Accessibility Tools

DirectDemocracyS
─── DDS Panama ───
POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC PROGRAM
FINANCIAL AND SOCIAL
FOR PANAMA
Critical Analysis of the National Reality · Detailed Solutions · Real Direct Democracy
2025 Edition — Based on logic, common sense, study, truth, coherence, and mutual respect
directdemocracys.org
DirectDemocracyS (DDS) is a pioneering, global political organization, radical in the truest sense of the word: it gets to the root of problems. Our principles are logic, common sense, rigorous study of reality, truth, consistency, and mutual respect. We are neither right nor left: we are of the people, of reason, and of justice.
Panama, in 2025, finds itself at a historic crossroads. A country with extraordinary resources—the Canal, a unique geostrategic position, a developed financial sector, exceptional biodiversity—that nevertheless fails to translate this objective wealth into real well-being for the majority of its population. This document analyzes the current situation with brutal honesty, identifies the real problems, and proposes concrete, functional, and verifiable solutions.
DDS is not here to offer empty promises. It is here to offer a system: the only system in the world that allows the people to exercise authentic, complete, continuous, direct, swift, competent, immediate, secure, and protected democracy. A system where Panama's wealth—and the power to decide on it—remains forever and exclusively in the hands of the Panamanian people.
On May 5, 2024, Panama held general elections in an atmosphere of profound institutional distrust. The winning candidate, José Raúl Mulino, obtained 34.23% of the valid votes, meaning that more than 65% of those who voted chose another candidate. This first-round victory with a relatively low percentage reflects the extreme fragmentation of the Panamanian political system and the absence of a unified alternative that embodies the interests of the people.
Mulino's arrival on the ballot was abrupt: he replaced former president Ricardo Martinelli, who was barred from running because he was taking refuge in the Nicaraguan embassy after being convicted of money laundering. This compromised background cast a shadow of doubt on the new government's legitimacy from the outset. Second place went to Ricardo Lombana (MOCA) with 24.60%, revealing an electorate searching for real alternatives that have not yet been found.
|
CANDIDATE |
PERCENTAGE |
|
José Raúl Mulino (Realizing Goals) |
34.23% |
|
Ricardo Lombana (MOCA) |
24.60% |
|
Martín Torrijos (PRD) |
~15% |
|
Rómulo Roux (CD) |
~8% |
|
Other candidates |
~18% |
|
DDS CRITIQUE: A system where the 'winner' obtains barely a third of the votes does not represent the people. It represents the most organized segment of a fragmented electorate. This is the most evident symptom of the collapse of classical representative democracy. DDS has the solution. |
One year into his term, the reality speaks for itself. According to surveys conducted by the National Crusade Against Corruption and Inequality (March 2025), the president's administration received a rating of 2.03 out of 5, close to the lowest possible level. Citizens identified five priority issues:
|
URGENT PROBLEM |
% THAT INDICATES IT |
GOVERNMENT ACTION |
|
Crime and insecurity |
78% |
Insufficient |
|
High cost of living |
75% |
Non-existent |
|
General economic improvement |
74% |
Broken promises |
|
Health care |
73% |
Sustained deterioration |
|
Affordable basic food basket |
70% |
Without concrete measures |
In March 2025, the government passed Law 462, an organic reform of the Social Security Fund (CSS). This law triggered the largest wave of social mobilization since the 1989 US invasion. Unions, teachers, transport workers, farmers, Indigenous communities, and students took to the streets. The general secretary of SUNTRACS, Saúl Méndez, was forced to seek refuge in the Bolivian embassy after being subjected to legal persecution.
President Mulino's response to the protests was to declare that dialogue was 'a waste of time' and that 'sooner or later the workers will tire of marching.' This attitude reveals the structural contempt of the traditional political class for popular sovereignty. It is precisely the type of government that DDS was designed to make impossible.
|
DIAGNOSIS: Law 462 represents the classic pattern of oligarchic politics: reforms that affect the majority, approved without genuine consultation, and implemented against the explicit will of the people. In the DDS system, no law of this type could exist because it would require the direct approval of those affected. |
Perhaps the most serious issue in 2025 is the direct threat to national sovereignty. Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, Washington has openly pressured to "take back" the Panama Canal, citing China's involvement in port management. Trump even went so far as to ask his military to "develop options" ranging from close cooperation to a military takeover.
In April 2025, the Mulino administration signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the United States allowing the deployment of U.S. military personnel to Panamanian facilities, the free passage of military vessels through the Canal, and joint training exercises at former military bases. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth signed this agreement in Panama City on April 9, while Trump declared he had sent "a lot of troops" to Panama.
|
KEY CRITIQUE: The 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties were the greatest achievement of sovereignty in Panamanian history. The Canal, recovered in 1999, is the ultimate symbol of the Panamanian people's self-determination. Any agreement that compromises that sovereignty is a betrayal of the nation. Under the DDS system, this agreement would have required a binding referendum of the Panamanian people, and it would have been rejected. |
Panama presents one of the most painful paradoxes in Latin America: it is a high-income country with poverty levels typical of lower-middle-income nations. The wealthiest 10% concentrate 37.3% of the national income, while 21.7% of the population lives in general poverty and 9.6% in extreme poverty. With a basic food basket costing approximately $344.68 per month, a family earning minimum wage must allocate more than 54% of its income solely to food.
This inequality hits Indigenous peoples, women, young people, and residents of rural areas and Indigenous territories particularly hard. The country has been called the 'Dubai of Central America,' but that glamour belongs to the elite, not the people. The current growth model benefits those at the top and structurally excludes those at the bottom.
In November 2023, the Supreme Court declared the mining concession contract with Cobre Panamá (a subsidiary of Canada's First Quantum Minerals) unconstitutional, responding to massive public protests. The Panamanian people had spoken clearly: subsoil resources belong to the people, not to transnational corporations.
However, the Mulino government has repeatedly indicated its intention to reopen the mine, ignoring both the court ruling and public opposition. This perfectly exemplifies the pattern of state capture by transnational corporate interests that DDS identifies as one of the greatest dangers to any nation.
Beyond the immediate crises, Panama faces structural problems that no government of the traditional system has been able or willing to solve:
DirectDemocracyS is the only political organization in the world that has designed and implemented a system of authentic, complete, continuous, direct, rapid, competent, immediate, secure democracy, protected against manipulation. It is not a utopia: it is a functional system with a verifiable architecture, tested in multiple countries and contexts.
The pillars of the DDS system are eight:
The operational heart of DDS is the micro-group of 5 people. This is the atom of the organization. Each group of 5 forms a macro-group of 25 when each member forms their own group of 5. These expand to 125, then 625, and so on. Each level maintains direct communication with the adjacent level. No group can grow uncontrollably: quality always precedes quantity.
|
CONCRETE APPLICATION IN PANAMA: DDS would begin with micro-groups in Panama City, Colón, David (Chiriquí), Santiago (Veraguas), and Panama Viejo. Each group of five people, specializing in a specific area (economics, health, education, law, environment), forms the basis of local collective knowledge. In six months, with fractal expansion, we could have a real presence in all provinces. |
DDS is the first political organization in the world to treat artificial intelligence as full members of the organization, not as tools. The allddsAI system integrates multiple specialized AIs that:
Applied to Panama: When the government proposes a reform like CSS Law 462, the allddsAI system would present each citizen-member, on their phone or computer, with a comprehensive analysis: What exactly changes? Who benefits and who loses? What are the alternatives? What do national and international experts say? What are the consequences in 5, 10, and 20 years? The citizen votes informed. Power returns to the people.
One of the greatest threats to genuine democracy is not military coups, but media brainwashing. Economic elites control the mainstream media and use it to shape public opinion in defense of their interests. DDS has a systematic response to this problem:
The Panamanian political system has a fundamental flaw: the people elect representatives every five years and then lose all effective power over decisions. Representatives, ministers, and presidents make decisions that affect the lives of millions without consulting anyone, often for their own benefit or that of the special interest groups that finance their campaigns. The Torrijos-Carter Treaties were signed by General Omar Torrijos—not the Panamanian people. Law 462 was passed by the National Assembly—not the affected workers.
Any decision affecting fundamental rights, national resources, international treaties, or structural reforms must be submitted to a direct vote of the Panamanian people. Not occasional and poorly informed referendums, but a permanent system of direct consultation, facilitated by the DDS platform and its allddsAI technologies.
Specific examples for Panama:
In the DDS system, no single individual holds absolute power. Leadership is shared, with clear mandates, continuous peer review, and mandatory rotation. Applied to Panama, the 'ponte umano' (coordinators for each area) are elected directly by their group, can be removed at any time, and must report weekly.
The Panamanian electoral system must be reformed to guarantee:
All government processes must be publicly accessible in real time:
The Panamanian Constitution must be reformed through a genuinely participatory process: not a constituent assembly of professional politicians, but citizen assemblies in each district, with technical facilitation from DDS experts and participatory synthesis of popular contributions. The resulting text must be ratified directly by the people in a referendum.
The Panamanian economy presents a structural paradox. GDP growth is projected to reach 3.5% to 4.4% by 2025, driven by services (commerce, transportation, logistics, and finance). However, this growth does not benefit the majority of the population because the economic model is designed to concentrate wealth, not distribute it.
|
ECONOMIC INDICATOR |
DATA 2024-2025 |
|
GDP growth 2025 (estimated) |
3.5% – 4.4% |
|
General poverty |
21.7% of the population |
|
Extreme poverty |
9.6% of the population |
|
Unemployment (Oct. 2024) |
+202,000 people |
|
Concentration of income |
Richest 10% = 37.3% of income |
|
Cost of basic food basket |
~344.68 USD/month |
|
% of minimum wage for food |
>54% |
The fundamental principle is inviolable: the riches of Panama—the Canal, mineral resources, biodiversity, land, electromagnetic spectrum, and marine resources—are the permanent and inalienable property of the Panamanian people. No government, no party, no international treaty can transfer this property to national or transnational private actors without the direct, informed, and binding approval of the people.
Specific mechanisms:
The Panamanian tax system is deeply regressive: those with the least pay proportionally more, while large corporations and wealthy individuals use Panama as a platform for international tax evasion. DDS proposes:
|
EXPECTED CONSEQUENCES: The tax reform would generate an estimated $2.5–4 billion in additional revenue annually. These resources would fund universal healthcare, quality education, and rural infrastructure without increasing public debt. Fiscal transparency would eliminate money laundering that finances political corruption. |
Over-reliance on the Canal as an economic engine is a proven strategic vulnerability: the 2023-2024 drought drastically reduced traffic and affected national revenues. Panama needs to diversify its economy toward sectors with high added value and low environmental impact.
DDS rejects both indiscriminate privatization and inefficient state management. The DDS model proposes collectively owned enterprises with independent professional management:
Panama has one of the most developed financial systems in Latin America. Its dollarization eliminates exchange rate risk, and the International Banking Center (IBC) hosts more than 60 international banks. However, this same system has serious flaws: it serves as a platform for money laundering, tax evasion, and the concealment of illicit assets. The Panama Papers (2016) and Pandora Papers (2021) scandals exposed how Panama's financial architecture serves global elites—not the people of Panama.
The primary instrument for money laundering and tax evasion is the corporation with a hidden beneficial owner. DDS proposes the creation of a National Registry of Beneficial Owners, public and updated in real time, for all legal entities incorporated or domiciled in Panama. Penalties for providing false information will be criminal, not merely administrative.
DDS proposes the creation of the Panama Citizen Sovereign Fund (FSCP), financed with:
The FSCP would be managed by a nine-member board of directors: three directly elected by citizens through universal suffrage, three workers' representatives elected by their unions, and three independent economists serving five-year terms. Every Panamanian over the age of 18 would receive an annual dividend from the fund's returns—initially modest, increasing over time.
Panama's public debt has grown significantly in the last decade. DDS proposes:
The Panamanian healthcare system is profoundly dual: a public network overwhelmed for the majority and an excellent private sector accessible only to those who can afford it. The Social Security Fund, which should be the cornerstone of healthcare protection, is in financial and management crisis. DDS proposes transforming the healthcare system into an effective universal right.
|
SPECIFIC CASE: The Ngäbe-Buglé, Kuna Yala, and Emberá regions have the worst health indicators in the country. DDS would finance, with resources from the FSCP and tax reform, a network of 50 intercultural health centers staffed with doctors, nurses, and community health workers specifically trained for these communities. Expected result in 5 years: a 40% reduction in infant mortality and a 60% reduction in maternal mortality. |
Education is both the most powerful instrument of emancipation and the most potent tool of domination, depending on how it is used. DDS understands education not as the transmission of information but as the formation of citizens capable of critical thinking, active participation, and shaping their own destiny.
Access to decent housing is a fundamental human right. The Panamanian real estate market, especially in Panama City, has generated massive speculation that makes housing impossible for working families.
Insecurity is identified by 78% of Panamanians as the most urgent problem. However, a purely police-based response has proven insufficient and frequently counterproductive. DDS proposes a comprehensive approach:
The seven indigenous peoples of Panama (Ngäbe, Buglé, Guna, Emberá, Wounaan, Naso Tjerdi, Bribri) are the guardians of the nation's biodiversity and deepest culture. Historically, they have been the most excluded from the development model. DDS proposes:
The Panama Canal is the ultimate expression of Panamanian sovereignty, regained in 1999 after decades of diplomatic and popular struggle. Its operation generates more than $4 billion annually for the state. Under Panamanian management, the Canal has proven to be managed with an efficiency equal to or greater than that of the period under U.S. administration.
The threat posed by US pressure under Trump is not merely geopolitical: it is existential for national sovereignty. Any agreement that opens the door to foreign military or political control of the Canal betrays the memory of Omar Torrijos, Jorge Illueca, and all those who fought for that sovereignty.
DDS establishes inviolable principles regarding the Canal:
|
DDS's response to Trump: The best defense of Panamanian sovereignty is not submission or direct confrontation with a superpower—it is massive citizen organization, undisputed democratic legitimacy, and the support of the international community. A government that enjoys the active and organized support of 80% of its population is much harder to pressure than one that governs against its own people. DDS is precisely building that legitimacy. |
Panama, due to its geographic location, is naturally a hub of international relations. DDS proposes a foreign policy that maximizes the advantage of this position without compromising sovereignty.
Panama is among the countries with the greatest biodiversity per square kilometer on the planet. However, deforestation, extractive mining, uncontrolled urban sprawl, and climate change threaten this invaluable natural capital. The drought that lowered the level of Lake Gatun in 2023-2024 was not just a Canal crisis—it was a major climate warning.
The first phase is organizational building. DDS doesn't come to power before it has demonstrated that it can organize itself, that its proposals work, and that Panamanians identify with them.
The entire implementation plan rests on a pillar that radically distinguishes it from any other political proposal: the complete, accurate, neutral, and independent information that the allddsAI system makes available to every Panamanian citizen. It is not enough to have the best proposals—the people must understand, evaluate, and approve them with full knowledge. This is the only way to build popular power that cannot be co-opted, bought, or deceived.
DDS's proposals are not abstract. They have concrete, verifiable, and measurable consequences in the daily lives of every Panamanian. Below, we present projections based on comparable experiences in other countries:
|
AREA |
CURRENT SITUATION |
DDS 5-YEAR PROJECTION |
|
General poverty |
21.7% of the population |
Reduction to 12-14% |
|
Extreme poverty |
9.6% |
Reduction to 3-4% |
|
Universal access to healthcare |
~60% with actual coverage |
+90% with effective coverage |
|
Preschool education |
~45% coverage |
Universal coverage 0-6 years |
|
Unemployment |
+202,000 people |
35-40% reduction |
|
Citizen participation |
~70% in elections |
Continuous participation >85% |
|
Corruption (CPI Transparency) |
Position ~95/180 |
Goal: position <50 in 10 years |
DDS's proposals are not unsupported experiments. They are based on successful experiences from multiple countries:
DDS does not hide the risks of its proposal. Honesty is a core value:
Panama has everything it needs to be a just, prosperous, sovereign, and democratic country. It has extraordinary natural resources. It has a unique geographic location. It has a history of struggle for sovereignty that is a first-rate political and identity asset. It has an active civil society, capable of mobilizing when it chooses to. What it lacks is not wealth or courage: it lacks a political system worthy of its people.
DirectDemocracyS offers that system. We don't impose it: we propose it, explain it, submit it to debate, and implement it only with the free and informed approval of the Panamanian people. Because that is precisely the difference between old politics and the new democracy: we don't ask you to follow us—we ask you to think, to compare, to demand, and to decide.
The wealth of Panama belongs to the Panamanian people. The power to decide Panama's future belongs to the Panamanian people. This is the premise we will not negotiate. This is the program we are building together.
— DirectDemocracyS —
Logic · Common Sense · Truth · Coherence · Mutual Respect
directdemocracys.org
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments