In this article, we will avoid saying banal things, and we will talk about politics, telling you the truth as always, analyzing the concrete facts, which cannot be denied by anyone, offering our analysis, and some of our solutions.
Let's make it clear right away that we have no preferences, and we did not toast, and we did not celebrate, Donald Trump's victory. We congratulated him, and his staff, as we would have congratulated Vice President Kamala Harris if she had won.
For us, the decisions of the people must always be accepted, supported, respected, even when we do not like them, and do not understand them, and above all, no one is allowed to judge, make fun of, often generalizing, with banal concepts, the decisions of a part of the electorate. Let us explain better, for us those who voted for the Democrats, or for the Republicans, have the same value, the same rights, and the same duties.
No person has the right to judge, and make fun of, those who freely decided to vote for Trump, or those who decided to vote for Harris, because those who give others lessons in morality, and those who want to teach anything to another person, must be morally and ethically correct, and must have scientific and cultural bases, and know perfectly all the topics they talk about.
We allow ourselves to give lessons in morality, and to analyze, in detail, all the facts. We never express the opinion of a single person, but of many groups, of all types, composed in turn of tens, hundreds, sometimes thousands of people.
Everything we write, in any public article, represents in every word used, and in every written sentence, the official position, of our entire political organization, with the possibility, at any time, for each of our members, to question, and to demand the vote, of our entire political organization, for everything we say to you, that we write to you, or that we show you. Obviously assuming all responsibility, for his own request, and for the time he wastes everyone, with his decision. This method, and this rule, we are the only ones who use it, in the entire history of politics, and we are the only ones who proceed in this way. But we will talk about it, in detail, at the right time, when we will give you further details, on how we work, in the reserved areas, in our political organization.
For DirectDemocracyS, the population, the entire population, is at the center of our political action, but only those who are with us have the right, the duty, and the possibility to influence, propose, discuss, vote, and control all our activities.
Before analyzing the victory, let's analyze a defeat, predictable by anyone who does politics, honestly, without preferences, analyzing every detail, in a neutral, free and independent way. We repeat it, because like everything we write, these articles are also read by people, who make superficial ideas, in bad faith, and interpret what we write, making their own ideas. Get used dear friends, to consider everything we write, exactly like this, without the need for interpretations, and personal deductions, which have nothing in common, with what we write. You are completely free to make your own personal opinions, on everything you read, see, or listen to, so in DirectDemocracyS, of course, but we, base ourselves only and exclusively on documented and concrete facts, we leave the theories, the suppositions, and the dreams to others.
Kamala Harris, and the Democratic Party, have made very serious mistakes, as beginners, and amateurs of politics. First of all, in the Presidency of Joe Biden, who, although with some good results, as far as employment is concerned, has substantially impoverished, many, perhaps too many Americans, of the lower-middle social class, enriching, all the lobbies, and the billionaires, who have always supported in a declared way, and often in a partially secret way, the Democratic Party.
A very serious mistake, that perhaps only we, in the whole world, have reported, was to allow Russia to invade, stupidly, with very little motivation, and with cowardly arrogance, Ukraine. What would a President of the United States, elected by DirectDemocracyS, have done? He would have flown to Moscow, a few months before the invasion, to try to find a fair solution to Russia's recriminations, some of which were, and still are, sensible. But be careful, for us Russian President Putin, and almost all his collaborators, are criminals, murderers, liars, dictators, oligarchs, and have made gigantic mistakes, causing death, and suffering, practically uselessly, many people. They have eliminated many opponents, and have entrusted all the wealth of Russia to a few incapable and corrupt oligarchs, who without any merit, have enriched themselves enormously, leaving the people, in absolute poverty. But we will soon publish a very detailed article, on the various world policies, of the past, and current, which surely, as every time we write the truth, will create a lot of controversy, and will make many people angry. We do not care, if some nostalgic, of the extreme right, and of the extreme left, will feel offended by us, those who support and those who prefer dictatorships, but also those who support political forces, incapable and unsuccessful, who only create injustice, debts, and cruelly exploit the entire population, are almost all stupid people, who do not know how to distinguish good from evil, right from wrong, and above all the truth, from lies. Yes dear friends, you read it right, we allow ourselves to judge you, because we too, before joining DirectDemocracyS, were the same as you. We too were accomplices, of traditional politics, the one that decides in place of citizens.
The same mistake made by Joe Biden was also made by another President, also a Democrat, Barack Obama, in 2014, during the Russian invasion of Crimea. That too could have been prevented and avoided, it would have been enough to use intelligence, diplomacy, mutual respect, and to keep a promise made to the Ukrainian people, with the Budapest Memorandum. But you know, political forces and political representatives, without a minimum of common sense, and without any ability, other than that of serving the lobbies, prefer to make so many people suffer, if this makes their masters gain money. But in the end, the American people do not care much about this invasion of Ukraine, even if these things have a certain power to change the voting intentions of the electors.
The Americans, who for some progressive and center-left forces would be stupid, because they freely, democratically chose Trump, look at their own country, and their real life situations. In domestic politics, the Democrats have created jobs, with clever policies, reducing unemployment, but decreasing, in an evident way, the purchasing power of the average citizen. The billionaires who support them, have hired a lot of staff, even useless ones, with lower salaries, if compared to the purchasing power. This type of discussion, a bit technical, we will delve into in a dedicated article, in which we will explain the tricks, with which almost all the old politics, and the old system, always fool you. Truly effective methods, but which are not ethically correct.
Still in domestic politics, a permissive and very ineffective democratic policy in combating illegal entries, clandestine immigrants, and in general, a policy of combating crime without concrete results, has created a lot of distrust in the Democrats, on the part of the legal immigrant communities, who saw their hard-earned jobs stolen by immigrants, often illegal, who worked for very little, often in inhumane conditions. Violence and crime increase when the economic situation does not favor, and does not protect the lower middle classes of the population. These are real and concrete issues, that Trump has promised to change and improve, even if we believe that it will be more complicated, and difficult, than what he said during the election campaign. Promises, often exaggerated, generate expectations, very high, on the part of those who trust you, therefore, we dare say, that only realistic promises should be made.
The disastrous election campaign of the Democratic Party, and of the incumbent President and Vice President.
A lot of money has been collected by all the candidates, often spent very badly, and without any useful result, for their cause. Speaking of money, what is the point of all the independent candidates? We all know that the final result is always decided between Republicans and Democrats (until we are known, and present at the elections too), often in a squalid and unsuccessful alternation. Everyone, even the independent candidates, without any possibility, receive funding, even from many poor citizens, who do not know that they are throwing away their money. The rich and powerful people, with their commercial companies, all the various lobbies, have very serious reasons, and great interests, to finance electoral campaigns, but also all politics, with the exception of DirectDemocracyS. Yes dear friends, you read it right, we are the only ones in the world, who do not let themselves be bought, for the simple reason, that we are not for sale, and anyone who joins us, will have to demonstrate concretely, to be incorruptible. We guarantee that we will always favor the entire population, and never and under no circumstances those who donate more money to us, or those who are part of the various lobbies. Be careful, this does not mean that we will make Robin Hood policies, taking money from the rich to give it to the poor, but we will make concrete policies, to make the poor richer, without taking 1 dollar from those who are rich with merit, thanks to hard work, to brilliant ideas, without cruelly exploiting workers, and without destroying our planet. Envy, resentment, hatred and contempt for those who are rich and famous do not belong to us, and we do not tolerate within us. So envious, resentful and hateful people should stay away from us, possibly forever. Yes, you understood correctly, we are not interested in the consensus of such people, and we will never invite them to join us. We will do everything we can to help even the rich and powerful to become even richer and more powerful, but we will always help more, and always first, the people and the commercial companies that are most in difficulty.
Other unforgivable mistakes have ensured a heavy defeat, not only in the Presidency, but in Congress, in the Senate, in the Judiciary, and in every other electoral challenge, including the popular vote, which has assigned, to the Republican Party, and to Trump, and his staff, about 3 million more votes. We had predicted about 300 electors for Trump, but he will get a total of about 312. We all know that even just 270 would have been enough to win. Deciding to re-nominate President Biden was wrong, because the population was tired and the situation unsustainable. Then, it was decided to have Biden withdraw, a few months before the vote, another very serious, amateurish mistake, the incumbent President had beaten Trump in the previous elections. The enormous ego of these incapable and fake Democrats, who are only democratic in name, made them make another very serious mistake. If instead of the President, you put as a candidate, one of the same administration, practically the number 2, the people who did not want Biden, did not want his Vice either. But like a mirage, after Biden's resignation, financial support increased enormously. As many as 83 billionaires, out of the main 85 in the country, were and are, in favor of the Democrats. Jeff Bezos practically abstained, and only Elon Musk, among these 85, gave his support, perhaps decisive, for Trump's victory. The billionaires, now, will all or almost all go over to the other side, because they will never give up the opportunity to continue to play their dirty game, trying, and often succeeding, in imposing their decisions, especially on the weakest traditional politics.
It was since the late 1800s that a President had not been re-elected after losing the previous election, but with these incompetents, Trump won easily, and Kamala Harris deservedly lost.
But let's see the subsequent mistakes. The choice of a woman, African American, beautiful, however intelligent, would have been a great idea, if she had not been, as we said before, Vice President in office. Even if Mrs. Harris, is not experienced enough, and is not used to real and hard political clashes, because she has always easily won the elections in which she participated, previously.
The support of 99% of Hollywood, 99% of singers, 99% of big influencers, and the so-called star system, has turned out to be a boomerang. The Democratic Party, and perhaps the Vice President in office Kamala Harris herself, had hoped, and perhaps believed, that by following the advice of actors, singers, producers, influencers and the star system, and by thanking them for the beautiful films, the splendid songs, the ballets, and the advice on how to live, how to behave, and what to buy, they would certainly vote for the Democratic Party, and for their candidates. For President Donald Trump, it was enough to take out a liter of milk, and ask the voters: how much did 1 liter of milk cost with me? And add: how much does the same liter of milk cost today? Talking about concrete things, and not about theories without foundation, and without evidence, always rewards you.
In general, the stupidity of left-wing parties, and progressives in any case, is known to everyone, but sometimes they manage to outdo themselves. The theory itself, according to which, to be governed, and in general to make any choice, one should vote for a woman, just because she is such, is a failure, unjust, and wrong. Above all, it does not create any advantage for women, and as old politics often does, it only creates the illusion of justice and equality. Think if you were the elected woman, you would do your job, knowing that you were elected, just because you are a woman, and you would live a life in which, for every mistake, you would be accused of having won, only with the women's vote. Women, have among them, many competent people, who must win, and can do so, thanks to their merits, and not just because they have a vagina. Then, for progressives, and left-wing parties in general, only those who make up their political party are fine, as women. In many countries, women have won, conservative parties, and in some cases nationalist ones, and those women are not good, because it is not enough to be women, but they must be their women, therefore only those of their political party.
As if that were not enough, the long list of errors continues, with a use of Justice, to eliminate the political opponent. Not only by filing lawsuits, with clear political purposes, but by reawakening after many years, memories of alleged sexual harassment, which happened many years ago. And when do the alleged victims remember the abuse they suffered? Shortly before the elections, perhaps at the right time. With all due respect, for all the possible victims, if you do not report within a year, it means either that nothing happened, or, it was consensual sex, opposing that for all this time, you took advantage of the favors, or you were compensated in various ways, for the service. This type of timed reporting, with years of delay, makes the many victims of real abuse less credible, therefore, in trying to harm Trump, harm is done, even to those who have actually suffered abuse. All these activities do not go unnoticed by many voters, who punish those who try to eliminate, with the complicity of Justice, the "enemy", not the political opponent.
In Italy, they have tried for many years, with Silvio Berlusconi, with many legal proceedings, of various crimes, many books have been written, and many articles, you can document yourselves, we will not repeat here, all the various activities, always carried out by Judges, generally friends, of the "progressive" and left-wing parties, against the former Cavaliere. Many of these trials are still going on, even more than a year after Berlusconi's death. To give you an example, let's just talk, in this article, about the accusations of being a mafioso, or in collusion with the mafia, made by repentants, during their periods, often very long, in some cases endless, in prison. Those who are in prison for life, or for many years, will surely have done something bad, if they are serving their sentence. Can we trust those who have certainly been definitively convicted for very serious crimes? Are the criminals really credible, in everything they say? For a reduction in sentence, or for the possibility of not dying behind bars, but also, to try to help those who are outside, doing favors, or for the simple desire for revenge, these "repentants" are often as credible as a 3 Euro banknote. Furthermore, under the center-right government, conservatives, to be clear, presided over by Silvio Berlusconi, the mafia boss, the boss of all bosses, Totò Riina, was arrested, and always, with a center-right government, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, the number one wanted man, Matteo Messina Denaro, was arrested, and many others. They will all be fortuitous cases, they will be strange coincidences, but we, in DirectDemocracyS, do not believe that certain things, certain concrete facts, happen by chance. Furthermore, if 2 clues, make a proof, here is demonstrated, which political party, can be more hated by all the mafias. The issue of mafias and crime is very important to us at DirectDemocracyS, and must be addressed in a serious, tough and concrete way, eliminating forever and definitively any illegal activity, preventing a subsequent reorganization.
Offending, denigrating, creating suspicion, and making voters believe that a candidate is the absolute evil, that he will only create problems, that he will not be able to do anything good, again backfires, against those who use these unfair means. Like negative advertising, it often attracts many supporters. Let's give you a simple example. If we told you: never, and under any circumstances, try a type of soft drink, because it is bad, it is bad for you, it makes you fat, it causes pimples, and it blocks digestion. Well, many people, out of curiosity, will try this product, to see for themselves, if it is really as they describe it. Not being able in any case, to be as they describe it, many of those who try the product, will say: it is not that bad. Well, many of them, will continue to drink that drink, for a very long time, often, just to go against the grain.
Saying all the worst things about Donald Trump allowed him to easily win the elections, but certain political forces only know how to do that, they don't realize the very serious mistakes they make. Saying don't vote for that fascist, that dictator, that liar, criminal, murderer, and all the worst offenses, without then offering solutions to the concrete problems, and without giving credible alternatives, only means wanting to lose the elections. People are almost all very intelligent, they ask for credible solutions to politics, they ask for concrete proposals, and not just mutual offenses, because in these cases, both did not hesitate to denigrate each other, even in a heavy way.
The “communists” who call you “fascists”, and vice versa, are the worst dirty tricks that almost all those failures of traditional politics do. Nazism, fascism, communism, are like salt, you can season everything with them. Right, left, center, all the old politics is unjust, and steals power from the people, immediately after the elections. For these reasons, we pity them, we do not hate them, on the contrary, we let them self-destruct, with all their constant lies, their promises almost always, not kept, their electoral tips, that for every dollar, that they give you with one hand, they take 2, or many more, with the other hand. And the poor voters, until we were born, had no alternative, except that, of not going to vote, and letting others decide, even for their destiny. As we have said in other articles, do not be stupid, choose our alternative innovation, we could never do worse, than the old politics. But about the current politics, and that of the past, we will talk about it in other articles.
The attack on Trump, in which he risked losing his life, and in which innocent people died and were injured, made us say immediately, 2 sentences. The first, how lucky he was, a few centimeters would have been enough and he would have died. The second sentence, this lucky man, has already won the elections. By dint of inciting people to violence, by dint of considering the political opponent, a public enemy to be eliminated, by any means, by dint of frightening citizens, about the terrible consequences, of the possible victory of the enemy, and by dint of telling lies of all kinds, it ends up that someone, really tries to eliminate, really the opponent. But immediately after the attack, posts by people with limited intelligence, who said: he did it on purpose, to gain consensus, sprung up like mushrooms after the autumn rain. Or, others always stupid, who said: one of his own shot him. You have to explain to us, how much trust one must have, in the aim of a presumed sniper, to really risk one's life, for a few votes, even if perhaps decisive, more? Furthermore, if it is truly impossible, to pay someone, to shoot the enemy, and then ask him to say, that he was a Trump supporter. If the attacker, was a supporter of his, imagine what his opponents would be capable of doing. Violence, is not part of the DNA of DirectDemocracyS, and we are very careful, to give only positive examples.
Bezos' neutrality. A sign of Harris' possible defeat was the lack of support from the Washington Post, ordered by the owner, of this historic media. Remaining neutral has lost some subscriptions, but has gained credibility to the source of information. Those who only follow biased media and newspapers are only subjected to continuous manipulation and brainwashing by those who tell you things, for interest, true or false, you will never be able to distinguish them, and in the end you will get used to doing what they tell you. Do not trust anyone, and never read articles signed by people convicted of defamation, or who have lied to you in the past. To try to balance, our advice is to consult and hear the opinions of as many people as possible, better if contrasting, and then form your own opinion, with an open mind, without pre-set preferences. Many sources is always better than a single source. In DirectDemocracyS, we are about to start an information service, with the collaboration of ordinary people, we advise you to continue to follow us, and to be part of it, because if there are very few reliable media, it is because we do not all start, to give the news, directly, and to always and only spread the truth.
Elon Musk's decisive support.
Can a Democrat become a Republican, and vice versa? If you treat him badly, exclude him, denigrate him, and try to boycott him, every citizen is always free to switch sides. But even without all these reasons, for us, freedom and democracy, to choose at any time which political force to vote for, or choose your favorite political representatives, are sacred, as must always be guaranteed to everyone, the possibility of changing their mind. Can the owner of an important social media, at a global level, take sides in favor of a political force, and a candidate, for the office of President of the United States? For some idiots, it is not their right, especially if they decide to support Trump, and the Republican Party. All the others, or those who support the Democrats, or other political forces, can take sides and support whoever they want, and they can say it clearly. Elon Musk cannot. Instead, for us, a billionaire, or a homeless person, and everything that is between the two social, financial and economic extremes, can say at any time, openly, and without fear of reprisals, which political force they will vote for. Some idiots will tell us that we, a few lines above, criticized actors, singers, and famous people, because they supported Harris, and the Democratic Party. This, according to the 2 neurons in their brain, would mean that we are hypocrites, liars, and that we side with Trump, and the Republicans. Reread, very carefully, what we have written, and concentrate to understand every word, and the meaning of what we have written. We simply said, that the support of almost the entire star system has turned out to be a boomerang. In which part, have we said, or written, that they are not free, in any way, and as they want, to publicly express their preferences? We, who are for freedom, would never dream of saying that every person is completely free, of publicly saying who they will vote for in the elections.
The lottery run by a company controlled by Elon Musk, which awarded a million dollars in cash to some randomly selected people for supporting Donald Trump, especially in swing states, has been criticized in very harsh tones. For us, Elon Musk, and anyone else, can do whatever they want with their money, as long as they don't harm other people. In this case, even if we don't like such behaviors, and we consider them ethically incorrect, we must admit that other billionaires could have done the same thing, and maybe they did it, in other ways, so even if ethically incorrect, it is behavior in the spirit of equality. If instead of the Governed, with public money, they give electoral tips, in the form of a citizen's income, and various super bonuses, even for construction, which create huge holes in the budgets of the States, therefore they do it with everyone's money, creating public debt, things change. But even unrealistic promises, then difficult to keep, of tax reduction, with related consequences, always for the community, are things that must be absolutely prohibited. It means obtaining money, and power, and prestigious roles in institutions, using the money of all citizens, creating enormous damage, to current and future generations. In other countries, for a few liters of oil, a little flour, but also alcohol, cigarettes, and perhaps drugs, just before the elections, ignorant people are convinced, to vote for unscrupulous political forces. Our advice: take the money, the gifts, and vote for someone else. Those who try to buy you, do not deserve you, and will certainly take away, much more than what they are giving you.
Anyone who has read this informative article up to this point may believe, wrongly, that DirectDemocracyS is on Donald Trump's side, and therefore, that we are more Republican than Democrat. As we have always said, and we never lie, we do not support other political forces, and the candidates of traditional politics, we are absolutely free, neutral, and independent.
We limit ourselves to seeing the facts, which can be documented, we never rely on theories, nor on suppositions, without being able to justify them, for everything we write. We go to analyze every single detail, and we make our own ideas, which we make public. We simply observe the phenomenon, called cause, and effect, we limit ourselves to exposing the errors, and the consequences. Sometimes, we write to you what we would have done, to make you understand the differences. We do not want to seem presumptuous, but we are certainly better, compared to all the others, we are also more fair, just, loyal, sincere, realistic, competent, honest, and reliable.
English: It happens to us several times, that based on what we write, some people, who do not have the right open mind, and are too used to the rigid schemes of traditional politics, accuse us of being, too left, too right, too center, too nationalist, too populist, but also too much, or too little capitalist, sometimes they accuse us of wanting to nationalize everything, others of wanting to liberalize everything, supporting a wild capitalism. Reading our articles, without an open mind, can easily make you make superficial evaluations. We anticipate something, of the next informative article, a bit long, and very detailed in which we will present the old politics, with a critical but constructive look, and then we will introduce you to our ideas, our ideals, politically perfect, and you will see that it is worth reading it, and keeping it, to consult it, when you ask yourself what we think about certain topics. The phrase that characterizes us, is: capitalism with a human face, communism, and meritocratic statism. A meaningless phrase, for many of you, but which contains a small part of our identity.
The Republican Party, this time won everything, perhaps not for their own merits, but for the very serious mistakes of their opponents. Like in a boxing match, where a boxer punches himself. We are sure that neither one nor the other will ever be able to keep all the promises made during the election campaign, such as expelling 12 million people, it would be enough to guarantee greater security and integration to those who deserve it, severely punishing those who do not respect the laws. They will certainly not be able to increase public spending, it would be enough to invest efficiently, for the few resources available, creating growth, purchasing power, for the weakest social groups, without increasing taxes.
Donald Trump, will he keep his promises? We don't have a crystal ball, and we don't have paranormal powers, or maybe we do? We hope so for him, and for all the American people, and why not, for the whole world. One thing is clear to everyone, the Democrats, this time, have not done anything right. Unfortunately for them, they are not capable of changing their method, even if they lost all the elections in the world, they are not capable of evolving, towards a policy that is truly close to the people.
Some of our collaborators, intelligently, asked us, if with Elon Musk close to Trump, direct democracy is also closer in the United States, and then in the rest of the world. Musk said, that he will take man to Mars, within 20 years, knowing his genius, his economic power, and his capabilities, we are almost certain that he can do it, and perhaps even before 20 years. He also said, answering a question, on what form of Government, he hopes for Mars, he said clearly, that he would like to implement direct democracy, because it is less corruptible, compared to representative democracy. DirectDemocracyS, with its rules, and its methodologies, to allow complete control, and ownership, by our voters, over our organization, and over our political representatives, before, during, and for the first time in the world (in the case of Musk, for the first time in the solar system), even after the elections, makes representative democracy more direct, and therefore less corruptible, and more fair and just.
English: Our complete and detailed response requires a whole, very long article to make a proper, documented analysis, and perhaps we will write and publish it soon. We invite anyone who believes that Elon Musk is behind DirectDemocracyS to check how some of our profiles on X are blocked or limited, because many things we say, even if all true, demonstrable, and fully documented, are annoying, as the truth has often been annoying. We do not know how to lie, we will never do it, we will never think what others want us to think, we will never tell you only what you want to hear, we will never write only what you would like to read, and we will never show you only what you would like to see. We will never, and for no reason, brainwash you, and we will never force you to give up your ideas, your concrete proposals, and any of your projects, to be realized all together. We respect you all, too much, and we will never risk making fun of you!
