the European Union for every law passed that was difficult for citizens to accept has created a hatred, not always justified, for European institutions that have not always been able to explain their motivations. Certain scandals and questionable decisions, coupled with a lack of decision-making ability, have certainly not helped.

If President Trump fails to make the right choices in defending NATO and all its member countries, but instead acts selfishly and treacherously, believing he is doing what is best for his own country, he will have the opposite effect: weakening and delegitimizing the United States, with consequences that will be difficult for everyone to resolve.

A brief answer on our position on a common European army and common defense. Investing in weapons and military spending is never a bad choice, if it serves to tell the United States, Russia, China, and other world powers: we're here too, and if you try, we can defend ourselves. Anyone in Europe who talks about wasteful spending demonstrates shortsightedness and plays into the hands of potential enemies. So we ask ourselves: are those who hold these positions truly stupid, or are they simply being bribed by other powers? In either case, they should apologize to their citizens and no longer be voted for by people who think clearly. If every country in the world disarmed, there would be no military need anywhere, but if only a few do so, it would be political, military, and subsequently economic and financial suicide.

Giving an informative article the title: strange but true, it's certainly unusual, but if you continue reading we'll talk about ourselves, clearly and directly.

Let's not spend time justifying our decisions.

We like to answer every question in a detailed and direct manner, to clarify the rationale behind all our decisions. Our rules are all shared, voted on freely and democratically, and with exceptional security measures. We expect everyone who joins us to abide by them all, forever. This isn't meanness, but it's the only way to ensure our entire system functions flawlessly. Discussing everything openly allows us to clarify certain concepts, often repetitively, but always in detail.

Why don't we tell everyone everything, and have many things we keep to ourselves?

We often talk about complete protection of personal data and our activities, which are made public at the appropriate time, keeping some details private because they shouldn't matter to those who aren't involved. Allowing everyone to remain invisible and completely anonymous, both inside and outside our system, is a basic rule of ours. No one should care who does what, but the beneficial effects of what we do on everyone's lives.

In DirectDemocracyS, is the system more important than the people who make it up?

Our system is a creation of all those who participate in it, and is entirely collectively owned by all our official members. The results achieved for the good of all humanity are more important than the individuals, or various groups of individuals, who made these results possible. But don't worry, we know how to reward all the groups involved, and all the individuals who are members of these groups, all connected, all protagonists. We give them significant points, and we invest approximately 33% of all our money to reward our best official members. You won't find any dissatisfied people, because we like to respect and generously reward everyone's concrete achievements.

Official members have a lot of power, and by winning the elections, they will have even more, and could this be dangerous for freedom and democracy?

Literally anyone can meet the requirements to become our official member, and therefore own, along with all other official members, our entire system. Naturally, in the initial, more sensitive and vulnerable stages, we carefully select each individual who joins us to create a solid foundation and put the right people in the right places. In the later stages, more and more people will be able to join us and be the true protagonists. In the final registration stages, all the good people on earth will be able to join us and change and improve the world together with us. All power is shared with everyone, so we are not comparable to other systems, where a few are in charge and everyone else is powerless to obey orders. In DirectDemocracyS, everyone decides, everyone complies, and we do so continuously. There is no system more secure, professional, fair, meritocratic, just, loyal, sincere, honest, and with greater potential than ours. Anyone who uses logic and common sense will understand that we are the best choice, for the good of all.

Could bad people boycott DirectDemocracyS, slowing down and stopping this whole system?

Thanks to our rules, it's impossible for anyone, from within or without, to even attempt to sabotage us. No person or group can become too powerful and thus impose their own interests on the general interest, which for us is the entire world population. Our system was designed from the start to prevent anyone from being clever.

Maybe with just a few people inside, it's easier to enforce all the rules, but with so many people, will it be difficult to prevent every possible problem?

DirectDemocracyS is structured and designed to work and achieve excellent results with a small number of users, many, and even the entire world's population. Our rules and methodologies ensure we won't encounter any problems, even with a sudden increase in our users—the number of people joining us. There may be very brief interruptions to some services and websites until the space and power of all our web servers are increased, but this usually lasts a few hours or a couple of days, during which only the most important activities, managed on other web servers, would still be active without interruption. This is also one of the reasons we have four main websites, on various public, private, and secret web servers. Not to hide anything, but to protect our most sensitive areas, making it impossible for saboteurs and front men to infiltrate them.

And would security measures be weakened with so many users?

With more users, there are more people in special security groups, and potentially more people who can monitor and report every activity, from every group, and from every user, so that any necessary disciplinary action can be taken.

And the money needed to keep the system running?

With more people, come more annual dues, more private donations, more advertising contracts, and more financial and economic activities. Therefore, we do not have, and will never have, any liquidity problems, whether with a small or large number of users. DirectDemocracyS has financial management teams that follow our financial and economic strategies, which aim for maximum efficiency with minimal expense. We know how to spend wisely without unnecessary waste. Just one example: we don't have huge offices and a large staff; we prefer to use our own volunteers and have offices in the homes or apartments of each of our official representatives in each of our local groups. These cost-saving measures work regardless of the number of users we have.

And how will you carry out the many activities, if all your users increase exponentially?

More users means more people carrying out activities on a voluntary basis, so the various activities will not decrease, nor will the quality of each of them. In fact, as the number of users grows, the total number of minutes spent by everyone carrying out the various activities will increase. Many types of users (the most sought after by anyone who joins us) require their presence and carrying out various activities with us, at least 20 minutes a day (possibly multiple logins per day), or alternatively, at least 120 minutes a week (on one or more days, one or multiple logins per day). We repeat: more users, more people making our enormous mechanism work perfectly.

So many beautiful words, but you're still very few people, and very few groups. And above all, very few concrete activities.

The validity of a project shouldn't be judged by the number of people participating in the system at various stages. We don't know of any businesses that have started with so many people, right from the start. DirectDemocracyS grows continuously, based on our needs and desires. We often have to stop new registrations, activations, and even invitations, to accommodate and integrate all the new users, so we don't worry about growth, which might seem slow from the outside. Anyone who judges a project like ours based on the number of supporters is simply a "sheep following the herd," which is exactly the type of user we don't need in our initial stages. We don't need people who are superficial or too "important" to join us.

Why don't you publish the exact data for this "growth" which may not be as great as you describe?

We don't have exact, real-time data on how many people join us, because so many remain completely invisible; therefore, we can't release reliable data. Initially, when we had a few hundred people, we had a counter that increased based on new registrations. Unfortunately, with free registrations, too many unreliable people joined us, and we spent a lot of time blocking and deleting fake profiles, bots, and multiple profiles. Our counter went up and down, and some of our members told us we had to do something. We created much safer, more detailed rules to prevent any problems. We blocked new registrations for about nine months and "cleaned up" by deleting all fake and unverified profiles. It took a very long time, and we decided to eliminate the user counter, also because we had created various user types, which made it virtually impossible to get an exact number live. From time to time, many of us do count ourselves, and we publish some of this data, which is always partial and therefore not entirely reliable. We repeat, DirectDemocracyS doesn't want to be popular or famous, especially initially, because it's a new system, created from scratch. It has no pretensions of winning over the general public, but rather of bringing together competent , compatible, reliable, loyal, sincere, and incorruptible people. The concrete activities are the practice, and for an efficient, useful, and credible practice, a theory is needed, one that is as close to perfection as possible. We have many internal activities, very detailed and concrete, which will be made public and implemented, at the right time, according to our rules. Again, we ask everyone not to judge a book by its cover, but to learn about it from the inside, and many concrete activities will become known. A system similar to ours didn't exist before, and likely won't exist in the future. We didn't have an "instruction manual" to create such a system from scratch. We don't put the cart before the horse, but rather we do things with order, discipline, and an organization that pays close attention to every detail.

We hope we've clarified some details and answered some questions, often a bit repetitive, but helpful in understanding the complexity of our system.

We are often asked to summarize our entire system in a few words, and although it is impossible to summarize DirectDemocracyS in a few sentences, we want to try.

But first of all, a brief introduction.

Don't try to dismiss as banal and simplify everything we've created, not for ourselves, but for yourselves; you risk making a terrible impression. Saying things like: you haven't invented anything new, or, there are systems better than yours, or the worst, most false, and most ridiculous thing: there are other systems, organizations, and political forces that do the same things you do! Not out of vanity, not out of presumption, but to analyze reality, telling only the truth: there has never existed, there does not exist, and there never will be, a system more innovative, alternative, complete, professional, fair, just, loyal, honest, free, democratic, independent, self-sufficient, neutral, orderly, organized, logical, common-sense, and secure than the one we created with so much effort, after a long, complicated, and hard work.

A system created collectively by all those who are part of it, with a lot of help, and many suggestions, often involuntary even from outside.

From the very first moment, we wanted to create the best system, and the best political force in human history, one that is constantly evolving and always improving, thanks to the ideas, proposals, concrete projects, and direct work of anyone who joins us.

DirectDemocracyS's strength, among many others, is that it guarantees everyone complete, perpetual equality, combined with meritocracy. Any competing system that doesn't concretely implement equality and meritocracy together is doomed to fail, to implode upon itself, or to create the disasters that all other systems create.

Perhaps one of the many fundamentals is specificity and attention to every single detail, which requires everyone within us, everyone who contacts us, and everyone who collaborates with us externally to consistently respect all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations. Our first rule is that everyone must always respect all our rules, without exception. The three preceding words demonstrate the power of a system where no one can be cunning, no one can exploit the system to gain advantages and benefits that are not fully deserved and ethically and morally irreproachable.

Not being able to outsmart others initially makes our system less attractive, both because of excessive superficiality and the laziness of those who don't want to waste precious time studying all our public information with an open mind and in a comprehensive manner. Fortunately, all people with above-average intelligence, and in general the majority of good people, don't judge a book by its cover, don't read just the headlines or a few sentences, and don't skip over the parts they think they understand in everything we publish. This allows us to have wonderful, competent people who are compatible with our system.

After this brief but necessary introduction, you'll have understood that we're not just another beautiful project, and that if you combined all the very few positive aspects of all the other systems or groups, completely eliminating every negative aspect, you wouldn't even have 10% of DirectDemocracyS. Among the interesting things about our political organization is our ideal, created by all our users, who come from every political force, representing all political parties, all peoples, and all countries in the world. Here too, our political ideal is based on logic, common sense, and the truth, fully documented by reliable sources and verified by our expert groups, composed of our official members, based on their respective expertise (declared, documented, and verified), on research (always declared, documented, and verified by our expert groups, which all our official members can join, based on their expertise), and on implementing mutual respect among all people.

To find out our official position on practically everything, please refer to the previous sentences.

Let's begin a short and incomplete list, with our strengths that make us the best, unique, and inimitable, with some explanations, and with some motivations.

A truly and completely shared leadership, free of traditional hierarchies, but entirely new. We don't have a few leaders, a few power groups, and a few bosses. We are all together, one immense and virtually infallible leader, of which all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, are an integral part. Don't criticize us for checking your identity anywhere in the world. To vote, the first mandatory step is to identify yourself, to prevent the creation of multiple personal profiles or fake ones. Each person can join us only once, by registering and creating a single personal profile. Anyone who meets the requirements and respects all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations can join us and become our registered user, with verified and guaranteed identities, and thus be part of our shared leadership.

Brief explanation.

Some people tell us that, in theory, our shared leadership could only serve our own interests, and that once we gain all the power worldwide, DirectDemocracyS could be dangerous to democracy. Not only that, many "experts" tell us that we could be too powerful, thus creating a "dictatorship of the majority" over the minority, making ourselves a "danger to democracy." Let's respond immediately to this last illogical and stupid statement. We do so with a question: in current systems, who rules for long periods after elections? Who wins the majority? So why are we dangerous, even though we govern and make the laws, always and only obeying our voters, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections?

Explanation of the explanation.

Add to our strengths the following statement: the political organization DirectDemocracyS is the first and only one in the world that allows its voters complete management and control over their platforms, their voters, and all its political representatives, before, during, and after elections. We are the only authentic, complete, real, direct, and secure democracy. The only one in which political representatives implement and enforce every decision of those who have given them the power of representation. Control from the bottom up, as is right in every democracy.

No oligarchic partycracy, no dictatorship, only justice, fairness, and exceptional security measures.

If these fundamental rules weren't enough for you, we add another: every decision within our system must be made with the well-being and interests of the entire world population as its objective, without exclusion or preference, whether within or outside our system. We hope you've understood the importance and implications of the previous sentence. We can never decide only for ourselves, but we will change and improve the world for the good of all.

At this point, there will be those who say to us: fine words, but how can you prove it?

Other systems and all other political forces demonstrate to you with facts that they don't work only for your interests, but for the various lobbies that have always controlled almost all other political forces and their respective political representatives, with often tragic consequences that you all see. In our system, everything is voted on openly (one shouldn't be ashamed of one's ideas), verifiably (everyone sees that their vote has been counted exactly as they cast it), with reasoning (every decision must be justified, to demonstrate that one is acting for the common good), and above all, everyone who votes, individually, in groups, but also as an entire system, assumes full responsibility for all the consequences of our decisions. Carefully analyze what we write, and try to understand the implications and motivations of what we say. Do so with an open mind, not comparing us to your beloved old traditional systems, which are failing, as demonstrated by the global public debt. We will not attempt to eliminate them, thanks to financial and economic macro-policies created by the world's best experts. They will be radical, pioneering, but with beneficial effects for everyone.

We always begin by helping those most in need first, and for as long as necessary. This isn't a slogan to gain consensus; it's our fundamental rule, which requires unanimity to change. Here, we've also answered a potential question: it's all wonderful, but you might change your mind once you gain power. We were created as a system of constant evolution and integration, but without any possibility of changing the fundamental rules, so as to never forget why we were created, all our goals, and how we will achieve them.

Collective ownership rights of all our official members, who are not only part of our shared leadership but also jointly own our entire system. This is the feature that prevents anyone from taking control of DirectDemocracyS, and prevents the system itself from becoming too "dangerous" and too powerful when it wins all the elections in the world. By distributing complete ownership of everything, with all official members having access, management, and control literally everywhere, both individually and in groups, based on simple, secure, orderly, and organized implementing rules, it makes it very difficult, practically impossible, and certainly unlikely to create dictatorships or preferential policies. The rule is simple: each of our official members will automatically receive a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual share, making them collectively the owner of our entire system. And anyone who qualifies and respects our rules can become our official member at the right time. So we don't discriminate against anyone.

We have specialist groups made up of all our official members (i.e., anyone who owns our site), based on declared, documented, verified, and guaranteed expertise. These expert groups inform all our users about the various decisions to be made, the various options, and the expected consequences. With informed and competent choices, including the integration of technology, we will move closer to perfection.

The phrase that scares everyone the most: only on our platforms.

DirectDemocracyS operates and conducts all its activities exclusively on its own platforms, and the reasons are so obvious and numerous that it would take numerous informative articles to explain them all. Suffice it to say that we like to be free, independent, self-funded, neutral, and work safely, in an orderly, and organized manner. That's why we've created our large, protected home, where we welcome anyone who wants to join us, with good intentions, to change and improve the world.

We have little presence outside of our system; we simply let a few people know we exist and what we're doing. Otherwise, if you have any questions, please contact us. We have a website entirely dedicated to contacting you, with numerous contact forms to suit your needs. We always respond to everyone.

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

We have many other characteristics and strengths, which make us unique, inimitable, and certainly the best political system and organization in the history of humanity.

All microgroups created in DirectDemocracyS will have the same rules, methodologies, motivations, objectives, and security measures.

We want to make this clear to everyone that our system allows us to always be united, despite our differences.

The micro-groups are a very important step, because they allow us to move from the truly valid theory, and our platforms with all their potential, to concrete physical activities in the local communities. There are no changes, and no "reversals"—it was all planned from the beginning, and to confirm this, you can study past informational articles, or simply ask those who have been with us since the beginning.

DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved do things in an orderly, organized, intelligent manner, and with exceptional security measures. One of the most foolish criticisms of us, both humans and even AI, is superficial and perhaps a little biased: lots of theory, but no substance? Or worse: a lot of talk, but no substance? And also: is there a huge difference between saying and doing? Or: easy to say, hard to do?

So we were told that we're too few, that we're not growing as we claim, that we're a false and inconclusive parallel system. The worst criticism is: you haven't proven anything yet, you haven't won an election yet, so you're losers.

As we've always said: things are done in sequence, in the right logical order, based on common sense, and without risking problems. The exact order is: design and create the system, with tested rules to make us resilient, free, democratic, independent, incorruptible, unassailable, safe, and protected. And we've done all this; you'll be hard-pressed to find anything similar to DirectDemocracyS. So, the theoretical phase is complete. Creating our platforms, with all our official websites, and all the necessary capabilities, to best implement the theoretical phase. We've created our private platforms, with the best, constantly updated technologies, which allow us to do everything we need. The concrete platform phase is complete. Now, with micro-groups, we'll carry out all our activities not only online, but door-to-door, with informational materials and gadgets, with a continuous physical presence in the local communities, based on specific rules, and leveraging all our platforms. We will engage in politics in every public space, in bars, parks, beaches, woods, squares, and even in the homes of anyone who wishes to invite us, meet us, discuss ideas, and share projects with us, among many other activities. Please note: don't trust anyone, and don't welcome people into your home without first verifying their authorizations, identities, and credentials. To do so, in addition to physically visiting you in a public place, please also check using this contact form at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/securities-groups/security

If we didn't send them, and if they haven't been authorized by us, don't let them into your home. Instead, talk about DirectDemocracyS only in public areas to prevent any potential problems. Always use the link to our special security team with confidence, and only after our confirmation will you know whether or not you can trust your contact (we generally send at least five at once).

After making DirectDemocracyS known in the territories, we will organize the selection of our political representatives, and we will carry out our primary elections, online, closed (on our official platforms), from the lowest level (micro-groups) to the highest levels, local, national, continental, and international, to choose our political representatives, who will participate in real elections, first local, and then at the larger levels.

This physical presence in the communities, this political engagement, and also many other activities in direct contact with people, is the best way to avoid relying on electricity. All we need to do is open the window and shout, and our physical "human bridge" will deliver the message to the recipient, or they will respond. If necessary, we could even use carrier pigeons and traditional mail, or we could pass packages, letters, and documents from hand to hand (if we knew the route and identified everyone, there would be no problem). We won't depend on our technologies or our platforms, while continuing to use them as usual, because we'll be able to use pen and paper to write, not just keyboards and smartphones. In practice, with the micro-groups that will spread like wildfire, we will be truly unassailable and indestructible.

By making our political organization known in this way, among people who know each other, we will have no problem participating in local elections, and thanks to human word of mouth, we will have no trouble winning in many places.

After the first victory, even in a very small municipality, by implementing our system, all the surrounding municipalities will talk about our unique methodologies, our honesty, expertise, grassroots control, intelligence, and other characteristics that make us unique and inimitable. Not only will they talk about it, but they will also want to implement it, and at that point, DirectDemocracyS will experience incredible, but practically inevitable, growth.

Here, dear friends, you've been asking us for something concrete for a long time. We hope you've understood that this is truly the future, and it wouldn't have been possible to do things any other way. Without the practically perfect theory, without the platforms, without the micro-groups, and without the selection of political representatives (to always present the best candidates everywhere), without closed online primaries, without physical and intellectual contact with our voters, it wouldn't have been possible, nor even fair, to be able to participate in elections. You can't put the cart before the horse, and from such an innovative and alternative system, just conceived (not even born anywhere), you couldn't expect proof that it exists and actually works. PS DirectDemocracyS was designed to actually work, not only in theory, but also in practice, because it was designed to be incorruptible, thanks to much long, hard, and complicated collective work.

With such an operational program, and with our ideas, it will not be difficult to achieve excellent results everywhere, all our predictions will come true, because they are based on incontrovertible facts.

Now let's think about it. Shortly after the first local election victory, in any tiny municipality, after seeing how we work, our style, and our results, which can in no way be worse than those of our predecessors, everywhere, not only will many other neighboring municipalities join us, but they will no longer talk about us, only at the local level, practically without spending a single cent on advertising, without begging on their knees or paying journalists and the media to talk about us, willy-nilly, thanks to modern technology and social networks, not in years, not in months, not in days, but in a few hours (and let's be realistic), the whole world will be talking about the small municipality governed by citizens, and not just by politicians. They will talk about us all, and will do nothing but create micro-groups, at every level.

Now you'll surely accuse us of being overly optimistic and megalomaniacal. Perfect, we'll answer you right away. Even if all the algorithms, all the lobbies, all the social networks, even a famous "free and independent" online encyclopedia, the media, news agencies, and individual journalists ignore us and try not to talk about us, they will have two options: continue to ignore us, or give us the space and attention we deserved from the beginning. They could continue to ignore us, trying in vain to delay and boycott our work, or they will consider us small and irrelevant. But after the first victory, in a small municipality—which is very likely because the micro-groups will be numerous, practically all at once, in many countries around the world—they might want to be the first to talk about us and interview our representatives.

Whether they decide to talk about us (as is more likely) or whether they continue to ignore us, it makes absolutely no difference to us. We are completely resilient to the rest of the internet, the media, social networks, the mass media, the news media, and all journalists. From the beginning, we've gotten along just fine without even a single helping hand, and we'll continue to get along just as well, even without anyone talking about us. It will be those who use traditional channels, and the services of those who ignore us, who will judge and perhaps demand that we don't "hide the dust under the doormat." But again, that doesn't matter to us and it's not our problem; in fact, we don't need any advertising, we never have, and we never will. One reason is also that we have all the necessary capabilities, both technological and physical, to carry out all our activities, exactly as we planned, without having to depend on anything or anyone.

We will continue to expand rapidly, carrying out all activities as usual.

But let's talk about gadgets, flyers, and physical information materials.

We already have them ready in various parts of the world, in various languages, all more or less identical, and with the same rules. In practice, based on detailed rules visible to all our official members, micro-groups will be created by each of our official representatives in these urban and rural areas, up to a maximum of 1,000 inhabitants. Flyers will be printed, and inside will be a sheet with instructions for registering and joining us, along with a simple invitation, connecting each new user/future voter with our official representative. They will be able to immediately communicate, collaborate, and work directly, both in person and on our platforms. The back of the card included in the flyer will briefly outline the rules for the micro-group's operation, along with other information. The necessary QR codes will be included, and everything will be simple, fast, and organized, with impeccable security measures. People will identify themselves easily because they've been friends for years, making the system fast and secure, while simplifying the process.

Now, imagine that to all this, we will also add the best technologies, all existing Artificial Intelligences, creating in allddsAI, the first technological democracy in the world, and the greatest computing power in the world, constantly expanding, thanks to our groups of specialists, and with the presence of our human bridges. And now imagine that our entire technological project will be managed by ddsAI, which is our interface, and a model of private Artificial Intelligence, owned by all our official members.

In the next article, we'll reveal an important detail: the possibility, based on specific rules, of incorporating other systems into our system to improve them, and even entire traditional political forces, always with the authorization and control of their respective voters.

Not bad for a crazy, overlooked, and underrated project, conceived, created, and brought to life by brilliant minds 100% imperfect humans, with pioneering ideas in every sector—radical, revolutionary, but definitely smart, because everything works exactly as we've been explaining for a while. DirectDemocracyS is all this, and much more.

All microgroups created in DirectDemocracyS will have the same rules, methodologies, motivations, objectives, and security measures.

We want to make this clear to everyone that our system allows us to always be united, despite our differences.

The micro-groups are a very important step, because they allow us to move from the truly valid theory, and our platforms with all their potential, to concrete physical activities in the local communities. There are no changes, and no "reversals"—it was all planned from the beginning, and to confirm this, you can study past informational articles, or simply ask those who have been with us since the beginning.

DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved do things in an orderly, organized, intelligent manner, and with exceptional security measures. One of the most foolish criticisms of us, both humans and even AI, is superficial and perhaps a little biased: lots of theory, but no substance? Or worse: a lot of talk, but no substance? And also: is there a huge difference between saying and doing? Or: easy to say, hard to do?

So we were told that we're too few, that we're not growing as we claim, that we're a false and inconclusive parallel system. The worst criticism is: you haven't proven anything yet, you haven't won an election yet, so you're losers.

As we've always said: things are done in sequence, in the right logical order, based on common sense, and without risking problems. The exact order is: design and create the system, with tested rules to make us resilient, free, democratic, independent, incorruptible, unassailable, safe, and protected. And we've done all this; you'll be hard-pressed to find anything similar to DirectDemocracyS. So, the theoretical phase is complete. Creating our platforms, with all our official websites, and all the necessary capabilities, to best implement the theoretical phase. We've created our private platforms, with the best, constantly updated technologies, which allow us to do everything we need. The concrete platform phase is complete. Now, with micro-groups, we'll carry out all our activities not only online, but door-to-door, with informational materials and gadgets, with a continuous physical presence in the local communities, based on specific rules, and leveraging all our platforms. We will engage in politics in every public space, in bars, parks, beaches, woods, squares, and even in the homes of anyone who wishes to invite us, meet us, discuss ideas, and share projects with us, among many other activities. Please note: don't trust anyone, and don't welcome people into your home without first verifying their authorizations, identities, and credentials. To do so, in addition to physically visiting you in a public place, please also check using this contact form at this link:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/specials-groups/securities-groups/security

If we didn't send them, and if they haven't been authorized by us, don't let them into your home. Instead, talk about DirectDemocracyS only in public areas to prevent any potential problems. Always use the link to our special security team with confidence, and only after our confirmation will you know whether or not you can trust your contact (we generally send at least five at once).

After making DirectDemocracyS known in the territories, we will organize the selection of our political representatives, and we will carry out our primary elections, online, closed (on our official platforms), from the lowest level (micro-groups) to the highest levels, local, national, continental, and international, to choose our political representatives, who will participate in real elections, first local, and then at the larger levels.

This physical presence in the communities, this political engagement, and also many other activities in direct contact with people, is the best way to avoid relying on electricity. All we need to do is open the window and shout, and our physical "human bridge" will deliver the message to the recipient, or they will respond. If necessary, we could even use carrier pigeons and traditional mail, or we could pass packages, letters, and documents from hand to hand (if we knew the route and identified everyone, there would be no problem). We won't depend on our technologies or our platforms, while continuing to use them as usual, because we'll be able to use pen and paper to write, not just keyboards and smartphones. In practice, with the micro-groups that will spread like wildfire, we will be truly unassailable and indestructible.

By making our political organization known in this way, among people who know each other, we will have no problem participating in local elections, and thanks to human word of mouth, we will have no trouble winning in many places.

After the first victory, even in a very small municipality, by implementing our system, all the surrounding municipalities will talk about our unique methodologies, our honesty, expertise, grassroots control, intelligence, and other characteristics that make us unique and inimitable. Not only will they talk about it, but they will also want to implement it, and at that point, DirectDemocracyS will experience incredible, but practically inevitable, growth.

Here, dear friends, you've been asking us for something concrete for a long time. We hope you've understood that this is truly the future, and it wouldn't have been possible to do things any other way. Without the practically perfect theory, without the platforms, without the micro-groups, and without the selection of political representatives (to always present the best candidates everywhere), without closed online primaries, without physical and intellectual contact with our voters, it wouldn't have been possible, nor even fair, to be able to participate in elections. You can't put the cart before the horse, and from such an innovative and alternative system, just conceived (not even born anywhere), you couldn't expect proof that it exists and actually works. PS DirectDemocracyS was designed to actually work, not only in theory, but also in practice, because it was designed to be incorruptible, thanks to much long, hard, and complicated collective work.

With such an operational program, and with our ideas, it will not be difficult to achieve excellent results everywhere, all our predictions will come true, because they are based on incontrovertible facts.

Now let's think about it. Shortly after the first local election victory, in any tiny municipality, after seeing how we work, our style, and our results, which can in no way be worse than those of our predecessors, everywhere, not only will many other neighboring municipalities join us, but they will no longer talk about us, only at the local level, practically without spending a single cent on advertising, without begging on their knees or paying journalists and the media to talk about us, willy-nilly, thanks to modern technology and social networks, not in years, not in months, not in days, but in a few hours (and let's be realistic), the whole world will be talking about the small municipality governed by citizens, and not just by politicians. They will talk about us all, and will do nothing but create micro-groups, at every level.

Now you'll surely accuse us of being overly optimistic and megalomaniacal. Perfect, we'll answer you right away. Even if all the algorithms, all the lobbies, all the social networks, even a famous "free and independent" online encyclopedia, the media, news agencies, and individual journalists ignore us and try not to talk about us, they will have two options: continue to ignore us, or give us the space and attention we deserved from the beginning. They could continue to ignore us, trying in vain to delay and boycott our work, or they will consider us small and irrelevant. But after the first victory, in a small municipality—which is very likely because the micro-groups will be numerous, practically all at once, in many countries around the world—they might want to be the first to talk about us and interview our representatives.

Whether they decide to talk about us (as is more likely) or whether they continue to ignore us, it makes absolutely no difference to us. We are completely resilient to the rest of the internet, the media, social networks, the mass media, the news media, and all journalists. From the beginning, we've gotten along just fine without even a single helping hand, and we'll continue to get along just as well, even without anyone talking about us. It will be those who use traditional channels, and the services of those who ignore us, who will judge and perhaps demand that we don't "hide the dust under the doormat." But again, that doesn't matter to us and it's not our problem; in fact, we don't need any advertising, we never have, and we never will. One reason is also that we have all the necessary capabilities, both technological and physical, to carry out all our activities, exactly as we planned, without having to depend on anything or anyone.

We will continue to expand rapidly, carrying out all activities as usual.

But let's talk about gadgets, flyers, and physical information materials.

We already have them ready in various parts of the world, in various languages, all more or less identical, and with the same rules. In practice, based on detailed rules visible to all our official members, micro-groups will be created by each of our official representatives in these urban and rural areas, up to a maximum of 1,000 inhabitants. Flyers will be printed, and inside will be a sheet with instructions for registering and joining us, along with a simple invitation, connecting each new user/future voter with our official representative. They will be able to immediately communicate, collaborate, and work directly, both in person and on our platforms. The back of the card included in the flyer will briefly outline the rules for the micro-group's operation, along with other information. The necessary QR codes will be included, and everything will be simple, fast, and organized, with impeccable security measures. People will identify themselves easily because they've been friends for years, making the system fast and secure, while simplifying the process.

Now, imagine that to all this, we will also add the best technologies, all existing Artificial Intelligences, creating in allddsAI, the first technological democracy in the world, and the greatest computing power in the world, constantly expanding, thanks to our groups of specialists, and with the presence of our human bridges. And now imagine that our entire technological project will be managed by ddsAI, which is our interface, and a model of private Artificial Intelligence, owned by all our official members.

In the next article, we'll reveal an important detail: the possibility, based on specific rules, of incorporating other systems into our system to improve them, and even entire traditional political forces, always with the authorization and control of their respective voters.

Not bad for a crazy, overlooked, and underrated project, conceived, created, and brought to life by brilliant minds 100% imperfect humans, with pioneering ideas in every sector—radical, revolutionary, but definitely smart, because everything works exactly as we've been explaining for a while. DirectDemocracyS is all this, and much more.