It's not easy to understand

This is the first informative article written entirely by the first 5 official members of DirectDemocracyS, to thank all the people who have joined us, as well as our visitors, who are just starting to study our system.

We're writing this short message because we're finally starting the first tests for some of our local micro-groups. As always, we'll take everything slowly, as we always have, to prevent any potential errors.

First, we want to clarify some fundamental concepts, including philosophical ones, that underlie our desire and determination to create DirectDemocracyS from scratch—a complete, new, secure, innovative system, and an alternative to all others. These are words we often respect, but it's necessary to be repetitive to connect various concepts and to explain certain concepts well.

To explain to anyone exactly what DirectDemocracyS is, one simple yet powerful sentence suffices: we are a few completely free and authentically democratic people who have decided to engage in political activity, as well as voluntarily engage in business and investment. We are many friends who have come together to become a family.

The previous sentence explains why we are legally recognized worldwide. From the first five of us on down to the last person who joins us, we will remain united forever, and we will do great work for the common good, not just of those who join us, but of all humanity.

No one will be able to challenge, oppose, or impede our freedom to communicate, collaborate, and engage in countless activities together, based on rules proposed, discussed, chosen, tested, and made definitive by democratic voting. In short, our legality lies precisely in deciding everything together, with innovative, modern, and truly democratic methodologies.

DirectDemocracyS was born from a banal phrase: we live in a shitty world. The opening phrase of DirectDemocracyS referred to the general state of the world we lived in, and still live in, as we write this first message. The subsequent phrases, which we have explained several times, up to the ones we have just spoken, and even those we will speak in the future, are all connected, coherent, and necessary to achieve our purpose and our goal: to change and improve the world, for the good of all, without discrimination.

To the superficial, they may seem like abstract concepts, but they are all very concrete and have enormous meaning.

But let's briefly analyze why, even now: we live in a shitty world. It would be too simple to blame all the other systems; the less intelligent will simply blame politics, the various lobbies, religions—basically, everyone has the tendency to blame everyone but themselves for the world situation.

This concept of collective responsibility, which no one can deny but no one wants to admit, is one of the reasons that has forced us not to try to change and improve other systems, because it would have been a waste of time and a completely pointless endeavor. You can't improve something created by others, but you can try to create something different, and better. We are often harsh in our assessments of those who try to challenge existing systems, because they are essentially fighting against themselves, wasting so much time pointlessly, for the simple reason that one cannot simply challenge them; one must propose real, concrete, and perfectly functional solutions to be credible. In countries where some partial freedoms exist, social networks and various apps have been created to allow anyone to complain, vent their frustrations, hate, envy, and denigrate everything and everyone.

But let us all ask ourselves together: who is to blame for everything that has happened throughout human history? Foolish people will all say in unison: those who governed, those who made decisions, those who held power, those who were behind all the previous categories. At DirectDemocracyS, however, we also, and above all, place the blame on those who failed to prevent all this, being complicit and passive bystanders, minding their own business, and allowing these despicable things to happen. The fact of not opposing injustice, inequity, violence, lies, crime, illegality, deceit, and manipulation, but continuing to assign blame, makes everyone guilty.

In designing and creating DirectDemocracyS, we, and all those who have joined us, and those who will join in the future, have decided first and foremost to assume all our collective responsibilities for the past and to do everything necessary to create a different and better world, for the benefit of all of us and all future generations. While we had no alternatives or opportunities to play a leading role until we partially made our fundamental rules public, with the creation of our system, we had a choice: whether to continue to cry and complain, or to take action ourselves, concretely.

We want to clarify a very important concept: not everything is bad, not all people in the old systems are bad, there are many positive things, and there are many people who are doing well, living happy, serene, and fulfilled lives. So not everything deserves criticism and change, but just looking around, getting the right information, from every angle, will reveal many things that aren't right, and that could be done differently, for the better.

Laziness, superficiality, and the unwillingness of so many people to work concretely for the common good are some of the reasons why our growth, while constant (because more people join us than leave, or we fire), is so slow. Many people aren't willing to study us, they make hasty judgments, and superficial assessments. But at DirectDemocracyS, we are fortunate and able to transform apparent problems into strengths, because we realized from the beginning that to do a great job, we needed, especially in the difficult and complicated initial phases, only truly motivated people, willing to sacrifice precious time and their intelligence to integrate everything into our system, making it ever bigger and more beautiful.

Before us, no one had the courage to establish a new system, for the simple reason that so many already existed; we just had to choose one and get to work. It would have been simpler, quicker, and less costly, both financially and personally. But we would have had limitations; we couldn't have rewritten every single rule from scratch, with pioneering ideas and projects, and with endless ingenious initiatives. For these reasons, we decided from the beginning: let's do something from scratch. There were no instructions for creating a new system; we often had to improvise, invent, and redesign a different and better society. And to do so, perhaps for the first and only time, we always thought of the collective good. For everything we decided, voting together, we always had the good of the entire world's population as our objective, not our own interests, not personal power, and not personal ambitions; rather, the community has always been at the center of everything.

It wasn't easy. We all know, for example, what the less intelligent say when you tell them: "I know a new political organization." The stupid ones stop you immediately, they don't let you explain, but they exclaim: "Oh, aren't all the political forces there are enough?" Shall we add more, corrupt, thieving, bastards, unreliable, manipulative, and liars? Senseless generalizations, superficiality, and a lack of desire to actually take action are among the worst and most widespread evils among the world's population, and it's a real shame, because the majority of the world's population is made up of very good, intelligent people with enormous potential, which often goes unrealized and is inexorably lost. But even in this, in almost every evil, there is also something positive: DirectDemocracyS has always been understood and appreciated by people with above-average intelligence, willing to contribute with annual fees (to risk all together and to self-finance us), and with their own concrete work (even doing things we don't like, for the good of the system).

We've also equipped our system with a unique, inimitable style and a different, better mentality. If you pay attention and study us, you'll see that we have the ability to be loved and hated by everyone at the same time. This isn't a very useful quality for a new political force, especially in elections, where those who promise more (even if they know they can't keep their promises), or even those who give public money to lazy people, gain huge consensus. However, those paid to do nothing useful won't be able to continue to be supported forever and risk finding themselves in enormous difficulty. We preferred to create a political organization that speaks clearly, without any possible interpretations, doesn't promise miracles, but acts in the common interest, always starting by helping those who are truly in need first, most, and for the longest time. This isn't a slogan like many other political forces have accustomed you to. We truly, without giving anything away to those who don't want to work, will concretely give everyone the opportunity to live better and more peacefully, by pursuing careers that allow them to express their full potential. Putting the right people in the right jobs, rewarding merit.

Micro-groups will occupy a large part of our activities for the coming months, and perhaps many years. We have some forecasts and "roadmaps," and we can tell you that we are several months ahead of schedule for the testing phases. We want to emphasize that the micro-test groups are not social experiments; they are the starting points for a DirectDemocracyS presence in urban and rural areas, up to a maximum of 1,000 inhabitants. This will expand rapidly, with human bridges connecting them, creating a highly efficient and collaborative system.

From us five crazy visionaries, who started with great effort, a lot of time, and personal risk, we have just one request: give us a chance, as you've given so many to other political forces, and welcome our micro-groups into your communities. By joining us, we guarantee they'll be very useful to you, and you'll never regret joining.