Accessibility Tools
DIRECTDEMOCRACYS
Global Political System of Direct Democracy, Collective Ownership and Shared Leadership
POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, FINANCIAL AND SOCIAL PROGRAM
REPUBLIC OF PERU
Critical analysis of reality, concrete solutions and a roadmap towards authentic democracy
Edition: June 2026
Spanish
directdemocracys.org | public.directdemocracys.org
"The riches of Peru and the power to decide about Peru belong exclusively and permanently to the Peruvian people."
Inviolable Principle of DirectDemocracy
DirectDemocracyS (DDS) is not a conventional political party. It is a pioneering, radical global political system—in the etymological sense of the word, meaning it gets to the root of problems—founded on logic, common sense, rigorous study, respect for reality, the search for truth, internal coherence, and mutual respect among all its members and between the system and the citizens of each country.
DDS operates through the fractal model of micro-groups (1 → 5 → 25 → 125 → 625 → on a scale), non-transferable collective ownership (NTCO), a three-code identity verification system that guarantees anonymity and security simultaneously, ponti umani (human bridges) of coordination, and ddsAI and allddsAI technologies — a democracy of Artificial Intelligences that informs users and groups in a complete, correct, neutral and independent manner, free from all media manipulation and all brainwashing, on DDS's protected platforms.
In this program we apply all these principles and tools to the concrete reality of Peru in 2026, analyzing the current situation without euphemisms, accurately identifying the causes of the problems, and proposing detailed, realistic and fully functional solutions.
|
The fundamental principle of DDS in every country is absolute and inviolable: the national wealth of each country, and the power to make decisions about that country, must belong exclusively and forever to the people of that country. No elite, transnational corporation, external financial power, or oligarchic political structure can appropriate what belongs to everyone. This principle applies to Peru without exception or nuance. |
Peru is experiencing one of the deepest political crises in its republican history. The general elections of April 12 and 13, 2026—described by the National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) itself as "the most complex in history"—have brutally revealed the exhaustion of the traditional political system. More than 40 parties appeared on a single ballot, fragmentation reached record levels, and the winner of the first round, Keiko Fujimori (Popular Force), obtained only 17.18% of the valid votes. Her rival in the second round, Roberto Sánchez (Together for Peru), barely reached 12.03%.
This fact is devastating in terms of democratic legitimacy: the two candidates vying for the presidency on June 7, 2026, together represent less than a third of the electorate. Blank and invalid votes individually exceeded Keiko Fujimori's vote total. In the words of political analyst Campos, this is a "precarious base" upon which to attempt to build a government mandate.
Even more serious: election day was marred by serious logistical irregularities—delays in opening polling stations, failures in the delivery of electoral materials, especially in Lima—which led the president of the National Elections Board (JNE), Roberto Burneo, to acknowledge that "serious irregularities existed" and that "it was a very serious situation." The director of the National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) was arrested the day after the elections. The Carter Center's Mission of Experts, while describing the electoral framework as "largely consistent with international standards," called for "greater public transparency" and respect for the process by candidates and parties.
The most alarming phenomenon, however, is not technical: it is structural. In recent years, Congress has taken systematic steps to undermine the independence of the judiciary and prosecutors. More than half of the members of Congress are under investigation for corruption or other crimes. Peru has had multiple presidents in just a few years: Pedro Castillo was impeached, Dina Boluarte's presidency was declared vacant in October 2025 through an obscure constitutional provision, and the country went to elections under the interim presidency of José María Balcázar. This chronic institutional instability is not accidental: it is the logical outcome of a system designed to perpetuate elites in power at the expense of the citizenry.
|
Indicator |
Fact |
Fountain |
|
Winner of the first round (Fujimori) |
17.18% valid votes |
ONPE 2026 |
|
2nd place (R. Sánchez) |
12.03% valid votes |
ONPE 2026 |
|
Congress members under investigation for corruption |
> 50% |
HRW / Media 2025 |
|
Presidents since 2016 |
7 in less than 10 years |
Political History PE |
|
Parties on the 2026 electoral ballot |
> 40 |
ONPE 2026 |
|
Elimination of PASO (open primaries) |
Yes, it generated proliferation. |
Fernando Tuesta / JNE |
The Peruvian economy presents a structural paradox that defines its tragedy: the country possesses extraordinary natural resources—copper, silver, gold, gas, biodiversity, lithium, exceptional agricultural lands—and yet almost 28% of its population lived in monetary poverty in 2024, a figure that remains well above the 20% recorded before the 2019 pandemic. The GDP growth projected by the World Bank for 2024 was a mere 2.5%, supported mainly by increased formal mining production.
The current economic model is, in essence, an enclave-based extractive model: companies—mostly transnational corporations or those linked to concentrated domestic power groups—extract resources from Peru's soil and subsoil, export raw materials with minimal processing, and the profits are distributed among foreign shareholders, local elites, and a state whose redistributive capacity is constantly undermined by corruption and institutional capture. The Peruvian people—the historical and legitimate owners of these resources—receive a minimal fraction of the wealth generated by their own land.
Illegal mining dramatically worsens this situation: according to the National Society of Mining, Petroleum and Energy (SNMPE), illegal mining generates approximately $4 billion annually, produces around 2 million ounces of gold per year that are not included in formal production figures, and fuels smuggling networks to neighboring countries. This money does not reach the Peruvian public treasury; instead, it feeds organized crime, finances political corruption, and destroys ecosystems.
Informal employment affects over 70% of the workforce. Micro and small enterprises (MSEs), which represent more than 95% of Peruvian businesses, operate with extremely limited access to credit and interest rates that put them at a disadvantage compared to large corporations. The gap between Lima and the Andean and Amazonian regions is enormous: access to quality basic services—health, education, drinking water, and internet—varies greatly depending on geography and socioeconomic background.
|
Economic Indicator |
Figure |
Year |
|
National monetary poverty |
~28% of the population |
2024 |
|
Poverty before the pandemic |
~20% |
2019 |
|
Projected GDP growth |
2.5% |
2024 |
|
Informal employment |
> 70% |
2024 |
|
Illegal mining (annual movement) |
~USD 4 billion |
2024 |
|
Loss due to crime |
35 billion soles |
2023 |
|
SMEs on the business fabric |
> 95% |
2024 |
Organized crime has spread throughout Peru with a speed and depth that the state has proven incapable of containing. Homicides, extortion, and other violent crimes have steadily increased. In 2023, the economic impact of crime was estimated at 35 billion soles. Eighty-two percent of police station vehicles were inoperable in 2022. Sixty-one percent of motorcycles and 58% of police trucks assigned to stations were out of service.
Investigative journalism is literally deadly in Peru in 2026: journalist Gastón Medina was murdered in Ica in January 2025 after reporting on irregularities in the regional government and on extortion rings targeting the transportation sector. Journalist Raúl Célis was murdered in Iquitos in May 2025. These are not isolated cases: they are symptomatic of a system in which organized crime has deeply infiltrated state institutions, including the judiciary, local prosecutors' offices, and regional and municipal administrations.
The Comptroller General's Office has documented that corruption affects the majority of the country's municipalities. The State, as one of the government plans analyzed during the campaign stated, "has abandoned the decent population and allowed mafias, organized crime, and corruption to flourish." This is not political rhetoric: it is a factual description of the situation.
Social inequality in Peru is not only economic: it is territorial, ethnic, linguistic, and generational. Indigenous communities in the Amazon and Andes suffer the worst indicators in all dimensions of human well-being. The education system consistently places Peru at the bottom of international school performance assessments. The quality of public education is unacceptable compared to the standards that a country with Peru's natural resources should guarantee.
The healthcare system is dual and exclusionary: EsSalud covers formal workers, the Ministry of Health (MINSA) covers the poor with insufficient resources, and those who can afford it have access to quality private healthcare. Rural areas, especially in the highlands and the rainforest, have access to healthcare services that in many cases is practically nonexistent or of critically poor quality. The recent investigation by the Public Prosecutor's Office at EsSalud's headquarters for "alleged acts of corruption" perfectly illustrates the state of public healthcare institutions.
On June 7, 2026, Peruvians will choose between Keiko Fujimori (Popular Force) and Roberto Sánchez (Together for Peru). This marks the first time in Peru's recent history that a runoff election pits a traditional right-wing candidate against a left-wing candidate, both having such low first-round support. Fujimori, in her fourth presidential bid after three previous defeats, enters the race with a political history marked by corruption charges, the legacy of Fujimorism, and a platform proposing a social market economy with fiscal discipline, police modernization, and support for private investment. Sánchez proposes industrialization, investment in social programs, pensions for women entrepreneurs, and industrialization.
Neither option addresses the underlying problem in a structural and systemic way: the fact that the Peruvian political system, as a whole, has systematically failed its citizens for decades. Both proposals remain within the paradigm of the conventional representative system—where citizens delegate their power to representatives who then act with broad autonomy, without effective mechanisms for direct control, without real accountability, and without the people being able to intervene quickly when representatives deviate from their duties or become corrupt.
|
This is precisely the fundamental difference between the conventional political system—including its right-wing and left-wing versions—and DirectDemocracyS: DDS does not propose better representatives. DDS proposes eliminating the need to blindly trust representatives, by placing power directly in the hands of citizens who are organized, informed, and protected from all manipulation. |
The representative system, as it functions in Peru and most countries worldwide, operates through a mechanism that DirectDemocracyS identifies as structurally flawed: every few years, citizens entrust all their political power to a group of representatives. Once elected, these representatives act with almost total autonomy, making decisions that affect millions of people without direct consultation, and citizens can only evaluate them—imperfectly—in the following election.
This mechanism is not a historical accident: it was designed in an era when instant mass communication was impossible, when information circulated slowly and in a controlled manner by educated elites, and when the direct participation of millions of people in collective decisions seemed technically unfeasible. None of those conditions exist today. Technology allows, in principle, any citizen to vote, deliberate, propose, and monitor in real time. The only reason this doesn't happen is that the political and economic elites who benefit from the current system have no incentive to change it.
In Peru specifically, the result of this system has been: seven presidents in less than ten years, a Congress where more than half of its members are under investigation for crimes, the capture of the judiciary, the proliferation of organized crime infiltrating institutions, and almost 28% of the population living in poverty. If the system functioned as it is supposed to—if representatives genuinely represented the interests of those they represent—these results would be impossible. The fact that these patterns are repeated election after election demonstrates that the problem is not with individuals: it is with the system.
|
STRUCTURAL CRITIQUE: THE 5 SYSTEMIC FLAWS OF THE PERUVIAN MODEL |
|
1. Irreversible delegation of citizen power between elections. 2. Lack of direct and rapid citizen oversight mechanisms. 3. Information opacity and systematic media manipulation that prevents informed decision-making. 4. Concentration of national wealth in private hands (both domestic and foreign) instead of the people. 5. Institutional design that incentivizes corruption instead of effectively penalizing it. |
For decades, the Peruvian economy has been structured as a system for extracting resources for the benefit of external and internal actors with sufficient power to capture state regulation. Peru's subsoil resources—copper, gold, silver, gas, and lithium—constitutionally belong to the nation. In practice, however, they are exploited through concessions that have historically favored corporations with privileged access to decision-makers. Social conflicts surrounding mining—which have been a driving force behind Peruvian political instability over the past 20 years—are the most visible expression of this contradiction between the people's formal right to their resources and the reality of who actually benefits from their exploitation.
Illegal mining, which generates $4 billion annually according to SNMPE data, is both a cause and a symptom: it causes environmental destruction, violence, and institutional corruption; but it is also a symptom of the State's failure to offer formal, accessible, and equitable avenues for local communities to participate in the economy. When the formal State is perceived as an instrument of the elites rather than of the citizens, informality and illegality inevitably expand.
Media concentration in Peru follows similar patterns to those in other countries in the region: a small number of business groups control the main television, radio, and print media platforms. The mass media are not neutral instruments of information: they are political actors with their own interests or those linked to powerful economic groups. The way they cover elections, corruption scandals, social conflicts, and government programs reflects these interests, not the pursuit of truth.
The result is a citizenry making electoral decisions with incomplete, biased, or outright manipulated information. This is one of the problems that DirectDemocracyS structurally solves through ddsAI and allddsAI: proprietary platforms, protected from external manipulation, where information reaches citizens in a complete, accurate, neutral, and independent manner.
DirectDemocracyS's program for Peru is not a catalog of campaign promises: it is a coherent, logical, and fully functional system of political, institutional, economic, and social transformation. Each element of the program is interconnected with the others. They cannot be implemented in isolation without losing coherence. The system works as a whole, or it doesn't work at all.
The founding principles that guide this program are the same as those that guide DDS in every country in the world, adapted to the specific reality of Peru:
Political participation in DirectDemocracyS is not organized through parties that compete for power: it is organized through fractal micro-groups that allow each citizen to participate directly in the decisions that affect them, at all levels, from the neighborhood to the national level.
In the Peruvian context, the model works as follows:
This model is particularly well-suited to Peru, where territorial, cultural, linguistic, and ethnic diversity means that centralized decisions made in Lima are often inadequate for local realities. Micro-groups allow Andean, Amazonian, and coastal communities to participate on equal terms, in their own languages if necessary, regarding their own priorities.
A concrete example: In a rural community in Cusco, the local micro-group can decide on the use of communal lands, negotiations with mining or agribusiness companies, the prioritization of infrastructure projects, and the control of participatory budgeting. Their decisions directly bind regional and national authorities, who cannot ignore them without immediate institutional consequences.
To ensure that each citizen participates only once, that their identity is verifiable but their vote is secret, and that the system is resistant to manipulation, DDS implements the three-code identity verification system:
This system guarantees that in Peru, where vote buying, voter coercion, and identity theft have been recurring problems, participation is authentic, verifiable in its uniqueness, and completely protected in its content. No external power—not the government, nor corporations, nor organized crime—can know how each citizen voted. It only knows that the vote was legitimate.
One of the most serious problems with the current Peruvian political system is that citizens can only "control" their representatives at the ballot box every five years. In the interim, representatives can act with impunity, ignore the government programs on which they were elected, and face no consequences until—if any—the next election.
DirectDemocracyS eliminates this problem structurally: in the DDS system, every representative—at all levels, from the city council to the presidency—is subject to continuous oversight by the micro-groups that elected them. If their actions do not align with their mandate, they can be recalled through a clear, swift, and democratic procedure, without having to wait years. This mechanism is not theoretical: it is integrated into the system's structure and technological platforms.
In the current Peruvian context, where presidents are removed from office through obscure constitutional provisions and Congress is perceived as an instrument of special interests, swift and transparent democratic recall would be an instrument of stability—not instability. The current instability does not stem from citizen oversight; it stems from the absence of genuine citizen oversight and its replacement by parliamentary maneuvering.
ddsAI and allddsAI technologies are not simply technological tools: they are the democratic infrastructure of the 21st century. In the Peruvian context, where media concentration and information manipulation are chronic, these platforms fulfill a critical function:
Expected consequence: In a country where extreme political fragmentation (more than 40 parties in 2026) partly reflects the informational disorientation of citizens, the availability of structured, neutral and accessible information would dramatically reduce electoral volatility, increase the quality of collective decisions and make it much more difficult for groups with media resources to manipulate public opinion.
The first and most fundamental economic change that DirectDemocracyS proposes for Peru is the transformation of the model of ownership and management of natural resources. Peru's subsoil resources—copper, gold, silver, gas, oil, lithium—are nominally owned by the nation. The DDS program converts this nominal ownership into real and operational ownership through a management system that applies the principle of Non-Transferable Collective Ownership (NTCO).
A concrete example with figures: Peruvian copper generated exports of approximately US$14 billion in 2023. If the Peruvian state were to guarantee the people a 51% share of the net profit—compared to the significantly lower percentage received under the current system—the additional revenue for the Public Pension Fund (FSPP) could exceed US$3–4 billion annually. Implemented systematically over ten years, this would transform the state's capacity for public investment.
Expected consequences: Reduction of social conflict surrounding mining, because affected communities would be co-owners of the benefits. Elimination of the incentive for illegal mining, which thrives where formal mining excludes local communities. Significant increase in resources available for public investment in health, education, and infrastructure.
The Peruvian tax system combines relatively low tax pressure on large corporations and capital with widespread informality, leaving a large part of the economy without a tax base. The result is a state with insufficient resources to finance the public services that the population needs.
DirectDemocracyS proposes a comprehensive tax reform for Peru based on the following principles:
Expected consequences: Significant increase in tax revenues without increasing the burden on formal workers and small businesses. Reduction of the public infrastructure deficit. Sustainable financing of a universal, high-quality health and education system.
Peru cannot remain indefinitely an exporter of raw materials without processing. Industrialization with added value is a necessary condition for generating well-paid formal employment, accumulating national technological knowledge, and reducing dependence on international commodity price cycles.
The DDS program proposes the following for Peru:
A concrete example: Lithium, of which Peru possesses significant reserves, is the key mineral for the global energy transition—batteries for electric vehicles, renewable energy storage. Currently, if extracted, it is exported as a raw material. With the DDS model, Peru would develop the capacity to produce battery cells domestically, tripling or quadrupling the value of the resource before exporting it, and generating thousands of skilled jobs.
Micro and small enterprises are the true productive backbone of Peru. 95% of Peruvian businesses are micro and small enterprises. 70% of the workforce operates in the informal sector, mostly in micro-businesses that lack access to formal credit, technology, and markets that would allow them to grow and formalize their operations.
DirectDemocracy proposes:
Access to credit in Peru remains one of the main obstacles to economic development for the majority of the population. Private banks, operating with a profit-maximization logic, direct credit toward sectors and actors that offer the greatest guarantees and returns—by definition, those who already have resources. The poorest sectors and entrepreneurs without capital are excluded or forced to accept usurious interest rates.
The DDS program proposes the creation of a Peruvian People's Development Bank (BDPP), with mixed capital—public and from DDS micro-groups—whose mandate is not to maximize profits but to maximize inclusive economic development. The BDPP:
DirectDemocracy proposes the gradual implementation in Peru of a Universal Guaranteed Minimum Income linked to Voluntary Services (IMGU-SV), following the methodology developed by DDS in its global program. The IMGU-SV is not a passive subsidy or a clientelistic handout: it is the recognition that in a 21st-century economy with natural resources like those of Peru, no citizen should live in extreme poverty, and that voluntary contributions to the community—through socially beneficial activities not covered by the market—are worthy of public compensation.
The Peruvian IMGU-SV would be structured in phases:
Expected consequences: Elimination of extreme poverty within the implementation period. Significant reduction in poverty-related crime. Boosting of domestic consumption in rural areas. Recognition and encouragement of unpaid community work that currently sustains large sectors of Peruvian society (especially the work of women in rural communities).
Peru experienced the effects of international financial volatility in 2026: the election campaign was closely watched by markets, with attention focused on the exchange rate and economic policy expectations. The sol's dependence on the dollar and international commodity prices is a structural vulnerability that the current model does not address.
DirectDemocracy proposes measures to protect the Peruvian financial system against speculation:
Public safety in Peru requires a reform that goes beyond simply increasing the number of police officers or harsher penalties. The expansion of organized crime is not a problem of insufficient police force: it is a problem of a weak state, institutional corruption, a lack of economic opportunities, and the capture of institutions by organized crime.
The DDS program for Peruvian security operates on three simultaneous axes:
Specifically: The expansion of drug trafficking in the VRAEM and other coca-growing regions cannot be resolved solely through crop eradication; it requires genuine alternative economic development programs with real public investment and community participation in program design and management. DDS provides the organizational structure—local micro-groups—and the technology—ddsAI—to ensure these programs are truly participatory and effective.
Every Peruvian presidential candidate in the last 20 years has promised to fight corruption. The results are well known: more than half of the congressmen investigated for crimes, presidents who end up in prison or facing charges, and a captured judiciary. Corruption isn't fought with rhetoric or more laws; it's fought by changing the structural incentives that generate it.
DirectDemocracy proposes the following for Peru:
Peru deserves a healthcare system that doesn't depend on a patient's financial means to determine the quality of care they receive. The current system—with EsSalud for those in the formal sector, MINSA for the poor, and private healthcare for those who can afford it—is structurally unfair and operationally inefficient.
DirectDemocracy proposes:
Peruvian education, as measured by international standards, produces unacceptable levels of reading comprehension and mathematical reasoning. The problem is not a lack of dedication among teachers; it is an educational system designed for the reproduction of knowledge rather than the development of skills, with outdated curricula, insufficient teacher training, and dilapidated infrastructure.
The DDS program for Peruvian education:
Peru possesses some of the most biodiverse ecosystems on the planet, including a significant portion of the Amazon rainforest. The destruction of these ecosystems—through illegal mining, deforestation for extensive agriculture, and river pollution—is not only an environmental disaster: it is a crime against the enduring heritage of the Peruvian people and of humanity.
DirectDemocracy proposes:
The implementation process of DirectDemocracyS in Peru begins with an informational presence: Peruvian citizens need to know what DDS is, what it proposes, and how they can participate. This phase requires no prior political structure or permission from existing institutions; it is a voluntary process of information gathering, registration, and organization.
As the number of registered users on the Peruvian DDS platform grows, the first micro-groups begin to form in neighborhoods, communities, and organizations that express interest. In this phase:
With a growing base of organized micro-groups throughout Peru, DDS reaches the critical mass that allows it to exert a decisive influence on national politics:
In the maturity phase, the Peruvian DDS system operates at full capacity, with active micro-groups throughout the territory, groups of specialists in all relevant disciplines, and technological platforms that guarantee the informed, secure and continuous participation of millions of citizens:
|
Dimension |
Current System |
DirectDemocracy |
|
Citizen participation |
I vote every 5 years, with no oversight between elections |
Continuous, direct, real-time participation |
|
Citizen information |
Concentrated, biased, manipulable media |
DDS platforms: neutral, complete, independent |
|
Control of representatives |
Only in subsequent elections |
Quick and direct citizen recall |
|
Ownership of natural resources |
State nominal, corporate real |
Effective collective ownership by the people (NTCO) |
|
Distribution of wealth |
Extremely concentrated |
FSPP: equitable and transparent distribution |
|
Fight against corruption |
Rhetoric without structural mechanisms |
Radical transparency + real-time citizen oversight |
|
Citizen security |
Police with weakened institutions |
Community + institutional + structural |
|
Access to health and education |
Unequal according to income |
Universal, equitable and of quality |
|
Illegal mining |
Growing, $4 billion USD/year |
Reduced by real economic alternatives |
|
Extreme poverty |
~28% in poverty (2024) |
Progressive elimination via IMGU-SV |
The first visible consequences of implementing the DDS program in Peru would be:
Peru in 2026 finds itself at a crossroads. The April 12 elections revealed a political system on the verge of legitimacy collapse: the two candidates in the June 7 runoff represent less than a third of the electorate. Organized crime has spread throughout the country. Nearly 28% of the population lives in poverty. Natural resources—belonging to the Peruvian people—are disproportionately used to finance foreign corporations and domestic elites. Corruption has permeated almost every state institution.
These are not inevitable tragedies. They are the predictable result of a political and economic system that concentrates power and wealth in the hands of a few, excludes the majority of citizens from decisions that affect them, and lacks structural mechanisms to correct itself when it fails—because those who control it have no interest in seeing it corrected.
DirectDemocracyS doesn't propose better representatives. It doesn't propose voting for the least bad candidate. It proposes something bolder, more logical, and more honest: changing the system that produces bad candidates. It proposes returning power to the Peruvian people—not as an electoral slogan forgotten the day after winning the election, but as a permanent institutional framework, verifiable in real time, and technologically protected against all manipulation.
Peru's wealth belongs to the Peruvian people. The power to decide Peru's future belongs to the Peruvian people. DirectDemocracyS is the system that makes these statements true.
|
DirectDemocracyS invites every Peruvian citizen—regardless of origin, language, region, economic status, or political affiliation—to learn about the system, register on the DDS platforms, form or join a micro-group in their community, and begin exercising the real democracy they deserve. Peru's transformation will not come from above: it will come from the free, informed, and conscious organization of millions of citizens who decide to take into their own hands what has always belonged to them. |
directdemocracys.org | public.directdemocracys.org | allddsAI | ddsAI
June 2026 — Program developed by DirectDemocracyS for Peru
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments