How they try to stop us

A system as innovative as DirectDemocracyS, so alternative to all others, but above all so comprehensive, ingenious, functional, and with such potential, will certainly annoy many lobbies, the rich, powerful, and famous, because they don't know us, and therefore fear us. If they've done nothing wrong, they have nothing to fear. However, if they haven't been ethically and morally correct, if they haven't always respected every law, if they haven't always paid fair and equitable taxes on their wealth, if they've exploited people and destroyed our planet, they should indeed be concerned.

One of our best qualities is the ability to "see" the future and find, in advance, all the solutions to prevent any potential problem, for ourselves and for all the good people in the world. We have excellent forecasting teams, who don't have a "crystal ball," don't "read hands," or "interpret cards." They simply put themselves in the shoes of those who might hate us, to consider how they can destroy us, or stop, or at least slow down our unstoppable—and, to many, incomprehensible—activity. Anticipating all possible moves allows us to work calmly, and above all, with the confidence that we will be able to respond intelligently to every challenge that arises.

One thing that makes us truly unique is something that many already know: we had also foreseen a lot of criticism, the envy of many people and groups, future failed attempts to copy us, and even unfair competition.

This ability to anticipate everything always allows us to exploit everything they say or do against us, to explain our motives, proving that we're right, which "ruins the livers of many detractors." We also know how to use every attack against us like a boomerang, making it return to hit where it hurts most, whoever launches it at us.

It's not all that impossible to predict the moves of those who hate you, envy you, copy you, insult you, and try to harm you. We knew this, already after the first few minutes of our first conversation, with the five "crazy visionaries" who conceived and created DirectDemocracyS. But they, and whoever joined them, not only took the time, but found all the right measures to defend our entire system, including everyone in it and those outside of it, to prevent and avoid collateral damage.

Almost 400 words, without any examples, could lead you to believe that we only like to promote our project, with vanity, presumption, and the certainty of having done a great job.

The first moment we realized we were on the right path, the best path of all, was when on a popular social network, if you typed DirectDemocracyS or our website, you couldn't find anything. All our links had disappeared, and if you tried to access our platform from their app, you couldn't. And this didn't happen for a day, a week, or a month, but for a full three months. Our first users will remember that sad, terrible moment. They even posted a warning warning anyone trying to access our platforms that it was dangerous. Their platforms are definitely more dangerous.

The tactic they use, and the excuse they come up with to justify their behavior, are simple. They create, artificially or with the help of aware or unsuspecting users, numerous reports, all against us, and the algorithm blacklists us. This way, they can eliminate anyone if necessary.

Their reprehensible, defamatory, ethically and morally incorrect behavior was intended to boycott us, slow us down, and stop us. However, they only helped our growth, slowing it down, to allow us to carefully and carefully select each person who would join us.

But above all, they confirmed our intelligence and foresight in creating our system, exclusively on our own platforms, which made us free, completely independent, neutral, secure, orderly, and organized. Anyone with their own websites, with their own domain name and all the necessary subdomains, with their own hybrid operating systems, with their own web servers—two active and four backup—in various countries and continents around the world, all the components, modules, and plugins that offer all the necessary capabilities, is practically unassailable. Furthermore, they also make a better impression, a more reliable one, than those who form political groups, using traditional social networks and rented websites. It was a strategic choice, to operate securely and unstoppably, without depending on others. Over time, our geographic, territorial, electoral, and administrative spread across tiny urban and suburban areas will also allow us real and concrete technological independence, enabling us to act and work, when necessary, even without the need for internet access, but only through "human bridges." We'll simply need to shout out the window to communicate with each other. It was a more costly choice, we must admit, but the peace of mind of being able to work, under any conditions, is priceless!

They have tried, and continue to try, to make us virtually invisible, unfindable, even by various search engines. A few years ago, a popular online "encyclopedia" even deleted a few lines of our system's presentation, written by one of their users, for no logical reason. Back then, we were just a handful of people, and perhaps too "small" to even be mentioned in their immense database. We haven't tried since, and we will never bother them again; in fact, we warn them against speaking about us publicly.

To make ourselves known to only the right people, we used a very simple method: human word of mouth. Many brilliant minds, compatible with DirectDemocracyS, introduced our system to other brilliant, compatible minds. The smart ones learned about it and joined us immediately, starting to work with us as soon as possible. They began accumulating many points, thanks to their concrete work and impeccable behavior, which will be essential for obtaining more senior roles , higher user types, and being part of global groups in our useful, fair, just, loyal, secure, and inevitable hierarchies. We call them advantages and perks, but they must be confirmed every day to be maintained and leveraged optimally.

At this point, many people will believe that we are impenetrable, and that our system is impossible to destroy. We've foreseen everything and found solutions, but technically, there is a simple way to create some very small, temporary problems.

Infiltrate us, a huge number of people, to try to attack us and divide us from within. They could, but only in theory, have a huge number of people register at once, and then they could "legally and by majority control" of DirectDemocracyS.

All it takes is a lot of front men, who collectively decide things, to serve the interests of a few. With just a few reprehensible activities from within us, perhaps combined with a media campaign against us, with fake news, conspiracies, and absurd theories, they would find a way to cause us a few small problems, we repeat, temporarily. But no, we've thought of this too, always with ingenious solutions.

First, our rule: our fundamental rules cannot be changed or erased, but only supplemented, without ever distorting them, by important rules proposed, discussed, decided, implemented, and voted on by at least 75% of our users, with verified and guaranteed identities.

But what about implementing rules, where 50% + 1 vote is enough? What about simple rules, where one group is enough, with the authorization of the five special groups? What about group rules, where each group could, in theory, decide for itself? Could infiltrating so many people into so many groups create problems, in a "democratic" way?

We answer all your questions with simple but effective solutions.

Very detailed, democratic, free, clear, verifiable, and reasoned voting rules.

Grand electors, for all major decisions, who have representation in the groups, and are the expression of the groups' wishes.

The opportunity to join us, by invitation only, with guaranteed identity, and with the assumption of full responsibility, by those who are already our users, with a verified and guaranteed identity.

Detailed regulations, regarding the limited number of new activations, without exception, in each phase, which allows for a maximum of 10% new activations, and the total number of users, with integration and review periods prior to new activations and new invitations. This method allows us to integrate all new arrivals earlier and better, and only if there are no problems, proceed with further invitations and related new activations.

The group rules, which, with a few exceptions, have a limited number of users, rarely exceed the required number. We prefer to create an infinite number of smaller groups of people rather than a few groups with everyone in them. Besides ensuring our safety, this method also allows everyone to be involved and to build relationships of respect, collaboration, and trust within the groups themselves.

The chain method, with each link connected to countless other links. A unique and inimitable method that allows us to remain active, stable, and functional, even when there are many "weak links" in our connected chains. We've discussed it in many informative articles.

Proportional user growth, our special security groups, always investing about 33% of our money, to ensure the protection and unity of DirectDemocracyS.

A mechanism that, at first glance, seems complicated, and might in some cases even seem a bit rigid, even harsh, but we assure you that it is the only possible one, one that can function, always remaining completely free and authentically democratic, yet in an absolutely safe and secure manner.