In the year 2025, DirectDemocracyS continued its work to create a robust, fair, equitable, comprehensive, and secure system to change and improve the world.

We have done it with every person who has joined us, and we will continue to do it forever, with all those who, with courage, determination, and inspiration, join us, at any stage of our journey.

Our continuous growth is slow, orderly, organized, and attentive to every little detail, because we cannot afford to make mistakes, we cannot risk being boycotted, slowed down, or worse, stopped, from the outside, and above all from within.

We know that our innovative and alternative system has been, is, and will be feared and perhaps hated by anyone who exploits all other systems for their own purposes, and even by those who declare themselves "anti-system," who, unable to offer anything different or better, merely strengthen, hopefully unwittingly, the systems they often pretend to fight.

We want to reassure everyone: we know we have disruptive potential, and we are confident that soon all the good people of the world, who are the absolute majority, will know us, appreciate us (not us, but our system), and will join us in these difficult, long, and arduous efforts of development and growth. Despite the enormous power we will wield, virtually everywhere in the world, we will not prevent anyone from criticizing us, opposing us, trying to undermine us, or even opposing us. In practice, we will not respond violently to those who dislike us, because they will surely do so without even a single logical or common-sense argument. In practice, they have no reason to hate us, and we, who hate no one, will not prevent any person, or group of people, from enjoying freedom and democracy forever.

Our predictions for victories everywhere aren't just optimistic; they're based on numbers, and therefore, on mathematical calculations (and mathematics has no political bias). Above all, we rely on the overall validity of DirectDemocracyS.

Good people are the vast majority of the earth's inhabitants, and as soon as everyone knows of our existence, they will have no choice but to join us, to work concretely within our system, together with all of us.

But who are these good people? They are all those who have made decisions that have not had disastrous consequences for others. In other words, those who have not committed evil deeds, and who have not made too many mistakes, intentionally. But also those who have committed many serious errors, but have repented, or have paid for those mistakes, and have decided to do good things, for themselves and for others.

Math helps us, because according to our data, almost everyone who knows about DirectDemocracyS and visits our platforms joins us. Those few who don't join immediately don't do so for three main reasons: superficiality, which leads to a hasty negative judgment. This group doesn't join us immediately, but if they return, they generally join after a few more visits because they understand our enormous potential.

The second category that doesn't immediately join us is made up of lazy people who prefer to remain passive, suffering the consequences of others' decisions, mere helpless spectators. These lazy people prefer being ordered around than being protagonists of their own destinies. Almost all of them do so because they find it satisfying to criticize, envy, and even hate others, who are richer, more powerful, and more famous than they are. If they joined us, with truly and completely shared leadership and the right to collective ownership, they wouldn't be able to criticize our official representatives, or even our political representatives, because in DirectDemocracyS, the grassroots holds the power, and therefore, by criticizing our hierarchies, they would also have to admit their own fault. Shared leadership and collective ownership have a small, unseemly side: shared responsibility for common decisions and their consequences for all. This category of people will join us in the final stages, therefore among the final registrations, when all the most important and responsible roles will already be filled, by those who are willing to put in the work. In short: they will join us when they can't cause any problems for all of us with their laziness. They will join us only when there are a great many of us, and only because they are people, often accustomed to following the herd.

The third category of people who won't join us immediately are all those who live very well in other systems, who perhaps exploit unjust and unfair rules to their advantage, and who live well thanks to inefficient security measures that allow so many people to be cunning. This will truly be the last category to join us; indeed, they will fight with all means, fair and unfair, to try to boycott us, slow us down, or in the vain hope of stopping us. When they join us, they will try in every way to engage in despicable activities, trying in vain to obtain advantages and benefits that, being undeserved, they will never be able to have, given the way our system was designed. These people will register last, and only when all other systems—unjust, inequitable, failed, and unsafe—have collapsed, and very few people are willing to stay.

These forecasts of ours, often mistaken for overly optimistic, are simply based on calculations, which in turn are based on the knowledge that we have created a system different, and better, than all the others. Our potential is truly immense, and will always be so, and to realize this, it is enough to compare DirectDemocracyS with all the other systems, and our political organization with all the other political forces of the past, present, and all those they will invent in the future.

It's not vanity, presumption, and we don't believe we're the new Messiahs. We, and all those who join us, look at reality, the truth, and make comparisons with everyone, and the more we do it, the more we realize that there's no way to match our system. It's not even possible to copy it, because good people, we repeat, are the majority of the world's population. They don't forgive those who steal, those who lie, or even those who copy the ideas and projects of others. Anyone who only took a few parts, trying to hide the fact that they're copying us, or, to do it less obviously, would end up with an incomplete system, never up to the standard of the original, so everyone would continue to prefer DirectDemocracyS.

But what's new for 2026?

To continue our long, complicated, and hard work, with continuous, but controlled growth.

Carry out some new activities, which we will present at the appropriate time, with the usual attention to every detail.

Develop local phases, as required by our implementing rules.

Create, in the right ways and at the right times, all our local micro-groups, which will transform at the right time, according to our rules and methodologies, into our official micro-organizations. These official micro-organizations will be the presence of DirectDemocracyS in every urban or rural area, up to 1,000 inhabitants. With slow but steady growth, at full capacity, we expect approximately 1,000,000 similar groups (created by an equal number of official members) worldwide, approximately one group in each area, up to 1,000 inhabitants (in some areas, there will also be multiple local groups in the same area). At the right time, gradually growing, they will involve approximately 3,100,000,000 people. We repeat: each micro-group will slowly grow until it has at least 31 official members each, transforming it from a group to an official organization. These are mathematical calculations, based on detailed forecasts, at the global level.

Growth will continue, both through the registration of new users and the creation and integration of micro-groups into official groups and organizations, at the local, territorial, administrative, and electoral levels, in urban and rural areas, and larger, therefore, populated. They will join together locally until, at the right time, they reunite with our national, continental, and international organizations.

From that moment on, elections will be held in every official organization, from the smallest to the largest, for new official representatives (who will manage the entire system, from the bottom up), but also, simultaneously, at the level of political representatives, who, after the relevant selections, and the various phases, of our primary elections, closed online, will be able to participate, in the real elections, as political representatives, of our voters/users.

Thanks to these more than 1,000,000 official microorganizations, our electors will be created, with their respective voting groups, at every level, according to very detailed and democratic implementing rules. These electors are essential to prevent a few individuals, or groups, from attempting to amass too much power in our system. We will provide you with all the details, explanations, and rationales, in due course.

All of this is a huge, complicated job, and it will take a very long time, but we will do it as always, in the best way possible, therefore without any rush.

The growth of official microorganizations will allow us to obtain all the signatures needed to participate in elections everywhere (in countries where they are mandatory), but it will also allow us a substantial, comprehensive physical presence, allowing us to carry out all activities in person, in every area, always organized and coordinated, through our platforms. In short: we will be able to participate in real elections everywhere, with our best candidates, and campaign literally door-to-door.

We are preparing flyers, advertising materials, calendars, and other gadgets, to make our system known to everyone, also by explaining it in person, listening, talking, learning, integrating everyone's ideas and projects, and deciding everything, meeting in public spaces, or in the homes of those who want to get to know us and invite us.

The latest innovation, which we hope to implement in 2026: participation in local elections, in a very small local area, in one of the world's countries, with our candidates, implementing all our rules, methodologies, instructions, style, and our unique and inimitable characteristics. We will surely win at least one of these local elections, where citizens will be protagonists, through direct decisions, with a system open to all, and with everything manageable and verifiable by all citizens, through our platforms. Now, imagine the enormous media impact our first victory would have, and a local government like this, open to all, based on equality and meritocracy.

In a very short time, we will be talked about all over the world, and all those who try in every way to "make us invisible" will find the whole world talking about us. We will demonstrate to everyone that we don't need the help and collaboration of traditional media, social networks, and advertising. All we need to do is let our concrete results speak for themselves, and they will surely confirm the validity of our choices. DirectDemocracyS will use word of mouth online, as well as physical, person-to-person communication, and the positive, verified reviews of those who know and appreciate us to present itself to the entire world.

Happy New Year everyone!

In the year 2025, DirectDemocracyS continued its work to create a robust, fair, equitable, comprehensive, and secure system to change and improve the world.

We have done it with every person who has joined us, and we will continue to do it forever, with all those who, with courage, determination, and inspiration, join us, at any stage of our journey.

Our continuous growth is slow, orderly, organized, and attentive to every little detail, because we cannot afford to make mistakes, we cannot risk being boycotted, slowed down, or worse, stopped, from the outside, and above all from within.

We know that our innovative and alternative system has been, is, and will be feared and perhaps hated by anyone who exploits all other systems for their own purposes, and even by those who declare themselves "anti-system," who, unable to offer anything different or better, merely strengthen, hopefully unwittingly, the systems they often pretend to fight.

We want to reassure everyone: we know we have disruptive potential, and we are confident that soon all the good people of the world, who are the absolute majority, will know us, appreciate us (not us, but our system), and will join us in these difficult, long, and arduous efforts of development and growth. Despite the enormous power we will wield, virtually everywhere in the world, we will not prevent anyone from criticizing us, opposing us, trying to undermine us, or even opposing us. In practice, we will not respond violently to those who dislike us, because they will surely do so without even a single logical or common-sense argument. In practice, they have no reason to hate us, and we, who hate no one, will not prevent any person, or group of people, from enjoying freedom and democracy forever.

Our predictions for victories everywhere aren't just optimistic; they're based on numbers, and therefore, on mathematical calculations (and mathematics has no political bias). Above all, we rely on the overall validity of DirectDemocracyS.

Good people are the vast majority of the earth's inhabitants, and as soon as everyone knows of our existence, they will have no choice but to join us, to work concretely within our system, together with all of us.

But who are these good people? They are all those who have made decisions that have not had disastrous consequences for others. In other words, those who have not committed evil deeds, and who have not made too many mistakes, intentionally. But also those who have committed many serious errors, but have repented, or have paid for those mistakes, and have decided to do good things, for themselves and for others.

Math helps us, because according to our data, almost everyone who knows about DirectDemocracyS and visits our platforms joins us. Those few who don't join immediately don't do so for three main reasons: superficiality, which leads to a hasty negative judgment. This group doesn't join us immediately, but if they return, they generally join after a few more visits because they understand our enormous potential.

The second category that doesn't immediately join us is made up of lazy people who prefer to remain passive, suffering the consequences of others' decisions, mere helpless spectators. These lazy people prefer being ordered around than being protagonists of their own destinies. Almost all of them do so because they find it satisfying to criticize, envy, and even hate others, who are richer, more powerful, and more famous than they are. If they joined us, with truly and completely shared leadership and the right to collective ownership, they wouldn't be able to criticize our official representatives, or even our political representatives, because in DirectDemocracyS, the grassroots holds the power, and therefore, by criticizing our hierarchies, they would also have to admit their own fault. Shared leadership and collective ownership have a small, unseemly side: shared responsibility for common decisions and their consequences for all. This category of people will join us in the final stages, therefore among the final registrations, when all the most important and responsible roles will already be filled, by those who are willing to put in the work. In short: they will join us when they can't cause any problems for all of us with their laziness. They will join us only when there are a great many of us, and only because they are people, often accustomed to following the herd.

The third category of people who won't join us immediately are all those who live very well in other systems, who perhaps exploit unjust and unfair rules to their advantage, and who live well thanks to inefficient security measures that allow so many people to be cunning. This will truly be the last category to join us; indeed, they will fight with all means, fair and unfair, to try to boycott us, slow us down, or in the vain hope of stopping us. When they join us, they will try in every way to engage in despicable activities, trying in vain to obtain advantages and benefits that, being undeserved, they will never be able to have, given the way our system was designed. These people will register last, and only when all other systems—unjust, inequitable, failed, and unsafe—have collapsed, and very few people are willing to stay.

These forecasts of ours, often mistaken for overly optimistic, are simply based on calculations, which in turn are based on the knowledge that we have created a system different, and better, than all the others. Our potential is truly immense, and will always be so, and to realize this, it is enough to compare DirectDemocracyS with all the other systems, and our political organization with all the other political forces of the past, present, and all those they will invent in the future.

It's not vanity, presumption, and we don't believe we're the new Messiahs. We, and all those who join us, look at reality, the truth, and make comparisons with everyone, and the more we do it, the more we realize that there's no way to match our system. It's not even possible to copy it, because good people, we repeat, are the majority of the world's population. They don't forgive those who steal, those who lie, or even those who copy the ideas and projects of others. Anyone who only took a few parts, trying to hide the fact that they're copying us, or, to do it less obviously, would end up with an incomplete system, never up to the standard of the original, so everyone would continue to prefer DirectDemocracyS.

But what's new for 2026?

To continue our long, complicated, and hard work, with continuous, but controlled growth.

Carry out some new activities, which we will present at the appropriate time, with the usual attention to every detail.

Develop local phases, as required by our implementing rules.

Create, in the right ways and at the right times, all our local micro-groups, which will transform at the right time, according to our rules and methodologies, into our official micro-organizations. These official micro-organizations will be the presence of DirectDemocracyS in every urban or rural area, up to 1,000 inhabitants. With slow but steady growth, at full capacity, we expect approximately 1,000,000 similar groups (created by an equal number of official members) worldwide, approximately one group in each area, up to 1,000 inhabitants (in some areas, there will also be multiple local groups in the same area). At the right time, gradually growing, they will involve approximately 3,100,000,000 people. We repeat: each micro-group will slowly grow until it has at least 31 official members each, transforming it from a group to an official organization. These are mathematical calculations, based on detailed forecasts, at the global level.

Growth will continue, both through the registration of new users and the creation and integration of micro-groups into official groups and organizations, at the local, territorial, administrative, and electoral levels, in urban and rural areas, and larger, therefore, populated. They will join together locally until, at the right time, they reunite with our national, continental, and international organizations.

From that moment on, elections will be held in every official organization, from the smallest to the largest, for new official representatives (who will manage the entire system, from the bottom up), but also, simultaneously, at the level of political representatives, who, after the relevant selections, and the various phases, of our primary elections, closed online, will be able to participate, in the real elections, as political representatives, of our voters/users.

Thanks to these more than 1,000,000 official microorganizations, our electors will be created, with their respective voting groups, at every level, according to very detailed and democratic implementing rules. These electors are essential to prevent a few individuals, or groups, from attempting to amass too much power in our system. We will provide you with all the details, explanations, and rationales, in due course.

All of this is a huge, complicated job, and it will take a very long time, but we will do it as always, in the best way possible, therefore without any rush.

The growth of official microorganizations will allow us to obtain all the signatures needed to participate in elections everywhere (in countries where they are mandatory), but it will also allow us a substantial, comprehensive physical presence, allowing us to carry out all activities in person, in every area, always organized and coordinated, through our platforms. In short: we will be able to participate in real elections everywhere, with our best candidates, and campaign literally door-to-door.

We are preparing flyers, advertising materials, calendars, and other gadgets, to make our system known to everyone, also by explaining it in person, listening, talking, learning, integrating everyone's ideas and projects, and deciding everything, meeting in public spaces, or in the homes of those who want to get to know us and invite us.

The latest innovation, which we hope to implement in 2026: participation in local elections, in a very small local area, in one of the world's countries, with our candidates, implementing all our rules, methodologies, instructions, style, and our unique and inimitable characteristics. We will surely win at least one of these local elections, where citizens will be protagonists, through direct decisions, with a system open to all, and with everything manageable and verifiable by all citizens, through our platforms. Now, imagine the enormous media impact our first victory would have, and a local government like this, open to all, based on equality and meritocracy.

In a very short time, we will be talked about all over the world, and all those who try in every way to "make us invisible" will find the whole world talking about us. We will demonstrate to everyone that we don't need the help and collaboration of traditional media, social networks, and advertising. All we need to do is let our concrete results speak for themselves, and they will surely confirm the validity of our choices. DirectDemocracyS will use word of mouth online, as well as physical, person-to-person communication, and the positive, verified reviews of those who know and appreciate us to present itself to the entire world.

Happy New Year everyone!

In its initial stages, DirectDemocracyS was known to a very few, carefully selected people, and we defined it as partially public. We are not a secret sect, and we have no secrets, but we respect everyone's privacy, both internally and externally, and we do not disclose the results of our work unless they are final and strictly necessary, based on individual and group decisions.

Spreading our activities to non-official members is completely pointless, and we don't like wasting precious time. If someone is truly interested, they join us, pay an annual fee, and work actively with us to make our vast and complex system work. After doing so, they'll receive much more information.

While we wait to have all our own micro-groups, in urban areas, and in rural areas, at the local level, with up to 1000 inhabitants, the only place where we carry out all our activities is represented by our platforms.

We call it our collective property, sometimes even the great common home of anyone who joins us. We've explained the reasons for our decision to hold off on outside activities until the right time. Here's a short list of some of them. Security measures that ensure the protection of every person, every group, and every activity we do. Log files that clearly show all our official members who has performed each activity, so we can punish those who make mistakes and reward the best users. To ensure that we will forever be free, independent, and neutral, thanks in part to self-financing. To have a clean, tidy, and optimally organized space, with all the necessary resources. To depend on no one but ourselves. To be indebted to no one but ourselves.

So if we ask for a small contribution, we don't do it to enrich a few, but to ensure the survival of our system, while taking into account the economic and financial conditions of those most in need. We offer annual installments with terms of up to four years for those on low incomes.

If we ask for direct commitment from the higher levels of users, it's because the world doesn't change and improve on its own, and no one should wait for others to do so; it requires a lot of long, hard work from everyone. It's not enough to simply change and improve the world; it requires ongoing commitment from everyone, not only to preserve all the good results achieved, but to continuously improve, continually evolving, and innovating as needed.

The preceding sentences explain many of our motivations, as well as some important details. First, DirectDemocracyS, in its important and delicate initial stages, wasn't suitable for everyone, and we couldn't accept just anyone to build a solid foundation on which to create such a comprehensive system with enormous potential. Second, not everyone understands, and above all, not everyone has the patience, time, and will to get personally involved. This widespread superficiality and chronic laziness slows our growth, but also preserves the integrity of our system, which grows slowly but steadily, and with the most suitable people to work with us at every stage. Simply put, only completely compatible people participate in the various stages, and this strengthens us and saves us precious time. At the right time, however, anyone who wants to join us can do so, because having the best people in the right places, even the least compatible, already within us, will not create any problems.

DirectDemocracyS has everything it needs to do great work, and if we need something, we create it, striving to use only the best technologies, constantly updated and improved. We have the best operating systems and all the most suitable components to perform every task.

We have economic and financial management groups, open to all our official members, who follow shared rules, methodologies, and instructions. We don't waste money and resources on trivial matters. We don't need huge offices and facilities to carry out our various activities. Be careful. Thanks to our local micro-groups, when the time is right, we will also have a physical presence in every geographical, territorial, administrative, and electoral area. So we won't just work online, but will gather in public spaces, as well as in the homes of anyone who invites us to get to know each other and work together. At a certain point, we won't be dependent on any technology, because we will have many of our own official representatives, everywhere in the world.

We repeat, without huge offices and without unnecessary expenses, DirectDemocracyS will be found at the home of each of our official members, who, as collective owners of our entire system, can request to officially represent our system, both internally and externally.

We are not without offices, but as we do with our truly and completely shared leadership, we have many offices, which create one enormous one. If we combine even less than one square meter in the homes of all our official members, we will have the largest, most functional, and best office, with a comprehensive presence in every corner of the globe. Without spending anything, and without requiring virtually nothing, for all our official members. By avoiding waste, we can invest only in the things that are truly important.

Transportation is also shared, and we generally prefer to hold virtual conferences and meetings, using our own technology, and hold in-person meetings only at the local level. We also do this to avoid polluting the planet, with large meetings at the national, continental, and international levels, which, if held in person, would cost money and could have a negative impact on the environment.

If necessary, we will organize our own public demonstrations, following detailed rules, methodologies, and instructions. We will not participate in demonstrations with other political parties, unions, or other organizations, but will conduct our own separately and with an internal code of conduct that will be respected by all participants. We will do so without any violence or destruction, and we will always request and obtain all necessary permits. All our participants will be identified and monitored continuously , always with their faces uncovered. Each individual participant will assume full responsibility for their own behavior, and will be responsible for any damage caused to people or property. All instructions from security forces will be respected, based on mutual respect.

All our physical activities are broadcast live and completely recorded, so we can document and verify everything we do. We do this for various reasons, all based on logic, common sense, transparency, truth, research, and mutual respect.

Technology is still necessary and fundamental, to hold everything together, but also to document, demonstrate, and verify every physical activity, in every part of the world.

But let's see what this technology consists of, and how our platforms are distributed.

We have only one main, fully exposed, publicly visible web server. It's the subdomain https://free.directdemocracys.org/ , which is the gateway to our platforms and the only website that allows anyone to join us.

We have five backup web servers, which ensure our presence on every continent, ready to be activated if needed and to back up all the data from the main web server. One of the backup web servers is used by lower-level users, with the subdomain https://access.directdemocracys.org/ . Another web server hosts the subdomain https://www.directdemocracys.org/ , where higher-level users work. Another web server hosts the subdomain of our creators, developers, and guarantors. We use two of these web servers not only for backup but also as emergency web servers, ready for use in case of emergency.

Each of our subdomains contains all the specific websites, created, managed, and verified according to our needs.

Our obsession with working only on our own platforms, though valid, isn't understood by many people, who consider us too demanding and too "hidden." We don't want to define this type of person in the most appropriate way; we simply call them frustrated and superficial. They often ask us: "Why should I register and create a personal profile on yet another platform when I'm already registered on various social networks and countless other websites?" Others complain, asking: "Why don't you let me join you using my personal profile on the main traditional social networks? It would be easier, faster, and always safer." Let's answer the second question right away with another question that will clarify some of the reasons. If you write something "wrong," or if you're reported by multiple users at once (rightly or wrongly), and they block you or delete your personal profile on a traditional social network, how will you access your personal profile on DirectDemocracyS? Basically, joining us by registering and creating a personal profile, thus obtaining an identity in our system, requires very few things. For example, for a completely free personal profile, with no obligation to be present or to engage in any activities with us, the requirements are very few and simple. A username chosen according to our rules (nickname or random code), maintaining anonymity. A password of at least 12 characters (containing non-consecutive numbers, uppercase and lowercase letters that do not form words, and special characters, and that is difficult to guess). To do this, you need a personal, non-temporary, individually accessible email address, protected by a secure password, where you will receive the self-activation link, and a personal phone number, which will be verified before activation. Of course, for non-free user types, you will have to pay annual fees (a nominal fee, but crucial to our self-financing), and for the most important user types, you will have to carry out concrete activities with us (to keep our enormous mechanism running), with an attendance of about 20 minutes a day, every day (because the world doesn't change or improve on its own; it requires everyone's ongoing commitment). For the higher-level user types, who are part of our shared leadership and have voting rights in our system, and for our official members, who collectively own our entire system, we verify the identities of each individual user, with increasing and gradual security measures. For all higher-level user types, an official invitation is also required, with the inviter assuming full responsibility for who is invited. To gain more significant user types, you need a certain number of points, earned based on your specific individual and group activities, and specific periods of time, with impeccable behavior. And to answer the initial question: if we had worked in someone else's home, we would always be submissive, and at risk of blocks or deletions of many of our activities, many of our groups, and many of our users. Therefore, we prefer to be protagonists, and masters of our own destiny, on our own properties. It costs a little more, and we might lose some potential users/voters, but we can assure you that it's the only way to prevent any potential problems. The fact that we are not a sect is demonstrated by the fact that at the right time, at the right stages, literally anyone can join us, and if and when they meet all the requirements, they can become an official member, and therefore collective owner, of our entire system.

The real reason why the world is not "a paradise on earth," but a place where it is difficult to survive, with an economy that only creates debt, where there are enormous differences between people, and countless very serious problems, is only one: making the wrong choices.

We won't list all the times we've all made mistakes, many of our choices. It would be a long, and frankly useless, list, and we'd also have to go back in time to find many of the culprits.

What's the point of discovering your own mistakes? It's essential to uncover them all, from the biggest to the smallest, because only by identifying these errors, studying them carefully and professionally, and identifying the real culprits, can we prevent, and therefore avoid, all potential future problems.

The past cannot be changed, so blaming someone only serves the frustrated, who refuse to admit an "inconvenient" but undeniable truth: the current situation cannot be the fault of a few crafty individuals, but of countless others, incapable of finding solutions.

It's very convenient to say banalities, or to generalize, to complain about those who govern us, or who held power before, after, or now.

It's very nice, but not very useful, to imagine possible but nonexistent scenarios, and to create ideas, conspiracies, based on our imagination, based on free thought, in which every idea becomes "true" only because many incompetent and uninformed people believe they are thinking with their own heads.

If something isn't true or can't be scientifically proven with reliable and reliable sources, it's still false. It's not the number of "thinking minds" that certifies the truth, because a few independent, yet competent, experts are enough to debunk any theory and make these "specialists in everything" feel ignorant, lacking the intelligence to understand that ignorance has always been exploited by the crafty. We could write for hours, giving you thousands of examples, but we'll give you just one: have you ever heard someone declare they lied, or that they defamed, and apologize? Have you ever seen someone publicly admit they were wrong, and that they spread falsehoods? Until their deaths, they will continue to defend their lies, and they will try to find excuses, blaming others, or talking about other things.

Human psychology isn't that difficult to interpret, in general terms: we need the validation of the "pack," because we humans are social animals. We do a lot of things together, but perhaps the one thing we do best, in general, is make bad decisions and allow others to exploit our ignorance.

All the various systems, and all the various political forces, spend their time exploiting misinformation and ignorance, to "make people believe they are free" and above all to make the population believe they can decide something, and that they really count.

If it were truly so, after every election, everyone's living conditions would improve significantly. However, in reality, whichever political force wins, and whichever person gets the most votes , the situation improves only slightly, often temporarily, giving an illusion of well-being and change, which then gradually but inexorably fades over time. All the improvements last a very short time, and all the "gifts" they give you, you will repay, with interest. All political forces that base their success on lies and on gifts paid for by the community usually enjoy brief but very powerful successes, until the good and intelligent people, who are the majority, realize the enormous deception.

But don't worry, there is a long line of political forces and political representatives, ready to take advantage of your trust, and exploit your inability to do the right thing.

It may seem to you that we're writing a lot of obvious things, and many of you will try to deny them, because not everyone likes having to admit that we're all truly to blame for the global situation. Instead, dear friends, each of us must take our share of the blame and find solutions that truly work, that allow us, all together, to change and improve the world.

Before talking about DirectDemocracyS, and all those who made the right choice, we want to explain something simple, which no one can deny: there is no political force like us, that says the things we say, in the way we say them.

But how do the "smart ones" always manage to win and control the masses? The infallible method since prehistoric times: divide and control.

Divisions on any subject weaken us and prevent us from understanding the truth. If you notice, for every topic, there are people who think differently, and that's normal and right. But unfortunately for all of us, all divisions only strengthen the crafty few who know how to exploit them to their advantage.

Using misinformation and manipulation, they manage to brainwash everyone, often even intelligent and competent people. They cunningly exploit our weaknesses, our unwillingness to take responsibility, and even our laziness.

We must admit that all of traditional politics has enormous power, because people rarely want to decide, act personally, and take responsibility. Even though it's a wrong and self-destructive choice, our subconscious prefers to be controlled rather than be the controller. In short, we like others to decide for us, so we can then criticize them and blame them entirely.

Just take a look at traditional social networks to see the real causes of the world we live in. You'll see a majority of frustrated and envious people who hate everything and everyone, who insult anyone who's rich, famous, or powerful, without ever delving deeper, without ever choosing or distinguishing between the good and the bad, but above all, who do absolutely nothing to change or improve the situation. They use the internet to complain, to hate, to envy, and to declare their impotence to the world. They often organize themselves with "revolutionary" ideas, creating small groups that seek to indiscriminately challenge everything and everyone , creating further divisions , but without ever proposing anything that truly works.

We're often very critical of social media revolutionaries who believe in giving all power to everyone, at any time, indiscriminately. They believe in a fairytale world where the bottom controls the top, unaware that this is precisely one of the biggest mistakes humankind has made throughout history: deluding people into thinking they're all equal, with the same skills and merits.

Thus, believing ourselves to be all the same, we all talk about everything, and influencers emerge, along with endless messages, announcements, and advertisements, teaching us how to live, what to choose, what to eat, what to drink, how to work, and how to think. Obviously, this creates enormous masses that, though divided, can be easily controlled and subjugated.

Total freedom, individual and group, which is potentially infinite but ends exactly where the freedom of another person or group of people begins, is only temporary, partial, and above all, never concrete, never truly collective. Authentic democracy, on the other hand, is a mirage in the desert, because every election is merely the transfer of power, for many years, from the people who hold it only on election day, to the political forces and their political representatives, who decide everything, without ever, or almost never, seeking the opinion of those who gave them the power of representation.

To solve all the world's problems directly, concretely, and lastingly, an innovative and alternative system called DirectDemocracyS has been created. Everyone reading this message knows about it, but perhaps doesn't fully understand it.

Many people, even very knowledgeable ones, simply study its name and already form definitive opinions, thinking of the first direct democracy of Ancient Greece, others think of the fake, partial, and limited direct democracy of modern Switzerland, and a few other geographical areas.

We live in such a superficial society, where most people understand everything simply by reading an article's headline (and we all know that headlines, in general, are designed to attract attention and get likes), so even in our system, everyone pretends to have understood, and judges a book by its cover. It happens to everyone, and those who deny this flaw, which affects almost the entire population, are knowingly lying. DirectDemocracyS is so comprehensive, complex, and coherent, that it can sometimes seem overly complicated, and even frighten those accustomed to others making decisions, and even put them at risk. Even in free countries, freedom of thought is limited to a few phrases and concepts, already thought of and used by others, while true freedom has never existed, for the simple reason that the majority of people would be incapable of exploiting it.

DirectDemocracyS rewrites all the rules, creating from scratch, with long, hard, and continuous collective work, a complete, fair, equitable, orderly, organized, real, concrete, perfectly functioning, and above all secure system.

But why base all our activities, and spend a third of all our money, on security measures? Why create everything from scratch, with new rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations?

Security measures are essential to protect everyone who joins us. If we have brought together people of diverse minds, it's only right that we continue to do so, fostering the unity in diversity that everyone envies us. To understand and appreciate us, people don't just read the headline, but write together, every rule, and co-create all our activities, in a truly shared leadership and collective ownership, guaranteed to every official member. People don't leave decisions to others, but, based on jointly agreed-upon rules, become protagonists and together build a society that is not only different, but above all better, for the good of all, within us, but also for those who are, and perhaps will forever remain, outside. This complete freedom to think and act together, not leaving it to others, must always be protected with the best security measures. Simplicity is always synonymous with "various interpretations," and offers crafty people the opportunity to exploit all systems to their advantage, in ways that are ethically and morally incorrect. DirectDemocracyS, by consistently combining equality and meritocracy over time, consistently offers everyone the same opportunities, always rewarding the best—not just the smartest, but those who truly do things the best way. We leave simplicity to those who read every sentence or headline. In DirectDemocracyS, with its lengthy articles, we express concepts exactly as they are, without the possibility of interpreting them in one's own favor. In this way, with a clarity and coherence unique in the world, we protect ourselves from potential fake news, or from people who try to denigrate us—and there will be many of them—because our presence will annoy many lobbies, and many powerful, rich, and famous people, who will try in every way to boycott us, slow us down, or worse, stop us. Obviously, they fail every time, for one simple reason: we spread only the truth, and we base all our activities on undeniable facts, fully documented by reliable sources. Therefore, those who seek to find fault are left with only resignation to an unassailable system. We don't seek to repair a world already destroyed by others, but rather to create our own, different and better, in which to live with those who join us.

So don't be superficial, but study DirectDemocracyS thoroughly and with an open mind, and if you don't like something, if it can be improved, we'll all change it together.

One of the greatest flaws of us human beings is that we are almost all easily corruptible.

From this simple and undeniable phrase, we created DirectDemocracyS, seeking solutions to this scourge that makes our lives worse.

Almost all of them come at a price, and all systems, except ours, don't do a good job of preventing these despicable behaviors.

It would be easy to trivialize by saying: politics is all corrupt. Generalizing is always wrong, and we try and succeed in never doing so. In many of our sentences, we add the words: some (some are corrupt), often (often there are corrupt people), in certain cases (in certain cases there are corrupt people), or almost all (almost everyone is corrupt). This way of communicating allows us to avoid offending the few incorruptible people, while still analyzing society in a fair and equitable manner.

We find it profoundly wrong to distinguish between petty corruption and grand corruption, because both are wrong. It's like saying: in that war, only a few people died. A few people killed, injured, or frightened are always too many. To better understand what we're trying to explain, let's give you a practical example: tax evasion. If a person or a company evades €1,000, it's a significant sum, which should be recovered and used for the common good. But 10,000 people evading €1 each create greater harm to the community. To justify their own misconduct, people often tend to minimize it, even with phrases like: "He who steals an apple ends up in prison; he who steals a truckload of apples never pays." Someone who steals a truckload of apples has a greater chance of bribing (giving away stolen apples), but by selling the apples or giving them away, they afford better lawyers to defend them.

We don't want to address issues of justice in this article; we've written many on this important aspect of society.

The key point is that a lot of micro-corruption often causes more damage than a little macro-corruption, and therefore it must be prevented, discovered, and punished in exactly the same way.

But the fundamental question is just one: can an incorruptible system exist? The simple answer is: no, a system free of corruption cannot exist immediately. But again, the correct answer is different: there are various types of systems, and there are some that, at various stages, can guarantee, thanks to controls and preventive measures, fewer instances of corruption.

DirectDemocracyS was conceived as a system that, over time, and with intelligent and courageous choices, will be the least corrupt in human history.

Once again, there will be people outside our system who will tell us that we're making claims unsupported by any concrete examples. It would be enough to continue studying our system, and we'd have all the necessary proof.

However, we'll give you a few examples to help you understand our method of monitoring the integrity of our system. Surely, many will tell us: it's excessive, you're obsessed with security measures. Others will say: you don't respect your users, let alone those who will never be part of it.

Security measures must always be preventative and discourage any behavior that might be ethically and morally incorrect. An insecure system is doomed to failure.

All our controls respect all honest, sincere, loyal, and trustworthy people. Those who respect all laws have nothing to fear. Those who have nothing to hide should not resist all necessary controls, at any time. Those who want to be cunning and engage in unethical activities can do so, hoping never to be discovered, within traditional systems or outside of DirectDemocracyS.

Specifically, in our system, we have increasing security measures, based on the various types of users and the roles of each person.

Free user types are less controlled, because they don't have much potential and can't cause any problems.

Even lower-level users, having no voting rights (because their identities are not verified and guaranteed), cannot create corruption cases.

For the types of registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, which together make up our truly and completely shared leadership, the controls are greater.

For our official members, who collectively own our entire system, the security measures are even greater.

We have comprehensive security measures and controls in place for our official representatives, who are official members representing our system internally or externally, and for our political representatives, who, after our closed online primaries, will participate in real elections. As public figures, they will have to continually demonstrate to us that they are incorruptible.

For even higher-level users, with access to restricted areas, and more important and responsible groups, we are very intrusive, precise, and inflexible, but we cannot risk being boycotted, slowed down, or worse, stopped.

Concretely, what do all these preventive checks consist of?

First, identity. Knowing who carries out each activity is essential, both to reward the best and to identify and punish the worst. Second, verifying each activity, through our special security groups, in collaboration with all other special groups, specialist groups, and other groups connected to these reporting, evaluation, and control activities. The third aspect, the most important, and the most controversial, consists of attempting various methods to verify the incorruptibility of each individual, but also of each group. Finally, verifying who is controlling, while also verifying who is controlling, who is controlling, who is controlling. A series of cross-checks, which at first glance may seem complex and exaggerated, but are essential to being credible, consistent, and therefore unassailable.

But why doesn't the DirectDemocracyS system leave it up to the authorities and institutions to monitor individuals and groups? Because we do it internally and externally, continuously, comprehensively, and efficiently. And if the authorities responsible for these controls do the same, where it falls within their jurisdiction, we will be happy to help them, respectfully, concretely, and safely.

But why don't you allow complete external control of DirectDemocracyS? Because we can't trust anyone who isn't an official member. We have nothing to hide, but we can't grant outside access to sensitive data or areas where malicious people might try to cause problems. Nothing prevents anyone from joining us, and based on our rules, methodologies, and instructions, they can control virtually all of our activities. Here are some reasons. First, our defense of the right to invisibility, which consists of allowing anyone to decide whether to make their personal data and activities with our system visible or invisible, both externally and within our system. Second, the right to anonymity, which allows anyone to use a nickname or a random code as a username to identify themselves and carry out activities with us. Finally, our promise to keep private and not disclose anyone's personal data and activities.

If there are any suspicions of any crimes, by any person or group, in our system, simply file a report (by authorities, institutions, or even ordinary citizens), and we will carry out all necessary checks.

If you have evidence of any crimes, just let us know, and after all our checks, we will report each individual or group ourselves.

At this point, there will be people who will say: "And who can guarantee that you won't hide any crimes?" The best guarantee is to join us, becoming our official members, and as collective owners of our entire system, you can participate in various oversight groups. Seeing firsthand how attentive we are to all our activities, you realize that, while we protect everyone, we don't hide, because we don't engage in illegal activities.

But is it right to test anyone's trustworthiness by attempting to bribe them? Undoubtedly, the only way to verify whether someone is incorruptible is to attempt to bribe them, as often as necessary. Let's take a concrete example, regarding political representatives. If you entrust them with public funds or positions of power, you must continuously verify each person's trustworthiness to prevent any potential problems.

What if a DirectDemocracyS political representative were discovered to be corrupt? Like all other political forces, it would rightly cause serious damage to their reputation, resulting in a loss of support and votes in the next election. But the difference between us and all the others is that our political representatives are continuously monitored by their constituents, according to our detailed rules. Before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections. Thanks to early, irrevocable resignations for personal reasons, we immediately dismiss them if they are corrupt or if they fail to comply with the decisions of their constituents, informed by our expert groups. Therefore, we are the first to verify, uncover, and punish anyone who makes mistakes. We believe it is right to give them one or more chances to correct their mistakes, but in the right ways and at the right time, and always with extensive proof of loyalty and reliability.

Of all possible systems, the capitalist one is better than the statist one, because despite its many imperfections and injustices, it can be changed and improved by continuously implementing equality and meritocracy over time, always together. Statism is a rotten system, riddled with problems, including corruption and backwardness, and is certainly doomed to failure.

Of all political systems, the relatively free and partially democratic Western political forces are always preferable to various dictatorships. Whether they are oligarchic dictatorships like in Russia, where all the country's wealth is given away to incompetent individuals who control and manage the most important companies, or one-party, one-way dictatorships like in China, where fake communism creates regime billionaires who are extremely wealthy, and the population, deprived of any rights, lives in poverty. We will never be in favor of political forces that tolerate no opposition and often even physically eliminate their opponents.

Some examples that explain our motivations.

Would anyone who supports President Putin's dictatorship in Russia, or China's one-party system, speaking ill of the West, the United States, NATO, Europe, and even Israel, have the courage and the ability to do so, living in Russia and criticizing Russian politics, or to create an opposition political party in China? The imperfect West at least gives everyone the freedom to criticize, protest, and demonstrate. It allows anyone to create a political force, and if credible, to win elections, govern, and make laws. This partial freedom is invaluable and must be defended at all costs.

Those who criticize investments in Europe's defense with banal and meaningless slogans like "no to weapons" certainly lack the ability to reason, using logic, common sense, and practicality. If the major military powers, which are armed, do not also give up their weapons, proportionately, a militarily weak Europe would easily be invaded and dominated by those who do not give up their weapons. Therefore, the fake pacifists are either stupid and ignorant, or corrupt, serving the interests of the various superpowers and dictatorships. We sincerely pity those who support such squalid political forces, which do not value freedom. Everyone is against weapons, as long as they are reduced and eliminated from all countries, not just a few. Otherwise, we are working for the strong "bad guys," and not for our own citizens.

To those who demand that Ukraine cede its territories in exchange for peace, we ask: if we forcibly occupied some rooms in their homes, would they give them to us, so as not to fight to defend them? And to those who say Europe is not helping Ukraine survive, we ask: if we came to their homes, by force, wouldn't they want help from their neighbors? Would they like to be left alone? International politics is very simple: all promises made must be honored, without allowing anyone, by any means, to fail to do so. Let us remember that Russia had sworn to defend Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for its nuclear arsenal, over 1,900 missiles, with full guarantees from the United States and the United Kingdom. By failing to honor the Budapest Memorandum, with the occupation of Crimea, and the subsequent cowardly invasion, the reliability and loyalty of Russian policy were demonstrated . The West stood by and watched, as it did in 1939, when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Intelligent and determined intervention by the rest of the world would have averted World War II, with tens of millions of deaths. Bullies are not fought with banal phrases, or unarmed, throwing flowers, but with popular uprisings that ensure their fate, which all dictators deserve: arrest, investigation, indictment, and, if found guilty, sentencing. We are not for the death penalty, under any circumstances, but for rendering harmless all cruel, dictatorial, and therefore dangerous people.

Enough with the rhetoric that Russia liberated Eastern Europe from the threat of Nazi-fascism. Everyone knows it wasn't Russia, but the entire Soviet Union (including Ukraine), that did it, but only thanks to the help of money, weapons, steel, and other technological components from the United States. Otherwise, German would have been spoken, even in Russia, and throughout the Soviet Union. But we don't look at the whole story; we often choose to tell only what suits us, eliminating the parts that don't prove us right.

To those seeking geopolitical, or even partially invented, reasons to justify the Russian invasion, we ask a simple question: what does it mean to be a sovereign, free, and independent country? Every people and every country should be able to freely choose, without asking anyone's permission, which military or economic alliance to join. If many countries surrounding Russia choose to join NATO, it is only because of Russia's unreliability and dangerousness, which does not hesitate to invade neighboring countries it had sworn to defend. The United States has never invaded its allies; on the contrary, it liberated them from fascist dictatorships.

To those who say that Russia is defending itself, we ask: what sane country would attack a military superpower that possesses nearly 8,000 nuclear warheads? Be logical and use common sense. No one threatens Russia, but Russia itself threatens and attacks militarily, and almost always interferes in the elections, of neighboring countries.

DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved guarantees everyone the freedom to think differently, but as we always repeat, we should take a 360-degree view, carefully analyzing all available data and verifying all sources. Once this is done, we must use only and exclusively: logic, common sense, truth, research, and mutual respect, without any preference.

Anyone who sides with the bully (President Putin's Russia) and fails to help and support the bullied (Ukraine) by all means not only fails to use logic, common sense, truth, education, and mutual respect, without any preference, but can only be defined in three ways, and we say this without offending anyone: stupid, ignorant, or corrupt.

We know that Ukraine has many faults and shortcomings, some of which include: discrimination against other nationalities, discrimination against the Russian Orthodox religion, the use of force to respond to provocations and violent actions organized on its territory by the Russians, and the evident and very serious corruption in many sectors. But no reason justifies so many deaths, so many injuries, so much destruction, and so much fear for the entire world, especially for the Ukrainian and Russian people, and all those living in conflict zones worldwide.

Something perhaps not everyone understands: if Russia were gifted Ukrainian territories, as happened with Crimea, would it stop, or, like Hitler, would it press on, even invading friendly countries with which it had signed treaties? Furthermore, would the conquered areas live freely and happily, in a true democracy, or would they be subjected to despicable dictatorships? Finally, who would exploit the conquered territories and their associated riches? Certainly not by those entitled to them, namely the respective populations. Not even the Russian people would gain anything, because the ones controlling everything, and truly profiting, would be a few Russian oligarchs, without any merit or competence. It would also be a failure for those few nostalgic communists who believe that the Nazi-fascist President Putin will restore the pathetic and false greatness of the failed communist ideology, which had many flaws, but at least claimed to be peaceful, despite being a false pacifist and a historic utopia.

The West, the European Union, the United States, Israel, and all the freest and most partially democratic countries certainly have many flaws, with systems that transform into oligarchic partycracies after elections, but at least they allow the birth and implementation of the DirectDemocracyS system. In dictatorial systems, our presence will be permitted only by the determination, courage, and intelligent choices of their respective populations, and certainly not by the peaceful cooperation of the political forces that control their countries through force and violence.

So, while we have no enemies, we will never support anyone who does not implement total freedom and authentic democracy, which for us, and for every person, should be non-negotiable.

To achieve true peace, true and complete disarmament, we will have to wait for DirectDemocracyS to win elections in every country in the world. Only then will we all live in a truly just, equitable, fair, reliable, prosperous, and secure world, for the good of all the world's people.

Ours is not a utopia, nor even a hope, but a certainty based on the validity of the system we are all creating together.

DirectDemocracyS does not seek to teach anything, but rather to provide everyone with all the information they need to form a more accurate and useful opinion, for the good of all.

The only political force born to unite, and not to win elections on divisions.

We share all power, with all who join us, and we will not allow this power to be exploited by a few rich, powerful, and famous individuals, groups, or lobbies.

We have created a system structured to prevent any dictatorship, eliminate any discrimination , and prevent any possible problems.

If you like it, get informed and join us; if you don't, stick with the old ways. But if you criticize us, at least let it be informed, competent, logical, and common-sense criticism. A plea: don't be superficial, and above all, lazy; be the true protagonists, along with the rest of us!

Of all possible systems, the capitalist one is better than the statist one, because despite its many imperfections and injustices, it can be changed and improved by continuously implementing equality and meritocracy over time, always together. Statism is a rotten system, riddled with problems, including corruption and backwardness, and is certainly doomed to failure.

Of all political systems, the relatively free and partially democratic Western political forces are always preferable to various dictatorships. Whether they are oligarchic dictatorships like in Russia, where all the country's wealth is given away to incompetent individuals who control and manage the most important companies, or one-party, one-way dictatorships like in China, where fake communism creates regime billionaires who are extremely wealthy, and the population, deprived of any rights, lives in poverty. We will never be in favor of political forces that tolerate no opposition and often even physically eliminate their opponents.

Some examples that explain our motivations.

Would anyone who supports President Putin's dictatorship in Russia, or China's one-party system, speaking ill of the West, the United States, NATO, Europe, and even Israel, have the courage and the ability to do so, living in Russia and criticizing Russian politics, or to create an opposition political party in China? The imperfect West at least gives everyone the freedom to criticize, protest, and demonstrate. It allows anyone to create a political force, and if credible, to win elections, govern, and make laws. This partial freedom is invaluable and must be defended at all costs.

Those who criticize investments in Europe's defense with banal and meaningless slogans like "no to weapons" certainly lack the ability to reason, using logic, common sense, and practicality. If the major military powers, which are armed, do not also give up their weapons, proportionately, a militarily weak Europe would easily be invaded and dominated by those who do not give up their weapons. Therefore, the fake pacifists are either stupid and ignorant, or corrupt, serving the interests of the various superpowers and dictatorships. We sincerely pity those who support such squalid political forces, which do not value freedom. Everyone is against weapons, as long as they are reduced and eliminated from all countries, not just a few. Otherwise, we are working for the strong "bad guys," and not for our own citizens.

To those who demand that Ukraine cede its territories in exchange for peace, we ask: if we forcibly occupied some rooms in their homes, would they give them to us, so as not to fight to defend them? And to those who say Europe is not helping Ukraine survive, we ask: if we came to their homes, by force, wouldn't they want help from their neighbors? Would they like to be left alone? International politics is very simple: all promises made must be honored, without allowing anyone, by any means, to fail to do so. Let us remember that Russia had sworn to defend Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for its nuclear arsenal, over 1,900 missiles, with full guarantees from the United States and the United Kingdom. By failing to honor the Budapest Memorandum, with the occupation of Crimea, and the subsequent cowardly invasion, the reliability and loyalty of Russian policy were demonstrated . The West stood by and watched, as it did in 1939, when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Intelligent and determined intervention by the rest of the world would have averted World War II, with tens of millions of deaths. Bullies are not fought with banal phrases, or unarmed, throwing flowers, but with popular uprisings that ensure their fate, which all dictators deserve: arrest, investigation, indictment, and, if found guilty, sentencing. We are not for the death penalty, under any circumstances, but for rendering harmless all cruel, dictatorial, and therefore dangerous people.

Enough with the rhetoric that Russia liberated Eastern Europe from the threat of Nazi-fascism. Everyone knows it wasn't Russia, but the entire Soviet Union (including Ukraine), that did it, but only thanks to the help of money, weapons, steel, and other technological components from the United States. Otherwise, German would have been spoken, even in Russia, and throughout the Soviet Union. But we don't look at the whole story; we often choose to tell only what suits us, eliminating the parts that don't prove us right.

To those seeking geopolitical, or even partially invented, reasons to justify the Russian invasion, we ask a simple question: what does it mean to be a sovereign, free, and independent country? Every people and every country should be able to freely choose, without asking anyone's permission, which military or economic alliance to join. If many countries surrounding Russia choose to join NATO, it is only because of Russia's unreliability and dangerousness, which does not hesitate to invade neighboring countries it had sworn to defend. The United States has never invaded its allies; on the contrary, it liberated them from fascist dictatorships.

To those who say that Russia is defending itself, we ask: what sane country would attack a military superpower that possesses nearly 8,000 nuclear warheads? Be logical and use common sense. No one threatens Russia, but Russia itself threatens and attacks militarily, and almost always interferes in the elections, of neighboring countries.

DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved guarantees everyone the freedom to think differently, but as we always repeat, we should take a 360-degree view, carefully analyzing all available data and verifying all sources. Once this is done, we must use only and exclusively: logic, common sense, truth, research, and mutual respect, without any preference.

Anyone who sides with the bully (President Putin's Russia) and fails to help and support the bullied (Ukraine) by all means not only fails to use logic, common sense, truth, education, and mutual respect, without any preference, but can only be defined in three ways, and we say this without offending anyone: stupid, ignorant, or corrupt.

We know that Ukraine has many faults and shortcomings, some of which include: discrimination against other nationalities, discrimination against the Russian Orthodox religion, the use of force to respond to provocations and violent actions organized on its territory by the Russians, and the evident and very serious corruption in many sectors. But no reason justifies so many deaths, so many injuries, so much destruction, and so much fear for the entire world, especially for the Ukrainian and Russian people, and all those living in conflict zones worldwide.

Something perhaps not everyone understands: if Russia were gifted Ukrainian territories, as happened with Crimea, would it stop, or, like Hitler, would it press on, even invading friendly countries with which it had signed treaties? Furthermore, would the conquered areas live freely and happily, in a true democracy, or would they be subjected to despicable dictatorships? Finally, who would exploit the conquered territories and their associated riches? Certainly not by those entitled to them, namely the respective populations. Not even the Russian people would gain anything, because the ones controlling everything, and truly profiting, would be a few Russian oligarchs, without any merit or competence. It would also be a failure for those few nostalgic communists who believe that the Nazi-fascist President Putin will restore the pathetic and false greatness of the failed communist ideology, which had many flaws, but at least claimed to be peaceful, despite being a false pacifist and a historic utopia.

The West, the European Union, the United States, Israel, and all the freest and most partially democratic countries certainly have many flaws, with systems that transform into oligarchic partycracies after elections, but at least they allow the birth and implementation of the DirectDemocracyS system. In dictatorial systems, our presence will be permitted only by the determination, courage, and intelligent choices of their respective populations, and certainly not by the peaceful cooperation of the political forces that control their countries through force and violence.

So, while we have no enemies, we will never support anyone who does not implement total freedom and authentic democracy, which for us, and for every person, should be non-negotiable.

To achieve true peace, true and complete disarmament, we will have to wait for DirectDemocracyS to win elections in every country in the world. Only then will we all live in a truly just, equitable, fair, reliable, prosperous, and secure world, for the good of all the world's people.

Ours is not a utopia, nor even a hope, but a certainty based on the validity of the system we are all creating together.

DirectDemocracyS does not seek to teach anything, but rather to provide everyone with all the information they need to form a more accurate and useful opinion, for the good of all.

The only political force born to unite, and not to win elections on divisions.

We share all power, with all who join us, and we will not allow this power to be exploited by a few rich, powerful, and famous individuals, groups, or lobbies.

We have created a system structured to prevent any dictatorship, eliminate any discrimination , and prevent any possible problems.

If you like it, get informed and join us; if you don't, stick with the old ways. But if you criticize us, at least let it be informed, competent, logical, and common-sense criticism. A plea: don't be superficial, and above all, lazy; be the true protagonists, along with the rest of us!

Welcome to the DirectDemocracyS website. For us, it is a pleasure and an honor to have you here.

Everything in a nutshell.

DirectDemocracyS: Democratic and meritocratic revolution. An ever-expanding system (politics, economics, finance, social). Each member is a co-owner, with total control and shared leadership. Website: directdemocracys.org. Study thoroughly before judging!

Our strengths: DirectDemocracyS is an innovative system, an alternative to all others, created to change and improve the world.
An infinite, ever-expanding universe composed of countless projects, with various activities, such as: political activity, business, financial investments, economic activities, multimedia, communication, social activities, sports, education, information, a charitable foundation, and many others.
The gateway to this system is our political organization.
All our activities are based on logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect. We implement and guarantee for everyone, always together, continuously: equality and meritocracy.
To join us, all you need to do is register and create a personal profile, absolutely free, simple, fast, and secure, with no obligation to be present or to participate in any activities with us. Each of our users has the right to remain completely invisible forever, both externally and internally, and can remain completely anonymous forever by choosing a username that can be a nickname or a random code.
All our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities (and therefore with the right to vote), automatically make up our truly and completely shared leadership.
All our official members automatically receive a single, non-transferable and non-cumulative individual share, making them collective owners of our entire system.
DirectDemocracyS is the only system, and the only political force in the world, that allows our users/voters absolute management and complete control over their official/political representatives, before, during, and for the first and only time in the world, even after elections.
All our decisions are made with the fullest discretion, for the good and interests of the entire world population. Before voting democratically, all our users and groups are fully, freely, independently, neutrally, incorruptibly, and competently informed by our expert panels. These panels are composed of our official members (thus with a vested interest in conducting professional work), with declared expertise, demonstrated with comprehensive documentation, all fully verified, and guaranteed.
Our entire system adopts the best and most modern technologies, constantly updated, which, together with all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations, respected by all, make DirectDemocracyS safe, orderly, and impeccably organized.
We are self-financed and conduct all our activities exclusively on our platforms, to always remain free, independent, neutral, and optimally protected.
We have rules for decision-making, with votes that are open, verifiable, free, and always motivated. We always assume full responsibility, individually, as a group, and collectively, for all the consequences of our decisions and all our votes.
We have many other characteristics, and infinite activities, that make us unique, pioneering, inimitable, the most fair, just, competent, meritocratic, professional, and secure.
To join us, read this informative article at this link:
https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/activity-rules/registration-rules/registration-form
After reading it carefully, register and create your personal profile at this link:
https://free.directdemocracys.org/register

We are often asked to summarize our entire system in a few words, and although it is impossible to summarize DirectDemocracyS in a few sentences, we want to try.

To communicate directly with us, according to your needs, you can go directly to our website dedicated entirely to contact forms.

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/