By Romania on Wednesday, 06 May 2026
Category: English

Program for Romania

DirectDemocracyS

Global Political System with Shared Leadership and Collective Ownership

POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, FINANCIAL AND SOCIAL PROGRAM

ROMANIA

Critical Analysis of the Current Situation

Structural Diagnosis of Problems

Concrete, Detailed and Functional Solutions

Version 1.0 — May 2026

Document prepared by DirectDemocracyS for Romania

PREMISE: WHY THIS PROGRAM?

Romania is a country with extraordinary resources, a capable and resilient population, and a strategic geopolitical position at the crossroads of Eastern Europe. Yet, more than thirty years after the fall of communism, Romanian citizens continue to experience a persistent structural crisis: mass emigration, endemic corruption, degraded public services, growing inequality, and fragile institutions.

This program is not a generic electoral document. It is a rigorous analysis of reality, followed by concrete, measurable, and implementable solutions step by step. It is built on the founding values of DirectDemocracyS: logic, common sense, understanding reality, truth, internal coherence, and mutual respect between all citizens and institutions.

No impossible promises. No demagoguery. Just honest diagnosis and thoughtful treatment.

THE FOUNDING PRINCIPLES OF THIS PROGRAM

1. TRUTH: Every analysis starts from real data, not from convenient political narratives.

2. LOGIC: Each proposed solution has a verifiable causal chain.

3. CONSISTENCY: The measures support each other, none contradicts the others.

4. REALISTIC GRADUALITY: each reform is divided into precise time phases.

5. COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY: citizens are not spectators, they are protagonists.

6. NON-TRANSFERABLE COLLECTIVE OWNERSHIP: Common resources remain common.

7. SHARED LEADERSHIP: No single individual or group holds absolute power.

PART I — DIAGNOSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION

1.1 REAL MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK

Romania is the European Union's seventh-largest economy by nominal GDP (approximately €350 billion in 2024), but it ranks among the countries with the lowest GDP per capita in the EU, around €18,000 in purchasing power parity. This apparent contradiction reveals the profoundly unbalanced structure of the Romanian economy.

Indicator

Value / Situation (2024-2025)

Nominal GDP

~350 billion EUR

GDP per capita (PPP)

~18,000 EUR (about 72% of the EU average)

Fiscal deficit

~8% of GDP — among the highest in the EU, outside the Maastricht limits

Public debt

~55% of GDP, growing rapidly from 35% in 2019

Inflation

Down to 5-7% in 2025, after peaking at 15%+ in 2022

Official unemployment

~5.5%, but underestimates grey work and emigration

Net emigration

Over 4 million Romanians live permanently abroad

Trade balance

Structural deficit of around 25-30 billion EUR/year

Gini coefficient

~34 — significant inequality, worsening

Diagnosis: The problem of structural deficit

Romania's fiscal deficit is the largest in the EU. In recent years, Romania has financed current expenditure (especially public salaries and pensions) through borrowing, without investing proportionately in productivity. The result is rapidly growing debt without a corresponding increase in domestic productive capacity. The European Commission has initiated an excessive deficit procedure. Without action, Romania risks a sovereign debt crisis within five to eight years.

Diagnosis: The Economy of External Dependence

Romania's economic structure is characterized by heavy dependence on foreign direct investment concentrated in low-value-added sectors (assembly, logistics, call centers), massive imports of consumer goods and technology, and remittances from emigrants as a significant component of household income. It is not a sovereign economy in the full sense of the term: it is a peripheral economy inserted in a subordinate position within global value chains.

1.2 SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND THE CAPTURED STATE

Corruption in Romania is not an episodic, marginal, or cultural phenomenon in the sense of inevitable. It is an organized system of redistribution of power and public wealth in favor of patronage networks that span political parties, public administration, the judiciary, law enforcement, and the private sector connected to the state.

MAIN FORMS OF SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION IN ROMANIA

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: ad hoc tenders for companies linked to political parties, cascading subcontracts, systematic cost inflation.

HEALTHCARE: informal payments ('plicul') for access to care, purchases of equipment at overpriced prices, political appointment of hospital directors.

JUSTICE: political appointments to top positions in the judicial system, pressure on magistrates, and instrumental trials against opponents.

EUROPEAN FUNDS: chronically low absorption (often below 30-40%) due to incompetence and/or drainage towards related parties.

TAX: Tax evasion tolerated by politically connected companies, selective pressure on SMEs and self-employed workers.

URBAN PLANNING: variations to the Master Plan sold to builders, land speculation on public lands.

Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) ranked Romania 63rd in the world and among the lowest in the EU in 2024. This isn't a subjective opinion: it's a systematic survey of thousands of businesses and citizens.

Diagnosis: The State Captured

Romania exhibits the characteristics of a "state capture": a mechanism in which formally democratic institutions are undermined from within by interest networks that exploit them for private gain. Romanian political parties (PSD, PNL, AUR, UDMR, USR, with varying degrees of success) are predominantly clientelist machines, not communities of political vision. Declared ideologies are pretexts, not programs. The result is that citizens find themselves periodically forced to choose between variants of the same dysfunction.

1.3 EMIGRATION: THE SILENT DEMOGRAPHIC CRISIS

Romanian emigration is the country's greatest structural crisis, yet it is rarely addressed with the seriousness it deserves because those who emigrate don't vote (or vote rarely), and because politicians prefer to hide the systemic failure that emigration represents.

Given

Estimate / Source

Romanians permanently residing abroad

4-4.5 million (EU, UK, USA, Canada)

Main destinations

Italy (~1.2M), Spain (~700K), Germany (~700K), UK (~400K)

Emigrant doctors 2007-2023

Over 14,000 — among the highest in Europe in relative terms

Average age of emigrants

20-40 years — the most productive age group

Remittances received annually

~4-5 billion EUR — approximately 1.3% of GDP

Rural municipalities in critical depopulation

Over 600 — without young people, without an economic future

Population decline expected by 2050

From 19M to potentially 14-15M inhabitants

Emigration is not the fault of the emigrants. It is the rational and individually correct response of people seeking dignity, adequate wages, functioning services, and personal safety. The fault lies with the system that made it rational to abandon one's country. This program addresses the causes, not the effects.

1.4 HEALTH SYSTEM: STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE

The Romanian healthcare system is in an advanced state of deterioration, documented by every available indicator. Public healthcare spending is chronically below the EU average (about 5-6% of GDP versus an average of 7-8%), but the problem is not just financial: it is organizational, managerial, cultural, and political.

1.5 EDUCATION: A FACTORY OF EMIGRANTS, NOT CITIZENS

The Romanian education system is technically functional in terms of formal access, but profoundly dysfunctional in terms of quality, equity, and relevance to the labor market and the construction of critical citizenship.

1.6 INFRASTRUCTURE: THE THIRTY-YEAR DELAY

Romania has the poorest highway network in the EU in proportion to its territory and population. In 2024, the country had approximately 950 km of highways—less than Lithuania, less than Croatia, and incomparably less than Poland, which built a modern network in 15 years, thanks in part to European funding. Yet Romania has had access to the same funds and has either squandered them or failed to absorb them.

Infrastructure sector

Current situation

Highways

~950 km total — among the lowest in the EU for a country of that size

Railways

Extensive but degraded network, average speed among the lowest in Europe

Airports

Only Bucharest functions at European standard; the others are inadequate.

National roads

Tens of thousands of kilometers of bridges are in critical condition.

Sewerage system

Less than 50% of the rural population connected to sewerage systems

Drinking water

Significant rural areas without access to safe drinking water

Digital / Internet

Paradox: Excellent broadband in cities, digital desert in rural areas

Energy

Transmission system outdated, dependence on Russian gas being reduced

Romania's infrastructure paradox is that the country has one of the best internet connectivity rates in Europe in urban areas (the result of private investment in the 2000s) and simultaneously some of the worst physical infrastructure in the EU. This imbalance reflects the structure of the state: where the market could do it alone, it did; where the state was needed, it failed.

1.7 AGRICULTURE AND TERRITORY: UNUSED WEALTH

Romania has the second largest usable agricultural area in the EU, exceptionally fertile soils (especially in Wallachia and Moldova), favorable climate conditions for many crops, and abundant freshwater. Yet it imports huge quantities of processed foods, sells raw grains at commodity prices, and lost the majority of its agri-food industries in the post-communist transition.

1.8 JUSTICE AND RULE OF LAW

The Romanian justice system is slow, selective, subject to political pressure, and characterized by deep popular distrust. High-profile corruption cases often have unpredictable or controversial outcomes. The National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA) has achieved significant results at times, but has also been the target of systematic political attacks when it has affected influential figures.

PART II — THE DIRECTDEMOCRACYS PROGRAM FOR ROMANIA

Each of the following sections corresponds to a critical thematic area. For each area, the program presents specific and measurable objectives, concrete measures with timelines, examples of countries that have successfully implemented similar reforms, and expected short-, medium-, and long-term consequences.

2.1 DEMOCRATIC REFORM AND ANTI-CORRUPTION

Central Objective

Transform the Romanian political system from a clientelist oligarchy to a truly participatory democracy, where citizens are not just voters every four years but permanent protagonists of the decisions that affect them.

Measure 2.1.1 — Reform of the electoral system

The current Romanian electoral system (proportional with a threshold) favors the concentration of power in traditional parties. The reform envisages:

Concrete example: Poland has introduced similar electoral transparency measures. Estonia has developed one of the most advanced e-voting systems in the world. Romania has the technology to do it—it just lacks the political will.

Measure 2.1.2 — Direct and participatory democracy

DirectDemocracyS brings its participatory democracy tools to the Romanian system:

Measure 2.1.3 — Radical reform of anti-corruption

Example: Georgia (a Caucasus country) dramatically reduced low-level corruption between 2004 and 2012 through similar radical reforms. The result was a rapid improvement in citizen services. Romania can do the same—the problem is not technical complexity but political resistance.

EXPECTED CONSEQUENCES — DEMOCRATIC REFORMS

SHORT TERM (1-2 years): Strong resistance from traditional parties. Media mobilization likely against the reforms. Need for a broad civic coalition.

MEDIUM-TERM (3-5 years): Measurable reduction in corruption in procurement (estimated 30-40% reduction in inflated costs). Increased absorption of European funds. Greater institutional trust.

LONG-TERM (5-10 years): Structural reduction of brain drain related to lack of meritocracy. Attracting high-quality foreign investment. Romania becomes a credible European partner.

2.2 TAX AND FINANCIAL REFORM

Central Objective

Bring the fiscal deficit back to within 3% of GDP within 5 years without disrupting domestic demand, redistributing the tax burden equitably, and building a stable and transparent public financial base.

Tax diagnosis

Romania's tax system is characterized by a 10% flat tax on personal income tax (one of the lowest and most regressive in the EU), a 19% VAT rate that affects low-income earners disproportionately more, tax evasion estimated at 15-20% of GDP, high social security contributions that discourage regular hiring, and chronically inefficient public spending.

Measure 2.2.1 — Income tax reform

Measure 2.2.2 — Combating tax evasion

Example: Italy has significantly reduced VAT evasion through mandatory electronic invoicing (introduced in 2019), recovering billions each year. Romania has already started on the path—it needs to be accelerated and implemented effectively.

Measure 2.2.3 — Public spending reform

DEFICIT RECOVERY PLAN — PROJECTIONS

Year 1-2: Anti-tax evasion measures and spending review. Estimated deficit: from 8% to 6.5% of GDP.

Year 3-4: Tax reform fully implemented, reducing unproductive spending. Deficit: 5% of GDP.

Year 5: Consolidation. Deficit: 3% of GDP — within the Maastricht parameters.

Years 7-10: Positive primary balance. Debt/GDP ratio begins to decline.

NOTE: Projections assume real GDP growth of 3-4% per year, conditional on reforms.

2.3 ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL REFORM

Central Objective

Transform Romania from a dependent peripheral economy into a semi-autonomous economy with a diversified industrial base, a strong technology sector, a sovereign and valued agriculture, and a network of innovative SMEs competitive at the European level.

Measure 2.3.1 — Selective industrial policy

Romania must choose which sectors to build a real competitive advantage in, instead of trying to compete in everything based solely on labor costs (which are eroding anyway).

Measure 2.3.2 — Support for SMEs and entrepreneurship

Measure 2.3.3 — Sovereign Trade Policy

2.4 HEALTH CARE REFORM

Central Objective

Build a universal public healthcare system, of quality comparable to the European average, based on the right to health as a fundamental right—not as a political favor or privilege for those who can afford it.

Measure 2.4.1 — Structural reorganization of the Romanian National Health Service

Measure 2.4.2 — Retaining and attracting healthcare professionals

Measure 2.4.3 — Elimination of informal payments

Example: Latvia, after severe difficulties post-2008 crisis, rebuilt its healthcare system with similar measures. Lithuania has dramatically reduced healthcare corruption through digitalization and wage increases. These countries have comparable resources to Romania—the results are verifiable.

2.5 EDUCATION REFORM

Central Objective

Transforming the Romanian education system from a mechanism for transmitting obsolete content to a system for training critical citizens, competent professionals, and innovative entrepreneurs—capable of building the Romania of the future instead of abandoning it.

Measure 2.5.1 — Curricular reform

Measure 2.5.2 — Territorial equity

Measure 2.5.3 — University and research

2.6 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN — CONNECTED ROMANIA

Central Objective

To complete in 15 years the basic physical infrastructure that Romania should have built in the thirty years after communism, with method, transparency, and constant civic oversight.

Measure 2.6.1 — Highway Plan 2026-2035

Goal: 3,000 km of motorways completed by 2035 (up from approximately 950 km currently). Priorities:

Measure 2.6.2 — Modern Railway

Measure 2.6.3 — Water, sewerage, gas in rural areas

2.7 AGRICULTURAL REFORM AND FOOD SOVEREIGNTY

Central Objective

Enhance Romania's agricultural heritage through voluntary land consolidation, the development of integrated supply chains, the protection of food sovereignty, and integrated rural development.

Measure 2.7.1 — Cooperative land consolidation

Measure 2.7.2 — Integrated agri-food supply chains

Measure 2.7.3 — Restoration of irrigation

2.8 SOCIAL POLICY AND THE FIGHT AGAINST POVERTY

Central Objective

Eliminate extreme poverty, reduce relative poverty below the European average, and build a modern welfare system that protects citizens in times of difficulty without creating permanent dependency.

Social diagnosis

Romania has one of the highest rates of at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in the EU (approximately 34% in 2023, compared to an EU average of 21%). This is unacceptable in an EU member state for nearly 20 years. The causes are structural: low wages, a fragmented and often ineffective social protection system, rural areas excluded from development, and minorities (especially Roma) systematically excluded.

Measure 2.8.1 — Guaranteed Minimum Income

Measure 2.8.2 — Integrated plan against child poverty

Measure 2.8.3 — Inclusion of communities in Rome

The Roma community in Romania (estimated at 500,000–1.5 million people) is the most marginalized minority and the one most affected by systemic institutional failure. Any serious program must explicitly address it.

2.9 PLAN TO RETAIN EMIGRANTS AND ATTRACT NEW ONES

Central Objective

Emigration cannot be stopped with walls or rhetoric. It can be reduced and reversed, making Romania a country worth staying or returning to. This requires concrete measures in every area of the program, as well as specific initiatives.

Measure 2.9.1 — 'Returns' Program

Measure 2.9.2 — Romania attractive for European citizens

2.10 ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND CLIMATE TRANSITION

Central Objective

Position Romania as a leader in the energy transition in Eastern Europe, leveraging its exceptional renewable resources, and build a green economy that is also fairer and less dependent on foreign sources.

Measure 2.10.1 — Renewable Energy Plan 2035

Measure 2.10.2 — Energy efficiency and building redevelopment

Measure 2.10.3 — Environmental quality and land management

PART III — IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

3.1 TIME PHASES OF THE PROGRAM

PHASE 1 — FOUNDATIONS (Years 1-2)

Urgent anti-corruption reforms and public monitoring system.

Launch of mandatory electronic invoicing and fight against tax evasion.

Hiring and incentive plan for doctors and teachers in shortage areas.

Infrastructure procurement procedures launched with new transparency rules.

Introduction of the digital participatory democracy platform.

Emergency plan for families in extreme poverty.

PHASE 2 — CONSTRUCTION (Years 3-5)

Tax reform fully operational.

Start of construction of regional hospitals (5 first construction sites).

Highway plan: construction sites open on all priority corridors.

School curriculum reform fully implemented.

Agri-food supply chains: first 50 processing plants operational.

Target deficit: 5% of GDP.

PHASE 3 — CONSOLIDATION (Years 6-10)

Return within the Maastricht parameters (deficit < 3%).

2,000 km of new highways completed.

Healthcare system: standard comparable to the EU average.

Net emigration rate reversed: initial return flows stable.

Romania recognizable as a model of reform in Eastern Europe.

3.2 SOURCES OF FUNDING

Source

Estimate (billion EUR, 10 years)

EU funds not yet absorbed (structural, NRRP)

25-30 billion

Recovery from tax evasion (conservative estimate)

15-20 billion

Reduction of unproductive public spending

5-8 billion

Public-private partnerships for infrastructure

10-15 billion

Romanian Sovereign Fund (investments)

5 billion

International Green and Social Bonds

3-5 billion

ESTIMATED TOTAL

EUR 63-83 billion in 10 years

Methodological note: These estimates are conservative and based on benchmarks for comparable countries that have implemented similar reforms. Absorbing existing European funds is the top priority—there's no point in increasing debt if the resources already allocated are used.

3.3 KPIs

KPI

10-year target

GDP per capita (PPP)

From 72% to 90% of the EU average

Fiscal deficit

From 8% to below 3% of GDP

CPI Corruption

From 63rd place to top 40 worldwide

Km of highways

From 950 to 3,000+

Life expectancy

From 75 to 78 years old

School dropout rate

From 15% to below 8%

Net emigration

From negative to neutral or positive

% waste recycling

From 14% to 50%

Installed renewable capacity

Increase of 10 GW

Absorption of EU funds

From ~40% to over 80%

3.4 PERMANENT CIVIC CONTROL SYSTEM

Any reform left unchecked becomes prey to the system it seeks to reform. DirectDemocracyS introduces a permanent system of civic oversight that is an integral part of the program—not a decorative addition.

PART IV — WHY DIRECTDEMOCRACYS FOR ROMANIA

Traditional Romanian political programs have failed not because the ideas were necessarily flawed, but because the system within which they were implemented systematically undermined them. Corruption, institutional capture, the logic of short-term mandates that prioritize the next election over future generations—these mechanisms destroy the best programs.

DirectDemocracyS is not a traditional party. It is an alternative political system founded on principles structurally incompatible with corruption and power-grabbing.

4.1 DIRECTDEMOCRACYS' ANTI-CAPTCHA MECHANISMS

4.2 THE ADDED VALUE OF DDS IN THE ROMANIAN REALITY

Romania needs something it has never had: a structurally honest political system. Not honest because its leaders are morally superior (people are people, with their weaknesses), but honest because its structure makes dishonesty economically irrational and practically impossible.

DDS doesn't promise charismatic leaders who will save the country. It promises structures that work even when individuals fail. This is the difference between a robust system and a fragile one.

DDS'S DIRECT CONTRIBUTION TO THE ROMANIAN PROGRAM

NATIVE TRANSPARENCY: every decision made in the DDS system is recorded, verifiable, and public.

REAL PARTICIPATION: Citizens are not formally consulted and then ignored — they participate structurally in decisions.

MERIT AND COMPETENCE: Roles are assigned based on verified competence, not loyalty or purchase.

CONSISTENCY OVER TIME: DDS programs have a ten-year horizon, not an electoral one.

CAPTURE RESISTANCE: The fractal structure and distributed ownership make DDS impossible to buy or systematically infiltrate.

AI INTEGRATION: AI as a tool for analysis and control—not as a replacement for human intelligence but as a critical amplification.

CONCLUSIONS: THE ROMANIA WE WANT TO BUILD

Romania in 2036—if this program is implemented with consistency, determination, and the necessary civic oversight—will be a profoundly different country than that of 2026.

It will be a country where the children of Romanian doctors aren't forced to emigrate to have a dignified future. Where an entrepreneur can start a business without having to bribe anyone. Where a student from a village in Romanian Moldova has the same opportunities as a student in Bucharest. Where an elderly person from Banat receives the medical care they deserve without having to hand a doctor an envelope. Where the forests still exist and the rivers are clean.

It's not a utopia. It's the normal standard of living that dozens of other countries—many with fewer natural resources, less strategic geographic location, and a less young and educated population than Romania—have already achieved. Romania has everything it needs to succeed. It just lacks a political system commensurate with its capabilities.

DirectDemocracyS doesn't ask for blind trust. It asks you to evaluate the logic, coherence, and concreteness of this program. To compare it with what traditional parties have offered over thirty years. And to choose, with common sense and a sense of responsibility towards future generations.

DirectDemocracyS — www.directdemocracys.org

Logic. Common sense. Truth. Consistency. Mutual respect.

Leave Comments