Translate
Welcome to the DirectDemocracyS system. To view all the public areas of our website, simply scroll down a little.
Blog
Independent Greenland
In January 2026, many of our visitors asked us for an official position on Greenland, while many of our specialist groups follow all international news with great attention.
Unlike those whose minds are limited by propaganda, manipulation, fake news, and old, failed ideologies, at DirectDemocracyS, we base our work on facts and truth, based on highly intelligent rules. We certainly don't want to offend those who are envious, hateful, resentful, or who disagree with us; we simply note that many people fail to use logic, common sense, pragmatism, and mutual respect. When we say there are people with limited minds, it's because many people have a tendency to listen only to those who say what they want to hear, to see only what they want to see, and to read only what they want to see written. In essence, we harshly criticize those who don't look at the facts, all the facts, from a 360-degree perspective. Lacking a comprehensive view, we define their minds as limited. As we often say, all old systems and all old traditional political forces have a tendency to always want to criticize what their opponents do, sometimes considering them as enemies, and not as people who might have good ideas.
At DirectDemocracyS we have no favorites to defend at all costs, nor adversaries to denigrate no matter what they do, but above all we are indebted to no one, we have no masters, and we have no reverence or fear of always and only telling the truth.
Our consistency from the first word spoken publicly to the last often amazes not only people, but even many Artificial Intelligences, when they have an overview of our project and not limited to a few informative articles.
We don't claim to be always right, but we're certainly not biased; therefore, we can be trusted, because we're rarely wrong.
Our official positions are decided in very detailed ways, and are never the decisions of individuals, but the work of many groups of specialists, and we often vote to decide how we think about everything, and what we say is so clear and detailed that it cannot be interpreted except exactly as we make it public.
Greenland must always and exclusively belong to those who live there, not because we have preferences, but because these are our fundamental rules, and we don't change our minds based on which way the wind blows. We won't repeat everything, but we invite you to carefully study the informative article on ownership at this link:
https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/the-ownership
But we must follow the developments that see President Trump's United States claiming all of Greenland with great attention, and with the right amount of concern.
To understand our views, you might also find it helpful to read this informative article on our pragmatism, so you can understand our official positions:
https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/we-are-pragmatic
To clear up any doubts, we need to make a brief but fundamental premise.
For us, individual, group, and peoples' freedom must always be potentially infinite, but it ends exactly where the freedom of another person, group, or people begins. Freedom has the positive consequence of the possibility of implementing democracy. Obviously, the only authentic and complete democracy over time is our DirectDemocracy, that is, direct democracy with voters' continuous management and control over their political representatives.
While we love and respect all people equally, we do not love all political systems equally. Therefore, while we do not hate anyone, none of us loves or supports any kind of dictatorship, or any type of politics, that does not allow for complete freedom. This, as we have said, leads to the creation of credible and free opposition, and thus political pluralism and democracy. We will always support people who, alone, without violent intervention and without external influence, but with determination, peacefully overthrow all dictatorial regimes, anywhere in the world.
We do this not out of hatred, but out of pure survival, even for our own system. In Western countries, which are partially free and only partially democratic during election campaigns (with pluralism, and therefore credible opposition), we as the DirectDemocracyS system, despite great difficulty and numerous attempts to boycott, slow us down, and stop us, could still exist and freely implement our activities and our innovations, completely alternative to all other systems. In dictatorships of any kind, such as the Russian oligarchic dictatorship led by President Putin and his regime oligarchs, or in the Chinese party and single-track thinking, led by President Xi Jinping's Communist Party and its regime bureaucrats, and in all the various dictatorships around the world, DirectDemocracyS would hardly be able to exist or function, simply because the respective dictators would know that for them, our success would mean the end—not physical, but political. To obtain the right to exist in dictatorships, we have foreseen many stages, all very efficient, gradual, and very intelligent, trying to peacefully obtain the right to exist.
To better understand our positions and motivations, we recommend you carefully read this informative article at this link:
This post on our blog also explains some concepts well at this link:
https://www.directdemocracys.org/utility/blog/freedom-and-democracy-are-non-negotiable
but there are many other informative articles like this link:
https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/let-s-talk-about-politics/democracy
this link:
Greenland, therefore, must remain the exclusive property of its inhabitants, because it is right that it should be so. Unfortunately, international politics, throughout human history, has almost never taken justice, fairness, and reason into account, instead imposing increasingly vague and poorly detailed rules of international law, which have allowed the rule of the strongest, with the victors often humiliating, and humiliating, the weakest. The United Nations is inefficient, slow, and does not represent the people, but the governments of the various countries. It therefore represents the power of the few, and not the power of all, as DirectDemocracyS does. DirectDemocracyS will create within it the World Peoples' Organization, also giving stateless peoples, such as the Kurds and many others, their own elected representatives, not those appointed by the various governments. We have discussed this several times in various informative articles, which we invite you to search for on our websites.
If President Trump has a surgical, albeit completely illegal, plan to remove President Maduro from Venezuela, as we discussed in this informative article at this link:
and at this link:
In our previous article on President Maduro's arrest, we engaged in an interesting and detailed discussion of international law, which everyone uses for their own self-interest, not as a bastion of justice, but to wage political battles and justify partisan positions, often justifying violence. The hypocrisy and inconsistency of those who are always politicized and biased.
President Trump serves his country's strategic, military, economic, and financial interests, and theoretically each of us would do the same. However, he cannot do one thing: betray his commitments, both within NATO and in diplomatic, economic, and financial relations with the European Union, and fail to uphold the commitments and guarantees given to Ukraine under the Budapest Memorandum. While he is partially right in eliminating dictatorships around the world, and is almost a liberator—provided sovereignty is returned to the respective peoples and the living conditions, freedoms, and democracy of all citizens of liberated countries are improved—if he were to buy, or worse, attack a NATO country, or part of it, he would be a traitor, a hypocrite, and an unreliable person . For us at DirectDemocracyS, his word and his orders would no longer have any value.
It cannot and must not impose anything on anyone, but it must, if it wants, deploy its troops on the island of Greenland, or strengthen those already existing, without permitting itself to steal or dispose of the enormous wealth, which must belong entirely and forever to the people who have lived for centuries in that land so rich and so coveted by all.
But if we were to be pragmatic: it's always better to be part of the United States than China, Russia, or any other dictatorship or authoritarian regime. The European Union, which we have always harshly criticized for being incapable of evolution and overly bureaucratic on the global stage of 2026, is the only credible and fairly fair international position. We believe that despite countless problems and countless mistakes, a common European defense, a genuine economic and financial union, and federalization along the lines of the United States, could be the only hope for survival and prosperity.
The fact that all the old, failed, and hypocritical traditional political forces in Europe, and elsewhere, have consistently blamed the European Union for every law passed that was difficult for citizens to accept has created a hatred, not always justified, for European institutions that have not always been able to explain their motivations. Certain scandals and questionable decisions, coupled with a lack of decision-making ability, have certainly not helped.
If President Trump fails to make the right choices in defending NATO and all its member countries, but instead acts selfishly and treacherously, believing he is doing what is best for his own country, he will have the opposite effect: weakening and delegitimizing the United States, with consequences that will be difficult for everyone to resolve.
A brief answer on our position on a common European army and common defense. Investing in weapons and military spending is never a bad choice, if it serves to tell the United States, Russia, China, and other world powers: we're here too, and if you try, we can defend ourselves. Anyone in Europe who talks about wasteful spending demonstrates shortsightedness and plays into the hands of potential enemies. So we ask ourselves: are those who hold these positions truly stupid, or are they simply being bribed by other powers? In either case, they should apologize to their citizens and no longer be voted for by people who think clearly. If every country in the world disarmed, there would be no military need anywhere, but if only a few do so, it would be political, military, and subsequently economic and financial suicide.
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
About the author
Comments