International policy clarifications

Some of our visitors who have not carefully studied our system have considered us inconsistent, reading our official positions on international politics, on Syria, Venezuela, Iran, and those in Greenland and other countries.

It is virtually impossible to find inconsistencies or flaws in our system, and in our official positions, but some superficial and careless people always try and fail inexorably.

Everyone knows that DirectDemocracyS does not consider all people equal, there are good and bad people, with varying amounts of individual and group goodness, there are intelligent and stupid people, with varying amounts of individual and group intelligence, there are competent and incompetent people, with varying amounts of individual and group competence, and we follow the same logic, for each human characteristic, trying to exactly quantify, both individually and in various groups, the qualities and defects.

However, as far as individual and group rights and duties are concerned, all people are equal.

Even with regard to well-being, water, food, health, education, and essential goods, everyone must have optimal living conditions. All people and all groups must live in love, happiness, serenity, and security.

All people and all groups must live in total and potentially infinite freedom, which ends exactly where the freedom of another person or group of people begins. Freedom automatically and immediately entails the possibility of implementing democracy and political pluralism, which we believe must always be guaranteed, fully and optimally, everywhere in the world, to all people and all groups.

Those who have followed us from the beginning, as well as those who study us carefully, know that DirectDemocracyS bases every rule, every methodology, every instruction, every motivation, and every official system position (and therefore of all those who join us) on logic, common sense, truth, reality, study, and mutual respect for all people.

Just as we treat people, we also treat all systems, be they economic, financial, political, cultural, religious, or social. They are not and will never be the same, and in no news article or official position have we been inconsistent.

From a general perspective, we can declare DirectDemocracyS a meritocratic communism, a capitalism with a human face. To those who might find this paradoxical or provocative (and many global "experts" agree), we can swear that we are exactly like that. Our system implements an absolutely unique, inimitable, and unrepeatable community in human history, but unlike communism, we are not a utopia. This statement might also make those who have not studied us thoroughly and with an open mind, especially the less competent, smile. Our rules and methodologies, if implemented correctly (and our system is designed to prevent any problems), allow us to be the only ones who guarantee equality and meritocracy to everyone, continuously over time, and always simultaneously . Together with our groups of specialists, we add the fundamental expertise, always declared, documented, verified, and authorized. Capitalism with a human face means that we support private property, which must belong to all people and groups, and a capitalism that is fair, just, supportive, professional, and attentive to everyone's needs. The very fact that our fundamental rule obliges us to always help those most in need first, most, and for as long as necessary, without discrimination, allows us to prevent any form of unbridled capitalism.

Taking into account the long premise: systems are not all the same, but can be divided into various categories, also based on the various countries, and their policies.

Europe, understood as the European Union, despite its countless and grave flaws, is, at the time of writing this article, the most credible and reliable political entity, because it does not engage in dangerous and potentially disastrous behavior. It invests in weapons and common defense, as we have been saying for years, not to attack democratic and peaceful countries, but for deterrence. We have said this many times, in our direct style: if the great military superpowers do not, and never will, give up their armed forces, reducing them, Europe too must equip itself with an army and weapons that make it impossible for anyone to pose a threat. Anyone who does not acknowledge, support, and promote this vital necessity is either stupid and reckless, or corrupt and paid by foreign powers. In any case, it is not in the best interests of Europe and the European countries. Even the financial and economic superpowers (all militarily solid) need courageous, intelligent, and highly efficient choices for Europe to match and surpass them. They don't have the capacity, and perhaps they don't have the will, at the European Union level, due to vested interests, but the right time will come when we at DirectDemocracyS will do so. A word of advice for European citizens: don't trust your political forces, who, every time they have to make decisions that could undermine their consensus, tell you: Europe is asking us to do so. They do this to mask their incompetence and to justify their failure to deliver on the programs that convinced you to vote for them. We repeat, despite their infinite flaws, that in the current situation, an imperfect Europe is the best option. In the global market, even with the emergence of the BRICS, the only form that works is that of superpowers, of all kinds. Economically and financially, countries alone, large or small, are doomed to failure, or worse, to the loss of sovereignty and territorial integrity. There's no shortage of examples, but we don't intend to write an overly long article. Even national currencies, if they don't unite, will remain weak, with serious and often difficult-to-resolve problems. DirectDemocracyS is already working on a new global currency, and we'll discuss it in due course.

The United States, while far from perfect and varying greatly from one country to another in its military, economic, financial, political, and social policies, is certainly not trustworthy or even competent under President Trump, who often says nonsense—and what's worse, he not only says it, but often does it. Despite being imperfect, we place it second in our ranking, as we explained in this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/questions-and-answers/political-strategy-questions/pro-western

Third and last, for anyone who joins us, are all countries, large or small, powerful or less powerful, where freedoms are restricted in some way. In short, all dictatorships, be they the oligarchic, unreliable, and dangerous one in Russia, where a few oligarchs close to President Putin manage, control, and exploit, without any right or credit, all the wealth that should belong to the Russian people. But also the dictatorship of one-way thinking and a single party (communist, but corrupt and wildly capitalist) in China, where a few party members, oligarchically, manage, control, and exploit, without any right or credit, all the wealth that should belong to the Chinese people. And all other dictatorships, of any kind, for us are failed, unfair, unjust, and unsafe.

Those who fuel social hatred against capitalism must distinguish between the failure of all statist countries, where corruption, backwardness, and lack of competitiveness reign, and the failure of uncontrolled capitalism, where, despite corruption and less failure, there are no adequate protections for those in difficulty, and DirectDemocracy, which obviously intelligently and efficiently solves all problems. Hating Europe, the United States, NATO, the West, and Israel—all of which are certainly imperfect, but can be changed and improved—and failing to offer credible, functional, and safe alternatives, but even considering them identical to various dictatorships, is a completely wrong and unintelligent choice, and will certainly gain virtually no consensus in the freest, and certainly slightly more "democratic," countries. We also find it hypocritical and discreditable for anyone who hates the United States, using US technologies and social networks owned by US companies to spread, with very little success, hatred, envy, and frustration, and to seek consensus among weak minds who, due to manipulation and outright brainwashing, believe that the system can and must be fought, or changed and improved. None of the systems other than DirectDemocracyS can be improved, or even changed, and they all have in common the outright theft of power, of all political forces, and of all political representatives, from their respective populations. In this case, as in everything else, we have the solutions: complete and continuous control of our voters, of our political representatives, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after the elections.

So the updated and indisputable ranking of the best systems is: first place DirectDemocracyS, second place Europe, third place United States, fourth place all the various dictatorships, with their respective rankings, from “best” to worst.

It's not discrimination, it's simply pragmatism, and we talk about it in this article

public information, at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/we-are-pragmatic

We do it also for the sake of survival (no dictatorial system would ever want to implement DirectDemocracy, which would represent the inevitable end of the various regimes) and for our sole interest and purpose: changing and improving the world, for the good of the entire world population. Don't always ask us how we'll do it; study everything, and then you'll understand our enormous potential and our ability to achieve any goal.

Every population, and every single citizen, has the duty to carry out every activity peacefully, intelligently, but with determination, to achieve well-being (better living conditions) and freedom (which is like air and water, essential to life). If you truly desire a better and different world, our advice is to join us and be the protagonists of your own destinies, and those of future generations. As we always say, we can never do worse than those who came before us.

The liberation of peoples should always take place from within, without economic sanctions to trigger revolts, but with the help of the international community (a non-existent entity), the United Nations (useless, impotent, and outdated), and all the good people of the earth, who are the absolute majority.

If the United States decides to launch a military operation to overthrow a dictatorial regime, surgically, quickly, and with as few casualties as possible (even one dead or wounded is too many for us), without too much destruction (even a destroyed doghouse is a serious problem for us), while we condemn such external action, we are not completely opposed.

They can do this, but only if they return all power, sovereignty, and ownership of the country to their respective citizens.

If, however, they threaten similar actions against their own allies, or against freer and more prosperous countries, for strategic, economic, geopolitical, and financial advantages, we consider them criminals, stupid, and untrustworthy.

These are the reasons why, to a casual visitor, our official positions might appear different depending on the country undergoing a regime change. We are proud of these positions, and we hope everyone can understand their rationale, which is crucial, professionally reasoned, freely and democratically chosen, and never banal.

The time will come when people will study us carefully and thoroughly, and will understand that we are truly and concretely the only hope for the entire world's population.