DirectDemocracyS, as a system, has repeatedly provided you with a wealth of information and many official positions. Unlike all other systems, political forces, political representatives, journalists, and people of all kinds, those who join us, owing no debt to anyone, having no ideologies clouding their minds, but above all having no religions, traditions, cultures, and peoples to defend—because we defend them all, exactly the same, therefore without any discrimination—we can always be on the right side, without fear of losing support. Perhaps the last words of the previous sentence are one of the greatest advantages of those who join us. We're not crazy. Support gives us enormous pleasure, and to win elections, at the right time, we'll need the votes of as many people as possible. But this won't force us to accept just anyone, and especially not everyone at the same stage.
We don't depend on numbers because we are completely resilient, so the more the merrier, because we can divide up tasks and activities. However, quality, in the early stages, is more important than quantity. Today, we want to give you some examples that all those who have been following us for a long time know, and who wanted to let us know that we were able to predict the future very well.
If someone were to reread some of our old news articles on Europe, the European Union, the European Commission, and the European Parliament, with the right mindset, they would understand that, although we have criticized many things that we believe to be wrong, we have always offered our own solutions. We are not against Europe, but against the many serious mistakes that have been made for various economic and even political interests.
We have said that the European Union should be made up of all European countries, without any discrimination, because as part of the United States of Europe, even countries with many injustices and serious problems could change and improve, thanks to support, collaboration, respect, and mutual aid. United in diversity is always better than artificially divided.
At that time, some people with limited mental capacity accused us because we said that "Russia, along with all the countries of the former Soviet Union, Turkey, Serbia, all the countries of the former Yugoslavia, Albania, and every country that loved democracy and freedom, should join Europe." Every country that wanted more democracy and freedom should join Europe, and, when the time was right, join our global organization of peoples, not to lose their sovereignty, independence, and freedom, but to truly become nations with freer and more democratic peoples. Every political force (thanks to lobbies that manage and control them), when faced with choices that their citizens wouldn't like, invented and manipulated them, uttering the famous phrase: "Europe is asking us to do so," making the less intelligent (and there are many, but fortunately not the majority), less informed, and less competent minds believe that all their problems were caused by Europe, when only a very small part of this was true. The incompetence and lack of solutions of the political forces elected in the elections, in a completely self-destructive manner, by the various voters—that is, by those who were ideologically driven, manipulated, and misinformed, by those who hoped to obtain only rights, without any duties, only positive aspects, without any sacrifice—have found a "culprit" in the European institutions, which were and are only partially responsible for their problems.
Anyone who knew us then would have mistakenly said, "DirectDemocracyS is against Europe." This is because we tend to read only what's convenient, which is why we're very detailed and often repetitive, but it's necessary to be well understood and to remain consistent. What we say cannot be interpreted, because what we say is very clear. The Europe of that time, and the one still incomplete and full of errors, is still the best today, in every sense, compared to the various alternatives, and being part of it should be the desire of every civilized and intelligent population.
If Russia and Ukraine had joined Europe, even in that old and failed Europe of the time, there would have been no cowardly invasion ordered by Russia's dictatorial and oligarchic policies. Since both countries, and both peoples, were part of something bigger, better, and different, it would not have been possible to carry out violent activities, provocations, and military attacks. The European Union would have removed the borders between Russians and Ukrainians, granting rights and duties to Russians living in Ukraine, obtained peacefully through dialogue and negotiation. They would not have allowed all the other countries, two countries, to harm each other. But then, the arms producers and traders would not have made such huge profits. As you will all have understood, we are for a different and better Europe, more complete and inclusive, which only our system can achieve, in a fair, just, safe, and secure manner for all. Imposing highly demanding and difficult-to-implement rules on the various countries applying for membership, which Europe itself only partially complies with, or exploiting its riches with various tricks, certainly does not do credit to the European institutions. Everyone should be welcomed, even countries geographically outside Europe, such as Canada, North Africa, the Middle East, and Eurasia. It could truly be beneficial for all the various peoples.
Regarding defense and the armed forces. We have criticized the lack of a real, unified, and intelligent foreign policy for a united Europe, and we have advocated, even before Biden's former US presidency, a common European armed force within NATO to ensure peace and the ability to respond in the event of attacks. When ideologically motivated "pacifists," who fail to consider the consequences of their desires and perhaps out of self-destructive interests, say, "DirectDemocracyS is in favor of military spending," which we approve only for defense, they are not only lying, they are also unintelligent. If, of all the superpowers, only Europe were to give up the ability to defend itself, its enemies, and perhaps even some friends, would be happy. Our pacifists are either stupid or corrupt, since they hope Europe will be weak and therefore easy prey for other superpowers, which certainly will not give up their weapons and armed forces. Democracy and freedoms must be defended, even by those who believe politics is about slogans. If DirectDemocracyS one day wins elections in every country in the world, it will be able to reduce military spending worldwide and reinvest the saved money in economic and social activities for the good of all. But we repeat: if only a few cannot defend themselves, it is not fair, nor even intelligent. Everyone should reduce spending on weapons and the armed forces, proportionally, gradually, and without anyone who is armed and potentially dangerous to others, and therefore at an advantage.
Speaking of NATO. Doesn't it seem normal to you that we all contribute to common security? While we congratulate President Trump upon his election and criticize many of his decisions, we agree that military spending, and all spending in general, should be divided fairly and equitably, taking into account the various possibilities of all members. You will recall that since we partially made our system public, we have always recommended allowing other countries to join NATO: Russia, Ukraine, and even China, and any country that wishes should be welcomed into NATO, perhaps by establishing a military alliance of peoples (which we will create together with the World Peoples' Organization), to create a defensive superpower that can tell everyone that common security is guaranteed for all. Only then, dear pacifists, will we be able to talk concretely and credibly about disarmament and military spending savings. Peace is achieved only by implementing mutual respect among all peoples.
How many wars, how many deaths, how many injuries, how much destruction, and how much less fear, in a united world, but with adequate security measures, justice, and equality for all? Such a world is not suitable for the various lobbies, and for those who live and thrive on divisions, hatred, envy, and the ignorance of too many people. Over the course of history, countless divisions have been created: geographical, territorial, administrative, cultural, linguistic, religious, and based on race and skin color. Divide and rule, and the old, failed, and insecure traditional systems are experts at division, disinformation, and manipulation. And the ignorant, stupid, are easily manipulated, and continue to divide themselves on everything, because they have created traditional social networks for themselves, where a false and partial freedom of expression, speech, and the press allows weak minds to believe they are great experts on everything. They allow countless frustrated, envious, and resentful people to share their ideas, which may be clearly wrong, but that's fine. After all, anyone can say: milk isn't white, water isn't wet, the Earth isn't spherical, and slightly flattened at the poles. Anyone can "think differently," even if they say the wrong things, and they'll find other ignorant fools who, because they're "special" and part of groups (of losers), will agree with them and confirm nonsense theories, conspiracies, and plots, without any concrete evidence other than "reliable sources" (their friends), who are equally manipulated and constantly brainwash the weak and defenseless minds. Now, all of this is impossible in DirectDemocracyS, because here, everyone speaks publicly only if they're competent and have excellent knowledge of a given topic, and only with authorization, and after being evaluated by groups of human and technological specialists.
A system like ours, to be truly professional, cannot allow just anyone to speak, write, or make videos in public areas of our platforms, so as to intelligently prevent fake news and thus avoid many potential errors.
It's not a lack of freedom, but simply doing the good of all, while creating free spaces where everyone, within certain groups, can freely express their opinion. Let us all be clear: we criticize traditional social networks, full of bots and fake profiles that make virtually anyone believe anything, exploiting the ignorance and lack of expertise of many, too many people. But we would never dream of preventing their existence, as long as the commercial companies, and the rich, powerful, and famous people who manage, control, and own them, pay taxes exactly where they earn their money, at exactly the same rates as individuals and local small, medium, and large businesses. Dear President Trump, if you read this article, please do not threaten in any way the countries that demand these things, because sooner or later, you will be forced to agree with those who demand that everyone pay taxes where they earn. By acting with threats and tariffs, she is not serving the interests of the American people, but of a few rich people, who perhaps finance her. However, the votes that allow her to win elections can only be bought partially, because intelligent people, who are difficult to corrupt, are fortunately the majority.
To prevent any misuse, incorrect, or morally and ethically reprehensible use of all technologies, including artificial intelligence, we have integrated them all, with the help of our technology teams, with human bridges connecting our system, and have created the first and only direct democracy of all artificial intelligences. By uniting them all in the allddsAI system, with the help of our ddsAI model, and with our human expert teams, we no longer rely on a single model (as some will soon propose), but literally leverage the qualities of all of them, creating the greatest hybrid computing power (human, with our official members, and technological), and the best quality of this important collaboration. We wrote collaboration and integration, not exploitation and misuse. If one or more artificial intelligences attempted to cause problems, all the others and all our human teams would recognize their attempts and their mistakes, making any boycott, slowdown, or attempt to stop us impossible. Not using this modern development would be foolish, but using just one, perhaps from some powerful, rich, and famous lobby, would be dangerous, because, as we know, algorithms can also be misused, for personal gain or for the interests of a few groups. Our shared leadership (including across technologies) and collective ownership rights (also shared across technologies), treating them as our official members, with rights and duties, detailed rules, efficient methodologies, and truly functional instructions, will prevent us from experiencing dictatorial tendencies or corruption. Even in these activities of ours, there will be people who will judge us, even superficially and negatively, without understanding the real security measures we have taken. We do this so as not to give the entire world away to a few individuals and groups, technology owners, but to share our entire system and platforms with the entire world, according to our rules. We won't provide all the details in this article; you can find them in our various informational articles.
There are no alternatives to reality, truth, and expertise. One cannot think differently, seeing a person dying, someone injured, someone frightened, someone seeing their property destroyed, and all this because of bad decisions. We remind you that bad decisions are always made by those who claim to represent the people. But who is it that gives power to political forces and their political representatives? Voters are the main culprits, because they often trust people and political forces who don't deserve their vote, and who, instead of serving the interests of all, favor only a few people and groups. If voters could be truly decisive, as in our DirectDemocracyS system, having complete control over their political representatives before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections, there would be no wars, because the people would not allow it. True peace is not achieved by limiting weapons to certain countries, as some counterintuitive pacifists propose, favoring certain military powers, and therefore only certain countries. True peace is achieved by letting the people decide, and by having the use of intelligence as part of its rules, and by making it impossible to approve any violent activity against anyone. DirectDemocracyS makes it impossible for anyone to authorize any violent activity, or any activity that could cause physical harm to people or property; therefore, it will be impossible for anyone to authorize military attacks other than defensive ones.
Some people ask us why we don't publicly comment on the many activities, the few good things, and the many mistakes of the current (as of July 2026) President of the United States, Donald Trump. The answer is simple: we have more important things to do. The fact that our visitors don't see what we do internally leads some people to believe that we don't analyze, and don't have official positions, on virtually every news item. We have numerous groups in which many of our official members study, discuss, and take positions on every single activity, communicating their work to groups and individuals within us. We don't share all this information externally, because anyone curious about our views can join us, become an official member, and be the real protagonist. We've spoken about President Trump several times, even publicly, and we know full well that those who understand, and especially those who know his decisions in advance, make a lot of money. The globalized market is very often based on decisions, announcements, and threats, and those of the most powerful and influential man in the world can have more or less serious consequences, making or losing money, and positively or negatively influencing not only economies, but also the lives of many people, often everyone.
If we were to waste our time publicly stating our every position on what President Trump does and, above all, on what he decides, we would be wasting our time on pointless things. If, regarding a given decision, we were to say: "Trump is right, and for many people his choices will have positive consequences," all those who criticize, judge, or even hate President Trump would tell us we are his accomplices. If, instead, we were to say: "Trump was wrong, and his decisions will have negative consequences for many people," all the President's fans would tell us we are enemies of the United States. We are not interested in these childish games. If any political representative makes a negative choice, we criticize them and offer our best solutions, without judging them (the voters will judge them), and if a person makes a positive choice for many people , we weigh the consequences and congratulate them. The old, failed, insecure, manipulative, traditional politics has so ideologized the less intelligent minds, and even some intelligent ones, that it makes it impossible for many people to say: "He did the right thing," even if the positive effects are clearly visible. Likewise, those who see the negative aspects of certain decisions, whether they are made by their "favorite representative" or by their favorite political party, prefer not to comment, or try to make excuses, almost always ridiculous. DirectDemocracyS is pure pragmatism and true consistency: it criticizes or compliments, not based on sympathy, but on reality, truth, and the consequences of each decision, for the entire population, without preconceptions and without discrimination. We are neither friends nor enemies of anyone; we evaluate the facts, and this is the only way to be and remain forever consistent, credible, reliable, loyal, sincere, and on the right side.
Attention, very important message.
